Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Manties -- The Delicate Frilly Panties Made Especially For Men | Main | Monkey Gender Wars »
December 08, 2005

"Landmark" Study: Women Need Friends

Another huge advance in science. This ranks right up there with the double-helix.

Friendships between women are special. They shape who we are and who we are yet to be.

I'm going to go out on a limb and guess this is a female writer writing for a female audience. What, couldn't work Haagen-Dazs and Desperate Housewives into your thesis sentence?

They soothe our tumultuous inner world, fill the emotional gaps in our marriage and help us remember who we really are.

And sometimes, when we're writing utter pap, they reassuringly coo to us "That's really quite good. I like the use of the words 'soothe' and 'tumultuous.'"

But they may do even more than that. Scientists now suspect that hanging out with our girlfriends can actually counteract the kind of stomach-quivering stress most of us experience daily.

A landmark University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), study suggests that women respond to stress with a cascade of brain chemicals that tend to make them seek out and maintain friendships with other women. It's a stunning finding that has turned five decades of stress research - most of it done on men - upside down.



"Until this study was published, scientists generally believed that when people experience stress, they trigger a hormonal cascade that revs the body to either stand and fight or flee as fast as possible," explains Laura Cousino Klein, Ph.D., now an assistant professor of biobehavioral health at Pennsylvania State University in State College and also one of the study's authors. It's an ancient survival mechanism left over from the time we were chased across the planet by saber-toothed tigers. Now the researchers suspect that women have a larger behavioral repertoire than just "fight or flight." In fact, according to Klein, it seems that when the hormone oxytocin is released as part of the stress response in a woman, it buffers the "fight or flight" response and encourages her to tend to her children and gather with other women instead.

When a woman actually engages in these tending or befriending behaviors, studies suggest that more oxytocin is released, further countering stress and producing a calming effect. This calming response does not occur in men, says Klein, because testosterone - which men produce in high levels when they're under stress - seems to reduce the effects of oxytocin. Estrogen, she adds, seems to enhance it.

The discovery that women respond to stress differently than men was made in a classic "aha!" moment shared by two women scientists who were talking one day in a lab at UCLA. "There was this joke that when the women who worked in the lab were stressed, they came in, cleaned the lab, had coffee and bonded," Klein says. "When the men were stressed, they holed up somewhere on their own. ... I commented one day to fellow researcher Shelley Taylor that nearly 90 percent of the stress research is on males. I showed her the data from my lab, and the two of us knew instantly that we were onto something."

This reverses 100 years of sociological research suggesting that women are responsible for 88% of all broken-beer-bottle barfights.

Coming Soon: Study suggests that lack of food before 2pm causes women to become "demonstrably cranky."

Thanks to Allah.

Another Breakthrough: Men get irrationally aggressive when stressed:

Finally, an explanation for why bar bets sometimes escalate into bar fights: Levels of a "high-octane" form of testosterone soar when men think others don't trust them.

Finally! Indeed. I've oftened wondered why men can get out of hand quickly. Now I know it's due to this heretofore unknown hormone called -- what was the spelling? -- "testosterone."

Economist Paul Zak of the Claremont Graduate University in Southern California said scientists have known for years that aggressive behavior in animals is sparked by elevated testosterone (which is present in men and women, though women have significantly smaller amounts). For example, testosterone levels have been shown to spike upward in both sexes before an athletic match as contestants psych themselves up.

Shut up, really?

...

While neither men nor women like being distrusted, "women don't have the same physiological reaction as men do," Zak says. "Women are just physiologically cooler. Women are probably better negotiators because they don't have these emotionally charged responses."

But another researcher found that being pumped up isn't always a bad thing: Men with elevated levels of testosterone were less likely to accept unfair offers in a different game where people were offered ultimatums.

Again... you could have polled 100 car-dealers about this and spared yourself the trouble, guys.

Yet Another Jaw-Dropper: Study "suggests" brain wired to drive for reproduction.

Yes, you can read all these shocking scientific discoveries in the new quarterly, New England Journal of Retard-Science.

Again thanks to Allah.



posted by Ace at 04:52 PM
Comments



If you're looking for material, just head over to Google News and put "study" and "testosterone" or "estrogen" in the search field.

Fun reading for hours.

Posted by: Allah on December 8, 2005 04:54 PM

Funny you should mention bar fights, actually.

Posted by: Allah on December 8, 2005 04:56 PM

Another bombshell here.

Posted by: Allah on December 8, 2005 05:06 PM

Let's just rename this place 'Battle of the Sexes HQ'.

Posted by: someone on December 8, 2005 05:09 PM

This just in... Men enjoy sex.

Posted by: Steve on December 8, 2005 05:11 PM

When I scoffed at Ace's stats on bi-sexual coeds make-out teams or something, he broke a beer bottle and challenged me to a fight.

Posted by: on December 8, 2005 05:15 PM

I mean really. Do we actually have to do studies on things that are so obvious?

I couldn't live without my best buddies.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on December 8, 2005 05:19 PM

And my girl friends mustache is so much softer than my husbands.

Posted by: corwin on December 8, 2005 05:20 PM

All women are gay.

Posted by: Pepys on December 8, 2005 05:26 PM

I wish. Wait. . .

Posted by: runninrebel on December 8, 2005 05:45 PM

Scientists now suspect that hanging out with our girlfriends can actually counteract the kind of stomach-quivering stress most of us experience daily.

I always suspected that naked pillow fights relieved stress.

Posted by: scott on December 8, 2005 05:52 PM

Well, Scott, let's have a naked pillow fight and put that theory to the test.

Posted by: Michael on December 8, 2005 05:59 PM

I love how, no matter what the result of a study, the conclusion is always that the female response is superior. In Allah's first link, women are "physiologically cooler" and "probably better negotiators" because they show no hormonal response to the experimental conditions while men's testosterone level alters. If it had been the other way around, then without a doubt, women would have had "specific adaptations for cooperative behaviour" and "innate responses to social interaction" while men would be "lumpish freakin' dolts."
I even recall one study from years ago in which women's brains showed twice as much activity, as measured by increased blood flow, as men's in performing identical tasks that was just described as "women think harder" - never "men 100% more efficient"!

Posted by: Botec on December 8, 2005 06:12 PM

Tell me, Allah, isn't it kind of killing you to give away all this golden material? In the back of your head, aren't you thinking: "Damn, Ace is hitting doubles and triples, and I could have knocked every damn one of them out of the park"?

Posted by: Michael on December 8, 2005 06:23 PM

No. I'm thinking, "Ace is hitting doubles and triples, and I would have hit a groundball to short."

Posted by: Allah on December 8, 2005 06:25 PM

"It's an ancient survival mechanism left over from the time we were chased across the planet by saber-toothed tigers."

I've never understood this.

It's not like, after we progressed past the hunter/gatherer stage, the utility of "fight or flight" completely disappeared.

"Fight or flight" continued to be pretty damn useful well into recorded history ... It's pretty useful today, actually.

Now me, I likes "flight."

Posted by: on December 8, 2005 06:34 PM

Don't sell yourself short, Allah. My daughter wanted pancakes on Sunday, and I almost couldn't make them because I kept thinking about your Wesley Clark photoshops and laughing while stirring the batter, pouring, etc.

No possible way to answer the question, "What's so funny, daddy?"

We all miss you, man. At least throw us a photoshop a week!

Posted by: Lapsed Leftist on December 8, 2005 07:51 PM

Whaddya need a woman for? You know what you need her for? In my time? To see if there's an animal behind you. Can't see alone, got no eyes in the back of your hear. You take two eyes, happens to be a lady. You say "lady, will you look behind me for a while"? That was the first marriages, was "will you take a look behind me"? and she was like "Ok, how long you want"? and you said "Forever, we're married".

Posted by: The 2000 Year Old Man on December 8, 2005 08:08 PM

I always suspected that naked pillow fights relieved stress.

Naked?

How about tasteful lingerie a la Animal House?

Pure stress relieve. Just ask Bluto.

Posted by: kelly on December 8, 2005 08:24 PM

Er, relief.

Posted by: kelly on December 8, 2005 08:27 PM

Oh, tell me about it Lapsed Leftist.

The stuffed animals.
Still kills me, in my minds eye.

'lambs-eat-ivy, kid'll eat-ivy-too'

He could start a new blog with just re-runs and it would still kick all kinds of ass.

Posted by: lauraw on December 8, 2005 08:36 PM

What was Wesley's little friend's name, again?

Christina Fortescue?

Posted by: lauraw on December 8, 2005 08:46 PM

Just rename your site "Ace of Oxytocin" and be done with it already.

Posted by: Craiggers on December 8, 2005 09:03 PM

The real truth is - that women make up these studies to convince themselves they don't feel better when their partner is a sympatico male.

Posted by: Jenny on December 8, 2005 09:57 PM

That would explain the sob-sisters who love their hormones more than their ability to think. The feedback they get from other sob-sisters they've befriended unfortunately reinforces to them the rightness of their feelings. A whole group of them would be called MoveOn.org. or the Democratic Party. (like there's any difference).

However, in a weak defense of the silly and indefensible assault on men in the language usage of the article: an acquaintance of mine (a male professor of English) years ago, was hired by a very large medical association to go through all of their standards and practices and publications in order to find and re-word all derogatory references to the female patient. Young as I was, I was amazed at the revelations he shared. The horribly mean and extremely biased view of women perpetrated by these professional men in professional journals certainly found its way into the mainstream.

Posted by: Joan of Argghh! on December 9, 2005 06:33 AM

scientists have known for years that aggressive behavior in animals is sparked by elevated testosterone

This explains why Bill Ardolino has to shave his back twice a day, too.

Posted by: spongeworthy on December 9, 2005 10:31 AM

Alas, another testimony in support of lesbianism. Who needs men anyway? Onwardly the 'sisters' march to the sperm banks. A thought - what kind of man contributes to a sperm bank?

Posted by: docdave on December 10, 2005 12:00 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Trump: Ukraine War 'Thousands of Miles Away' is 'Nothing to Do' with America Russia isn't threatening to kill Americans! [CBD]
Update to Gavin Newsom Under Investigation story: This investigation was begun under Senor Dementia:
Adam Housley
@adamhousley

As I have reported several times and now acknowledged by the Governor of California... Gavin and his wife are under federal investigation... what he failed to tell you... This began during the Biden Admin. Kind of a big detail.
Teen Driver Tayvin Galanakis Wins Jury Trial Against Officers Who Charged Him With DUI Even After He Blew 0.0 on A Breathalyzer And Passed Sobriety Tests. One Officer Accounted For 72% of All DUI Arrests For That PD [dri]
Days before the woman was stabbed in the neck by a taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer, in the same general area, another taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer attacked a boy and bloodied his head with a brick.
What is the UK Regime's plan for protecting the citizens from the savage criminals they've foisted on the populace? They offer NONE. They do, however, have a plan for protecting the savage criminals from the citizens: The citizens must STAY CALM and not get angry and not share videos of citizens being attacked by savage criminals.
The public keeps saying "protect us from the foreign savages you have imported against our wishes and over our objections" and the UK branch of The Regime keeps proposing plans to protect the foreign savages from the public. Soclose to what the public is demanding, just, you know, the complete opposite.
Just a thought: Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about the public attacking the savage criminals if you actually introduced a plan to protect the public from the savage criminals. Maybe they wouldn't feel as if it was necessary for them to protect the public through self-help.
Courtney Subramiam, one of the "journalists" who "previewed" her questions for the decrepit and demented Biden so that he could "answer" it with a pre-scripted response, rewarded by promotion to president of the White House Press Corps
Bonchie
@bonchieredstate

hahahahaha

This is the lady who gave her question to Biden beforehand, and he had it written verbatim in his notes with her picture.

You know what's really terrible? There are Daily Signal reporters in the press room. That's the Real Scandal Here!
You might think that movie critics by nature are effeminate and bitchy, but, did you know that grass is green and red peppers are red?
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD bounce around from Maine and its pet Nazi, to the cracks in the Democrat messaging, to the failure of California and its effect on the 2028 election, sea drones rescuing Apache crews, and more!
Seattle mayor shrugs off millionaire-tax concerns as 44% of business leaders consider leaving
It happens in all the blue states, but WA and Seattle will be different! [CBD]
Mary Margaret Olohan
@MaryMargOlohan

NEW: Five FBI employees were fired today over the infamous Richmond Catholic memo on "radical traditionalist Catholics," FBI source confirms to @realDailyWire.
Oof. Reviewers do not like Scary Movie 6. The criticism I keep hearing is that the movie mistakes a reference for an actual joke. The movie (they say) keeps Key Jangling a reference to another movie (or some other pop culture ephemera) and you expect there to be a joke but nope, the Key Jangle was the joke. Other reviewers say that the promise that "no lines will be uncrossed" is a fake-out, and that the movie is bland and inoffensively corporate.
Recent Comments
Don Black: "Anyway, I feel talked out on the whole Iran thing. ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "FIRST!!!!! ..."

Rev. Wishbone: ">>>Duh. There isn't a "final solution". To thin ..."

man: "Not just adversaries. "Friends"." Yeah. Too man ..."

pawn: "I hope they take a serious look at those 25 Chines ..."

fd: "Hezbollah will be the thorn that remains. ..."

Huck Follywood: "How anyone could think "Iran won" is beyond me. ..."

San Franpsycho: "the would-be-returning Shah has pretty much disapp ..."

The Shah Has No Balls: "you're right the would-be-returning Shah has pret ..."

fd: "Iran will get out of line and we will hit them aga ..."

Ben Had: "The MoU is nothing but foreplay. This is not the ..."

runner: "A basic question just occurred to me regarding thi ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives