Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Three Die Playing Catch With Hand Grenade | Main | French Riots: Opportunistic Jihad After Happenstance Electrocution? »
November 07, 2005

NYT: Fuck the "Absoloute Moral Authority" Of Corporal Starr's Family & Beloved

Gee, I thought the NYT would be pretty consistent as regards the "absolute moral authority" of those closest to the dead of war -- as they said about Cindy Sheehan -- but it turns out they're giving the finger to Corporal Starr's family and girlfriend.

I'm having trouble wrapping my head around this. I'm about to say something crazy; I can't believe I'm going to say it. But just hear me out before judging me, okay?

I am beginning to believe -- and mind you, this is a first-blush reaction -- that the "absolute moral authority" mentioned by Maureen Dowd in the New York Times is in fact a highly selective and not at all "absolute" moral authority, and seems to apply only to left-wing freaks criticizing the war.

Jesus, I'm beginning to doubt my very senses. It's almost incomprehensible to me that this could be true, but... I don't know.

I may have to take a few days off to take stock of the entire situation, as well as my mental stability.


posted by Ace at 03:41 PM
Comments



You could probably save some time by skipping the "mental stability" stock-taking.

Posted by: geoff on November 7, 2005 03:49 PM

I am beginning to believe -- and mind you, this is a first-blush reaction -- that the "absolute moral authority" mentioned by Maureen Dowd in the New York Times is in fact a highly selective and not at all "absolute" moral authority, and seems to apply only to left-wing freaks criticizing the war.

Jesus Ace, that's crazy talk. Soon you'll be, like, doubting Paul Krugman's objectivity or something.

Have a drink or six and think about this, man. You're screwing with the very freakin' fabric of our existence.

Posted by: W on November 7, 2005 03:51 PM

What the NYT did was wrong, but remember Maureen Dowd doesn't speak for the NYT. The moral authority line was hers and not that of the NYT editors. They may share her thinking, but at least they were smart enough to not put it in print.

Posted by: steve sturm on November 7, 2005 03:57 PM

I am shocked... Shocked I tell you....those red shoes do not go with that outfit....oh sorry... you were talking about the war and the so called "media bias".

Honestly Ace, I do not know where you get ideas like that.

Posted by: WunderKraut on November 7, 2005 03:57 PM

Easy does it there, Ace. Breathe; just breathe. We'll explain everything in good time. Here, have some of this nice Koolade meanwhile.

Posted by: Mike on November 7, 2005 04:06 PM

I may have to take a few days off to take stock of the entire situation, as well as my mental stability.

Oh crap, I can see another 5-day Val-U-Rite and butane cocktail binge coming on. Get ready for a long series of drunken, blubbering, incoherent posts, folks. Maybe lauraw and Dr. Symes could take over for a few days.

Posted by: OregonMuse on November 7, 2005 06:16 PM

If anyone has absolute moral authority it's Ace on any matter involving a +5 Flaming Longsword.

He's got the medication in his cabinet to prove it.

Posted by: The Warden on November 7, 2005 06:17 PM

I may have to take a few days off to take stock of the entire situation, as well as my mental stability.

Is it just me, or does this sound suspiciously like something that Andrew Sullivan would say?

Posted by: OregonMuse on November 7, 2005 06:19 PM

Good Lord! Up is down, black is white, cats and dogs will soon be living peacefully together!

Posted by: Sean M. on November 7, 2005 06:22 PM

The New York Pravda is losing readers becuase they are liars i hope FRANK RICH ends up in a homeless shelter

Posted by: spurwing plover on November 7, 2005 08:35 PM

Congratulations, Spurwing. Your grammatical error rate is lower than 50% on that lost posting. Keep up the good work.

Posted by: Bart on November 7, 2005 08:51 PM

. . . on that lost posting

I think all his postings are lost.

Posted by: geoff on November 7, 2005 09:06 PM

Ouch.
That's embarrassing. I will now go back to the corner and never criticize anyone else's grammar.


Posted by: Bart on November 7, 2005 09:12 PM

Ouch. That's embarrassing.

Not embarrassing, just Freudian.

Posted by: geoff on November 7, 2005 09:14 PM

Have you noticed spurwing plover never responds to anything addressed to him/it?
Weird.

Posted by: Knemon on November 7, 2005 09:32 PM

Have you noticed spurwing plover never responds to anything addressed to him/it?

Yes, I've wondered if he's an automated spambot.

Posted by: geoff on November 7, 2005 09:37 PM
Posted by: tubino on November 7, 2005 10:07 PM

He reminds me of that little brother who's... special... and follows in behind you, shouting stuff in a good natured but wholly inappropriate fashion.

He's endearing because he means well. He's just a little... slow... that's all.

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 7, 2005 10:10 PM

I never see spurwing posting within a few seconds of tubby, though.

I question the timing.

Posted by: VRWC Agent on November 7, 2005 10:12 PM

I was talking about spurwing of course, not Tubby, the "older punk brother who thinks everyone hates him because he's too cool and smart, not because he's an obnoxious emotionally-stunted latent homosexual."

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 7, 2005 10:14 PM

given it's tiresome repetition I was thinking autism Sue.

but I don't do this for a living.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 7, 2005 10:23 PM

its

I fucking HATE it when I do that

Posted by: Dave in Grammar School on November 7, 2005 10:24 PM

Tubby is latent? About anything?

Posted by: VRWC Agent on November 8, 2005 12:22 AM

he's an obnoxious emotionally-stunted latent homosexual."

Unable to control outbursts. Random injection of profanity. Symptoms of Obsessive-Compulsive disorder. Socially marginalized because of his behavior. I'm going with Tourettes Syndrome and that's my final answer. Tubby Tourette.

Posted by: JackStraw on November 8, 2005 08:18 AM

SPEEN BEETCHESS!

Do any of you have an answer for me?

Can any of you wingers answer this? DIDN'T THINK SO.

Knock this battery off my shoulder!! I DOUBLE DOG DARE YOU!!

How predictable you all are.

Posted by: Itty Bitty Tube on November 8, 2005 11:41 AM

I'm going with Tourettes Syndrome and that's my final answer.

Two more symptoms:

He doesn't read his own sources and links, so he's lazy or unable to focus long enough to apprehend more than the titles; and he doesn't remember prior threads very well, including his own comments.

I think it's ADHD Tourettes for our prolific, but research-challenged, friend.

Posted by: geoff on November 8, 2005 12:01 PM

Asperger Syndrome. Autism that can type.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 8, 2005 12:08 PM

As for Spurwing Plover, he's been posting for years under the name Dick (Great Auk) Short at various conservative sites, but also at a Pokemon site. Looks like he lives in Etna, CA.

Posted by: geoff on November 8, 2005 01:15 PM

I find him biting, yet insightful.

Posted by: Ned Pepper on November 8, 2005 01:18 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD have a short chat about Iran, the disgusting SAVE Act theater, Mamdani's politicizing of St. Patrick's Day, and more!
Recent Comments
CharlieBrown'sDildo: "center-blob. [i] Posted by: Weasel at March 29, ..."

mindful webworker - blows the dog whistle: "NOOD ONT https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=419101 ..."

Tonypete: "Good evening good people. ..."

four seasons: " Hello All! ..."

Puddleglum, cheer up for the worst is yet to come: "Evenin' ..."

mindful webworker - on the dot: "You had to be there. Or were you? ..."

Weasel: "Posted by: Sam Adams at March 29, 2026 09:57 PM (X ..."

mindful webworker - on the dot: "Terror From The Year 5000! Not 4999. Not 5001. ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "Compared to the PPK, the Beretta 80 series guns ho ..."

toby928(c) : "[i]You do you, man. But that sounds like a dangero ..."

vmom deport deport deport: "My vision sucks I probably need the kind of sight ..."

Sam Adams: "Really appreciate the help. If I focus on the sigh ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives