Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« AP Headline On Torture Poll: "US Allies Oppose Torture[]" | Main | Eminem Reuniting With Ex-Wife Kim »
December 08, 2005

If They're So Scary-Smart, How Come They're All So Stupid?

[Okay, I'm the Stupid One. Corrected at the end.

Ah, liberals.

See-Dubya snarked:

The New York Times review (and find your own damn link) was explicitly down on the Christian angle [in the Narnia film]. 'Too high a Jeesiosity quotient', I believe they said.

An anonymous liberal demands:

No link because no review maybe? It doesn't seem to exist on the NYTimes site (Times Select?). Where did you read this "jeesiosity quotient" review?

There's no such thing as a stupid question. There are, however, stupid people who ask them.

Yeah, Yeah: Obviously, not all liberals are dumb.

Just... a lot of them.

Actually, it's not that they're especially dumb so much as the chasm between their self-assessed level of intelligence and their actual level is so yawningly vast.

I'm dumb, but I'm smart enough to know what I'm dumb about. A lot of liberals... well, they kinda think that having listened to a two minute report on NPR about global warming (or cooling, or moderating, or whatever it is now) mints them into instant world-renown climatologists, able to speak fluently and confidently on long-range computer modeling of anthrogenic climate change.

And they seem to pretty humorless. Not just dour -- dour can be kind of cool, actually -- but humor-impaired.

And thus: Margaret Cho.

The LATimes Sacked Hack Robert Scheer, So That Proves Everyone's Dumber Than Me Update: The unjustifiably smug preening of a self-assessed Mensa Chapter President in full flamboyant peacockery.

It's been my theory for a while that if we just give them t-shirts that say "World's Smartest Smarty-Smart," they'll kinda go away as regards public debate.

Seriously, they just want that t-shirt. They just want us to tell them they're smarter. I don't think they really want to run the country into the ground; but, because they don't have those t-shirts, grabbing political power is currently they only manner they have of demonstrating superiority.

By withholding those t-shirts, we're kinda forcing them to run for office and then implement ruinous public policies.

If you want this country at its full potential, if you want an end to the eternal culture wars, remember the words of the Wise One:

The guys get shirts. The guys get shirts. That's just. The way. It fucking. Is.

All This Ranting For Nuthin' Update: It wasn't a liberal who asked that question. And the question wasn't stupid. The commenter meant to ask about See-Dubya's NYT review, not about a review containing the phrase "quotient of Jeesiosity." So, yeah, he knew that part was a joke.

Oh, well. Sorry, Mantis.


posted by Ace at 12:04 AM
Comments



US: Let's roll.
THEM: Let's troll.

Posted by: See-Dub on December 8, 2005 12:09 AM

Cite? Can you give me a quotation of anyone actually saying that?

Or are you just making up more lies?

Posted by: ace on December 8, 2005 12:12 AM

There are lies, damned lies, and not citing a stupid liberal propoganda machine.

Posted by: DeeDaGo on December 8, 2005 12:27 AM

Are you questioning their patriotism?

Posted by: MH on December 8, 2005 12:30 AM

Who was right about Iraq?

Molly Ivins? Or Paul Wolfowitz?

Posted by: tubino on December 8, 2005 12:33 AM

Libs being dumb is old news Ace. Jennifer Aniston old.

Posted by: Iblis on December 8, 2005 12:36 AM

Tubino,

Right? Wrong?

Why is everything so black and white with you people?

Have you not heard there are shades of gray? Nuances? Complexities? Wollschteins?

Posted by: ace on December 8, 2005 12:40 AM

I'm dumb, but I'm smart enough to know what I'm dumb about.

Touche.
I'd like to think of myself like that as well.

Posted by: yls on December 8, 2005 12:41 AM

Ace-

This may be your entire point of linking that Santa Monica Mirror piece, but did you notice that Mr. Smarty McSmartenheimer there didn't bother to look up the correct spelling of Robert Scheer's name?

Posted by: See-Dubya on December 8, 2005 12:46 AM

The smartest people I've ever met were homeschooled Christians, the kind that left-wing elites hate so much. And the dumbest all went to NYU and became New York Times writers... Go figure.

Posted by: hyper-hormonal monkey on December 8, 2005 12:46 AM

Who was right about Iraq?Molly Ivins? Or Paul Wolfowitz?

Errr ... Wolfowitz. Screw nuance - I reject the implied premise that we are losing or that the peace has been botched. Historically it's butter smooth.

Molly Ivins can make all of the clever generalizations that she wants. Ultimately, she's where she belongs - writing for a hack paper and becoming fodder for send up campy right wing blogs, and Wolfowitz is right where he belongs - at the head of the World Bank.

Posted by: DeeDaGo on December 8, 2005 12:47 AM

You forgot to tell tubino how smart he is. Let's see if it works:

Tubino! You are just so smart! I am amazed at the breadth and depth of your intelligence, which far exceeds mine or anyone else's on this blog on every level! Nay -- across the length and breadth of the entire internet itself, your amazing intellect shines! You da smartest, man! You got smart! Smarty smart smart! Take that, puny humans, TUBINO -- HE BE SMART. EL NUMERO UNO A-NUMBER ONE HEY-LOOK-AT-ME-TOP-O'-THE-WORLD-MA STUPENDO BRAIN PAR EXCELLANCE EMPEROR OF ALL THE BIG HEADS SMART GUY.

Word.

(So, is he gone?)

Posted by: Andrea Harris on December 8, 2005 12:48 AM

Cute: Have you not heard there are shades of gray? Nuances?

Cuter: We have no idea what kind of ethnic strife might appear in the future, although as I have noted, it has not been the history of Iraq's past. -- Paul Wolfowitz

Here's a nice shade of gray from 1959 in Iraq:

For four days and four nights Kurds and Yezdis stood against Arabs; Assyrian and Aramean Christians against Arab Moslems; the Arab tribe of Albu Mutaiwat against the Arab tribe of Shammar; the Kurdish tribe of al-Gargariyyah against Arab Albu Mutaiwat; the peasants of the Mosul country against their landlords; the soldiers of the Fifth Brigade against their officers; the periphery of the city of Mosul against the center; the plebians of the Arab quarters of Al-Makkawi and Wadi Hajar against the aristocrats of the Arab quarter of ad-Dawwash; and within the quarter of Bab al-Baid, the family of al-Rajabu aggainst its traditional rivals, the Aghawat. It seemed as if all social cement dissolved and all political authority vanished.

From Republic of Fear.

So who was right about Iraq: Ivins or Wolfie?

Posted by: tubino on December 8, 2005 12:49 AM

You're very, very smart for quoting Paul Wolfowitz stating that "we have no idea" how much ethnic strife might be present in postwar Iraq.

God, you're smart.

Can I suck your dick?

Posted by: ace on December 8, 2005 12:53 AM

To clarify: Ivins predicted a quick "win" followed by the peace from hell. She accurately predicted what's going on in Iraq for the last 2 years.


Wolfowitz, on the other hand, said this: "There are other differences that suggest that peacekeeping requirements in Iraq might be much lower than our historical experience in the Balkans suggest."

Shya right. DeeDaGo? Want to tackle this one?

Posted by: tubino on December 8, 2005 12:54 AM

Ace, speaking of Scheer, didya catch Jonah Goldberg's G-file Wednesday, where he responds to Streisand's yapping? 'Twas a fine work.

And I'm not just saying that because I'm on Jonah's payroll. Because I'm not.

But if it paid well, I would be.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 8, 2005 12:54 AM

"From Republic of Fear."

So you HAVE read that book!

And you still think Iraq is worse off now?

Posted by: Knemon on December 8, 2005 12:56 AM

Wait, let me pre-empt you: "at least under Saddam there was security."

Yeah? Is that what you were going to say? More or less?

Posted by: Knemon on December 8, 2005 12:57 AM

I think Andrea said it best. Tubino is just categorically smarter than everyone else. Including Al Gore, who, as we all know, invented the inter-thingy.

But just to make the point, an out of context quote from Wolfowitz against an context-establishing introduction does not an argument make.

But I bet you knew that. i bet you were just setting me up.

Posted by: DeeDaGo on December 8, 2005 12:58 AM

"Can I suck your dick?"

It's spoken for tonight, but maybe another time -- IF YOU FLOSS FIRST.

I have standards.

If anyone wants to put their beliefs to a test, I'm always open to a bet.

Fitz indictments? Progress in Afghanistan? Abramoff scandal?

Posted by: tubino on December 8, 2005 12:58 AM

Tubino, baby,

I understand from your flaccid typing that your a pussy, but I have two words for your sorry ass...

Stalingrad.

This 'peace' has been a fucking cakewalk. Are you kidding me? 2000 dead for the whole stretch, more have died in training you idjit. In training!

I realize the DNC stamps thier talking points on your red baboon ass, but can't you at least make it entertaining?

As to Molly Ivins, I hear she's still recovering from a 'special report' from the Cheney. All hail!

Posted by: Jake Jacobsen on December 8, 2005 01:01 AM

And you still think Iraq is worse off now?

Uh, I didn't actually say that... but when the VP of Iraq says in many ways it is just as bad... it's worth thinking about.

Iraqi fatalities are estimated from ~26K to over 100K in the last 2.5 years. It is far from clear that left alone, Saddam would have exceeded those numbers.

Certainly in many measures (oil production, homicides, access to drinking water) it seems that Iraq is worse now.

But hey, they've got a flat tax!

Posted by: tubino on December 8, 2005 01:04 AM

Hey what happened to Fitzmas? I had my stocking up but all I got was block of stinky tofu.

Posted by: hyper-hormonal monkey on December 8, 2005 01:05 AM

Jake J.,

Ratio of wounded to fatalities is high, as high as 7:1. Nearly 15K US military wounded, many quite badly. Limbs and organs -- like eyes -- blown off.

That's not a cakewalk. It's due in part to the incredible advances in battlefield medicine. In previous conflicts many of those 15K would not have survived.

It's not a cakewalk, moron.

Posted by: tubino on December 8, 2005 01:07 AM

If you want to be formal, I'd be happy to tackle it. What is interesting is that I don't have to.

Your premise is a false one Tubby. The peace has not been flawed. Life is flawed - I can't make a cell phone call across the country without being dropped like Nancy Pelosi's skin grafts. It would seem to be a victory though when the only call you were likely to get from across the country 3 years ago was from an executioner.

The truth of the matter is that Iran has taken a vested interest in Iraq. Along with a handful of other parties, they see their future as tied up with the failure of democracy in Iraq. They are doing everything they can to insure that failure. If Iran's success will guarantee your own ability, and Ivins', to say that you were right all along then by all means, root for Iran.

Posted by: DeeDaGo on December 8, 2005 01:08 AM

Hey what happened to Fitzmas?

Fitz was in court 3 hours today with the GJ.

V. Novak is lawyered up.

Fitz keeps chipping away. Luskin keeps spinning knots. And no one has come up with any theory to account for the known facts and still absolve the top level in the Bush admin.

Bush is a wimp who was lied to, or he has been lying all along.

Be patient. Plenty more coming.

Posted by: tubino on December 8, 2005 01:10 AM

Tubby,

You are so so so so so so so smart. You should read something for a change instead of squatting behind Howard Dean with two slices of bread waiting for him to have another opinion.

[ht to Sue Donhim, as I too was awestruck]

Posted by: DeeDaGo on December 8, 2005 01:14 AM

Wow. I disagree with tubino but that's pretty bad. And I live in NYC, I'm used to hearing nasty shit all day long...

Posted by: hyper-hormonal monkey on December 8, 2005 01:15 AM

He's holding out for the t-shirt, ace. Mere compliments aren't good enough -- to show our sincerity we've got to put it on cotton with an iron-on printout! I've got my inkjet ready, but no iron-on transfer paper! Well hell, it's not like I'm smart, like I'm tubino, you know. I can't think of everything. Like tubino does.

Everything.

Posted by: Andrea Harris on December 8, 2005 01:16 AM

Your premise is a false one Tubby. The peace has not been flawed.

You mean your straw man is made of straw.

The post was about liberals and smarts. The example I gave was about Iraq, and the simple question: who was right, the liberals or the neocons?

Ivins (and many others) was right about the post-invasion situation. The neocons were wrong.

You are just smart enough to try to redefine it to something else.

The news now is that Afghanistan seems to be getting Iraqified, with suicide bombings and more. The situation has deteriorated recently. The bold, stupid invasion of Iraq is damaging US credibility, US military, and US success in Afghanistan.

There's your neocon smarts for you.

Nighty-nite. Someone's done flossing.

Posted by: tubino on December 8, 2005 01:16 AM

An anonymous liberal demands:

Actually I accidentally left that question anonymously. I don't know why I'm so dumb because of it, as I thought See Dubya was serious, and that the Times had reviewed the film and panned the Jesus angle (not actually using the word jeesiosity; I knew that was a joke). It seems entirely possible such a review would appear in the Times. I just wanted to read it, and didn't know if it had possibly been in today's print edition, or part of the new select bullshit, or what.

So what I thought was part joke turns out was all joke, but my assumption was based on another assumption that the NYTimes would negatively review a religious film on its religiosity alone. So I guess it makes me stupid for missing that Dubya was making up the review, but I don't see how it makes me stupid and liberal.

Posted by: mantis on December 8, 2005 01:20 AM

Awww, nuts. Okay, I assumed it was a troll who searched for the word "jeesiosity."

It doesn't make you liberal or stupid to ask about the review.

Posted by: ace on December 8, 2005 01:23 AM

Everything.

The way to get through the day, Andrea, is to say it like this ...

If I were Tubino, what would I be thinking now?

And then ignore the random noise about financial markets and cosmology and neutrinos and all that God stuff.

Somewhere in there is iron-on transfer paper. But you've got to ask the question ....

Posted by: DeeDaGo on December 8, 2005 01:27 AM

Go back to the other thread. I wasn't joking about the tone of the review and there's a link to it now. My synopsis was fake but accurate.

Posted by: See-Dubya on December 8, 2005 01:29 AM

Tubino,
Ok, so the 27000 number is from Iraq body count and 100,000 is from the Lancet study. HRW put the number of executions under Saddam per year to be 30,000 to 40,000. So that looks like anywhere from 75,000 to 100,000 using HRW numbers and math. I also seem to recall that the president of HRW stated that those numbers were not worthy of military intervention. I'm guessing that's acceptable to you. Way to go liberals. I realize that this is all about missing Saddam and wishing he was still there. You're going to have to move on.

Posted by: sears poncho on December 8, 2005 01:30 AM

Hey, no problem. I can see how my question might make you think I took the quote seriously. Besides, I am a stupid liberal! Gotcha!


(Ok, I don't think I'm stupid, but I am pretty liberal, in a John Stuart Mill kind of way, not a modern democrat kind of way, whatever that is)

Posted by: mantis on December 8, 2005 01:46 AM

You are so so so so so so so smart. You should read something for a change instead of squatting behind Howard Dean with two slices of bread waiting for him to have another opinion.

[ht to Sue Donhim, as I too was awestruck]
Posted by DeeDaGo at December 8, 2005 01:14 AM

Oh my God. I just opinioned my pants reading that.

Posted by: on December 8, 2005 02:57 AM

Molly Ivins was right.

In the short to medium term.

However, we can't compare the current Iraq to a possible future Iraq where Saddm would rule and sanction would be gone.

Sort of off topic:

The USA could have pulled a Balkans and armed the Kurds and Shias and fored Iraq into a civil war where we would be able to pick up the pieces much easier after some years...but at the time we all thought they had WMDs and you wouldn't want a civil war in such a country.

Posted by: Aaron on December 8, 2005 03:44 AM

Tubino! Where you been?

Only...ummm...this guy doesn't actually sound like tubino, does he? With the short, spiky posts and the no links and stuff.

Is that really you?

Posted by: S. Weasel on December 8, 2005 04:06 AM

"Okay, I'm the Stupid One. "

That is the first thing acehole has ever said that has any truth to it.

Posted by: Sortelli on December 8, 2005 05:55 AM

Molly Ivins can make all of the clever generalizations that she wants.

Without the edits, that should read, Molly Ivins can make all the stupid* generalizations that she can get away with the help of idiot leftists who think there's something funny about reading the editiorial opinions of the Socialist Daily Work processed through the 'Dialectizer' internet utility to sound faux-redneck.

Which was Dan Rather's gig for a number of years, before he tried his hand at forgery...

* because It's such a fine line between stupid, and clever.

Posted by: V the K on December 8, 2005 06:14 AM

Thought you might enjoy this research by Cornell University, published by the A P A. ...but I think that their sample group was not nearly random enough.

Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments

Justin Kruger and David Dunning
Department of Psychology
Cornell University

http://www. a p a .org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html

Abstract
People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it. Across 4 studies, the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the 12th percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd. Several analyses linked this miscalibration to deficits in metacognitive skill, or the capacity to distinguish accuracy from error. Paradoxically, improving the skills of participants, and thus increasing their metacognitive competence, helped them recognize the limitations of their abilities.

Posted by: TGS on December 8, 2005 08:44 AM

Correction. New link http://www.a p a .org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf

Also, earlier I got an warning message for posting content from p a . org when the link was for a p a . org. Please correct your filter.

Posted by: TGS on December 8, 2005 08:47 AM

I don't think it's tubino. Not enough links.

Posted by: Slublog on December 8, 2005 10:02 AM

Oh, its him.

Note all the breathless challenges.

Posted by: lauraw on December 8, 2005 10:13 AM

LOL! It looks like my Midol depravation has spawned a new meme at AoSHQ.

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on December 8, 2005 10:17 AM

Can any one of you morons knock this tiresome lefty meme off my shoulder?

Any of you man enough to take me on?

Didn't think so.

Posted by: very small tube on December 8, 2005 10:19 AM

Tubino, according to the Brookings Institute, the Iraq per capita income is up 30% from when Saddam was in power and their economy is projected to grow at nearly 17% this year.

Compared to Saddams time there are also 5 times as many cars on the road now, 5 times the telephone subscriptions and 32 times more internet users.

Posted by: scott on December 8, 2005 10:30 AM

Well, it don't sound like tubino to me. And I should know; I'm under contract to smooch his butt.

But if it is you, tubino, you might want to consider depersonalizing the Personal Web Site That Must Not Be Named. If you're going to argue on the internet, you really should do it under an unGooglable name.

Posted by: S. Weasel on December 8, 2005 10:36 AM

There's no such thing as a stupid question. There are, however, stupid people who ask them.

Nearly 15K US military wounded, many quite badly

Well then, you must be pleased to see the fucking military as you delightfully refer to them, get what it deserves.

Oh, and you are scary-smart.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on December 8, 2005 10:54 AM

Scott, that merely proves that America is just destroying another traditional society by exporting its culture of capitalism and consumerism.

Traditional Heshemite torture camps being torn down to build Wal-Marts. Plastic shredders replaced with Chik-Fil-A's. It's horrifying.

Posted by: V the K on December 8, 2005 11:44 AM

If you could fax a tee shirt (I suggest "You're with Smarty McSmartenheimer" or "You just got served"), you could put the entire DNC out of business by sending it along with their talking points every day.

How intelligent is it, really, to bring a crib sheet to every argument that you get into?

Posted by: DeeDaGo on December 8, 2005 12:53 PM

Why do liberals think "neocon" is some sort of insult?

Posted by: zetetic on December 8, 2005 02:11 PM

Tubino,

You got a link to support your assertion? And on your way can you find out who she likes this weekend in the NFL?

Actually you can skip the latter request. It just occured to me that she has been predicting the fall of the US ever since 2000 because of tax cuts for the rich? How's that particularprediction working out for you?

Posted by: Sweetie on December 8, 2005 05:23 PM

LION you will find all liberals living in a place right next to NARNIA WITCH whats the place called LION ninnia

Posted by: spurwing plover on December 8, 2005 11:28 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Trump: Ukraine War 'Thousands of Miles Away' is 'Nothing to Do' with America Russia isn't threatening to kill Americans! [CBD]
Update to Gavin Newsom Under Investigation story: This investigation was begun under Senor Dementia:
Adam Housley
@adamhousley

As I have reported several times and now acknowledged by the Governor of California... Gavin and his wife are under federal investigation... what he failed to tell you... This began during the Biden Admin. Kind of a big detail.
Teen Driver Tayvin Galanakis Wins Jury Trial Against Officers Who Charged Him With DUI Even After He Blew 0.0 on A Breathalyzer And Passed Sobriety Tests. One Officer Accounted For 72% of All DUI Arrests For That PD [dri]
Days before the woman was stabbed in the neck by a taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer, in the same general area, another taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer attacked a boy and bloodied his head with a brick.
What is the UK Regime's plan for protecting the citizens from the savage criminals they've foisted on the populace? They offer NONE. They do, however, have a plan for protecting the savage criminals from the citizens: The citizens must STAY CALM and not get angry and not share videos of citizens being attacked by savage criminals.
The public keeps saying "protect us from the foreign savages you have imported against our wishes and over our objections" and the UK branch of The Regime keeps proposing plans to protect the foreign savages from the public. Soclose to what the public is demanding, just, you know, the complete opposite.
Just a thought: Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about the public attacking the savage criminals if you actually introduced a plan to protect the public from the savage criminals. Maybe they wouldn't feel as if it was necessary for them to protect the public through self-help.
Courtney Subramiam, one of the "journalists" who "previewed" her questions for the decrepit and demented Biden so that he could "answer" it with a pre-scripted response, rewarded by promotion to president of the White House Press Corps
Bonchie
@bonchieredstate

hahahahaha

This is the lady who gave her question to Biden beforehand, and he had it written verbatim in his notes with her picture.

You know what's really terrible? There are Daily Signal reporters in the press room. That's the Real Scandal Here!
You might think that movie critics by nature are effeminate and bitchy, but, did you know that grass is green and red peppers are red?
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD bounce around from Maine and its pet Nazi, to the cracks in the Democrat messaging, to the failure of California and its effect on the 2028 election, sea drones rescuing Apache crews, and more!
Seattle mayor shrugs off millionaire-tax concerns as 44% of business leaders consider leaving
It happens in all the blue states, but WA and Seattle will be different! [CBD]
Mary Margaret Olohan
@MaryMargOlohan

NEW: Five FBI employees were fired today over the infamous Richmond Catholic memo on "radical traditionalist Catholics," FBI source confirms to @realDailyWire.
Oof. Reviewers do not like Scary Movie 6. The criticism I keep hearing is that the movie mistakes a reference for an actual joke. The movie (they say) keeps Key Jangling a reference to another movie (or some other pop culture ephemera) and you expect there to be a joke but nope, the Key Jangle was the joke. Other reviewers say that the promise that "no lines will be uncrossed" is a fake-out, and that the movie is bland and inoffensively corporate.
Recent Comments
Heroq: "31 Not surprising. Idaho has long been a homo han ..."

fd: "False pride. ..."

"Perfessor" Squirrel: "If my local Walmart is celebrating "Pride Month" I ..."

AOC: "May I remind you that that H8r Donald Trump always ..."

BruceWayne: "Only by cucks! Indians forever! Posted by: The ..."

...: "The Left is already busy rebranding Pride. We shou ..."

tubal: "35 I never did understand why if you're born that ..."

FenelonSpoke: "Posted by: FeatherBlade at June 17, 2026 02:33 PM ..."

Ian S.: "[i]Why did Gabe Malor's name suddenly pop to mind? ..."

rickb223 [/b][/s][/u][/i]: "When the LBGQT+ lost the L & G's, that should tell ..."

Semi-Literate Thug: " 159 It's funnier than that. You have to convi ..."

FenelonSpoke: "I never did understand why if you're born that way ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives