| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
The Week in Woke
In Case You Missed It: Intercepts of Foreign Parties Revealed Ukraine's Plot to Take US Taxpayer Dollars Given To Them By Biden to Illegally Contribute to Biden's Reelection Effort House Rejects Senate Deal Plus: JD Vance Affirms That Ilhan "Omar" Committed Immigration Fraud, Vows to Pursue Her Legally Appeals Court Overrules Activist Leftwing Minnesota Judges, Declares That Illegal Aliens Can Be Held Indefinitely Without Bond While Waiting for Their Deportation Jonathan Turley: Florida Grand Jury May Finally Reveal the Truth of the RussiaGate Criminal Conspiracy -- and Maybe the Consequences, Too Documents: Partisan DC Judge Beryl Howell Had Secret Ex Parte Conversations with Fake Special Counsel Jack Smith Trump Announces He Will Unilaterally Fund DHS and Dares Democrats to Sue to Stop Him; Republican Senators Offer Democrats Deal, and Democrat Senators Accept THE MORNING RANT: Illegally Logged Wood for Wind Energy is Deforesting the Amazon Rainforest Mid-Morning Art Thread The Morning Report — 3/27/26 Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
|
« Brain Candy: Scientists Work On Pill To Reduce Emotional Trauma |
Main
| Jack Bauer, Thug-Life Anti-Hero »
January 15, 2006
Playoffs ThreadPittsburgh looking good. Woot! posted by Ace at 02:55 PM
CommentsFrom your previous predictions, it looks like you're trying to jinx 'em... Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 03:15 PM
Looks like Indy fans are going to need that "Pill To Reduce Emotional Trauma" from the last thread. Posted by: TallDave on January 15, 2006 03:19 PM
The Steelers actually showed up with some game! Posted by: Monty on January 15, 2006 03:22 PM
Very ballsy play going for it on 4th down. Just when Manning has some momentum on his side, the game is paused for the kid's contest winners. Posted by: Bart on January 15, 2006 03:23 PM
Polamalu! Wish we had a guy like him. Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 03:52 PM
Ha! Nice job by the NFL trying to fix the game. Won't work. Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 03:56 PM
Your Welcome. Posted by: The Ref on January 15, 2006 03:56 PM
That was some buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuulshiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit.. Wow, how much did Manning pay the ref for that crap? Posted by: Bremelow on January 15, 2006 03:59 PM
Still, ya gotta admit those were some nice passes in that drive! Posted by: Enas Yorl on January 15, 2006 04:04 PM
who woke up the Colts? Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 15, 2006 04:04 PM
Wow, the Colts might "win" this game. Total f'in outrage. Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 04:08 PM
This is becoming a real nailbiter. Posted by: Brass on January 15, 2006 04:09 PM
Of course, why WEREN'T the Steelers blitzing last drive? Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 04:10 PM
Beautiful blitz. Posted by: Slublog on January 15, 2006 04:12 PM
Ruined by a really preventable fumble. Posted by: Slublog on January 15, 2006 04:13 PM
Wtf from Bettis!? Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 04:13 PM
HA!! it ain't over till it's over people. Posted by: Enas Yorl on January 15, 2006 04:14 PM
If Pittsburgh loses this game, Bettis will be the Bill Buckner of the Steelers. Posted by: Slublog on January 15, 2006 04:14 PM
Yup. But the refs will have stolen this one. Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 04:15 PM
If the Steelers lose this, I'm not sure if Bettis or that ref will be the bigger goat. Posted by: paul on January 15, 2006 04:15 PM
Why even run the ball? Posted by: scott on January 15, 2006 04:16 PM
I missed the call - what happened? Posted by: Slublog on January 15, 2006 04:17 PM
Because the Colts had all of their timeouts. Posted by: paul on January 15, 2006 04:17 PM
Hey, come on. Change the channel. Point Last Seen is playing on Lifetime TV right now. It's not like you haven't seen a baseball game before. Seen one, seen 'em all. Now, come on. Give me the remote. Posted by: sandy burger on January 15, 2006 04:17 PM
Hey come on - the Steelers db only held on to the ball for about 5 minutes - that's no where long enough to establish a catch. Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 15, 2006 04:17 PM
Sandy - heh. Wow. That was a bad kick. Posted by: Slublog on January 15, 2006 04:19 PM
YES! That is justice. What's great, is that the Colt kicker likes to talk trash - but what a choke! Posted by: paul on January 15, 2006 04:19 PM
Polamalu cleanly picked Manning, did a roll, and caused himself to fumble with his own knee as he came up. Got his own ball. Initially (correctly) called a pick and fumble (and own recovery), then bizarrely overturned on replay. Manning then led a TD drive. Doesn't matter anyway, Steelers win. Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 04:19 PM
Btw -- how great is Roethlisberger? Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 04:21 PM
Yikes. If the Colts had won under those circumstances, it would had been bad. Why do the morons keep calling time outs? Posted by: Slublog on January 15, 2006 04:22 PM
I've always said: don't bet against Bill Cowher. He might find out, hunt you down, and kill you with his scowl. Posted by: Tim Higgins on January 15, 2006 04:23 PM
WOO HOO! That is about the weirdest second half I have ever seen. On to Denver! Posted by: Michael on January 15, 2006 04:23 PM
It's all about the PANTHERS baby. Chicago has a classy organization BUT the Panthers are gonna give them an uberfloggin today. Posted by: Johnnywaka on January 15, 2006 04:28 PM
Despite the best efforts of the refs, Steelers win....haha awesome game Posted by: brak on January 15, 2006 04:29 PM
Wow, what a game! Posted by: scott on January 15, 2006 04:30 PM
Yeah, I thought the same thing about Manning. He was absolutely right to go for it then, but it is quite unsettling to see that he's really in charge of the team more than Dungy. I'm happy the Steelers won, but visions of a Broncos-Seahawks Super Bowl aren't exactly sending shivers down my spine. Posted by: paul on January 15, 2006 04:33 PM
IIRC Manning calls the plays. Unusual, but not unprecedented. Effing Steelers. I was hoping for a Colts/Seahawks showdown. Then again, none of my teams I followed at the start of the season even made it to the playoffs. Posted by: cranky-d on January 15, 2006 04:34 PM
Ugh. I can't stand Joe Buck. Posted by: harrison on January 15, 2006 04:35 PM
I hate that the top Fox broadcast teams both have Cowturds. Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 04:37 PM
Whoa. Less than a minute in and a touchdown. Posted by: Slublog on January 15, 2006 04:44 PM
Go John Fox go. Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 04:44 PM
BOOOOOO-YAAAAAAH. Posted by: Johnnywaka on January 15, 2006 04:45 PM
Was that the start of the game, or a bitchslap? Posted by: Steve Smith on January 15, 2006 04:47 PM
...don't bet against Bill Cowher. He might find out, hunt you down, and kill you with his scowl. After immobilizing you with his spittle. Holy Crap, what a bogus call on the interception! Posted by: Lipstick on January 15, 2006 04:51 PM
So, are the refs going to try to screw the Panthers too? Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 05:13 PM
BOOOOOOO-YAAAAAAAAAH!!!!! Posted by: on January 15, 2006 05:15 PM
Another totally made up call. Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 05:16 PM
League trying to fix both games today. Nice. Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 05:17 PM
bullshit--bullshit Posted by: on January 15, 2006 05:17 PM
A Panthers/Steelers Superbowl would be ideal. Posted by: Johnnywaka on January 15, 2006 05:37 PM
A Panthers/Steelers Superbowl would be ideal. Brace yourself for disappointment. But I'm sure you'll get just as much enjoyment watching the Broncos. Posted by: geoff on January 15, 2006 05:40 PM
I was rooting for the Steelers, but on the Palumalu non-pick, I can see the refs' reasoning. By rule, IIRC, if the ball is knocked loose by hitting the ground in the process of catching it, it's incomplete. Although Palumalu rolled up with it, it was clear (to me) that the impact with the ground had taken away his control of it; it was only against his hand, not in his hand, like his hand was just with the ball as it was coming free. So, ground caused loss of control in the process of catching it. Not a catch. Posted by: ace on January 15, 2006 06:23 PM
Although there need to be specific sorts of rules about this (because sometimes a team actually wants a "catch" ruled an incomplete, because the receiver subsequently fumbles it away to the other team), I'm kind of a big believer in the basic rule that if it's a catch, you demonstrate that BY HOLDING ON TO THE FRICKIN' BALL THROUGHOUT THE CATCH AND TACKLE, and if you don't, don't go whining about some technical analysis of precisely when you demonstrated possession. Posted by: ace on January 15, 2006 06:28 PM
So, ground caused loss of control in the process of catching it. Not a catch. Are you blind? He had total control of the ball when he caught it and while he was rolling on the ground. His own knee knocked the ball loose while he was coming up, thereby creating the fumble that he recovered. They only showed this about 80 times on the replay. Posted by: Michael on January 15, 2006 07:18 PM
Another total BS call for Chicago. The fix is definitely in. Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 07:23 PM
His own knee knocked the ball loose while he was coming up, thereby creating the fumble that he recovered. They only showed this about 80 times on the replay.Not to mention, even if he DID lose it on the ground, there certainly wasn't "indisputable video evidence" to that effect. Posted by: someone on January 15, 2006 07:34 PM
If this ***ing game goes into overtime and delays the beginning of "24," I am going to be pissed. Posted by: Slublog on January 15, 2006 07:47 PM
"We now join '24', already in progress." Posted by: harrison on January 15, 2006 07:55 PM
I would be in a killing mood if that happened. Posted by: Slublog on January 15, 2006 07:59 PM
24 will be pre-empted and will air already in progress. That's okay, though, it's not like every single minute in 24 is important or anything. Posted by: Bart on January 15, 2006 07:59 PM
Idiots! I don't want commercials or your stupid postgame "analysis." Carolina won, the other team lost. Analysis over. JUST START THE F**CKING SHOW THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO START 8 MINUTES AGO!!!! Posted by: Slublog on January 15, 2006 08:08 PM
Y'all know I'm humble and would never sieze an opportunity to gloat. I blew it on the Patriots, they stunk. My other picks, however,.... A reminder of my earlier predictions: Seattle beats Washington 30-13
Posted by: Bart on January 15, 2006 08:11 PM
Easy, Slub, easy. Posted by: BrewFan on January 15, 2006 08:17 PM
Sorry...breathe...breathe... Have to ask myself, What Would Jack Bauer Do? Probably shoot someone in the kneecaps and scream "THERE ISN'T ENOUGH TIME FOR PROTOCOL!" Posted by: Slublog on January 15, 2006 08:31 PM
Is this the most boring playoffs ever or whut? Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 15, 2006 09:51 PM
I am soooooo sick of announcers giving us the tired old "Grossman's got the whole team behind him!" spiel. I would prefer some frigging completed passes. Hey Seattle, here's a hint: double-cover Smith. Posted by: Dogstar on January 16, 2006 02:30 AM
I don't think so Dave, the only boring one for me this weekend was the Washington game. The 3 others could have gone either way in the 4th quarter. Posted by: scott on January 16, 2006 08:53 AM
Good to see the Pissburgh Cheaters get screwed by the refs. It's good for them to see what it's like. I'm tired of the NFL (No Fair League) playing favorites. Go Broncos, I guess. Posted by: Ken on January 16, 2006 09:51 AM
I don't want that to be the last comment in this thread. Big Ben! Posted by: mary on January 16, 2006 11:12 AM
How about this one? Joey Porter is correct, I wouldn't trust the refs. It's funny though, he doesn't feel that way when they give his team the bs calls. Posted by: Ken on January 16, 2006 12:33 PM
May Jerome Bettis sit on Ken's face. Posted by: Lipstick on January 16, 2006 01:21 PM
Actually Jerome seems like a pretty nice guy, though I've never met him. With that being said, and even though I've been going through a dry spell, I think my face and I will wait in hope that someone better will come a long and sit on it. Posted by: Ken on January 16, 2006 01:57 PM
I think my face and I will wait in hope that someone better will come a long and sit on it. The bad luck for you is that, right now, all the chicks are lining up instead for John Boulton's Moustache... Posted by: Lipstick on January 16, 2006 03:35 PM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)* Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown. A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask). * Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV. Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR. Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him. LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR. Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too. LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others. But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring: "But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said." In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power." I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron. Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring. I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do. But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Batman fires The Batman
Batman is disgusted by the Joachim Phoenix version of Joker Batman tries to fire Superman Batman is still workshopping his Bat-Voice
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please I'm even on knees Makin' love to whoever I please I gotta do it my way Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Sec. Army recognizes ODU Army ROTC cadets for their bravery and sacrifice in private ceremony
[Hat Tip: Diogenes] [CBD]
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter One day I'm gonna get that faculty together Remember that everybody has to wait in line Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD] Recent Comments
illiniwek:
""It wants to 'create a more inclusive museum exper ..."
Hatari somewhere on Ventura Highway: "Real men eat tuna fish for breakfast. Posted by: ..." GigantorX: "ANSWER ME!!!!! ..." Mark Andrew Edwards, buy ammo [/b][/i]: "31 That Othello was definitely a white supremacist ..." Hatari somewhere on Ventura Highway: "We don't speak affirmations here motherfucker ..." Thomas Bender: "Real men eat tuna fish for breakfast. ..." SpeakingOf: "[i]Remember when we used to think that lawyers are ..." GigantorX: "When is an erection "unwanted????" ..." LinusVanPelt : "What’s depressing is the number of people on ..." JackStraw : "The tranny lawyer who lost her shit in court has c ..." Tiger Woods, Blasted Out Of My Mind and Driving: "Most people today under 40 have no idea how a car ..." Aetius451AD work phone: "All Bran? Can't be done. ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|