Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Our "Mainstream" Judiciary | Main | Finally: Cheney Cites Hussein-Al Qaeda Ties »
June 14, 2004

Graphic Video: Iraqi Insurgent Meets the USMC

Warning: Very graphic. Not gory per se, but it does show someone being killed in battle.


Welcome to the party, pal.

I don't know if I should be linking this. But I found it compelling. It's macabre, but it's war.

Keep track of the number of bullets fired on this guy. I saw only two or three. No one pours gunfire over the scenery.

Our boys have elite-class fire-discipline. It's something to remember, the next time some pro-terrorist cocksucker starts screaming about collateral damage.

Caution about the link. The link itself just brings up the video. However, it's coming from Ogrish.com, a very work-unfriendly site that specializes in grotesque and violent videos. (Possibly sex, too; I don't know.)

Found on Free Republic.

posted by Ace at 05:33 PM
Comments



Lesson to be learned:

a) Never play with rocket launchers.

b) The middle of a road does not afford cover.

c) Don't fuck with American soldiers.

d) All of the above.

Posted by: rdbrewer on June 14, 2004 05:53 PM

Time to crank up the Queen (just for you, Andrew Sullivan). *Thump* *thump* *thump*...

Posted by: Smack on June 14, 2004 06:17 PM

Most excellent killing of Iraqi moron!

Posted by: Rivet_Gun on June 14, 2004 06:43 PM

This is off-topic, but there's a story on cnn.com right now entitled "Is the Job Market Healthy or Just Less Sick?"

The writer actually has the gall to point out the cowbell-worthy numbers (while pointing, of course, to the fact that the new jobs are shameful and humiliating jobs, rather than sleek, high-paying jobs with few hours for recent journalism graduates who spent four years at undergrad getting high and playing X-Box).

I think the key quote is "administration critics are not impressed." Gasp! If GWB started pooping gold and handing it out to minorities and Somali orphans, they still wouldn't be impressed. Nothing impresses an administration critic. What impresses me, however, is that the media have finally started mentioning the cowbell (even while pointing out how it doesn't count, or at least it shouldn't count for W).

Posted by: Aaron on June 14, 2004 06:56 PM

Not to be a bitch, but there's really nothing "excellent" about a guy getting hosed by rifle fire. I'm not going to lose sleep over it, but crowing over some damnfool getting shot to death just ain't that classy, folks.

Posted by: Bravo Romeo Delta on June 14, 2004 07:02 PM

sorry BRD, but it is always most excellent to see an enemy lit up>one less moron to light your guys up. The only thing better would be seeing them wasted in numbers the mind cannot comprehend, the old "stacked like cordwood" simily. If one muses on the big moral debates one is dead. So I'm am sorry you don't agree but that was a most excellent killing of an Iraqi moron and the US soldiers he had decided to kill that day get to go home. My only question is why were there no snipers to take out anyone who came to his aid? And he also was not "hosed". That was supreme fire discipline, it looks like he was hit by three rounds and once he was down, firing ceased. "Hosing" is a whole different bundle of laundry and has it's place if fire suppresion is your objective.

Posted by: Rivet_Gun on June 14, 2004 07:22 PM

It's true that there's nothing joyful about someone having to die. In fact, it's downright depressing that this stuff has to happen. But this man chose the course of life that led to this end and he bears the responsibility for it.

Posted by: Smack on June 14, 2004 07:37 PM

It's gruesome and unfortunate, but he caused it, and he died quick.

I only saw two shots.

Posted by: rdbrewer on June 14, 2004 07:47 PM

Rivet, perhaps I've failed to communicate my point effectively.

There's nothing particularly joyful in someone getting shot and killed. Full stop.

I don't lament his death, and I'm not a big quivering mass of agony over the fact. Anymore than I would be to see a boil being lanced.

Personally, I am rather glad to know that if the outcome of his actions was his imminent demise, that it was quick and none of our guys got hurt in the process (from the looks of it, he never got the round off).

But doing the happy dance over it strikes me as being in poor taste.

[NB - I apologize for the term 'hosed' as I think 'wasted' or something else would have been more appropriate. I do agree that his opponents had incredible fire discipline.]

Posted by: Bravo Romeo Delta on June 14, 2004 07:55 PM

Good use of firepower; it's a shame he had to die but it beat all the alternatives; full stop.

About right, BRD? If so, we agree.

Posted by: Patton on June 14, 2004 08:05 PM

Patton,

Roger that.

Posted by: Bravo Romeo Delta on June 14, 2004 08:08 PM

If BRD is a military man, I wouldn't want to question him too much on this issue.

But from my point of view, I'm happy the man is dead. I'm happy when all of our enemies are killed. I don't see why I should pretend otherwise.

I suppose from a purely social-convention perspective one should be careful about celebrating the death of another human being. I wouldn't argue too stridently that "honesty" is the more important that a decent, if somewhat artificial, regard for human life.

Still, if I'm being honest, I'm glad he's dead, and I'm glad every time more people like him share in his fate.

If I'm forced to, I'll preface that with the usual I'm-sorry-it's-come-to-this caveats. And I guess I am sorry that it's come to this.

But it has come to this, and I don't see anything especially outrageous about proclaiming that, in all honesty, the world is a better place because this man was killed.

Posted by: ace on June 14, 2004 08:59 PM

Ace:

I think that's a sentiment generally shared. But there's a line between being happy that "an emeny who wanted to kill our troops has died" and being happy that "that particular misguided and worthless piece of crap" is dead.

I think there is, anyway. As a result, I try very hard to separate him from the bucket of bastards from which he emanated. Sometimes, I even succeed.

Posted by: Patton on June 14, 2004 09:14 PM

I love this thread on so many levels. Most of all because so many liberals would find so utterly disgusting the fact that we're debating the meaning of decency at a level of which they have no comprehension.

Posted by: The Black Republican on June 15, 2004 12:18 AM

What the hell are you idiots moralizing over this? It was funny as hell, be honest! Did you see "Who farted look?" in the Muj's face before the last round plinks him in the head? Priceless! Chalk up one more happy client to the Ft. LeJune "72 Virgins Dating Service"!

Posted by: Swiftsure on June 15, 2004 12:25 AM

I don´t like the idea of us gaping at those pictures. It makes mee feel like being something like the western right-wing version of the people in iraq jumping and cheering on burnt out cars and celebrating the death of the people inside.
Of course, the differnce is quite clear. This person was not innocent at all, he tried to kill american soldiers and it´s a good thing he wasn´t able to succeed.
But i think there´s no way to justify celebrating his death.
It makes me feel kind of uneasy that there are so many people around here who don´t seem to have any problem with this...

Posted by: I don´t know on June 15, 2004 06:31 AM

"Pour some SUGAH on MEEEAAAHH!"
Rock on...that was some dead nuts shootin'.
Looks like he got him right in the 10 circle.

Posted by: sentinel on June 15, 2004 08:33 AM

I look at it this way:

1. From a human perspective it's a shame when any human being gets his/her life cut short.

2. The U.S. is at war.

3. The duty of a soldier in a war is to kill the enemy.

4. I'm an American.

5. I'm proud to be an American and proud of what this country stands for.

6. As an American I hate to see any of our soldiers die, but I honor the ones that give the ultimate sacrifice.

7. In this particular war, the enemy can ONLY win by demoralizing the population of America to such an extent that it chooses to withdraw.

8. Because of 7., all US citizens really are part of the fight even though we're not in uniform and carrying weapons. Our role to to be steadfast and show both our country, the enemy, and the world that we know we can win and that we have the courage to stay in the fight.

9. As an American, in spite of point 1., because of points 2. through 8., I've got no problem watching the video and though I won't dance over the fact that a human being died, I will celebrate the fact that there is now one less person shooting at our armed forces. I will celebrate the fact that there is one less person disrupting the transition. I will celebrate the fact that the enemy can also see a video of just how effectively our armed forces can kill and hope that it will scare the crap out of them. I will celebrate the fact that we are one dead terrorist closer to winning the war.

I think a few Patton quotes might be in order as well:

"May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't."

"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."

"There is only one tactical principle which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wound, death, and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time."

Posted by: on June 15, 2004 08:33 AM

That was me above.

Posted by: Jimmy Page on June 15, 2004 08:35 AM

I guess I think it's much like cutting out a tumor.

Kind of sucks the tumor was there to begin with, glad its gone, but doing an end-zone dance over a now inert mass of tissue is just goofy.

Posted by: Bravo Romeo Delta on June 15, 2004 09:58 AM

How sure are we that this is an American doing the shooting? All we hear is Arabic in the sound, and after it's done, we see some guys in street clothes(obviously Arabic) walking towards the corpse in the street. While all we see is their backs, the way they walk indicate that they're carrying rifles.

Posted by: Xoxotl on June 15, 2004 10:17 AM

It makes me feel kind of uneasy that there are so many people around here who don´t seem to have any problem with this...

Have you fricking got your fingers in your ears? What the hell have we just spent 2 days talking about? Geez.

Posted by: Smack on June 15, 2004 02:42 PM

xoxotl, you sure that's arabic being spoken? sounds like the voice-over is in spanish or some other European language to me.

Posted by: lauraw on June 15, 2004 03:15 PM

Xoxoti....

First off, if you listen closley, the rounds being fired are being fired from a Belgian-made SAW. Secondly, it was a tight semi-automatic three-round burst, which shows supreme fire-control.

The first round hits the Muj in the upper left chest, hence spinning him towards the camera, the seond round lands off to the Muj's right, and slightly behind him; indicating the firer had still not re-adjusted his sighting. In the split-second after the second round, the firer re-adjusts to the targets movemnt, and hit's the Muj in the neck, just below the jaw line.

Towel-heads don't shot that well, that was EX-CELL-ENT Kentucky Windage.

Secondly, the footage was bought from a Free-lancer by Spanish TV, you can see the water-mark in the lower right side.

Posted by: Swiftsure on June 15, 2004 07:45 PM

So you're saying the bullet exited from his back left shoulder area, stopped in mid-air, executed a 90 degree turn, hit the roadway, making another 90 turn before passing through MickyD's for an Egg McMuffin and a decaf?

There were two shots. You were hearing echoes of the reports. A three round burst is almost a constant zip. These shots were fired individually.

Posted by: rdbrewer on June 15, 2004 10:16 PM

Looked like he was being lit up from behind, somewhere to the right of the cameraman, rather than from the front. Shit, if I was the cameraman and the rounds were coming from in front, I'd be on the ground 'cause it looks like a clusterfuck crossfire to me. I concur on the two three-round bursts. I don't have enough experience to discern the type of weapon from its sound. That estimate comes from the video, as too much echo makes it hard to count shots. Two nice, tight groups, tho. If you watch his arm fold up from impact, it definitely folds away from the camera, which suggests it came form behind. Him falling backwards from the initial hit is more a neurological, shock-related reaction rather than being pushed by a bullet. You get shot while in an odd position, you're gonna want to sit down, nice and comfy, and think about the situation for a moment. Notice when he gets hit in the head, it doesn't move an inch--he just drops straight down. So much for the Kennedy conspirators. And this wasn't a skimming strike... it went in his ear, so it traveled the full width of his head, therefore it had the chance to dump as much energy as possible.

Posted by: McGurk on June 15, 2004 11:14 PM

good shooting... any hajji who sits in the middle of the road to shoot deserves to get 'hosed'... i wonder why the fcuking spanish journalists were on the other side filming...

Posted by: niner1whiskey on June 16, 2004 02:41 AM

I think the cameramen and the other guys w/ guns are behind some obstacle, a wall or something. They don't go too far forward and they're just standing there as opposed to hitting the deck. If you're not behind some kind of cover you're gonna be on the ground or running away.

Posted by: Jimmy page on June 16, 2004 07:13 AM

How sure are we that this is an American doing the shooting? All we hear is Arabic in the sound, and after it's done, we see some guys in street clothes(obviously Arabic) walking towards the corpse in the street.

These blast points are too accurate for Sandpeople; only imperial stormtroopers are so precise.

Posted by: rdbrewer on June 16, 2004 10:10 AM

http://s5.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=AE0830ACAE31AF22354E5B05E95EDC33

http://s5.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=4CF6ED1D0DDA82EBAAA467F176D2CEF1

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/video1/C20254.mpg

copy and paste these into your adress bar...Don't show this to an Iraq ;)

Cyaaa

Posted by: Liberator on October 8, 2004 06:27 PM

For those who liked this...there are some great 'links' of dead sons of american bitches. The Iraqi at least was fighting for his freedom, americans are too cowardly to understand the concept any more.

Why not actually fight like men, at least the dead Iraqi wasnt a coward hiding behind machines? Forgotten what it really means to fight for freedom, rather than be told by a bunch of jews what to do, how to think and who to kill?

You guys are pathetic, you are loosing and your 'leaders' wont even tell untill its too late to do any thing but whine about it like you did in Vietnam...gutless bastards.

Some piece of shit said "I'm proud of being an American and what we stand for"... what the hell are you proud of moron? Killing women and children in the name of 'freedom', occupying other countries to 'liberate' them? Or are you too stupid to figure out what your so called troops are really doing in Iraq?

Fighting for freedom, my ass. You brain dead scum deserve the pathetic state your country is getting into... and its only going to get worse so better learn to deal with it. And while youre at it you might as well learn Chinese or maybe Hindi, at least you'll be able to get a job in the future.

Posted by: proud not to be an american on October 2, 2005 12:54 PM

Only morons look for a "fair fight".

Posted by: on October 2, 2005 01:02 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Recent Comments
Thing From Snowy Mountain: "Hadrian: I feel your pain, I'm in Harris County. ..."

ibid: "92 Guinness Draught? Step up your game to the best ..."

Easy the Elder: "Yep, an A-6. https://youtu.be/AF55oyAJDBk ..."

Rosey Grier: "[willowed]: Irradiation works to preserve foods ..."

No Justice for Iryna, No Peace for Charlotte Government: "Worst audiobook to walk to? The Road by Cormac Mc ..."

Mike Hammer, etc., etc.: "Mike Hammer, I think the whole purpose of insuranc ..."

Nova Local: "134 This is the first time we've had to deal with ..."

John F. MacMichael: ""The Unpleasant Profession..." starts when Mr. Hoa ..."

Easy the Elder: "84 There have to be easier and less dangerous ways ..."

Anonymous Rogue in Kalifornistan (ARiK's Phone): "Happy Mother's Day Mom! This year it will be ten y ..."

Emmie -- be strong and courageous!: "This is the first time we've had to deal with an a ..."

Eromero: "Now I have an urge for a Guinness. They go with st ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives