| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Food Thread: You Say Dumplings, I say Kneidlach: Let's Call The Whole Thing Off!
First World Problems... No Kings? If We Had A King, These Morons Would Be In Jail Book Thread: (03/29/2026) [Sabrina Chase] Daily Tech News 29 March 2026 Saturday Night Club ONT - March 28, 2026 [D Squared] Saturday Evening Movie Thread - 3/28/2026 Hobby Thread - March 28, 2026 [TRex] Ace of Spades Pet Thread, March 28 Gardening, Home and Nature Thread, March 28 Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
|
« "Nearly 20" Women Protest Cable Carrier's Dropping of Lifetime Network |
Main
| Controversial CAP Article: Satire? »
January 12, 2006
Ahmadnejean Says "Great Event" Is ComingIran’s hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Thursday evening that the Islamic Republic’s 1979 Islamic revolution was a great movement and a stepping stone to a final “great event” in the world. This isn't any time for joking, and this isn't really a joke, but I get the feeling this guy sees the bomb much as the mutants in Beneath the Planet of the Apes did. Not quite a God, but God's Avenging Angel on Earth. We can't let them have the bomb. If it means preemptive war-- we canot let them have the bomb. This, and a lot of other depressing stuff, from the internet's own Dr. Feelgood, Allah Is In the Link Mecca. posted by Ace at 08:20 PM
CommentsIt could also be a rallying cry to the faithful, knowing they're about to be attacked. I'm hopin Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 12, 2006 08:36 PM
People I respect -- people who are in a position to know, let us say -- still maintain that America will not pre-emptively attack Iran but will instead rely on Security Council sanctions to do the trick. There is a feeling that China and Russia are getting fed up with Iran as well. I do not share this view of things. Even if sactions are levied by the Security Council (doubtful in itself), it will take time for them to go into effect, and more time before they begin to take effect. It could be years before a sanctions regime would have any effect, and even then it would be so porous that I think it would fail (we have the example of Iraq). The ides of March are the decision point. Posted by: Monty on January 12, 2006 08:36 PM
Does anyone know if these kind of speaches are a staple in Iran, but we're just hearing about it this year? I know Ahmadnutjob is new, but how was the last guy? Posted by: adolfo velasquez on January 12, 2006 08:37 PM
The great event of which he speaks mostly needs to involve the random scattering of his ashes by the persian winds. Posted by: Sticky B on January 12, 2006 08:43 PM
Does anyone know if these kind of speaches are a staple in Iran, but we're just hearing about it this year? I know Ahmadnutjob is new, but how was the last guy? Adolfo, Iran has been spouting this stuff since the Jimmy Carter administration. They are behind the whole "take over the world" nazi cliche of our time. Posted by: Jenny on January 12, 2006 09:08 PM
I think everyone is missing the point. Obviously what is needed is a Security Council Resolution that prohibits Iran from having nuclear weapons. Iran will obey - I think everynoe agrees. Why cannot people see this rather simple solution? /end sarcasm Posted by: Mark on January 12, 2006 09:09 PM
Does anyone know if these kind of speaches are a staple in Iran, but we're just hearing about it this year? Well, the "Death to America/Israel" stuff has been around ever since the Revolution. Ditto the "Great Satan" stuff. What's more bothersome to me is Ahmadinejad's recent "wipe Israel off the map" comments, along with his apparently-sincere belief in an apocalyptic Mahdi cult. Worse yet, the other powers-that-be in Iran aren't rushing to tell everyone that this guy's full of shit, which tells me that at least implicitly they are still behind him. Posted by: Monty on January 12, 2006 09:16 PM
Soon there will be a "great event" but not the one he's hoping for. It's too bad because a lot of innocent people are going to get killed. Posted by: THIRDWAVEDAVE on January 12, 2006 09:22 PM
The "great event" will be the reappearance of the Hidden Imam. Certain Shiites believe that actions can be done to prepare for his reappearance or to speed up his reappearance (a little bit like Chabad Lubavitch's "do a mitzvah - it brings us closer to the Redemption"). Evidently, activist Shiites in Iran (note: this is compared to quietist Shiites) believed that the establishment of a truly Islamic republic was not only possible (quietist Shiites would say such an endeavor is impossible without the Hidden Imam) but would contribute to the Hidden Imam's reappearance. What I question was: what were Ahmadi-Nezhad's intentions? It can be said that certain world powers are moving to potentially take action. Even the EU is beginning to voice its consternation. If Russia gets fed up, Iran is in big trouble. This could be a rallying cry for the faithful. Or, it could just as likely be propaganda not so much to mobilize the people as much to legitimize the regime. Perhaps what he means to say is: "The Islamic Revolution was the pinnacle of Muslim achievments: Iran and its theocratic regime are preparatory to the Hidden Imam's reappearance - which is the only thing we have to wait for until Islam's final global triumph." We must, nonetheless, monitor Ahmadi-Nezhad's rhetoric: if it becomes desperate or millennialist/messianic (in that he's declaring the imminent reappearance of the Hidden Imam), he's mobilizing the troops, as it were, for confrontation. I will be extremely worried if he claims to have been selected by the Hidden Imam to be the Imam's hand-picked agent/representative (vakeel) - and I wouldn't rule such a tactic out. Posted by: Muslihoon on January 12, 2006 09:23 PM
“The Islamic revolution is... reaching the climax of history” - so, would we be calling his philosophy "Ahmadinejism"? Posted by: David Ross on January 12, 2006 09:25 PM
Still a country run by radical extremists leaders still a bunch of zelots where prince charlie and his religion of peace? Posted by: spurwing plover on January 12, 2006 09:28 PM
I'm convinced that they're about to get a big foot up their ass. Posted by: CraigC on January 12, 2006 09:30 PM
Monty - thank you for pointing out that the administration, through their silence, implies their behind him. It's one thing to put a man in power, but it's quite another to let him stay in power. They could have kicked him out if they wanted to. Or condemned him. My hope is that they're using him to distract the people from the real problems in Iran, which the regime cannot fix. This would be the most ideal situation. My other guess is that they put Ahmadi-Nezhad in power in order to reestablish their supremacy, undo recent reforms, and reinstate Islamic values. However, my fear is that Khamene'i and his gang endorse (if not believe in) what Ahmadi-Nezhad believes and does. Posted by: Muslihoon on January 12, 2006 09:34 PM
Question for Ace or the Almighty Allah or anyone else who knows a lot about Iran: how reliable is Iran Focus? Some of the stuff on that site is quite alarming, to say the least. I like that they support the West...I'm wondering how significant, important, and relevant their material is. Posted by: Muslihoon on January 12, 2006 09:43 PM
Two words: nukes. (It echoes when the rubble bounces.) Posted by: Karl Maher on January 12, 2006 10:09 PM
Well if you would like my reason for maybe going to into Iran hop on over. It's that heartfelt stuff I'm known for. Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on January 12, 2006 10:14 PM
In the back of my mind (and that's not a long journey from front to back) I keep thinking of Nostradamus' prophecy that the final conflict of mankind will start with a madman from the middle east. Now, one could say 'Sure, Nosty, THAT'S kind of obvious!' Posted by: Uncle Jefe on January 12, 2006 10:15 PM
In the back of my mind (and that's not a long journey from front to back) I keep thinking of Nostradamus' prophecy that the final conflict of mankind will start with a madman from the middle east. Wasn't there something about that in The Late, Great, Planet Earth? Posted by: geoff on January 12, 2006 10:18 PM
The PC fears of our "grey men in grey suits" will keep them from doing what should be done, (LEADING). Once a western city is vaporized, they will still act like the castrated hacks they are. The left, and the democRATs, will go" insane-er" blaming the west for the attacks. But it will be too late. There will be Civil WAR in the west, while the islamist animals sit back laughing at our impotence. Then the long knives WILL come out, and islam WILL learn the meaning of FEAR. Millions will die, because of the lack of will ,the lack of the BALLS, to do what should have been done. I pray I am wrong, I fear I am correct. Posted by: 3Ravens on January 12, 2006 10:29 PM
Muslihoon -- Iran Focus is pretty reliable. They clearly have an anti-mullah agenda, but their reports on Iranian atrocities -- public hangings of gays, stoning of teenaged girls -- are often published a day or two ahead of the wire services. Keep your eye on them as this thing heats up. Lefty talking points are already taking shape, incidentally. Posted by: Allah on January 12, 2006 10:32 PM
Come on Ace. Post something else! I bored already. Feed me.
Posted by: Red Jode on January 12, 2006 10:37 PM
Ace is out drinking with Karol, Red. Probably won't be back for another couple of hours. Posted by: Allah on January 12, 2006 10:49 PM
Allah - thank you! 3Ravens - I'd like to think the US and Israel are too assertive to let Iran get away with anything. All it will take is one test explosion - and the US and Israel will be after Iran like a starving hawk after prey. Israel has proven that it will take any action it views to be in its best interest. Before the Six-Day War, the US was adamantly opposed to an Israeli first strike. The administration (in which the State Department was, surprise!, not so hot about Israel) told Israel that if they struck first, the US would not get involved. IKsrael struck first, and ended with a spectacular victory that stunned the world. I consider it the last nail in Islamic potency's coffin. This was a major wake-up call for Muslims that they were, indeed, quite impotent. As has been said here so many times - and I love read it - they're going to blame the US for supporting Israel regardless of whether the US supports Israel or not. (The same thing happened during the Six-Day War: the Arab states accused the US of significantly assisting Israel. They knew it was a lie. (It was called, in fact, the Great Lie.) This upset America. When the Arab states appealed to America for assistance to end the conflict, the US refused their appeal.) So, we might as well help Israel. They're the only one in the region with a spine. I'm sure we can bully Pakistan, Iraq, and Afghanistan into assisting us. The fact Iran is surrounded by states assisting the US does not bode well for Iran. But rationality never stopped madmen. Posted by: Muslihoon on January 12, 2006 10:54 PM
On the day Netanyahu is sworn in, Tehran becomes a smoking crater. Posted by: Nine of Diamonds on January 12, 2006 11:01 PM
The story of demographic collapse ala Mark Steyn has been a big story on the 'net for a few years now, I guess that's why I was surprised to see that Iran has a fertility rate of only 1.82 children per woman. I was just under the impression that Muslim countries were reproducing like rabbits. Iran has a young population for now, but at this rate it will keep on ageing and, assuming, get more Islamic conservative. I certainly wouldn't put much faith in the Iran youth-street rising up to take care of our problems there. Posted by: Otho Laurence on January 12, 2006 11:03 PM
good to know u.s. incinerates civilians w/ nukes w/ a moral purpose. sometimes I forget. Posted by: ergastularius on January 12, 2006 11:27 PM
Ace is out drinking with Karol, Red. Probably won't be back for another couple of hours. Why can't he just drink at home, alone, like me? Posted by: Red Jode on January 12, 2006 11:36 PM
good to know u.s. incinerates civilians w/ nukes w/ a moral purpose. We'll give terrorists the GPS coordinates for your house so you can atone for our sins against them. Posted by: Sue Dohnim on January 12, 2006 11:37 PM
Fucking Frankfurt School commie. Posted by: Sue Dohnim on January 12, 2006 11:38 PM
Why can't he just drink at home, alone, like me? Exactly what I said to him earlier. Posted by: Allah on January 12, 2006 11:41 PM
Fucking Frankfurt School commie Heh, heh,,, I'm laughing at that an I don't even know what a Frankfurt School commie is! heh! Posted by: Red Jode on January 12, 2006 11:43 PM
sue you're dumb Posted by: ergastularius on January 12, 2006 11:43 PM
my bad, sue red rube jode is dumber Posted by: ergastularius on January 12, 2006 11:45 PM
just noticing the contradictions. that's all. Posted by: ergastularius on January 12, 2006 11:47 PM
Fucking Frankfurt School commie. Posted by: Red Jode on January 12, 2006 11:47 PM
Commies engage in procreative activities? I'd have never guessed. I thought they were in love with their tractors. Oh, sorry. Those are [procreating] Stalin School commies. Posted by: Muslihoon on January 13, 2006 12:28 AM
I don't know what he's talking about with this upcoming "great event". The Longhorns already beat USC. Posted by: Steve in Houston on January 13, 2006 12:47 AM
Ace is out drinking with Karol, Red. Probably won't be back for another couple of hours.\ More than a few hours. As his former roomate, I can tell you the drinking bout will be followed by hours of agonizing before doing an outcall with a latina shemale prostitute. The ten minutes of sexual activity will be followed by 60 minutes of violent showering in a vain attempt to wipe away the shame. So you are looking at 5+ hours before receiving a response, and when it comes, it will be curiosly subdued. Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 13, 2006 01:13 AM
"This was a major wake-up call for Muslims that they were, indeed, quite impotent." I think this gets at the heart of it. Osama is always talking about restoring respect. His major beef was with the humiliation of the US soldiers (including women!) being in the muslim holy land to protect Saudi Arabia. And then of course, little Israel keeps whipping them. And the US takes the most agressive Arab - Saddam - and gives him a public lice check. Even for those who hated Saddam, this had to be very humiliating. Many muslim counties have all this oil but no power, and are miserably under developed.
3ravens - what's with this civil war stuff - what are you talking about? Posted by: Desmond22 on January 13, 2006 01:21 AM
Muslihoon, What do you think the odds are that the recent shift in Iranian rhetoric has been tied to Israeli domestic politics? Yours/ BRD Posted by: Bravo Romeo Delta on January 13, 2006 01:28 AM
Screw you guys. I'm drunk and want to have fun ragging on Ace, and all you guys want to talk about is global thermonuclear war. "How about a nice game of chess?" Posted by: steve_in_hb on January 13, 2006 01:35 AM
Not to sound alarmist or anything, but the event he is referring to could be an attack on the US, possibly by using a nuke in an EMP attack to try to knock out our power grid. Iran's military is reportedly a big fan of such attacks on the theory it would paralyze and possibly cause the collapse of the US as a society - and they may be right. IF we really want to prevent Iran from developing and using nuclear weapons, we should hit them first with a pre-emptive nuclear strike - assuming our own nuclear weapons still work, of course. Posted by: BattleofthePyramids on January 13, 2006 01:39 AM
I would tell ergasthilarious to go fuck himself, but I'm sure that he's quite adept at that already. Posted by: Uncle Jefe on January 13, 2006 02:23 AM
BattleofthePyramids - would they try to do so even if they have not experimented their weapons delivery system? I ask because I believe - for what its worth - that Iran will not be able to perform a second test. One test and the US and/or Israel will be at their door. Or in it. They can try what you have said, but I'm sure the US will be able to direct its military through other means. And if the US military still survives, well, Iran would be better of surrendering already. BravoRomeoDelta - I honestly think Israel's domestic issues have not yet translated into any action by Iran. The rhetoric continues, although one can argue it has been consistently escalating since its beginning. Having said this, I do believe Iran's rhetoric will escalate at a greater speed than what they may have perhaps earlier planned, in order to exploit Israel's domestic issues. However, Iran's rhetoric will not benefit Iran. Israelis who fear for their existence will vote in a hardline Prime Minister. (I personally don't trust Bibi, but he might be actually hawkish enough.) I don't get why states want to mess with Israel. I mean, they sent their forces to kill the assassins of their Olympic team, one man at a time. These aren't people to mess with. Unlike Arabs, motivated by colonialsm/imperialism (another way of portraying the initial spread of the caliphate is Arab imperialism: as such I don't think Arabs ought to be slamming imperialism or colonialism), Israelis are motivated by something that runs deeper: the desire to survive. Desmond22 - first, great name. :-) Second, thanks for the comments. It is a major motivating factor, I believe, amongst militant Muslims. Unfortunately, Muslim entities will never be able to become the world power they want to become. One obstacle is their inability to institute proper programs. A good way would have been to secretly infiltrate a Muslim state, turn in into a police state, and begin massive military research and development. All entities depend on Western technology - we know, mostly, what they know. In order to prevail over us, they have to devise something more advanced. The other reason they can't succeed is because of their lack of unity. They're even more disunited than a room full of Reform, Conservative, Orthodox, and haredi Jews. Their weaknesses are our advantages, and since these are based on their character, it means we will prevail. The sooner they realize this, the sooner that can become integrated into Pax Americana, the sooner they can begin to grow and develop the proper way. Posted by: Muslihoon on January 13, 2006 02:25 AM
At first I told myself that NO ONE can be that fuckin crazy, it's jsut bluster. But then I started to see a bigger picture. All these crazy mofos want Islam (spit) to be the ruling class/sect on the planet. Well how do you do this? First knock the U.S. out. This will cause a global economic catastrophe. Turn off the oil spigot, and drive the price of energy so high that it bankrupts the rest of the world. Convert/kill the rest. I honestly believe that Ahmadinejad is willing to "take one" for the team here. He knows that someone is going to take him out, I believe that he wants to be remembered as some great religious figure that started the New Caliphate. Scary..... Posted by: Alpha Sierra Whiskey on January 13, 2006 02:29 AM
Otho Laurence , Nice link. How many of us has looked at the CIA's site for info? As for the rest, I'm pretty sure the Hidden Imam is actually Joe Paterno. Fight on State, bitches. Posted by: Biff Boff on January 13, 2006 02:32 AM
BattleofthePyramids, A power-grid destroying EMP Pulse created by a nuclear detonation in the ionosphere is a theory. Please don't tell us to protect ourselves with adamantium armor and Green Lantern power rings. Posted by: Biff Boff on January 13, 2006 02:36 AM
The only silver lining I can see is that Republicans can make gains in 2006. Americans prefer Republicans in times of peril. (Maybe it has to do with the fact that Republicans believe in action while Democrats would prefer to use words, conferences, meetings, negotiations, and the UN to protect our national security.) Posted by: Muslihoon on January 13, 2006 02:40 AM
I do not believe we can make gains in the House if our next Speaker is not an Ass-kicking reformist. And when should we all start talking about Lynn Swann? Oh, and fuck Iran (just to maintain thread thread affinity). Posted by: Biff Boff on January 13, 2006 02:47 AM
They do have short range missles. Actually, dropping a dirty bomb on the main Saudi Oil field - Gawar - would probably be enough to plunge the world into an economic depression - plus making their own oil very valuable. Posted by: WIMPYbURGER on January 13, 2006 02:47 AM
Mushiloon - they HAVE experimented with their delivery system - the Shahab 3 missiles. They are confident they can do it, just look at what they are saying on MEMRI.org. IF they do, will we really be able to retaliate with over half our country in chaos, food, power, transportation and communication out of action? We would need every soldier we have just to try to keep things from collapsing completely. Sure we have Sub-launched nukes - which have not been test-fired in over 10 years. Do they still work? And, even if they do, will they US have the will to kill half the population of Iran to get the Mullahs? I doubt it.
And, FWIW, I don't think the Iranian Mullahs are afraid that the US will use nukes in retaliation. Why should they? Look how we are behaving in Iraq - we are fighting with kid gloves, arresting more terrorists than we are killing, etc. And, even this limited half war is opposed by half the country! No, the Iranians are quite confident we are a paper tiger. Posted by: on January 13, 2006 03:20 AM
The above was me. Sorry. Posted by: BattleofthePyramids on January 13, 2006 03:21 AM
I will be extremely worried if he claims to have been selected by the Hidden Imam to be the Imam's hand-picked agent/representative (vakeel) - and I wouldn't rule such a tactic out. He wouldn't be the first. Think Osama. Heck, think Osama's late older brother. Posted by: scarshapedstar on January 13, 2006 03:25 AM
Thank you for that info, BotP. I wish a sociologist would come out of the woodwork and explain: One would think decades of research on NSDAP Germany, Fascist Italy, and expansionist Japan would have yielded some practical results we could use. Iran - the new Third Reich. Posted by: Muslihoon on January 13, 2006 03:28 AM
Iran - the new Third Reich. I guess that makes egalacticaticus and his friends the Vichy French. Posted by: Sue Dohnim on January 13, 2006 08:24 AM
Oh, and it's better to be dumb than a Commie. Posted by: Sue Dohnim on January 13, 2006 08:25 AM
The Longhorns already beat USC Allahu Akbar! Posted by: Dave in Texas on January 13, 2006 08:38 AM
....but the event he is referring to could be an attack on the US, possibly by using a nuke in an EMP attack to try to knock out our power grid." Oooooh! Then we'd have to reboot everything! Posted by: on January 13, 2006 09:19 AM
Ahmadnejean Says "Great Event" Is Coming Yeah he's gonna get laid Posted by: Scott on January 13, 2006 09:20 AM
Time for another Omdurman, I see. Posted by: Mikey on January 13, 2006 09:39 AM
Wow. Almost 13 hours since a post from Ace. Maybe this Latino Transvestite Prostitute is the one, eh steve_in_hb??? Posted by: Red Jode on January 13, 2006 09:49 AM
Someone has got to tell the Iranians that the Halo structure is not a religious artifact, but a weapon! Starting the "Great Journey" will destroy everything in a 10,000 lightyear radius. 343 Guilty Spark want Iran to detonate Halo. We need to stop them. The first step is to plant homing beacons in each of Iran's 400 centrifuge facilities. Then we just wait for the air-strikes. Along the way, we should try to eliminate as many islamic-zombies as possible. Lets go! Posted by: joeindc44 on January 13, 2006 10:27 AM
The first step is to plant homing beacons in each of Iran's 400 centrifuge facilities. Then we just wait for the air-strikes. Along the way, we should try to eliminate as many islamic-zombies as possible. Lets go! But the new season of 24 starts this weekend. Can we do it in June? Posted by: Red Jode on January 13, 2006 10:34 AM
Dammit, man! Don't you have Tivo for that! Any second now, the Ayatollah's shield will regenerate. Posted by: joeindc44 on January 13, 2006 10:44 AM
Red, let the war start now. The only way to watch 24 is on DVD, straight through! The more I look at it, the more likely that if there is any military action, the US will be heavily involved. Posted by: Iblis on January 13, 2006 10:48 AM
Red, let the war start now. The only way to watch 24 is on DVD, straight through! No, the only way to watch is to on DVD, straight through, while doing George Dickel and Xanax shooters. Which coincidentally is also the very best way to go on the attack against the Mad Mullahs of Tehran!!!!! So, were good to go! Posted by: Red Jode on January 13, 2006 11:10 AM
Musilhoon, Perhaps this might provide the basis for your answer to question 1: My dad just got back from overseas about a month ago, visiting relatives, some of whom are from Iran (my family's home country is nowhere near the middle east). The head of the Iranian household was asking why the US was paying so much attention to the Iranian president. Everyone there knows the guy is nuts but powerless, so it does no good to encourage the guy by giving him attention. I wish I had gone there to ask the guy: (1) If the guy is nuts but powerless, why is he the president? (2) If those who are really in power let a guy like this represent them, why would that make the US feel better about Iran getting nukes? (3) What does this say about the Iranian people who allow crazy and irresponsible people to run their affairs? From their perspective, the problem is George Bush provoking their leaders into confrontational policies. But they don't see how they are at fault for letting their leadership run amok. It is as if the US is responsible for what the US does, and it is the US which is responsible for what Iran does. What does this say about the Iranian people's view of themselves? Posted by: EricTheRed21 on January 13, 2006 11:10 AM
On another topic (As Ace has apparently been strangled by his Latina Shemale Whore or drowned during his post-coital shower and will no longer post), I'd like to suggest a new verb for addition to the English Lexcion: Teddify v. tedd i fied, Tedd•i•fy•ing, Ted i•fies [Modern English, der fr. Theodore (Teddy) Kennedy, a late 20th century U.S. politician whose person and life embodied these characteristics] Posted by: Red Jode on January 13, 2006 12:16 PM
To paraphrase Belloc: "Whatever happens We'll see you. And raise you - to somewhere beyond low-earth orbit, Spanky. Posted by: Mikey on January 13, 2006 12:50 PM
Ace is out drinking with Karol, Red. Probably won't be back for another couple of hours. Ace and Karol sitting in a tree, Posted by: Don Carne on January 13, 2006 01:11 PM
Heh. Karol was probably the designated Posted by: Iblis on January 13, 2006 02:34 PM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)* Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown. A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask). * Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV. Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR. Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him. LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR. Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too. LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others. But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring: "But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said." In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power." I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron. Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring. I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do. But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Batman fires The Batman
Batman is disgusted by the Joachim Phoenix version of Joker Batman tries to fire Superman Batman is still workshopping his Bat-Voice
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please I'm even on knees Makin' love to whoever I please I gotta do it my way Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Sec. Army recognizes ODU Army ROTC cadets for their bravery and sacrifice in private ceremony
[Hat Tip: Diogenes] [CBD]
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter One day I'm gonna get that faculty together Remember that everybody has to wait in line Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD] Recent Comments
barbarausa:
"you're welcome, SSBN.
Best to you <3 ..."
m: "250 ..." Aetius451AD work phone: "There was one of those candy prep videos that at l ..." Aetius451AD work phone: ""Everyone's So Creative!" channel would post with ..." Nova Local: "Dessert engagement farmers usually smash up a stor ..." The Paolo: " Well, actually it takes a fair amount of time, b ..." Stateless - Day 10 of 14 or so - extreme dog care: "I could see people making that. I'm curious how fa ..." SSBN 656 (G): "Willowed, of course, but I want to thank all of yo ..." Don in SoCo: "We always figured this meal's pickiness determines ..." Additional Blond Agent, STEM Guy[/i]: "That easy kid's dinner reminds me of something my ..." Aetius451AD work phone: "Re: video CBD's gustatory equivalent to a fat f ..." Nova Local: "PS - You know that kid food video was engagement o ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|