Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Three Die Playing Catch With Hand Grenade | Main | French Riots: Opportunistic Jihad After Happenstance Electrocution? »
November 07, 2005

NYT: Fuck the "Absoloute Moral Authority" Of Corporal Starr's Family & Beloved

Gee, I thought the NYT would be pretty consistent as regards the "absolute moral authority" of those closest to the dead of war -- as they said about Cindy Sheehan -- but it turns out they're giving the finger to Corporal Starr's family and girlfriend.

I'm having trouble wrapping my head around this. I'm about to say something crazy; I can't believe I'm going to say it. But just hear me out before judging me, okay?

I am beginning to believe -- and mind you, this is a first-blush reaction -- that the "absolute moral authority" mentioned by Maureen Dowd in the New York Times is in fact a highly selective and not at all "absolute" moral authority, and seems to apply only to left-wing freaks criticizing the war.

Jesus, I'm beginning to doubt my very senses. It's almost incomprehensible to me that this could be true, but... I don't know.

I may have to take a few days off to take stock of the entire situation, as well as my mental stability.


posted by Ace at 03:41 PM
Comments



You could probably save some time by skipping the "mental stability" stock-taking.

Posted by: geoff on November 7, 2005 03:49 PM

I am beginning to believe -- and mind you, this is a first-blush reaction -- that the "absolute moral authority" mentioned by Maureen Dowd in the New York Times is in fact a highly selective and not at all "absolute" moral authority, and seems to apply only to left-wing freaks criticizing the war.

Jesus Ace, that's crazy talk. Soon you'll be, like, doubting Paul Krugman's objectivity or something.

Have a drink or six and think about this, man. You're screwing with the very freakin' fabric of our existence.

Posted by: W on November 7, 2005 03:51 PM

What the NYT did was wrong, but remember Maureen Dowd doesn't speak for the NYT. The moral authority line was hers and not that of the NYT editors. They may share her thinking, but at least they were smart enough to not put it in print.

Posted by: steve sturm on November 7, 2005 03:57 PM

I am shocked... Shocked I tell you....those red shoes do not go with that outfit....oh sorry... you were talking about the war and the so called "media bias".

Honestly Ace, I do not know where you get ideas like that.

Posted by: WunderKraut on November 7, 2005 03:57 PM

Easy does it there, Ace. Breathe; just breathe. We'll explain everything in good time. Here, have some of this nice Koolade meanwhile.

Posted by: Mike on November 7, 2005 04:06 PM

I may have to take a few days off to take stock of the entire situation, as well as my mental stability.

Oh crap, I can see another 5-day Val-U-Rite and butane cocktail binge coming on. Get ready for a long series of drunken, blubbering, incoherent posts, folks. Maybe lauraw and Dr. Symes could take over for a few days.

Posted by: OregonMuse on November 7, 2005 06:16 PM

If anyone has absolute moral authority it's Ace on any matter involving a +5 Flaming Longsword.

He's got the medication in his cabinet to prove it.

Posted by: The Warden on November 7, 2005 06:17 PM

I may have to take a few days off to take stock of the entire situation, as well as my mental stability.

Is it just me, or does this sound suspiciously like something that Andrew Sullivan would say?

Posted by: OregonMuse on November 7, 2005 06:19 PM

Good Lord! Up is down, black is white, cats and dogs will soon be living peacefully together!

Posted by: Sean M. on November 7, 2005 06:22 PM

The New York Pravda is losing readers becuase they are liars i hope FRANK RICH ends up in a homeless shelter

Posted by: spurwing plover on November 7, 2005 08:35 PM

Congratulations, Spurwing. Your grammatical error rate is lower than 50% on that lost posting. Keep up the good work.

Posted by: Bart on November 7, 2005 08:51 PM

. . . on that lost posting

I think all his postings are lost.

Posted by: geoff on November 7, 2005 09:06 PM

Ouch.
That's embarrassing. I will now go back to the corner and never criticize anyone else's grammar.


Posted by: Bart on November 7, 2005 09:12 PM

Ouch. That's embarrassing.

Not embarrassing, just Freudian.

Posted by: geoff on November 7, 2005 09:14 PM

Have you noticed spurwing plover never responds to anything addressed to him/it?
Weird.

Posted by: Knemon on November 7, 2005 09:32 PM

Have you noticed spurwing plover never responds to anything addressed to him/it?

Yes, I've wondered if he's an automated spambot.

Posted by: geoff on November 7, 2005 09:37 PM
Posted by: tubino on November 7, 2005 10:07 PM

He reminds me of that little brother who's... special... and follows in behind you, shouting stuff in a good natured but wholly inappropriate fashion.

He's endearing because he means well. He's just a little... slow... that's all.

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 7, 2005 10:10 PM

I never see spurwing posting within a few seconds of tubby, though.

I question the timing.

Posted by: VRWC Agent on November 7, 2005 10:12 PM

I was talking about spurwing of course, not Tubby, the "older punk brother who thinks everyone hates him because he's too cool and smart, not because he's an obnoxious emotionally-stunted latent homosexual."

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 7, 2005 10:14 PM

given it's tiresome repetition I was thinking autism Sue.

but I don't do this for a living.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 7, 2005 10:23 PM

its

I fucking HATE it when I do that

Posted by: Dave in Grammar School on November 7, 2005 10:24 PM

Tubby is latent? About anything?

Posted by: VRWC Agent on November 8, 2005 12:22 AM

he's an obnoxious emotionally-stunted latent homosexual."

Unable to control outbursts. Random injection of profanity. Symptoms of Obsessive-Compulsive disorder. Socially marginalized because of his behavior. I'm going with Tourettes Syndrome and that's my final answer. Tubby Tourette.

Posted by: JackStraw on November 8, 2005 08:18 AM

SPEEN BEETCHESS!

Do any of you have an answer for me?

Can any of you wingers answer this? DIDN'T THINK SO.

Knock this battery off my shoulder!! I DOUBLE DOG DARE YOU!!

How predictable you all are.

Posted by: Itty Bitty Tube on November 8, 2005 11:41 AM

I'm going with Tourettes Syndrome and that's my final answer.

Two more symptoms:

He doesn't read his own sources and links, so he's lazy or unable to focus long enough to apprehend more than the titles; and he doesn't remember prior threads very well, including his own comments.

I think it's ADHD Tourettes for our prolific, but research-challenged, friend.

Posted by: geoff on November 8, 2005 12:01 PM

Asperger Syndrome. Autism that can type.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 8, 2005 12:08 PM

As for Spurwing Plover, he's been posting for years under the name Dick (Great Auk) Short at various conservative sites, but also at a Pokemon site. Looks like he lives in Etna, CA.

Posted by: geoff on November 8, 2005 01:15 PM

I find him biting, yet insightful.

Posted by: Ned Pepper on November 8, 2005 01:18 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD are joined by Jeff Carter, candidate for NV treasurer, and seasoned finance professional, for a discussion of the issues facing Nevadans, and the larger financial challenges in America.
Few people remember that Norm MacDonald began his career as a ventriloquist
MacDonald's old partner Adam Egot revealed that MacDonald repurposed a bit with one of his ventriloquist dolls -- that he was a "bad guy" who "didn't believe the Holocaust happened" -- for the Norm MacDonald show, in which he claimed Egot didn't believe in the Holocaust.
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Recent Comments
Biff Pocoroba: "He's reportedly threatened to call a snap election ..."

Skip: "Good afternoon Ace and everyone ..."

San Franpsycho: "Senator Rand Paul @SenRandPaul 4h 🚨 CI ..."

TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "Fauci did nothing wrong. Pardon outside should ..."

Oldcat: "Word on the street is that the SNP is tabling a No ..."

TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "317 Starmer is Nero fiddling. He’s Punch and ..."

Thanatopsis: "Nood ..."

runner: "He's reportedly threatened to call a snap election ..."

LASue: "Class action lawsuit? ..."

Cow Demon: "he is going now Posted by: runner at May 13, 2026 ..."

Thanatopsis: "Nooding ..."

Vengeance : "Starmer is Nero fiddling. He’s Punch and Jud ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives