May 23, 2018

SJW NFL Proposes Compromise on Anthem Protests

—Ace of Spades

Bake me a cake, bigots.

Actually that's not even an apt metaphor, because, being employees of the NFL, and the NFL in the business of putting on a show, the NFL has every right to tell its performers how to act for its show.

But the left wing is freaking out about this anyway.

You'll still have to bake them their cakes on demand, though.

Is anyone who's given up on the NFL recently going back due to this change? I've been out for a while, so this doesn't really change anything for me.

Posted by Ace of Spades at 01:27 PM Comments

Feminist: We Must Protect The Concept of Feminism From "Conservative Appropriation"

—Ace of Spades

Sure why not.

According to the New York Times' Jessica Valenti, conservative women cannot use the term "feminist" because their beliefs do no match up with hers nor in her mind help women. In today's edition of NYT, Valenti says:
"Now, we have a different task: protecting the movement against conservative appropriation. We’ve come too far to allow the right to water down a well-defined movement for its own cynical gains. Because if feminism means applauding 'anything a woman does' -- even hurting other women -- then it means nothing."

Valenti basically says that feminists wrongly led others to believe in a version of feminism that was separate from the truth. It does not simply mean equal treatment under the law or in the work place. Instead it means believing in ideals that ascertain only to the left. Because, according to Valenti, those ideals are what truly help women.

This is due to the leftwing feminists' dishonest use of the "Motte and Bailey" tactic in propaganda.

The Motte and Bailey tactic uses as its central metaphor a medieval castle. There are two main areas of it: the bailey, the useful but poorly defended area around the castle that must be defended, and the motte, the tower fortification itself, small but designed to resist assault.

The idea is that dishonest propagandists, such as feminists, will define "feminism" in two different versions: the Motte version, and the Bailey version.

The Motte version is the most defensible definition of feminism: that women are social and legal equals to men and should suffer no man-made impediments to their own pursuits of happiness.

Hard to argue against that -- that's why it's the Motte. The peasantry retreats to the well-defended Motte when the area is under attack.

But feminists also deploy a Bailey definition of feminism: That feminism means that we must have abortion on demand and that there may be no dissent about this, that the Wage Gap which doesn't exist must be eradicated by government action, that rape does not need to be proved by evidence, that some people with penises are actually women if they say they are, and so on.

Now, this terrain is harder to defend. This is the outlying area around the Motte -- the Bailey. Feminists really intend feminism to mean this series of dubious and fringe ideas, but when you call them on it, they retreat to the Motte and say, "But Feminism only means that women should be social and legal equals; how can you disagree with that, YOU HATER?!!!"

When this tactic has the effect desired-- that you back down and apologize -- they flow back out of the Motte into the surrounding Bailey and again begin making claims that any woman who doesn't believe in the left's bizarre list of Sex War agenda items is not really a woman, etc.

And then when you push against that again, they rush back into the Motte and insist again that feminism only means that women shouldn't be raped, etc.

And so on, and so on, lying forever.

If Jessica Valenti is concerned that many conservative women believe they're "feminists," that's because she and her dishonest allies are always playing this game of changing the definition of what "feminism" means according to whether they're on the rhetorical defense or rhetorical attack.

Maybe they should stick to one definition -- the crazed one they all obviously really believe in -- and push that as what "Feminism" really is, and let people if decide if they are feminists by that single definition.

But they won't. They'll keep playing Motte and Bailey games and then getting mad when conservative women say they're "feminists," according to the highly defensible "Motte definition" of feminism, selectively choosing when feminism requires the full Sex War litany of cultural demands and fringe obsessions.

Motte and Bailey Illustrated, from Oregon Muse: Neat post.

Posted by Ace of Spades at 12:38 PM Comments

The Morning Rant


talking ape.jpg
"One last thing about the potatohead media deliberately taking President Trump's remarks about MS-13 out of context. He said, quote, When the MS-13 comes in, when the other gang members come into our country, I refer to them as animals and guess what, I always will. Unquote. See what he did there? He didn't back down, he didn't grovel, he didn't apologize. He shoved it right back in their smug little faces. And probably had a good laugh in private watching them fall all over themselves defending MS-13. Trump is showing the GOP(e) how to fight the progressive hive and its allies in the potatohead media. The question is, are they listening?"


pelosi - ms13.jpg

Continue reading

Posted by OregonMuse at 11:29 AM Comments

Mid-Morning Open Thread


Rosati inspecting arrivals.jpg

Inspecting New Arrivals
Giulio Rosati

[Hat Tip: OregonMuse]

Sorry about the delay. The power and internet service was down and my cell service is intermittent at best. I blame James Comey

Posted by CBD at 10:22 AM Comments

The Morning Report 5/23/18

—J.J. Sefton


Good morning kids. Midweek and as I was aggravating the links for you all, a theme emerged, and that is "the best of times, the worst of times," which all things considered could be construed as "interesting times" per the old Chinese proverb. We are seeing the truly evil machinations of the Deep State revealed day by day as the details of the plot to take out the President, spawned from the plot to install Hillary president come out. We are seeing the Democrat-Leftist-Media-Academia complex become more strident, vocal and even violent as their thousand-year reichhhhhhh-uh is dismantled bit by bit in front of their eyes. And despite the feckless backstabbing and betrayal by the GOP, the process and even machinery of "fundamental transformation" of America as founded has slowed and perhaps even ground to a halt (we haven't quite got to the point of throwing it in reverse - yet).

So while the Constitution still hangs in the balance courtesy of the bureaucracy, the courts and the politicians of the Uniparty, there are some very encouraging headlines that should give you a bit of a boost. And all of this because of Donald Trump and more crucially, because a significant portion of the citizenry, despite the propaganda and indoctrination were still able to understand that the trajectory of the nation punctuated and underscored by life in America from 2009-2016 was terribly wrong.

Let's take a gander, shall we? First up, we now have e-mails confirming the conspiracy between the FBI, CIA and the media (in this case CNN) to lay the groundwork for releasing the fictional dossier to smear and bring down PDT. In the mix are a number of links laying it all out as well as a more sanguine piece about our nation, now imperiled.

To immigration where a fine, upstanding guy who happened to be an illegal alien, happened to be in MS-13 and happened to be nicknamed "Animal" just got 40 years for stabbing a teenager to death. Meanwhile, the crackdown on border jumping is a net win for women seeking construction jobs, the ICE Director totally pwn3d a Congressfool and yet another California municipality has said "no mas" to the state's sanctuary edict.

Yesterday was primary day in several states and while the GOP-e seemed to take it on the chin in a few key races, the Dems are going to be fielding hard left candidates such as this Stacey Abrams woman from Georgia. Meanwhile, as has been reported, the Democrat double digit generic advantage of six months ago is gone and the GOP is now up +6 IIRC, for what it's worth.

Meanwhile, PDT is taking an axe to Dodd-Frank, a veteran's choice healthcare bill was signed, household income hits an all-time high and people are crediting PDT for the economic boom. And yet, the Marxist in Seattle is calling for a boycott of businesses who are opposing the insane employee head tax. And to top it off, we had a big pro business/pro freedom win at SCOTUS courtesy of Justice Gorsuch. Elections matter.

Some sobering links in the Islam department via Pam Geller on the not-so-stealth Islamization of West Virginia's schools, the fifth anniversary of Lee Rigby's horrific murder in Englandistan, and the rise of the bollards (no, that one is still down for the count although she refuses to believe it).

Internationally, the NorK summit is now in doubt, SoS Pompeo seems to be hinting at regime change as the goal in Iran via tightening the economic screws and two interesting pieces about the threat from the Chi-Coms, both in their alliance with the Farsis an Pakis as well as the potential for actual war with them inside of two years. Hmm.

From hither and yon, the wonderful, famous tolerance of liberals was on full display as Tomi Lahren got a drink as well as vulgarities hurled at her and her mother as the two sat down for a brunch, Bernardo Sandersnista is a lying hypocrite (BIRM-BIRM), the real Russian infiltration is a classic one (the environmentalist movement to sabotage our fossil fuel production) and finally we have Mike Rowe trying to revive the American work ethic contrasted with parents who had to sue to evict their 30-year-old layabout son from their house. Isn't this really the story of Average Joe et al?

Anyway, links from around the world, across the nation and up your street. Have a better one and remain blessed.

Posted by J.J. Sefton at 07:42 AM Comments

Tuesday Overnight Open Thread (5/22/18 )

—Misanthropic Humanitarian



The Quotes of The Day

Quote I

When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it. Frederic Bastiat

Quote II

Always love your country - but never trust your government! Robert Novak

Quote III

Love is that condition in which the happiness of another person is essential to your own. Robert A. Heinlein

Continue reading

Posted by Misanthropic Humanitarian at 10:30 PM Comments

Some House Republicans Call for Second Special Counsel, to Investigate How Hillary Was Exonerated, How Mueller Got Appointed, and How the FISA Warrants Were Handled

—Ace of Spades


According to Fox News, the 12-page resolution is backed by Rep. Mark Meadows(R-NC), the chairman of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, as well as two of the group's co-founders -- Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), and Rep. Ron DeSantis ( R-FL). It will ask for a second special counsel to investigate matters related to three topics:

The ending of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's personal email server, the progress of the Trump-Russia investigation from its origins through the appointment of Robert Mueller as special counsel, and abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) during the warrant application process.

The resolution is expected to say that a second special counsel would have greater autonomy to investigate those issues than the Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General.

Posted by Ace of Spades at 08:18 PM Comments

Besieged Former Trump Aide Michael Caputo: Stefan Halper Wasn't the Only Spy Trying to Insinuate Himself Into the Trump Campaign

—Ace of Spades

Yes, this is what I was figuring.

"Let me tell you something that I know for a fact," Caputo said on “The Ingraham Angle” with host Laura Ingraham. "This informant, this person [who] they tried to plant into the campaign... he's not the only person who came at the campaign. And the FBI is not the only Obama agency who came at the campaign."

"I know because they came at me. And I'm looking for clearance from my attorney to reveal this to the public. This is just the beginning."

Chuck Ross also seems to ID the other Trump aide targeted by Halper:

Halper also contacted and had coffee with Sam Clovis, the campaign's national co-chairman. They met once several days before Halper reached out to Papadopoulos.

That jibes with what I've heard.

Posted by Ace of Spades at 07:06 PM Comments

Reuters Poll: GOP +6


Hard to believe but there you go.

Posted by Ace at 06:01 PM Comments

Washington Post, May 8: Revealing the Name of the Spy Could Put Lives in Danger
Washington Post, Today: Let's Talk About This Stefan Halper Fellow In Detail

—Ace of Spades

Flashback to the Washington Post's report of May 8th, which shrieks about the danger posed by revealing this unknown, completely-anonymous deep-embed NOC's name.

Last Wednesday, senior FBI and national intelligence officials relayed an Murgent message to the White House: Information being sought by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes could endanger a top-secret intelligence source.

Top White House officials, with the assent of President Trump, agreed to back the decision to withhold the information. They were persuaded that turning over Justice Department documents could risk lives by potentially exposing the source, a U.S. citizen who has provided intelligence to the CIA and FBI, according to multiple people familiar with the discussion and the person's role.


The debate over the risk to the source is now at the center of a pitched battle between House Republicans and the Justice Department.


For the intelligence agencies, Nunes's request threatened to cross a red line of compromising sources and methods of U.S. intelligence-gathering, according to people familiar with their views. Intelligence officials fear that providing even a redacted version of the information Nunes seeks could expose that person and damage relationships with other countries that serve as U.S. intelligence partners.

Note that a week after they ran this scarifying report, the Washington Post itself released a "redacted version" of the information Nunes sought -- giving a full biographical sketch of the spy, which just happened to match Chuck Ross' details about Stefan Halper.

And of course they got that from their friends at the DOJ.

So: Is this a grave threat to national security or not?

National Security Clown Nose On,

National Security Clown Nose Off.

Oh by the way: Bonus points for a "Republicans Seize."

The role of the intelligence source in the Mueller investigation may now be seized upon by conservative Republicans who have publicly accused the Justice Department and intelligence agencies of overreach and misuse of their surveillance powers.

Now compare their story of May 8th to their new story: Who is this jaunty fellow called Stefan Halper anyway?

Margaret Cleveland has been excellent on this case.

Her latest is about inconsistent claims about when the FBI began its "investigation" -- it clearly had a spy (or spies) attempting to entrap Trump officials before the claimed start of the investigation.

Does that mean they're lying? Well no... but also, yes.

Halper first sidled up to his target Page in mid-July 2016. But CROSSFIRE HURRICANE (a codename designed to draw media attention, I think) didn't begin until July 31st.

So what gives? They had a spy in Trump's camp before they started the investigation?

Well, yes.

The timing of the informant’s initial encounter with Page proves significant because that meeting occurred before the FBI launched Crossfire Hurricane. That detail proves the raison d'etre for the Washington Post's Friday article because, with reporters already cracking the identity of the informant from the Post's earlier articles, it would not be long before someone highlighted that early July meeting. For the last several weeks, the few members of the press bothering to report on the Obama administration's targeting of the Trump campaign have questioned the FBI's contention that it first launched its investigation into the Trump campaign in late July 2016.

The Washington Post gives cover to the revelation that the sting began earlier: "The FBI commonly uses sources and informants to gather evidence and its regulations allow for use of informants even before a formal investigation has been opened. In many law enforcement investigations, the use of sources and informants precedes more invasive techniques such as electronic surveillance."

So... you can start spying before an investigation is even opened?

Spying on a major party's nominee for President? Before you've even decided there's enough for an official investigation?

Well that's problematic.

But even putting that aside -- this means the FBI has been lying.

All true. But for the last two years the FBI maintained first that it did not spy on the Trump campaign and second that it only launched its "investigation" in late July 2016, after Australian officials informed the FBI that in May 2016 George Papadopoulos, a foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, blabbed to Alexander Downer, Australia's ambassador to Britain, that the Russians had dirt on Hillary Clinton.

The New York Times promoted this narrative based on the "direct knowledge of the Australian's role" by "four current and former American and foreign officials." The storyline went that Downer only realized the import of Papadopoulos' May revelation after WikiLeaks released emails hacked from the Democratic National Committee server in late July, precipitating the July 31, 2016, start of Crossfire Hurricane. Clearly, the insiders intended to create the impression that the FBI's interest in the Trump campaign stemmed from legitimate concerns its allies had relayed.

Sometimes the FBI Investigates Before Its Investigation

But now we know that the FBI used the term "investigation" in a technical sense, not a colloquial one. Rather than vindicate the FBI, this raises the specter that the FBI extensively targeted Trump campaign officials before its official launch of Crossfire Hurricane.

There are a lot of possibilities, because under the attorney general’s guidelines the FBI may use extensive "information gathering activities" before launching an official "investigation." Under the guidelines, the FBI may make an "assessment" "to obtain information about" a potential threat to national security.

So prior to the start of the official "investigation," the FBI was merely "assessing" the matter... with a spy.

But the FBI has repeatedly lied and claimed the investigation began later, after the Australian information.

Plainly Halper could not have been assigned to spy on Trump aides based on information received from Downer, which came months later.

And yet certain self-proclaimed Bad Boys of Conservatism continue to claim the FBI's claims are the unvarnished truth, whatever those claims turn out to be for this week, and spouting about authoritatively about a case they plainly haven't even done the most basic reading about.

Posted by Ace of Spades at 05:02 PM Comments

Honorary Members of the Media, Barack and Michelle Obama, Become Official Members of the Media with Netflix Production Deal

—Ace of Spades

Netflix announced today that former President Obama and former first lady Michelle Obama have struck a "storytelling partnership" with the video-on-demand service that will unfold in front of and behind the camera.


The agreement with the Obamas is a "multi-year" pact, the company said, "to produce films and series" with the company.

"The Obamas will produce a diverse mix of content, including the potential for scripted series, unscripted series, docu-series, documentaries and features," the company said.

Yeah I'm going to cancel Netflix this month.

Meanwhile, HBO is running an absurdly fawning "documentary" about Obama's last year in office-- though I don't think they're going to highlight all the spying and lawbreaking.

Christian Toto quotes some of the cringiest wet-panties reviews, including this one:

The biggest knee slapper comes courtesy of New York Magazine via Critic David Edelstein throws any pretense of objectivity to the wind in his final thoughts.

Who knew "The Final Year" demanded Kleenex?

It's hard to know how to read Barker's last scenes, which feature footage of Obama at the Parthenon along with an up-close interview with the president backstage after an event. Obama wants to allay fears and take the long view: This election is a mere blip in the positive arc of humankind, he says. At the White House, Power packs up her files, insisting, like her boss, that "we're in this for the long haul." A surprisingly melancholy gospel cover of "The Times They Are A-Changin' " plays her out. And at least one viewer wept all the way through the credits.

Posted by Ace of Spades at 04:03 PM Comments

Did the FBI Trump Squad Discuss The Dossier with CNN?

—Ace of Spades

Sean Davis looks through the emails, and thinks FBI officials -- Andrew McCabe especially -- were very familiar with CNN's thinking.

These emails were sent shortly after the Dossier Briefing, which supposedly was for the purposes of informing Trump about the "salacious and unverified" allegations in the dossier but which had actually been engineered in order to give CNN the "news hook" CNN told Brennan, Clapper, or whoever they needed to run the story.

Two days after the briefing, on January 8, 2017, former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe, who earlier this year was fired and then referred for criminal prosecution by the DOJ inspector general for repeatedly lying about media leaks, wrote an e-mail to top FBI officials with the subject, "Flood is coming."

"CNN is close to going forward with the sensitive story," McCabe wrote to Comey, Rybicki, and two others. "The trigger for them is they know the material was discussed in the brief and presented in an attachment." He did not detail how he came to know what CNN’s "trigger" was for publishing the dossier briefing story.

Although the January 10 story from CNN also claimed that Trump was presented with a two-page summary of the dossier, which was not part of the official intelligence community assessment given to Trump, Comey himself later claimed that he did not give the two-page document to Trump, raising questions about whether McCabe himself was a source for CNN’s assertion that Trump had been given the entire two-page document during the briefing.

John Sexton of Hot Air emphasizes the #FakeNews about Trump being given a two-page summary of the dossier even more.

Remember, Comey says he never gave Trump any summary. In fact, he barely even briefed him on the dossier at all -- he only mentioned the "salacious" parts about the prostitutes, not any of the other stuff. He didn't even tell Trump that there was a "dossier." Just that there were reports.

That background established:

The big takeaway here is that two days after the briefing took place, someone had leaked word of it to CNN. Not only that but Andrew McCabe knew word of the briefing had leaked and that CNN was about to publish. It doesn't appear from the description of his emails that he was a) surprised or b) concerned about the leak so soon after the briefing. So far as we know, no one at the FBI was pounding a desk demanding to know who gave CNN exactly what it was looking for.

CNN would publish a story two days later and that story would still contain the inaccurate claim that Trump was presented with a two-page summary of the dossier during the briefing. According to Comey, that never happened, but someone told CNN it had. It's probably not a coincidence that the claim that a summary was handed to the President-elect, though not true, seems designed to give CNN the news hook it needed.

Ron Johnson is on it:

Posted by Ace of Spades at 03:11 PM Comments

Job Market Optimism Now At Highest Level Ever Recorded

—Ace of Spades


The average American is more optimistic about their ability to find a job under the Trump administration than at any point previously recorded, according to a new poll.

Data released by Gallup on Monday showed 67 percent of Americans believe now is a "good time" to find a quality job. The results were buoyed across gender lines, with 71 percent of males and 59 percent of females decidedly optimistic about the job market.

The data stretched across all age, income, and education groups...

The numbers under President Trump stand in stark contrast to his predecessors. Prior to January of 2017, the number of respondents optimistic about the job market never inched above 50 percent. The poll also found that total optimism about the "availability of good jobs" has increased by 25 percentage points since November 2016.

Meanwhile, per PJMedia, a CBS poll says that 68% of the public gives Trump credit for the economy, with 35% saying he had a "great deal" of responsibility for the good economy, and another 33% saying he's "somewhat" responsible.

Oh, and for the sixth year in a row, the United States was the world's largest producer of fossil fuels.

It's important to remember that stored energy is a substitute for human labor. So the more energy we have, the more machines we can make run, and the more work we do as a species, resulting in more wealth for the human species to share and compete for.

Time is money. Energy is also money.

"Cowbell me, baby!"

Posted by Ace of Spades at 02:05 PM Comments

Dan Bongino: It Was Brennan

—Ace of Spades

Lee Smith pointed the finger at Brennan in February as being the first mover of the Russia Hoax. That would have made a nice journalistic coup for the Weekly Standard, if they hadn't had fired him soon after he submitted a piece about Fusion GPS that might have been a journalistic coup for them.

Brennan has himself previously taken credit for initiating the inquiry. While on Meet the Press, Brennan suggested that the British sent their intelligence on to the FBI, in his May testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, he indicated it came from him directly.

"I was aware," Brennan said in May, "of intelligence and information about contacts between Russian officials and U.S. persons that raised concerns in my mind about whether or not those individuals were cooperating with the Russians, either in a witting or unwitting fashion, and it served as the basis for the FBI investigation to determine whether such collusion-cooperation occurred."

Brennan continued: "I wanted to make sure that every information and bit of intelligence that we had was shared with the bureau [FBI] so that they could take it. It was well beyond my mandate as director of CIA to follow on any of those leads that involved U.S. persons. But I made sure that anything that was involving U.S. persons, including anything involving the individuals involved in the Trump campaign, was shared with the bureau."

In other words, the FBI investigation didn't start when the Australians, according to the Times--or the Brits, according to Brennan’s most recent version of the story--contacted the FBI after the Papadopoulos-Downer meeting. No, it started when the director of the CIA decided to start an investigation, when Brennan passed on information and intelligence to the FBI, and signaled that the bureau better act on it.

It's cute that some Conservative Geniuses still believe the ever-shifting stories of when and why this investigation started. Hey, they've only changed the story three times already, but sure, go ahead believing their fourth version.

Now here's Dan Bongino:

Trump is quoting Bongino on Twitter. He adds this to the quotes:

As Richard Fernandez notes, America hasn't had to deal with the consequences of a failed coup before. (Perhaps with Aaron Burr, but he didn't have the power that Obama and Brennan do.)

Posted by Ace of Spades at 12:48 PM Comments

The Morning Rant: J.V. Edition



Senator Feinstein has an inflated sense of her own intelligence and importance, and most of all her ability to sway public opinion. When she spouts "facts" that upon close examination disprove her point, it exposes the conceit that our politicians are in any way intellectually impressive. On the contrary, most of them are mendacious, grasping, gutter-dwelling scum.

One would assume that with so many guns we would have an astronomical murder rate, and that is what the senile old fool from California wants you to believe. But it isn't actually true! I know...shocking.
Map: Here are countries with the world's highest murder rates

...most of the top countries with the highest homicide rates are in Africa and Latin America. The homicide rates, defined as the number of deaths by homicide per 100,000 people, of the top 20 countries are showed in the chart below. The US was ranked 107 out of 218 countries, according to data from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

Mexico's murder rate is four times that of ours (and does anyone trust their numbers?), and Mexico has incredibly strict gun control laws. To be fair to Mexico, they use other weapons too. Which brings up an interesting question: is gun murder worse than knife murder or machete murder or club murder or fists-and-feet murder?

As for that "epidemic" she is spouting about? Really? Because gun violence has been decreasing for a generation in this country. And the number of school shootings is also suspect. They tend to count two gang-bangers killing each other on a school playground at 3:00am as a school shooting. So what did the harpy get right? Well, the United States does have about 4% of the world's population!

Continue reading

Posted by CBD at 11:00 AM Comments

Mid-Morning Open Thread


Paxton The House Maid.jpg

The House Maid
William McGregor Paxton

[Hat Tip: Bluebell]

Posted by CBD at 09:30 AM Comments

The Morning Report 5/22/18

—J.J. Sefton


Good morning kids. Top story is one that is continuing from last night, a group of masked gunmen brandishing AK-47s opened fire on a crowd of young people in Marseille. There are reports that a pitched gun battle occurred with gendarmes shortly afterwards and that there may be a hostage. Considering there is no right to bear arms in France, I would like to ask Camera Hogg, Shaved Guevara et al what law(s) are not on the books in France that would have prevented this from happening? I'm sure London Mayor Sadiq Khan will derogate us for missing the obvious - we need common sense mask control. Prayers for the victims, but I guess the Left is sick and tired of that as well.

Moving on to the Mueller Witch Hunt and the Deep State coup against the President and the citizenry who elected him, more and more evidence is stripping away the onion to reveal what we had all surmised, that John Brennan engineered the entire Russian collusion myth via the fabricated dossier and a spy - or spies as Michael Caputo is alleging - within the campaign to sabotage the campaign. But since Hillary's loss, which they gambled would never happen, the plan now is to attempt to destroy the Trump presidency in order to save their hides from being exposed. This too has failed and sooner or later, we will indeed learn that while Brennan engineered this whole thing, it was Obama who gave the order to do it. He needed Hillary in not just to cover up the crime but to preserve his eight years of poisonous ruin and seal the fate of the Republic.

This entire thing just boggles the mind on many levels. We are living through an historic and terrifying phase of our nation's history. But the thing to remember, as Ace alluded to yesterday evening in citing Richard Fernandez's piece at PJ Media, and Clinton Pollster Mark Penn's essay, all of this just didn't happen overnight. It took years, decades to corrupt an entire Federal Bureaucracy to such an extent as to make this possible. A couple of things that I think are worthy of keeping in mind; first on a granular level, as the Agitprop Media reveals names and details, they are doing this not out of journalistic integrity; they are doing this intentionally as a means to shield their political allies/fellow travelers.

The real criminals/masterminds will never be exposed, not by them anyway. And that means Obama and Clinton. Speaking of the Bollard that Ate the Pavement, see the links about Awan and Rush's take on all of this vis a vis her servers, but I digress. Along with Mark Levin openly calling for the vacating of everything that has come out of Mueller's "investigation," keeping in mind everything I have just noted, take a look at that link about the 1996 election. Forgetting Bob Dole as a candidate and his personality, how many candidates r even elections has the Deep State sabotaged if not thrown in the past 50 or more years? Richard Fernandez in his piece at PJ Media is spot on. We are at the phase of this where it's for all the marbles, baby. And even if the President does come out on top, will vermin like Comey, Clapper, Brennan and their deputies let alone Obama and Clinton actually face imprisonment let alone even be indicted?

Along with the complete polarization of the populace vis a vis cultural rot, demographic changes (natural and otherwise [mostly otherwise]), and the anti-American indoctrination that has poisoned the minds of at least two generations of children - and continuing - taking all of the above into consideration, I really don't see how we can continue as a group of united states. Without a set of common values and ideals, and now without the rule of law to punish the wicked and criminal no matter who they are, and especially those we elect to the highest offices in the land, it's over.

On that cheerful note, let us continue, shall we? In Amnesty news, Steve King has introduced a bill to punish elected officials who aid and abet illegal aliens avoid deportations; five years in jail. And that made the inspiration for this bill (and its namesake, heh!) Oakland Mayor Libby Schaff react in a generally not nice way. Meh. Considering the leadership in Congress, I doubt this has a chance. In any case the President is not backing down on his use of the mild and understated adjective of "animals" to describe MS-13 and has released a fact sheet that highlights the raison d'etre for that appellation.

On the political front, as Keith "X" Ellison prances about in a blonde wig (any imam Morons in the house can tell me if that's kosher?), the DNC coffers are sucking fumes and the great Bernardo Sandersnista, who will lead the youthful masses in raising the red banner above the White House once he has a lie-down and an Ensure, has an organizing arm that is falling to pieces. A Democrat wife-beater won't say if he's still beating his wife and won't step aside, and 114 conservatives in the House are backing Jim Jordan in a bid for Speaker of the House. And yet, the schmuck who lost the West Virginia GOP primary is going to go third party. Putz.

Internationally, speaking of stolen elections, Venezuela. More than just hintng at a goal of regime change, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is promising the toughest sanctions ever against Iran while the Euro-peons are promising to stab us in the back over them (a day ending in 'Y"). And while the Chi-Coms have seemingly flinched over tariffs, the US is negotiating with them about the Chinese telecom company EZE. In related news, while alarming reports of the PLA Navy being twice the size of the US Navy by 2030, we also see have a link to China's lifting of its "one child" policy, indicating it knows that it too is facing a crisis with low birth rates.

Moving around the horn, is Justice Kennedy staying or going, Kamala-Toe talks out the side of her mouth about the death penalty, the problem with schools is not lack of money, an interesting take on cronyism in Michigan and finally the nail in the coffin for Netflix.

Anyway, links from around the world, across the nation and up your street. Have a better one and remain blessed.

Posted by J.J. Sefton at 07:26 AM Comments

Monday Overnight Open Thread (5/21/18 )

—Misanthropic Humanitarian



The Quotes of The Day

Quote I

Among the biggest obstacles to educating children in many ghetto schools are disruptive students whose antics, threats and violence can make education virtually impossible. If only 10 percent of the students are this way, that sacrifices the education of the other 90 percent.

The idea that Eric Holder, or anybody else, can sit in Washington and determine how many disciplinary actions against individual students are warranted or unwarranted in schools across the length and breadth of this country would be laughable if it were not so tragic. Thomas Sowell

Quote II

Finish each day and be done with it. You have done what you could. Some blunders and absurdities no doubt crept in; forget them as soon as you can. Tomorrow is a new day. You shall begin it serenely and with too high a spirit to be encumbered with your old nonsense.” Ralph Waldo Emerson

Quote III

“What a slut time is. She screws everybody.” John Green

Continue reading

Posted by Misanthropic Humanitarian at 10:08 PM Comments

Tater Tut: It's Offensive to Claim I'm an Anti-Trump Democrat

—Ace of Spades

Via Ed Driscoll of Instapundit, CNN's Tater is claiming he's not on either side of the political aisle.

Does Brian Stelter even listen to himself talk? The same man who compared Donald Trump to "authoritarian" "strongmen" is now "offended by the idea that top White House aide Kellyanne Conway sees the CNN journalist as an anti-Trump Democrat. While talking about Russia on Sunday's Reliable Sources, Conway referred to "people on your side of the aisle."

Stelter huffed, "I'm not on a side of an aisle. That's an offensive remark." Conway pounced: "Well, tell America. Did you vote for Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump? How did your wife vote? Tell America."

The media wants to lie to your face about fundamental things and then demand that you believe everything they say.

Hello, they lied.

That's Our Tater! Tater's too stupid to be any good at lying.

Also, I heard that there might be some news broken on Tucker Carlson's show tonight.

Eh, it looks like he's just debating a Democrat who claims he has "proof" of collusion. Seems like theater, but not news.

Posted by Ace of Spades at 08:02 PM Comments

Derek Hunter: I Used to be Skeptical of the Existence of a "Deep State." I'm All Out of Skepticism Now.

—Ace of Spades

Extraordinary claims require extraodinary proofs.

We now have extraordinary proofs.

The Deep State Is Real, And Much Bigger Than You Know

I used to be a doubter who would cringe, just a little, at any mention of "the deep state." I admit it, it all seemed a little far-fetched to me that there was this cabal of careerists conspiring from within the government to harm President Donald Trump when I first heard it. I never doubted there were individuals doing it, but a wide net of conspirators seemed like something out of a bad movie more than anything that could actually happen in the United States.

I was wrong, very wrong, the deep state is real. But there is much more than just this small group of powerful people working toward a common goal, there is an entire infrastructure created by the left not only to destroy Trump, but to indoctrinate unsuspecting Americans into their agenda.

As the curtain is pulled back on the Obama administration's unprecedented efforts to spy on the Trump campaign, there is a good possibility many of the perpetrators could face criminal charges, or at least should. But it's important to understand that liberals didn’t just create this out of the blue in 2016, it's the culmination of everything they've worked toward for decades.

The infrastructure they used to spy on the Trump campaign was something inherently governmental, simply planting a mole in the campaign couldn't tap phones or access emails. But the ability to cover up that fact requires a level of media complicity that takes time to create.

Getting the desired message out is only part of the battle, it has to be believed by a significant percentage of the public for it to really matter. Conditioning the public to be receptive to that message, without questioning how it came about or why they should care required subtle indoctrination over a lifetime.

As it stands, liberals have that infrastructure in place, they had that support system ready to go. And, not to get all Scooby-Doo on you, they would've gotten away with it were it not for the existence of conservative media.


None of this is by accident, and it didn’t start on November 8, 2016, it just sprang into action. Nearly every aspect of life, to one degree or another, has been or is ready to be weaponized against anyone who dares to stand up to the liberal agenda. And none have stood up to it in a more threatening way than Donald Trump.

But the clock is ticking, the fuse is burning down low.

Derek's got a book coming out called Outrage, Inc.: How the Liberal Mob Ruined Science, Journalism, and Hollywood, available June 19th. I just got an advanced copy and will be reading it soon.

Andrew C. McCarthy has also seen the light on the Deep State. Months and months ago, he was largely taking the line that the Armed Wing of the Democratic Party was just a bunch of great ethical heroes who should be trusted in their judgment.

Since then, he has been a steadfast critic of Mueller and the Russia Narrative. He constantly points out that the special counsel law requires the factual statement of an actual crime to be investigated, which Rosenstein and Mueller have completely ignored, instead basing their authority -- lawlessly -- on the premise of a counterintelligence investigation.

But the Special Counsel law says that a crime must be named. You can't evade that requirement by just saying "It's a counterintelligence operation." A Special Counsel cannot be appointed to conduct such an investigation.

Chuck Grassley has picked up on that, and is now demanding that Wray and Rosenstein explain what part of what law they rely on for the proposition that a Special Counsel can be appointed in absence of a named crime:

he regulations authorizing the appointment of a special counsel state that the Attorney General (or Acting Attorney General) may appoint a special counsel "when he or she determinations that criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted." The Appointment Order proscribes the Special Counsel's jurisdiction by citing specifically "the investigation confirmed by then-FBI Director James B. Comey in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017." In his March 20 testimony, former Director Comey referred to "the investigation" as a counterintelligence investigation -- not a criminal investigation.

Please explain which portion of which regulation authorizes the appointment of a Special Counsel to conduct a counterintelligence investigation.

That letter also has some other "bombshells" in it, btw:

McCarthy also wrote a good column recently comparing the kids-glove treatment of Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, who obviously lied to the FBI -- Hillary claiming she didn't know what (C) meant in a classified report (hint: It stands for "confidential"), and Cheryl Mills claiming she didn't know about Hillary's secret server, despite ample evidence that she did, compared to the Squeeze Their Family Members and Threaten Them With Jail pressure put on former Trump associates.

You can either read that, and/or read Hot Air's John Sexton's take on it.


The reference to the "spy" seeking a job in the Trump campaign is from Axios.

Posted by Ace of Spades at 07:08 PM Comments

IG Report Expected to Fault FBI Leadership For Sitting on Email Investigation in 2016

—Ace of Spades

Apparently the AP has a "glimpse" of the report. I guess it leaked. This link is actually to FoxNews.

The report is said to criticize Comey and, get this, Andrew McCabe for sitting on information about the Hillary emails discovered on the pedophile Anthony Weiner's laptop, and waiting a month to get a warrant to examine them.

A highly anticipated report from the Justice Department's internal watchdog reportedly is expected to hit FBI leaders for moving too slowly to review a batch of Hillary Clinton emails discovered toward the end of the 2016 presidential campaign.

Offering a glimpse at the contents of the closely held inspector general review, The Associated Press cited people familiar with the findings in reporting Monday that the investigation would criticize the bureau for its handling of that incident.


Some FBI officials, like then-Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, knew as early as September 2016 of the emails, but the bureau did not obtain a warrant to review them until the following month.

The IG report, which is examining a broad range of FBI actions during the email investigation, is expected to criticize officials, including Comey, for not moving fast enough to examine the email trove and for a weeks long delay in getting a warrant, sources told the AP.


There are suspicions about whether there was an effort to delay pursuing those Clinton files. The Washington Post first reported in January that Horowitz was investigating whether McCabe wanted to avoid taking action on the laptop findings until after the presidential election.

Ironically, given that Comey was just set to say that nothing new was in that trove of emails, despite finding them on the unsecure computer of a known sexter and pedophile who was, therefore, highly susceptible to kompromat himself, McCabe could have avoided any impact on the election had he acted promptly and whitewashed it sooner, when it first came to his attention.

I actually don't think it had a big impact on the election -- remember, Comey once again cleared her, as is his habit/as was his orders, almost immediately after announcing a brief re-opening of the case.

However, if it had any impact on the election, obviously there would have been less impact if McCabe and Comey had investigated the Sexter's Stash of Emails when they became known to them in September, instead of delaying it until October.

Posted by Ace of Spades at 05:55 PM Comments

Trump Demands Rosenstein, Wray Investigate Any "Irregularities" in "Tactics" Used by the DOJ Against the Trump Campaign

—Ace of Spades

This seems to be a clarification of his original order: He doesn't just want a report on crimes, but on irregularities, deviations in protocol or accepted practices which may not be criminal but nevertheless are a deviation from routine.

Oh, and he also wants to review this allegedly too-dangerous-to-be-revealed-to-Congress information himself. (Or rather, by his Chief of Staff John Kelly.)

A friend points out that the White House put this out immediately itself, instead of waiting for Rosenstein or his pals to start leaking their version of it.

I have to make a point about the Deep State simultaneously leaking all biographical details necessary to identify the spy as Stefan Halper (or someone who just happens to share every key biographical detail with Stefan Halper) while also claiming that to leak his name would put a trusted undercover NOC in grave danger.

The leaks are either authorized by someone high up at Justice -- someone on the level of Rosenstein or even Sessions -- spat out to give a Modified Limited Hang-Out to friendly media forces, or they are unauthorized, and therefore criminal, leaks.

I hope Trump told Rosenstein and FBI Director Wray the following:

Either these leaks are authorized or unauthorized.

If they are authorized leaks, then you are simultaneously telling me the name is too sensitive to release, while releasing information to your media friends that all but confirm the name. In which case, you are liars, and you are protecting this name not to defend national security but to stop further inquiry (such as asking when Halper was asked to begin spying, and who asked him to spy, and on what authority or pretext), and I therefore demand your resignations by tomorrow morning.

If they are unauthorized leaks, then, by your own claims, someone has leaked out dangerous information that can literally result in the death of a highly confidential NOC operator, in which case I want you to open a full and fulsome investigation to find these leakers of sensitive NatSec information, and then prosecute them, and then jail them.

If you are not doing that already, then you are liars regarding the sensitivity of this name, and this probably was an authorized leak (or at least a tolerated leak), and in that case, I want your resignations by tomorrow morning.

This name cannot be so serious a natsec secret that the Top-Secret-clearance House Permanent Select Intelligence Committee cannot have it, and yet simultaneously so LOL No Big Deal that high ranking DOJ sources can leak everything about this guy except his name to the Washington Post, the New York Times, and CNN.

These contradictory claims amount to a lie -- there is a lie somewhere in here, on one end or the other, or maybe on both ends, and the officials at the DOJ refusing to give Congress information about this spy are therefore lying to both Congress and the President they ostensibly served and therefore should be fired for cause.

Posted by Ace of Spades at 04:55 PM Comments

Former Clinton Pollster Mark Penn: To Save the Republic, Robert Mueller and the Deep State Must be Stopped and Defeated

—Ace of Spades

A sensible opinion, coming from a completely unexpected speaker.

The "deep state" is in a deep state of desperation. With little time left before the Justice Department inspector general's report becomes public, and with special counsel Robert Mueller having failed to bring down Donald Trump after a year of trying, they know a reckoning is coming.

At this point, there is little doubt that the highest echelons of the FBI and the Justice Department broke their own rules to end the Hillary Clinton "matter," but we can expect the inspector general to document what was done or, more pointedly, not done. It is hard to see how a yearlong investigation of this won't come down hard on former FBI Director James Comey and perhaps even former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, who definitely wasn't playing mahjong in a secret "no aides allowed" meeting with former President Clinton on a Phoenix airport tarmac.

No seriously, this is coming from Bill Clinton's former pollster.

With this report on the way and congressional investigators beginning to zero in on the lack of hard, verified evidence for starting the Trump probe, current and former intelligence and Justice Department officials are dumping everything they can think of to save their reputations.

But it is backfiring. They started by telling the story of Alexander Downer, an Australian diplomat, as having remembered a bar conversation with George Papadopoulos, a foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign. But how did the FBI know they should talk to him? That's left out of their narrative. Downer's signature appears on a $25 million contribution to the Clinton Foundation. You don't need much imagination to figure that he was close with Clinton Foundation operatives who relayed information to the State Department, which then called the FBI to complete the loop. This wasn't intelligence. It was likely opposition research from the start.

Note that Bill Clinton's former pollster is more skeptical of the Deep State's current story than alleged Bad Boy of Conservatism Ben Shapiro.

In no way would a fourth-hand report from a Maltese professor justify wholesale targeting of four or five members of the Trump campaign. It took Christopher Steele, with his funding concealed through false campaign filings, to be incredibly successful at creating a vast echo chamber around his unverified, fanciful dossier, bouncing it back and forth between the press and the FBI so it appeared that there were multiple sources all coming to the same conclusion.

Time and time again, investigators came up empty. Even several sting operations with an FBI spy we just learned about failed to produce a DeLorean-like video with cash on the table. But rather than close the probe, the deep state just expanded it. All they had were a few isolated contacts with Russians and absolutely nothing related to Trump himself, yet they pressed forward. Egged on by Steele, they simply believed Trump and his team must be dirty. They just needed to dig deep enough.

Mark Penn concludes that stopping Mueller isn't about party or politics or any particular president, but necessary to preserve the normal functioning of democracy itself.

Obviously, worth the read.

Richard Fernandez has previously written that we are now experiencing what we had long avoided in America -- a deadly fight of a King vs. another King (the current president versus the Deep State embeds of the previous president), and that this fight may change America forever.

He now elaborates on that idea, as he watches two scorpions with a death-grip on each other trying to kill each other before the other kills first.

The Deep State understands that either they must find some claim that Trump is a criminal, or else they'll be prosecuted for their own rampant criminal acts.

The invaluable timeline of the investigations compiled by Sharyl Attkisson seems to confirm what Lee Smith of Tablet Magazine has already suggested: that the roots of domestic spying predated the Trump candidacy. He notes that "Obama officials vastly expand[ed] their searches through NSA database for Americans and the content of their communications. In 2013, there were 9,600 searches involving 195 Americans. But in 2016, there are 30,355 searches of 5,288 Americans."


On January 20, 2017, "Fifteen minutes after Trump becomes president, former National Security Adviser Susan Rice emails memo to herself purporting to summarize the Jan. 5 Oval Office meeting with President Obama and other top officials. She states that Obama instructed the group to investigate 'by the book' and asked them to be mindful whether there were certain things that “could not be fully shared with the incoming administration."

In response to Trump's demand, Rod Rosenstein has asked the DOJ inspector general to review the possible infiltration of the Trump campaign. The hunters have themselves become the hunted. For better or worse, two major American political factions are trying to jail each other. The outcome of their struggle may determine not only who occupies the White House, but what future role the intelligence agencies play in public life.

The specifics of the individual accusations may be fake, but the struggle over the control of the bureaucracy is frighteningly real. Concern over the independence of powerful bureaucracies has long been paramount for a reason. The biggest problem with weaponizing intelligence agencies is it CREATES a pathway for the foreign takeover of the system. If a once hostile power takes over the White House and that president corrupts the agencies, an unfettered secret police will have the ability to remain in power indefinitely.

That seems to have been Obama's plan all along.

Posted by Ace of Spades at 03:55 PM Comments

Three O'Clock High: Trump Summons Wray and Rosenstein to White House; Will Discuss His Demand for Investigation Into Spying and Release of Information About Spying Efforts

—Ace of Spades

Showdown? The meeting's scheduled for three pm Eastern.

President Trump will meet with top Justice, FBI and intelligence officials Monday to discuss congressional requests for information on the investigation into Russian collusion, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said.

The meeting comes a day after Trump demanded that the Justice Department investigate whether the FBI improperly infiltrated his campaign for president in 2016.

The president has been urging his administration to turn over information to congressional Republicans demanding the identity of sources in the probe. Law enforcement and intelligence officials have resisted, saying it could compromise their investigation and imperil covert sources.

In the Oval Office Monday, Trump will meet with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, FBI Director Christopher Wray, and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, Sanders said.

PJMedia's Morning Briefing says Trump should declassify the documents on his own authority instead of asking underlings to do it.

Trump is getting bad advice. He should not have asked the DOJ, a subject of the investigation, to investigate itself. With all the DOJ stonewalling and slow-walking of documents to comply with congressional oversight, there's no doubt a mountain of bad behavior is being covered up. What Trump should have done, and can still do, is DECLASSIFY ALL THE DOCUMENTS in question. He has the power to do this and after the documents are declassified, then we can look at further steps depending on what they reveal.

Maybe that will be discussed -- giving these guys one last chance to make their case why a name we already know, and which the DOJ pretty much gave to the Washington Post and New York Times, cannot be openly mentioned.

Posted by Ace of Spades at 02:36 PM Comments

OUT: Trump's a Liar and Lunatic For Saying Obama and Brennan Spied on Him
IN: Of Course Obama and Brennan Spied on Trump; It Would Have Been Dangerous NOT To!

—Ace of Spades

Yes, this is what I imagined you would say next.

Posted by Ace of Spades at 01:41 PM Comments

Blowjob Queen Nina Burleigh Calls Dana Loesch "Fat"

—Ace of Spades

#FakeNews from Newsweek, as usual.

Posted by Ace of Spades at 12:33 PM Comments

The Morning Rant


talking ape.jpg
"So, if you can believe the latest Rasmussen poll numbers, President Trump's approval rating is 50%. Now here is a curious thing. With all the viciously and relentlessly negative media coverage that Trump has received since his election, the deliberate non-coverage of anything positive he has done and the magnification of his every last miniscule fault and mistake, and you'd expect his job approval rating to be in the low 20's or maybe even the teens. That's obviously what the MSM would like to see, anyway. And yet it's at 50%. That's kind of amazing. Especially when you contrast this with all the fawning, dripping, slobbering coverage given to Obama, the constant fluffing, primping, pimping, and boosting, the forced applause given to his dubious achievements and the aggressive ignoring of his manifold failures, and yet his approval rating was 50% or below for most of the time he was in office. One can only speculate what this country would be like if the MSM had covered Obama like they're covering Trump, and Trump like they covered Obama."

trump - dems defend ms13.jpg

Continue reading

Posted by OregonMuse at 11:20 AM Comments

Mid-Morning Open Thread


Brughenn St. Matthew.jpg

The Calling Of St. Matthew
Hendrick ter Brugghen

Posted by CBD at 09:30 AM Comments

The Morning Report 5/21/18

—J.J. Sefton


Good morning kids. Monday again and yet again we're forced to deal with the aftermath of another school shooting; two actually. Not to diminish the tragedy that befell the victims, their families and friends, but horrible as it is, in the cold light of day it is a local crime story. Nothing more, nothing less. Unfortunately, the Democrat-Left-Media complex has yet another opportunity to trample on the barely cold bodies of the victims to use them as props in their bid to disarm the millions of law-abiding, responsible and decent gun owners by demonizing them and the NRA as the cause of the carnage. Yet again.

Any sane, rational and logical examination of the facts surrounding this case and every case like this, especially over the course of the past 20-50 years when Democrat-Leftist social policy was ramped up in every corner of our society, would reveal that that was 99 44/100% no relation to what happened. I hinted (well more than a hint, really) at the cause when I said 20-50 years of Democrat-Left social policy. The destruction of the nuclear family, the dissolution of morality, the rise of radical feminism and the concomitant demonization of the male gender, the dismantling of the traditional social order, the abandonment of ethics, morality and individual responsibility and the war on Judeo-Christianity (which are all part of the overall scheme to create a populace of dumbed-down compliant sheeple) have in no small part played a significant role in probably every single school shooting incident in the aforementioned time span. And yet its guns; fully automatic, semi automatic, manually automatic, with bump stocks, muzzle brakes, disc brakes chainsaws and scary pop-up things that go pew-pew-pew and give the cognoscenti a case of the willies. Worse, it's us bitter clingers who refuse to give them up.

Meh. What more can I say that has not been said before and that you all don't know? At least this time, the Democrat-Socialist-Media complex is more and more open about it. That's fine with me, especially with the midterms just five months away and the Dems energizing the base with this - that would be ours not theirs. You all go right ahead and run on this as well as impeachment, raising taxes, defending Hamas and MS-13 because of their "spark of divinity" which evidently does not exist in an unborn child. By the way, you'll be pleased to know that Hillary Clinton has publicly announced to the Democrat party that she ain't going anywhere, so there's your mouthpiece. And take Camera Hogg along for the ride.

Moving along to the Mueller Witch Hunt, that is now become more and more part of the effort to cover up the truly blockbuster revelations that the Obama DoJ and intelligence services were involved as far back as the 2016 primaries to covertly spy on the Trump Presidential Campaign to derail it and then post election to use whatever information - factual or fabricated - to remove him from office or cripple his agenda. And I hope and pray that someone like Rudy Giuliani who is no dope is just yanking Mueller's and the MFM's collective chain about PDT sitting down for an interview. The whole rotten thing is crumbling from within, faster and faster with each passing day so don't interrupt while your enemies are shooting themselves in the face.

On the political front, while Nancy Palsi does her "Norman, coordinate!" schtick, Hillary orders another round for the room, John Kerry smears PDT and America in Abu Dhabi and Keith "X" Ellison is stiffing Dem candidates, Jim Jordan may be trying to make a play for House Speaker. I can't see him winning considering the numbers and forces arrayed against him. But here's hoping. He's solid.

Meanwhile, talk of a trade war with China is quieting down as the Chi-Coms have evidently blinked and agreed to allow even more US imports into their country. And as the Administration prepares for the upcoming summit with Whoa, Fat!, they are also ramping up pressure on the Mullah's in Iran. A couple of good links on that regime vis a vis will it be around to celebrate its 40th anniversary as well as how does it stack up against the Climate-Changing Money-Changing-Shapeshifters in Jerusalem should a shooting war break out.

Meanwhile, as Mahmoud Abbas does his third Fred Sanford impression in a week, parents even here in the Leftist paradise of New York City were outraged at a moment of silence at a city school for the Gaza "victims," the son of a Boston police captain pleaded guilty to plotting an ISIS attack and one year ago, Islamist terror expert Robert Spencer was poisoned in Iceland before a lecture and yet there have been no arrests, unexpectedly (sarc).

Going quickly around the horn, PDT's quietly shaping the judiciary, a CBS poll shows a large majority of Americans credit the President for the economic boom (and that could be a harbinger for November) and reflections on the 50th anniversary of the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy.

Anyway, links from around the world, across the nation and up your street. Have a better one and remain blessed.

Posted by J.J. Sefton at 07:35 AM Comments

Overnight Open Thread (05-20-2018 )


poof monday.jpg

If peace cannot be maintained with honor, it is no longer peace.
-- Lord John Russell
"My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty and despair!"
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that collossal wreck, boundless and bare,
The lone and level sands stretch far away.
-- Percy Bysshe Shelley
The advantage of doing one's praising for oneself is that one can lay it on so thick and exactly in the right places.
-- Samuel Butler
I have seen the moment of my greatness flicker,
And I have seen the eternal footman hold my coat, and snicker,
And in short, I was afraid.
-- Thomas Stearns Eliot

Continue reading

Posted by CBD at 10:10 PM Comments

Weekend Gun Thread

—Misanthropic Humanitarian



Continue reading

Posted by Misanthropic Humanitarian at 07:30 PM Comments

Food Thread: Sheep, Organic Chemistry And Marbles



Herb-crusted rack of lamb is one of those foods that I will eat whenever I can, but it is ridiculously expensive in restaurants, and so easy to make at home that I rarely (read: never) order it anymore. I saw it on the menu last night at a French restaurant in Manhattan. It was something like $48, which is just silly. I can go to Costco and buy excellent quality Australian lamb and make enough for six people for $48.

Sear the rack. Coat it with an herb mixture. Roast in a medium oven with a temperature probe set to your preferred doneness.

See? I told you it was easy. Just don't serve it with mint jelly, which is worse than serving French Toast with syrup.

Continue reading

Posted by CBD at 04:00 PM Comments

Trump: I'm Ordering the DOJ to Investigate Whether Obama Ordered Spying for Political Purposes

—Ace of Spades

Greenwald notes, as many others have, that the DOJ is simultaneously leaking all the biographical details needed to identify Stefan Halper, while claiming that it would endanger his life to identify him:

Last night, both the Washington Post and New York Times -- whose reporters, like pretty much everyone in Washington, knew exactly who the FBI informant is -- published articles that, while deferring to the FBI's demands by not naming him, provided so many details about him that it made it extremely easy to know exactly who it is. The NYT described the FBI informant as "an American academic who teaches in Britain" and who "made contact late that summer with” George Papadopoulos and "also met repeatedly in the ensuing months with the other aide, Carter Page." The Post similarly called him "a retired American professor" who met with Page "at a symposium about the White House race held at a British university."

In contrast to the picture purposely painted by the DOJ and its allies that this informant was some of sort super-secret, high-level, covert intelligence asset, the NYT described him as what he actually is: "the informant is well known in Washington circles, having served in previous Republican administrations and as a source of information for the C.I.A. in past years."

Despite how "well known" he is in Washington, and despite publishing so many details about him that anyone with Google would be able to instantly know his name, the Post and the NYT nonetheless bizarrely refused to identity him, with the Post justifying its decision that it "is not reporting his name following warnings from U.S. intelligence officials that exposing him could endanger him or his contacts." The NYT was less melodramatic about it, citing a general policy: the NYT "has learned the source"s identity but typically does not name informants to preserve their safety," it said.

In other words, both the NYT and the Post chose to provide so many details about the FBI informant that everyone would know exactly who it was, while coyly pretending that they were obeying FBI demands not to name him. How does that make sense? Either these newspapers believe the FBI's grave warnings that national security and lives would be endangered if it were known who they used as their informant (in which case those papers should not publish any details that would make his exposure likely), or they believe that the FBI (as usual) was just invoking false national security justifications to hide information it unjustly wants to keep from the public (in which case the newspapers should name him).

Update: The left's new rules, as summarized by Adirondack Patriot:

It's all academic because this is how the left thinks:

1. It is illegal to defeat a Democrat.

2. Anything we do to stop an illegal act is legal and a morally necessary.

3. The only way a Democrat can lose is if someone (in this case, Donald Trump) did something illegal, such as collude with Russians, because no Republican is qualified to legally defeat a Democrat.

4. Everything we do to stop Trump is legal, regardless of the law.

Ben Shapiro, Deep State Defender.

Correction: Red-faced embarrassment -- I got the timeline screwed up here myself. I conflated Misfud's mention of the emails with Halper's (Halper's mention was several months later).

The timeline goes something like this:

April 2016: MISFUD, not Halper, mentions the Russians hacking the emails to Papadoplous

May 2016: Papadoplous mentions this to Downer (the Australian diplomat)

September 2016: Halper asks Papadopolous about the emails (Papadopolous says he doesn't know anything)

I confused the dates and who it was (Misfud, Halper) doing the talking.

I still don't see how mentioning the emails to anyone could be grounds to begin an investigation -- everyone was speculating about the idea that Russians had the emails for months; it was one of the reasons people said Clinton should be indicted -- and I'd like Ben Shapiro to explain that to me.

If talking about the Russians having Hillary's emails is grounds for an official counterintelligence investigation, then the NSA should have been monitoring me and this blog as well. And pretty much everyone I knew.

Who knows, maybe they were/are.

But my jibe about the timeline was all wrong. I'm the one who had to do more research into the specific timeline here.

I also suspect that when all is done we'll find out that Misfud was actually involved in this "investigation," but that's not in evidence yet. It's just my private supposition.

Oh: The FBI has repeatedly lied about the origins of this "investigation." First it was sparked by the Steele Dossier. When the highly dubious and partisan nature of the document was revealed, they edited their story to claim it all originated with this Papadopolous mention of the emails to Downer.

With the FBI and DOJ crabwalking and changing their stories, why should anyone have any faith in their current claims?

Who can say what the FBI's current claim actually is? Have they made an official statement, or does it continue to be put out via not-under-oath leaks to the media?

Posted by Ace of Spades at 02:25 PM Comments

The Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect: A Wikipedia Corollary


When I was a wee lad, cutting my conservative teeth baiting hippies and fighting with communists on the streets of Berkeley, I lived in student cooperative housing. Since placement was based on seniority, I lived for the first two years in the least desirable and largest place, called Barrington Hall. It has been closed for years; a result off awful management on the part of the socialist organization that ran it, and dumb ass college students being allowed to do pretty much whatever they wanted.

In its defense, I met a lot of very interesting and intelligent people there, one of whom is a dear friend. And there was also a lot of free sex and nudity and punk rock and booze and all sorts of other stuff that appealed to the less high-minded part of my psyche. Anyway, I wanted to look up one of my acquaintances from Barrington, so I started poking around the internet, and discovered that there is a Wiki page devoted to it. As I read it I was immediately reminded of this:

“Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray's case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the "wet streets cause rain" stories. Paper's full of them.
In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.”
-- Michael Crichton

I am as guilty as many of turning to the easy research of Wikipedia for many things. And while I am aware of its crowd-sourced nature, and its political bent, and most of all its famous inaccuracies, it is an effortless and lazy shortcut.

But the absolute drivel written about a place in which I lived for two years was astounding. Dates were wrong, events were reported badly, or ignored or made up from whole cloth. And this is not an overtly political topic, one that I assumed would have some passing familiarity with the truth! It was an amazing experience, having the world's portable encyclopedia revealed to be completely full of shit.

Posted by CBD at 12:00 PM Comments

Sunday Morning Book Thread 05-20-2018


Library of Jake Holenhead.jpg 04 525.jpg
Library of Jake Holenhead

Good morning to all you 'rons, 'ettes, lurkers, and lurkettes. Oh, and we've got a new category of readers, escaped oafs and oafettes. Welcome once again to the stately, prestigious, internationally acclaimed and high-class Sunday Morning Book Thread, a weekly compendium of reviews, observations, and a continuing conversation on books, reading, and publishing by people who follow words with their fingers and whose lips move as they read. Unlike other AoSHQ comment threads, the Sunday Morning Book Thread is so hoity-toity, pants are required. Even if it's these hideous-looking pants, which look like an explosion in a hippie factory.

Pic Note

Jake tells me:

Hope this photo size isn't too large. I took photos of the individual shelves then stitched them together. It drives me nuts to see someone's personal library and not able to read the book titles.

I know the library pic looks tiny, but click on it, and you'll see how yuuuge, classy, and luxurious it is. You can, indeed, read every title on Jake's shelves.

It Pays To Increase Your Word Power®

Something that is BOMBYLIOUS is buzzing like a bee.

Usage: Muhammad Ali bombyliously defeated George Foreman.


A MUCK-ROBIN is a child who deliberately enjoys annoying or disturbing adults.

Yes, but isn't that a description of pretty much every child?

Continue reading

Posted by OregonMuse at 09:00 AM Comments

EMT 5/20/18


How many EMT would a woodchuck chuck?

Posted by krakatoa at 06:00 AM Comments

Saturday Night Open Thread (5/19/18 )

—Misanthropic Humanitarian



Continue reading

Posted by Misanthropic Humanitarian at 09:46 PM Comments

Saturday Evening Movie Thread 05-19-2018 [Hosted By: TheJamesMadison]


Number Five

62. Apocalypse Now 01.jpg

So, here I am with the next installment of "Let's go through my personal top ten movies of all time because it's all about me!"

Moving chronologically after Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey is Francis Ford Coppola's Apocalypse Now.

The Seventies

In terms of the 1970s of American cinema, in my opinion, the most imposing individual was Francis Ford Coppola. Beyond his own creative output, which was obviously significant, he helped foster some of the most prominent filmmakers of the generation with relationships from mentor to collaborator with people like George Lucas, Steven Spielberg, and Paul Schrader. He was at the center of the new movement of American cinema that we're still seeing the effects of today (most are still making movies, although generally just not at the same level of quality as when they first started).

62. Apocalypse Now 02.jpg

But back in the seventies, Coppola was king. From '72 to '79, he made four movies. All four were nominated for Best Picture at the Oscars. He won for two of them (The Conversation's loss was to his own The Godfather Part II). The second loss was to Apocalypse Now, which lost to Kramer vs. Kramer Now, I do really like Kramer vs. Kramer, but it's nothing compared to the mad odyssey into the depths of the jungle that is Apocalypse Now.

A Difficulty

With the other movies on my list, I had little difficulty explaining to myself why I loved them individually. The disparate parts of each film assembled so easily together into something often beautiful that I found the experience of writing about them easy. Apocalypse Now is very different. I really see it as a work of genuine madness. Coppola went into the jungle and lost his mind on the way out, the perfect mirror of the main character's journey, and I really do feel like the movie captures that amazingly well.

But then that leads to the question: How does madness lead to great art? How do you read an art born of madness?

I think the only way to really approach it in an abstract sense. Its effect on the viewer as he watches it. There are arguments that all art should be approached that way, but I do personally feel that formal structural and character based approaches are important to both creating and taking in art, but Apocalypse Now largely forbears any formal approach. Long story short, this post is going to be messy. Let's roll!

Continue reading

Posted by OregonMuse at 07:17 PM Comments

Chess Thread 05-19-2018


spock plays chess - flip.jpg
Spock Plays Chess

As always, the chess/dress pr0n thread is an open thread, so there is no such thing as an off-topic comment.

Easier Problem - White To Play (672)

Hint: Win material with a pin

20180519 - Problem 1.jpg
2kr3r/p1q3p1/2nb4/2p2p2/4p3/2B1P1Pb/P1P1Q2P/1R2R1KB w - - 0 1

Continue reading

Posted by OregonMuse at 05:05 PM Comments

Ace of Spades Pet Thread

—Misanthropic Humanitarian



Good afternoon. Welcome to the almost world famous Ace of Spades Pet Thread. Sit back and relax!

Continue reading

Posted by Misanthropic Humanitarian at 03:05 PM Comments

The AoSHQ Amazon Store

Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
There's a peculiar Red tint in the upcoming Nov 2018 Blue Wave.
"New Poll Shows GOP Now Leads In 2018 Generic Ballot"
Long-time Moron commenter "Yeff" has passed away. RIP
Thought: Although conservatism argues for a lot of specific policy goals, there has always been a large part of what we call Republicanism that has never been anything more than a reflexive, steadfast defense of vested caste/class interests. We are entering the second year of discovering which "conservatives" have always been motivated primarily by what might be called Ruling Class Republicanism.
Republican-for-CNN-Purposes Amanda Carpenter, A Basic Becky Version of Ana Navarro, Continues to Dazzle
The part of Conservatism, Inc., responsible for promoting and over-promoting "Hot New Conservative Talent" needs to be fired and replaced with monkeys, who would do a better job. If you look at the list of Hot New Conservative Talent who were relentlessly promoted over other more deserving people, and how they've turned out, you quickly see that Conservatism, Inc. has basically spent 15 years training and promoting liberal commentators. I... think CNN can train and promote its own liberal commentators.
The Media Just Can't Quit Its Spin That DOJ Leaks to The Washington Post and New York Times are All Nunes' and Trump's Fault, Somehow
This guy is less covert than I am, for crying out loud. And they're deliberately ignoring the real leakers to fixate on people who did not leak, but who are their political enemies and therefore more convenient targets. Welcome to Valerie Plame 2: The Outing of Someone Who Was Never In
Did I mention this guy worked for the Cambridge Intelligence Seminar -- openly? Do covert agents work for open Intelligence groups? He's a known associate of MI-6 big Richard Dearlove, for crying out loud!
Katie Pavlich: Rosenstein's referral of the spying matter to the IG is inadequate, because the IG cannot interview former government employees, and most of the malefactors here have already departed government.
A more suspicous man than myself might suspect that Rod Rosenstein punted it to the IG for precisely this reason.
Lee Smith Continues Dropping Bombs on the Russia Collusion Hoax
Gee, it's too bad the Weekly Standard fired him almost immediately after he submitted an article about Fusion GPS' role in this fraud. I guess it was just bad timing, and his firing wasn't connected to his investigations into Fusion GPS and the Deep State at all.
Weird: Everyone talked about Red State firing anti-Trump writers, but no one has ever breathed a word about the Weekly Standard purging Larry O'Connor and then Lee Smith. Again, it's probably just a coincidence that those writers weren't on the same page as the cucks running that clownshow.
Chatter: There Will be Some News Made on Tucker Carlson's Show Tonight
More news than we have right now? I'm not sure I believe it!
The Washington Post: If the DOJ Spied on Trump, It Was to Protect Trump, Not Harm Him
Well, when Trump orders the prosecution of Deep State Conspirators, it will also be to protect them, not to harm them
One of the Weekly Standard's Cuckiest Cucks Joins the Leftwing In Claiming That No One Was Talking About The Spy Until Lou Dobbs Mentioned the Controversy on May 12
Funny, I seem to remember a very hinty-hinty-hinty report from Chuck Ross on March 25th, which I then hinted about every couple of weeks... By the way, I didn't get a "tip" about it or anything. I just read the facts presented and drew the hard-to-avoid conclusions... You know, it would be just great if alleged "conservative" reporters would read conservative media on occasion, instead of just the Chinese Telephone Game descriptions of it they get from their leftwing reporter Cocktail Party palz
Clarification: Note that I said one of The Weekly Standard's Cuckiest Cucks. Ahoy, mon Capitan!
More from Sean Davis
Larry O'Connor: Might Be Time to Admit Trump Was Right About Spying, Huh?
The tall, broad-shouldered Jake Tapper with piercing blue eyes, who is a good man who believes in goodness, still hasn't corrected his claim that Americans were crazy for thinking that Obama's government would spy on anyone (despite Obama's government having spied on lots of people, including journalists, who Jake Tapper tells me are Sacred Priests)
The Deep State has instructed their Media Lackeys to Not Call the Spy a "Spy," But Instead Call Him Only An "Informant." Next Week They'll Demand He Only be Referred to as a "Matter."
See Sean Davis' Tweet, too
Axios Claim: Top Trump Trade Adviser Peter Navarro Recommended Stefan Halper for Trump Campaign Job
Was a he a dupe being used, or did he know what was going on? And -- can we even trust Axios?
Bear in mind, too, that anyone involved in this is going to naturally want to leak other names out to the press, to take focus off themselves
James Clapper Says It's a Good Thing the DOJ and IC Were Also Spying on Trump
Corrected: Clapper didn't spy on Congress. That was his P-I-C Brennan. Clapper just spied on millions of Americans through the metadata capture program and then lied to Congress about it. Thanks to David Harsanyi for clearing that up for me.
Did Pope Innocent II Really Forbid the Use of the Crossbow?
TL;DR version: Yes, but he also forbade the use of any bow against Christians, as well as the sling. He also forbade jousting and tournament fighting (which were more lethal and play-for-keeps in the twelfth century than the later high medieval versions). The idea seemed to be to limit the deaths Christians inflicted on each other so as not to deplete Europe's armies while those armies were needed for the Crusades. But everyone ignored him, of course.
Recent Comments
votermom pimping NEW Moron-authored books!: "It always bemuses me that Feminism is the antithes ..."

Rick in SK: "343 Thanks for the info..... " Paradise by the Das ..."

Boulder t'hobo: "what's the award for? upper class twat of the year ..."

Deplorable Jay Guevara [/i][/b][/s]: "[i]Similarly, Harvard now has a black only graduat ..."

Cheri: "Oh f#$@ off, lady! Posted by: Lizzy I second ..."

Alcoholic Asshole Shut In : "[I]Is there any sort of 'honest' use of Motte and ..."

Laughing in Texas: "First? ..."

Colorado Alex in Exile : "Leftism seems to contain a strong strain of gnosti ..."

kraken: "Thanks for the info..... " Paradise by the Dashboa ..."

Alcoholic Asshole Shut In : "[I]337 Super-dee-doper femnazi Hillary will be at ..."

Margarita DeVille: "302---Her husband tells her how to vote? Posted ..."

Mike Hammer, etc., etc.: "Jennifer - Big Daddy Don Garlit's Top Fuel Rail Dr ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Frequently Asked Questions
The (Almost) Complete Paul Anka Integrity Kick
Top Top Tens
Greatest Hitjobs

The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon
A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates
Margaret Cho: Just Not Funny
More Margaret Cho Abuse
Margaret Cho: Still Not Funny
Iraqi Prisoner Claims He Was Raped... By Woman
Wonkette Announces "Morning Zoo" Format
John Kerry's "Plan" Causes Surrender of Moqtada al-Sadr's Militia
World Muslim Leaders Apologize for Nick Berg's Beheading
Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree
Milestone: Oliver Willis Posts 400th "Fake News Article" Referencing Britney Spears
Liberal Economists Rue a "New Decade of Greed"
Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility
Intelligence Officials Eye Blogs for Tips
They Done Found Us Out, Cletus: Intrepid Internet Detective Figures Out Our Master Plan
Shock: Josh Marshall Almost Mentions Sarin Discovery in Iraq
Leather-Clad Biker Freaks Terrorize Australian Town
When Clinton Was President, Torture Was Cool
What Wonkette Means When She Explains What Tina Brown Means
Wonkette's Stand-Up Act
Wankette HQ Gay-Rumors Du Jour
Here's What's Bugging Me: Goose and Slider
My Own Micah Wright Style Confession of Dishonesty
Outraged "Conservatives" React to the FMA
An On-Line Impression of Dennis Miller Having Sex with a Kodiak Bear
The Story the Rightwing Media Refuses to Report!
Our Lunch with David "Glengarry Glen Ross" Mamet
The House of Love: Paul Krugman
A Michael Moore Mystery (TM)
The Dowd-O-Matic!
Liberal Consistency and Other Myths
Kepler's Laws of Liberal Media Bias
John Kerry-- The Splunge! Candidate
"Divisive" Politics & "Attacks on Patriotism" (very long)
The Donkey ("The Raven" parody)