Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Top Thirty-Five Deep Thoughts | Main | Declaring Hyperviolent/Ultrasexual Video Games "Obscene" For Children »
December 21, 2005

Dave From Garfield Ridge Brokeback Mountain

A glowing, almost giddy review... what a shock.

Related: "Brokeback Mountain" Syndrome: Sure, they're just seizing on a pop culture moment to publicize themselves, but obviously they're right about many gays still trying to "pass" as straights, dating and marrying people of the opposite sex.

Howard Stern is no great political philosopher, but he always hits a good point about this. Put aside the more objectionable parts of the radical gay agenda. Let's just talk about simple acceptance of gays.

If gays aren't comfortable being gays, some will try to lead lives as straights.

Does any father want his daughter marrying a gay man? It's hell on the gay husband, but it's a loveless, empty relationship for the woman as well. And there will almost certainly be possibly-unsafe gay sex in the future, putting the wife at risk.

Thanks to Allah.


posted by Ace at 12:06 PM
Comments



Not there's anything wrong with that...

Posted by: harrison on December 21, 2005 12:15 PM

Always knew he was a secret homo.

Posted by: on December 21, 2005 12:18 PM

AP headline:

"Saddam Says He's Been Beaten in Detention"

Oh, shit -- I bet Excitable Andy is beside himself with this one. Cancel the P Town week end with the boyfriend and the beagle.

Posted by: Ralphie on December 21, 2005 12:19 PM

And he is the founding (and to date only known) member of the Powers Boothe barebacking fan club.

Posted by: Iblis on December 21, 2005 12:29 PM

If you are going to have Secret Santas, might as well have Secret Homos. I want Ace to be my secret homo. :)

Posted by: on December 21, 2005 12:40 PM

Geez, Dave, why don't you change your name to 'Dave from Brokeback Ridge'?

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on December 21, 2005 12:43 PM

Dave is stuck on stupid with gay propaganda films and Ace voted for Clinton.

One wonders what the difference is between Ace and Dave and Andrew Sullivan.

Posted by: Bart in "disgust" mode on December 21, 2005 12:51 PM

Shit Ace, I'd hardly call me review "glowing." It's pretty fucking far from glowing.

If I was using stars, I'd say it's *barely* 3 out of 4. That's a good movie, not a great one.

Sheesh. As long as you put words in my mouth, is there anything else you want to put in there??

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

P.S. Thanks for the link, pal ;-)

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 21, 2005 12:52 PM

One wonders what the difference is between Ace and Dave and Andrew Sullivan.

Duh. Two are gay and one is straight.

I'll leave it up to you to figure out who's who.

Posted by: Slublog on December 21, 2005 12:57 PM

Ace of Spades: More "Brokeback Mountain" Posts than Andrew Sullivan!

Posted by: someone on December 21, 2005 01:00 PM

Dude, I've held off. You know how many links I've been sent?

Posted by: ace on December 21, 2005 01:04 PM

If I was using stars, I'd say it's *barely* 3 out of 4.

By "stars," do you mean "spontaneous erections?"

Posted by: Bart on December 21, 2005 01:06 PM

"You know how many links I've been sent?"

And that's just from Allah...

Posted by: harrison on December 21, 2005 01:06 PM

And there will almost certainly be possibly-unsafe gay sex in the future, putting the wife at risk.

Thanks to Allah.

Posted by: on December 21, 2005 01:08 PM

You know, it's pretty damned annoying to read comment after comment complaining about what a guy chooses to put on his own frickin' blog.

Posted by: Slublog on December 21, 2005 01:09 PM

Yeah Bart, I typically like to rate mainstream movies like Hustler Magazine porno reviews, but I figured that giving Brokeback Mountain a "three-quarters erect" rating would really confuse my readership.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 21, 2005 01:13 PM
"You know how many links I've been sent?"

And that's just from Allah...

I just sent him the link to Sullivan's BM review.

How much will you pay me to go see the movie and show up at the theater wearing a cowboy hat?

Posted by: Allah on December 21, 2005 01:15 PM

Complaining? I was thinking of new slogans so Ace could sell The Gay to advertisers...

Posted by: someone on December 21, 2005 01:15 PM

How much will you pay me to go see the movie and show up at the theater wearing a cowboy hat?

No cash unless there are chaps involved.

Posted by: Slublog on December 21, 2005 01:17 PM

So, is the opposite true? Are there "straights" out there passing as gays?

Posted by: Bart on December 21, 2005 01:20 PM

"How much will you pay me to go see the movie and show up at the theater wearing a cowboy hat?"

Got chaps?

Posted by: harrison on December 21, 2005 01:21 PM

So, is the opposite true? Are there "straights" out there passing as gays?

Yes.

Hey, it sure would explain how my high school ex-girlfriend conveniently went "gay" on me. . .

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 21, 2005 01:22 PM
Posted by: on December 21, 2005 01:22 PM

Hey, it sure would explain how my high school ex-girlfriend conveniently went "gay" on me. . .

Got to hate it when that happens. What's worse is when they start telling friends, "I'm just his beard."

Posted by: Slublog on December 21, 2005 01:24 PM

Slublog, are you at work today?

Posted by: Dave in Texas on December 21, 2005 01:26 PM

Slublog, let's be serious: I'm not gay.

But I would be willing to learn, if, you know, they'd post me someplace special.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 21, 2005 01:28 PM
Allah waits for the cash to roll in

The thing about Gyllenhaal? He really looks the part. I wonder if chicks look at him differently now.

An alpha heterosexual like Chris Klein never would have taken that role. He would have been like, "Thanks, Ang Lee. Thanks for the attention. But get out of my face."

Here's another fun review of BM from nihilistic queen Gary Indiana. Best line: "The more pointlessly fecund our species, the more shits we are likely to have."

Link via ... NRO(?).

Posted by: Allah on December 21, 2005 01:29 PM

I am at work today. It's actually a pretty stressful-ish day, so I'm blowing off steam now and again on this site while writing various and sundry stuff for work.

Um...you're not my boss pretending to be Dave, are you?

Posted by: Slublog on December 21, 2005 01:30 PM

SLUBLOG!!

Get back to work!!

Posted by: Your Boss on December 21, 2005 01:32 PM

" 'It's the most stupid move he could make,' a supposed 'top producer' told Newsweek magazine of Gyllenhaal's choice to do Brokeback Mountain. 'It'll alienate his teen girl fan base and could kill his career. What a waste.' "

I need to start a linkblog.

Posted by: Allah on December 21, 2005 01:38 PM

Nah, I'm just giving you some shit Slub. I took a few days off, so I'm not goofing around on the company dime.

Like you are
.

Hope that helps with the stress stuff!

Posted by: Dave in Texas on December 21, 2005 01:46 PM

Heh. That's what I figured.

I just had to give someone an impromptu tour of the new office.

I actually have one of those posters - the one on Ambition. I need to hang it in my cube soon.

Posted by: Slublog on December 21, 2005 01:53 PM

Whoops - thought I'd put a link to the poster in that comment.

Posted by: Slublog on December 21, 2005 01:55 PM

Criminy, Andrew Sullivan's review of this movie is really overwrought, isn't it?

Not that I'm surprised by that...

Posted by: Slublog on December 21, 2005 01:56 PM
" 'It's the most stupid move he could make,' a supposed 'top producer' told Newsweek magazine of Gyllenhaal's choice to do Brokeback Mountain. 'It'll alienate his teen girl fan base and could kill his career. What a waste.' "
While I've heard some young women making similar remarks, they tend to have the memory spans of gnats. Anyway, did doing gay hurt Jon Voight's career? Dustin Hoffman's?
Posted by: on December 21, 2005 01:57 PM

Kevin Kline? Tom Selleck?

Posted by: on December 21, 2005 02:01 PM

That's funny, I've had Ambition as my wallpaper for about 6 months

Posted by: Dave in Texas on December 21, 2005 02:01 PM

Again, I would really like Ace and Allah to review the film. Of course, that wd require the boys to go see it. Unfortunately, they are so insecure in their "manhood" they are afraid to see the film.

Posted by: on December 21, 2005 02:03 PM

Shit, Allah-- that Village Voice review you linked is full of *priceless* quotes. I haven't read bullshit that pretentious in a long, long time.

If only I could understand whether Indiana, you know, liked the movie. . .

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 21, 2005 02:04 PM

My favorite pseudo-intellectual quote:

Consider Brokeback Mountain's overt pandering to Rousseauian notions of the American West and its insularity, the toughness and self-sufficiency of its tight-lipped, xenophobic denizens, its rituals of faith and patriotism. You could say that simply depicting this hillbilly heaven accurately is itself an unsettling criticism, yet the effect, again, is to make it seem, in many ways, admirable—its unflagging work ethic, its quasi-mystical connection to harvest, soil, livestock, and weather.
What. The. Hell.

Posted by: Slublog on December 21, 2005 02:08 PM

Yeah, I'm pretty much trying to procrastinate from work now.

From Excitable Andy's review:

Then there's the scene when Ennis' wife finally confronts him - and you can see the damage done to so many lives by the powerful, suffocating evil of homophobia. So many lives. Sometimes I start to imagine how much accumulated human pain has been inflicted for so many centuries on so many gay hearts and souls, and then I stop. It's too much. We are slowly healing; but some wounds will never heal; and they are inscribed on the souls of millions in the past - the ones who persecuted, the ones who suffered, the ones who never let themselves be loved - or saw it briefly once, feared it and lived their lives in the lengthening shadow of their regrets. Yes, these were souls whose backs were broken. And now a new generation stands up.
Oh, my.

Posted by: Slublog on December 21, 2005 02:11 PM

Slublog, I dug this one:

The insular quality of American life reinforces a stubborn naïveté about sexual matters that's been part of our national character from the outset. The hermetic communities pictured in Brokeback Mountain illustrate sociologist Kai T. Erikson's findings in Wayward Puritans (1966)—that American communities have always defined themselves in terms of who doesn't belong in them. The deviant, whether religious, political, or sexual, has always needed to be identified from among the existing population, then exterminated or expelled. The expunged have tended to found their own little territories, which in turn establish their identities by driving out the unorthodox—who have to be invented if they don't already exist. (Slaves, of course, were imported, and assigned a negative status as legitimate inhabitants.) From the days of the Massachusetts Bay Colony to the present, American exceptionalism begins on the microcosmic level. In this respect, Brokeback Mountain is a pungent slice of an essentially unchanging reality.

That's not the *only* pungent slice in that review.

BTW, for a refreshing rejoinder to Gary Indiana's piece, read this review on National Review Online (i.e., that's where Allah seems to have found the Village Voice review).

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 21, 2005 02:12 PM

Slublog-- Excitable Andy is blocked here at work (smartest thing the Pentagon's ever done).

Care to cut and paste that whole review into a comment, eff with Ace's server?

Thanks,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 21, 2005 02:14 PM

It's not that long, to be honest...

BROKEBACK: I saw it last night. Maybe my hopes were too high, but the movie didn't quite sustain itself for the time it took, I felt. The short story accomplished it all with more concision and thereby with more punch. But the movie, as you'd expect with Ang Lee, had enormous integrity. Heath Ledger was magnificent in his indirection - this was a rare movie in which the anguish of the outwardly conforming, "straight-acting" gay man was exposed in all its raw pain. Three scenes remain in my mind. There's a shot after the two men leave each other for the first time when Ennis [Ledger] stays upright and walks nonchalantly as his lover drives away. But then, as soon as his beloved is out of sight, he collapses in emotional pain, punching a wall in agony, even then having to deflect the suspicion of a stranger. The moment when they reunite - its passion, its need, its depth - ravishes with insight into what love truly is. Then there's the scene when Ennis' wife finally confronts him - and you can see the damage done to so many lives by the powerful, suffocating evil of homophobia. So many lives. Sometimes I start to imagine how much accumulated human pain has been inflicted for so many centuries on so many gay hearts and souls, and then I stop. It's too much. We are slowly healing; but some wounds will never heal; and they are inscribed on the souls of millions in the past - the ones who persecuted, the ones who suffered, the ones who never let themselves be loved - or saw it briefly once, feared it and lived their lives in the lengthening shadow of their regrets. Yes, these were souls whose backs were broken. And now a new generation stands up.

Posted by: Slublog on December 21, 2005 02:20 PM
Shit, Allah-- that Village Voice review you linked is full of *priceless* quotes. I haven't read bullshit that pretentious in a long, long time.

Yeah, he's been writing for the Voice for years; that piece is very much par for the course. People like him, Larry Kramer, Tony Kushner, and the rest of the radical-queer movement are bound to hate the movie because, in their opinion, it doesn't go nearly far enough. Too much love, not enough glory-holing -- that's how you'd really shock the red states.

Re: Sullivan's review --

It's too much. We are slowly healing; but some wounds will never heal

I already told Ace, that sentence sounds like Andy finally committing entirely to grievance culture. Like Ace says, Sullivan thinks he'll never be "fully free" until we straight boys come to respect gayness in all its many splendors. Legal equality isn't enough. As I read today's post, though, it sounds like he's gone beyond that point, even. Now he's saying there's no way we can ever balance the ledger. Whatever we do, whatever concessions we make, we as a society will owe him in perpetuity.

How soon before he starts talking about reparations?

Posted by: Allah on December 21, 2005 02:21 PM

The Village Voice review is pretty fkn offensive.

Posted by: on December 21, 2005 02:21 PM

Ace, Allah, and All the Straight Boyz will never bend over! Nevah!

Posted by: on December 21, 2005 02:23 PM

Reparations? Wasn't Will and Grace enough?

Posted by: Slublog on December 21, 2005 02:26 PM

Thanks, Slub. It's funny to read that, as it's pretty accurate, yet. . . off. Like, reality seen through rose-colored (or, gay-colored) glasses.

BTW, if I may spoil something for all five people here who will actually bother seeing the film, where Sully writes:

"The moment when they reunite - its passion, its need, its depth - ravishes with insight into what love truly is."

That's the moment when Ennis grabs Jack and kisses him in an alley underneath his apartment window. . . right in plain daylight view of his wife watching above. The same Ennis that is made throughout the whole movie, before and after, as cautious and timid in dealing with all of this. Yet, all of a sudden, he throws all of that to the wind in order to make out with Jack in broad fucking daylight in front of his own home?!? Riiiight. Totally fucking preposterous moment there.

Although, Ennis's wife's reaction was totally real: she decided to keep things quiet and not complain "for the children." If only Ennis had bothered to have that same reaction, perhaps he wouldn't have found true love, but at least he'd have been there for his kids (kids the movie takes pains to portray as having turned out all right-- sure, uh-huh, I believe that).

Shit, the more I think about this movie, the more of a crock it is. I'm thinking we just may be down to 2 1/2 stars.

If only Anne Hathaway had showed her breasts for longer than one flippin' second. . .

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 21, 2005 02:27 PM

Reparations! Lol, I thought the same thing, Allah.

It's like Andrew pulled a Shirley Maclaine and channeled a 18th Century soldier named William who couldn't declare his love (ass-love, that is) for his fellow soldier, Mortimer. O the pain!

Posted by: Bart at Bareback Mountin' on December 21, 2005 02:33 PM
The hermetic communities pictured in Brokeback Mountain illustrate sociologist Kai T. Erikson's findings in Wayward Puritans (1966)—that American communities have always defined themselves in terms of who doesn't belong in them. The deviant, whether religious, political, or sexual, has always needed to be identified from among the existing population, then exterminated or expelled. The expunged have tended to found their own little territories, which in turn establish their identities by driving out the unorthodox—who have to be invented if they don't already exist.
Unintentional self-evisceration never got more obvious.
Posted by: someone on December 21, 2005 02:40 PM

Real cowboys are not gay this is just how low hollywood has gotten no wonder its losing money and viewers

Posted by: spurwing plover on December 21, 2005 02:51 PM

Comma Splice, meet Spurwing.
Spurwing, this is Comma Splice.
I trust you two can find something to talk about.

Posted by: Bart on December 21, 2005 02:54 PM

Don't pick on our next President, Bart.

Election 2008: It don't mean a thing if you don't vote for Spurwing.

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on December 21, 2005 03:48 PM

If only Anne Hathaway had showed her breasts for longer than one flippin' second. . .

Wait a minute, now: Anne Hathaway shows her breasts?

Posted by: Ralphie on December 21, 2005 03:52 PM

Dave, you should review Total Eclipse, with Leonard DiCapprio. It's right up your alley, man.

Posted by: on December 21, 2005 03:55 PM

Yup, Ralphie. But just for a moment.

Save yourself the time and rent her movie "Havoc" instead-- longer nudity. Or, better yet, just search for the clips on INTERNET.

Hey, free porn is always the best kind.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 21, 2005 04:04 PM

Everybody always complains about gay threads, but what gets fifty or more comments every time?

Damn, you're all homos.

Posted by: adolfo velasquez on December 21, 2005 04:10 PM

Oh, be quiet and give me a kiss.

Posted by: Slublog on December 21, 2005 04:11 PM

Election 2008: It don't mean a thing if you don't vote for Spurwing.

lol!

Posted by: on December 21, 2005 04:16 PM

Save yourself the time and rent her movie "Havoc" instead-- longer nudity. Or, better yet, just search for the clips on INTERNET.

Thanks for the heads up. Putting it on the "to do" list for when I get home from work.

Posted by: Ralphie on December 21, 2005 04:57 PM

It's not like this is a "breakthrough" movie. Top Gun was made in like 1986.

Posted by: Kevin on December 21, 2005 05:40 PM

And I find I still have no interest in seeing this movie. The gay cowboy thing was just the primary reason. Take away the gay cowboys and it's still a movie about marital infidelity, which is going to bore me unconscious. I have to endure enough of hearing about such woes in real life. I don't go to the movies to endure the commonplace troubles of fake people. Anne Hathaway could strut around completely nekkid for five minutes and I still wouldn't want to endure the rest. It'll turn up on cable eventually and some site will tell me how far to fast forward for the celebrity flesh.

Some people, women I think they're called, draw great enjoyment from enduring the emotional conflicts of fake people but not me.

Posted by: epobirs on December 21, 2005 05:45 PM

I truly would rather get a prostate exam from Vlad the Impaler than see this, but my inner jerk can't help but laugh at the thought of a theater full of gay guys watching this, weeping like a pregnant woman at an Oprah taping. I know that's fucked up, but Jesus, could Sullivan's gooey histrionics be any more over the top? Hey Andy, Dr Foppish Gay McStereotype called, you're appointment is tomorrow at nine.

Posted by: UGAdawg on December 21, 2005 07:08 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD are joined by Jeff Carter, candidate for NV treasurer, and seasoned finance professional, for a discussion of the issues facing Nevadans, and the larger financial challenges in America.
Few people remember that Norm MacDonald began his career as a ventriloquist
MacDonald's old partner Adam Egot revealed that MacDonald repurposed a bit with one of his ventriloquist dolls -- that he was a "bad guy" who "didn't believe the Holocaust happened" -- for the Norm MacDonald show, in which he claimed Egot didn't believe in the Holocaust.
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Recent Comments
runner: "People elected Massie to chase women, pay them off ..."

NemoMeImpuneLacessit[/i][/b][/u][/s]: "The courts are crooked when they have dealt malici ..."

mikeski: "[i]You have to admire the intellectual somersaults ..."

Joemarine: "NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump won&# ..."

runner: "Troll is comparing an act of a private citizen, to ..."

NemoMeImpuneLacessit[/i][/b][/u][/s]: "Or maybe it’s the ONT: we’re waiting&# ..."

Never Change, Horde: "You have to admire the intellectual somersaults th ..."

NemoMeImpuneLacessit[/i][/b][/u][/s]: "GOPe politicians always make me think of Judge Sma ..."

runner: "Massie is a democrat. ..."

NemoMeImpuneLacessit[/i][/b][/u][/s]: "[i] 261 Some of these so-called Republicans are so ..."

mikeski: "OK, Massie is technically a republican, so that sh ..."

JackStraw : ">>It’s the third domino to tip over in less ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives