Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Ahmadnejean Says "Great Event" Is Coming | Main | Satanic Vampire Running For Minn. Governor »
January 13, 2006

Controversial CAP Article: Satire?

Dinesh D'Sousa d'ishes that one of the controversial "racist" article being used against Sam Alito was intended as a satire:

D'Souza worked for CAP from 1983 to 1985, editing CAP's controversial Prospect magazine. He said a number of the Democratic attacks on Samuel Alito were based on falsehoods.

First off, D'Souza says, one of the two stories from Prospect that Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-MA, read this week at the confirmation hearings was intended as a satire.

The 1983 essay "In Defense of Elitism" by Harry Crocker III included this line, read dramatically by Kennedy: "People nowadays just don't seem to know their place. Everywhere one turns blacks and hispanics are demanding jobs simply because they're black and hispanic..."

The essay may not have been funny, D'Souza acknowledges, but Kennedy read from it as if it had been serious instead of an attempt at humor.

"I think left-wing groups have been feeding Senator Kennedy snippets and he has been mindlessly reciting them," D'Souza said. "It was a satire."

It is a little hard to believe that a Princeton alum could possibly write, in seriousness, as late as 1983 that ""People nowadays just don't seem to know their place."


posted by Ace at 12:33 PM
Comments



It's alive...ALIVE!

So, Ace, how was that Latino Transvestite baggage handler or whatever?

Posted by: Biff Boff on January 13, 2006 12:37 PM

Hey, those at the Corner say we're not taking Iran seriously enough on the blogs.

Insert old media joke here.

Posted by: Slublog on January 13, 2006 12:37 PM

I'd really like to read the whole article if it is a Lampoon. That would be quite the post or, at least, quite the link.

Nothing would be more satisfying than to prove that Teddy was spoon fed this blurb by a lefty hack. That issue would have legs enough to walk for two weeks. I smell mad blog money.

Posted by: Biff Boff on January 13, 2006 12:43 PM

Harry Crocker III is the editor of Regency Publications and the author of "Triumph: The Power and the Glory of the Catholic Church.

[Ace, glad to see you back. Remember, there is no shame in loving differently!]

Posted by: Red Jode on January 13, 2006 12:48 PM

I peeked in on the DUmmies this morning. They are still going batshit and spewing every vile insult at Mrs. Alito conspiracy theories galore. I hope these people don't procreate.

Posted by: shawn on January 13, 2006 12:52 PM

I heard a few days ago that the piece was satire. Kennedy is a lunk-headed, self-rightous, hypocritical jerk. I was forced to watch too many hours of the hearings (been sick all week) - it's been added pain to my misery listening to these politicians grandstanding. They ask a question, and have their response pre-written, regardless of Alito (or, as Kennedy calls him "Alioto") says.

Posted by: carin on January 13, 2006 12:56 PM

Here is the whole quote. It isn't good satire, but it quite obviously is satire.

"People nowadays just don't seem to know their place. Everywhere one turns, blacks and Hispanics are demanding jobs simply because they're black and Hispanic. The physically handicapped are trying to gain equal representation in professional sports. And homosexuals are demanding the government vouchsafe them the right to bear children."

Posted by: Brad on January 13, 2006 12:57 PM

When asked to comment, Sen. Kennedy responded "(unintelligible) QUAHGMIAH! (unintelligible) Ruuuurrruuuurrrr (unintelligible) right-wing extremists!"

Posted by: zetetic on January 13, 2006 01:02 PM

Shawn: They do procreate, but they abort the babies before they can be born.

Posted by: cranky-d on January 13, 2006 01:17 PM

Hey, post the whole article, ands let the public be the judge of whether it's satire. The rest of that paragraph gives no indication one way or the other that it was intended as satire, so how are we to know? Trust this guy D'Souza? Why? As fas as I know, he's a RNC shill, or Alito's brother in law.

Posted by: Larry the Urbanite on January 13, 2006 01:38 PM

" so how are we to know? "

You're joking...right?

Read Brad's post above, he highlighted it to make it easier for you.

Posted by: Master of None on January 13, 2006 01:40 PM

Given that D'Souza isn't exactly a "white" male might give you a clue that perhaps this is satire.

Posted by: carin on January 13, 2006 01:47 PM

The rest of that paragraph gives no indication one way or the other that it was intended as satire, so how are we to know?

'vouchsafe', QED

.

Posted by: BumperStickerist on January 13, 2006 01:56 PM

Yet another author who read "A Modest Proposal" in high school and was way more impressed with it than he ought to have been.

Posted by: The Colossus on January 13, 2006 02:41 PM

Kennedy's like one of those public address announcers that gets tricked into paging "Ibin Fahrtin".

Posted by: profligatewaste on January 13, 2006 02:52 PM

Is it just me or does anyone else look at Ted Kennedy and think "Denny Crane" ?

Posted by: Harp on January 13, 2006 03:07 PM

That's a pretty sorry attempt at satire, if you ask me.

But since Alito had nothing to do with it... don't our congress critters have real work to do? Like maybe asking Alito hard questions about his judicial philosophy?

Posted by: sandy burger on January 13, 2006 04:18 PM

Well, granted that its no 50 things to be happy about now that the pope is dead. But few things are.

It will be a test of the new media to see which version gets cemented into the public's mind.

Posted by: joeindc44 on January 13, 2006 04:30 PM

Errr ahhh Judge Alioteetojermaine, am I to understand ahhh errr uhhh that you uhhh *hic* denied one Michael Hunt a job errr ahh as a clerk in your ahhh uhhhh office?

Posted by: Ted Kennedy on January 13, 2006 04:34 PM

"Senator Kennedy's office refused to comment on the report that the article was satire."

"On a related note, Mary Jo Kopechne was unavailable for comment."

Posted by: rls on January 13, 2006 04:48 PM

How long will it take the Dems to discover that they have made an enemy on our now-imperial Supreme Court? By making his wife cry, no less. About as smart as a bucket of warm gravel.

Posted by: dchamil on January 14, 2006 09:56 AM

Carin the fact that D'Souza isn't a White male doesn't make him less of a lap dog for the RNC.
As for Kennedy, it's easy to make fun of the guy at this point in his life. But lets not forget the sacirice his family made fo the country. They could have taken their millions and spent the rest of theirt lives golfing and going to fancy parties in Manhatten. Instead they chose public service. The guy has lost two brothers in the line of service to this country and he is a true liberal icon in my book. I, or no other well meaning American should be ashamed of Ted Kennedy or what he has done for this country.

Posted by: wayne's world on January 15, 2006 12:41 PM

They could have taken their millions and spent the rest of theirt lives golfing and going to fancy parties in Manhatten.

And how would that differ with how Senator "TheHutt" behaves currently?

And while we're at it, you should only reference "one dead brother in the line of service to this country" in the future. One drowned campaign worker cancels out a brother killed by an Arab whackjob in a kitchen if we're going to play the "Absolute Moral Authority" board game with our politicians.

Posted by: on January 15, 2006 12:49 PM

Instead they chose public service.

What did you expect them to do, get real jobs?

Posted by: zetetic on January 15, 2006 12:51 PM

Crap, that was me. I was so worried about getting my italics closed up that I missed signing my work. Loose Shit.

Posted by: Russ from Winterset on January 15, 2006 12:51 PM

That you are not embarassed by Ted Kennedy does not speak highly of you, Wayne. Public service, my ass. The Kennedy's don't even pay there fair share of taxes.

Posted by: shawn on January 15, 2006 01:30 PM

They could have taken their millions and spent the rest of theirt lives golfing and going to fancy parties in Manhatten.

Instead they spend the rest of their lives golfing in West Palm Beach and going to fancy parties in Georgetown and Martha's Vineyard.

Posted by: caspera on January 15, 2006 04:43 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD have a short chat about Iran, the disgusting SAVE Act theater, Mamdani's politicizing of St. Patrick's Day, and more!
Recent Comments
Case: "Tiring old clowns of the left. Didn't like them th ..."

JQ: "There couldn't have been 200 people at the local p ..."

Itinerant Alley Butcher: " read a post by a Japanese guy on Twixxer and he b ..."

[/i][/i][/i][/s][/s][/s][/b][/b][/b]Christopher R Taylor: "[i]Nobody saw it coming. Apparently our big brains ..."

This is reality.: "Without regime change, this war will have been poi ..."

Kindltot: "My mistake, most of the Egyptian Tucanos were sold ..."

Captain Obvious, Laird o' the Sea: "The entire premise is one of the stupidest things ..."

Martini Farmer: "> Drones are really changing the tactics of war. ..."

[/i][/i][/i][/s][/s][/s][/b][/b][/b]Christopher R Taylor: "[i]I wouldn't be at all surprised if Meta has exte ..."

People's Hippo Voice: "The left has big plans for "after Trump". Packing ..."

Cow Demon: "I do not know what is done with unsold magazines. ..."

Kindltot: "[i]"Skyraider II" Based on the Ag AirTractor used ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives