Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Christmas in Cambodia: The Bleeding Edge of the Attack on Kerry's Truthfulness | Main | Top Ten Kerry Answers to Question, "Were You In Cambodia, or Not?" »
August 11, 2004

Schroedinger's Candidate

And now Kerry is displaying his characteristic Gallic nuance on the rather binary, yes-or-no question of whether or not he was actually in Cambodia, as he has frequently, stridently, resume-paddingly alleged.

Was he in Cambodia? His answer is the same as to the questions, "Would you have gone to war with Iraq?" or "Do you support gay marriage?"

Sort of yes, but not really, although in a way yes, but also no. Yes, for all helpful political purposes; but no, to the extent "yes" might be used against me politically.

"Nuance" over policy questions is one thing. "Nuance" over yes-or-no historical facts completely within his competency to answer is another thing.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: The Liberal Spirit Squad in the media is aiding and abetting John Forbes Kerry's political need to have it both ways on every question, one way to appeal to moderates, another way entirely to appeal to his Howard Dean lovin' leftist base.

He may be the first presidential candidate in American history to exist on a quantum level. As the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle informs us, the exact position of a nuclear particle cannot be absolutely determined; it exists in a wide range of positions at once, a probablistic "cloud" of multiple and varied positions rather than a single definable state.

Determining where Kerry falls on a position at any moment is much like attempting to pin down the exact location of an electron. Like an electron, he manages to be many places at once, and it is beyond the ken of mortal minds to plum its quantum mysteries.

And like an electron, the actual act of measuring his position actually changes his position, moment to moment. A reading on Kerry's position when he's on television will not be the same reading observed when he's delivering a speech to a liberal organization.


posted by Ace at 03:28 PM
Comments



believe he has corrected the record to say it was some place near Cambodia he is not certain whether it was in Cambodia...

But he previously had the "seared" memory of being five miles across the Cambodian border.

Pretty exact statement for someone who had a "mistaken recollection."

Posted by: Nicholas Kronos on August 11, 2004 03:41 PM

I like the corrected title. It doesn't quite match up with your uncertainty principle analogy, but it sounds much better.

Posted by: Sobek on August 11, 2004 03:44 PM

It also occurs to me that since Kerry wasn't actually in Cambodia, whichever President--Johnson, Nixon, Bush(?)--who denied he was there was, well, telling the truth.

Posted by: Nicholas Kronos on August 11, 2004 03:56 PM

"resume-paddingly alleged"

Ha!

I like the quantum Kerry explication too. It fits. The more closely you examine him, the more he changes.

Oh, yeah. Does nuanced mean liar in French or Latin or something?

Posted by: rdbrewer on August 11, 2004 04:05 PM

I love the Heisenberg/Kerry principle. LOL funny.
That's why I come through this space often...
Keep it going

Posted by: Chris on August 11, 2004 04:11 PM

Sorry to revisit the 'he's stoopid' political meme that we are all tired of, but Kerry is an idiot.

Telling complete falsehoods during a presidential campaign. Not just lying about how something happened, but making shit up from whole cloth.

When he drops one of these whoppers, do his aides smack themselves upside the head, as they should?

And then his complete inability to pull an Al Gore (also a prolific liar on the campaign trail) and claim to be misquoted, or say 'I exaggerated,' or reconcile what he said with something mildly truthful mumbled out the side of his mouth.

Sigh.
Anybody But Bush??? Are you sure about that wish, loonie-moonies? Because if anybody's STOOPID, its your boy, not ours.

Posted by: lauraw on August 11, 2004 04:11 PM

I'd prefer an anology to the Pauli exclusion principle because it's easier to work in the concept of spin (and to use the name Wolfgang without irony, truth be told).

In any case, I wanna be there when JeffinK's wave function finally collapses.

Hey MSM, open the damn box already.


Posted by: SmugWump on August 11, 2004 04:13 PM

I agree with Laura that there's more evidence Kerry isn't the deep-thinking intellectual than that he is.

I mean, it's not obvious to me that his intellect is vastly superior to Bush's.

Posted by: Nicholas Kronos on August 11, 2004 04:59 PM

Oh my! Sounds a lot like Schroedinger's cat. You never know if it's alive 'til you open the box.

Posted by: Tarheel on August 11, 2004 11:45 PM

What an awesome title for a post! The half-life of the "war hero" meme....does it decay before we open the ballot box?

Posted by: cthulhu on August 12, 2004 01:47 AM

On some planet earth somewhere in the multiverse, Kerry actually did cross into Cambodia. He probably just switched places with the alternate John Kerry in an terrible quantum-level accident in Al Gore's lab during the development of the internet.

Posted by: Mark on August 12, 2004 02:05 AM

Evan over at Brain Terminal posted this analogy a while back. Not that I'm accusing you of stealing ideas, Wonkace.

Posted by: Joe R. on August 12, 2004 02:07 AM

By jove Ace! I think you've managed to finally hit on the reason that Kerry is able to take all sides of every issue! He is living proof of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle! At every point where we mere mortals have to choose one reality and stick with it, John Frickin' Kerry can actually spin off multiple universes with each nuance of position he takes! He was both in Cambodia AND in Sa Dec on Christmass eve 1968. He was getting shot at by friendly troops AND by the as yet barely extant Khmer Rouge at the same time. His memory was seared, seared mind you, by Nixon lying about troops in Cambodia AND his brain was baked by good pot and bad acid. He dumped Rassman in the water by gunning his boat in panic when he heard the mine AND picked him up under fire during a silver star winning performance of courage. See, it's not about what the meaning of "in" is, it's about whether you are viewing him as a particle or a wave form. And I think that distinction depends on whether you are drinking a vodka martini while grilling eggplant and veal or washing down peote with Mescal and piclked worms.

Posted by: Dacotti on August 12, 2004 02:28 AM

The quantum foam of Kerry's brain is made up of tiny bits of string vibrating in 11 dimensions. The tiny, curled up, extra dimensions are what allowed the Kerry probability wave to exist in Cambodia when he was clearly not. You people have got to stop thinking in three dimensions. The during Christmas part also confuses many Republicans that think of time as a linear function, myself included. We must remember that space-time is relative to the observer's position and velocity.

Posted by: Kingslasher on August 12, 2004 07:12 AM

Dammit, you're right. That's how he was able to know that Nixon would lie about Cambodia 3 years before he actually did so in our own space-time continum. He's not just a walking, talking worm, he's a walking, talking worm hole! Think of the benefits of having a president with prescient vision though. The Dems are really dropping the ball not using this information in their strategy.

Posted by: Dacotti on August 12, 2004 09:15 AM

(slaps forehead with a roast beef sandwich)

OYVIN!!!

Posted by: lauraw on August 12, 2004 11:12 AM

Killed another thread. Yessss

Carving another notch on my mousepad.

Posted by: lauraw on August 12, 2004 09:59 PM

Stretching the analogy a litle further

The uncertainty principle doesn't state that you can not absolutely pin down the position of a particle

But that if you do find it's exact position you would not be able to measure its momentum

which in laymans terms means you won't know where it's coming from or going to

Posted by: konshtok on August 14, 2004 06:07 AM

Schroedinger's Plan: You can't see it until he opens the box after November.

Posted by: PJS on August 14, 2004 01:25 PM

Although you cannot simultaneously know the position and direction of the Kerry Particle, nonetheless its wave function has local maxima in the near vicinity of the Francium nucleus and Martha's Vineyard. Wendy's, on the other hand, is definitely a local minimum.

Posted by: PJS on August 14, 2004 01:59 PM

Science. BAH!

Posted by: lauraw on August 15, 2004 12:47 PM

I'm with you, LauraW. Who needs science, when you have emotion?

Posted by: Sobek on August 15, 2004 09:43 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Recent Comments
m: "from Genius lyrics; on Portal - Still Alive: Th ..."

clarence: "Guten morgen, horde. ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: " Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, Can ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "The penalty of a long nap. ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, Can' ..."

m: " Portal - Still Alive Look at me, still talkin ..."

m: "A trifecta, of sorts! ..."

m: "w00t ..."

Skip: "TECH THREAD IS NOOD ..."

clarence: "!! ..."

Skip: "G'Day everyone ..."

m: "Pixy's up! ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives