Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« John Simpson - BBC Degenerate | Main | 18 Year Old Kidnaps Two Children For Use In A "Demonic Ritual" »
November 28, 2005

Chilling of Dissent, Courtesy of John McCain

Two Washington State DJ's have been deemed to have run afoul of McCain-Feingold campaign contribution laws. The offense? By railing against proposed gas tax increases, they (and their station) were making "in-kind" donations to, I guess, political groups opposing the increases.

They used to call it "free speech" or "entering the marketplace of ideas." Now it's called an "in-kind campaign contribution" and "potential crime."

Wow. Remember when we used to actually voice our opinions publicly, before John McCain wisely took that alleged "right" away from us, in an effort to "increase democracy." (Try to find that made-up fakey "right" in the Constitution!)


[T]he radio station had to put a dollar value on what the hosts had said. The estimate of that in-kind contribution of $100,000 of airtime was reported as a campaign donation under state law.

...

In other words -- in the name of campaign finance "reform" -- free speech no longer is free. If that ruling withstands appeal, especially if it reaches the U.S. Supreme Court, it would have profound ramifications for media nationwide.

...

If this ruling is not struck down, anytime anyone in the media (including the Internet) decides to speak out on an issue, it could be considered an in-kind contribution.

And if federal or state election laws limit the amount of money that can be donated to candidates or causes, the mere mention of an opinion could be estimated (by the government) to be worth the maximum dollar amount allowed to be contributed and thereby prohibit any other reference regarding the subject.
...

[I]f McCain and others get their way, there could be new legislation further rationing free speech to limit the First Amendment rights of the 527 nonprofit groups.

When the government -- and that means politicians who will do whatever they can get away with to preserve and increase their political power -- wants to silence its critics, it will do so.

But unlike in a dictatorship, it will be done very subtly, bit by bit, all in the name of reform, good government, cleaning up politics or whatever else a gullible citizenry will swallow.

Allow politicians to put a price on free speech and then keep your mouth shut when you discover it's more than you can afford.

Bear in mind, John McCain has always been a very thin-skinned politician. I can't help but he's rather pleased that the riff-raff may soon be limited to how many criticisms of him they may make.

The McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform Act

We had to destroy the village in order to save it.

Meanwhile... McCain is said to be increasingly palatable to Republican voters.

Except, of course, the actual committed base. Nominating McCain would rip the party in two.


posted by Ace at 12:37 PM
Comments



To this day I am astounded and appalled that the McCain-Feingold bill passed constitutional muster in SCOTUS. What in hell were they thinking?

Posted by: Steven Den Beste on November 28, 2005 12:58 PM

Uh, I don't think you should ever use that phrase without pointing out that Peter Arnett made the whole thing up.

Posted by: someone on November 28, 2005 12:59 PM

It will be interesting to see how the Roberts court with the addition of Alito will interpret the phrase "Congress shall make no law..."

As for McCain getting the 08 nomination, one thing is for sure it will probably guarantee that I end up violating BCRA.

Posted by: Stephen Macklin on November 28, 2005 12:59 PM

So, at this point, we crack down on Limbaugh, Franken, et. al., and start earning that sweet, sweet free speech beef by selling soapboxes on 42nd. Street?

(Not for nuthin, but watch out for those "Lost Tribe" guys wearing all the leather and studs.... I mean, puhleeze!...)

Posted by: TC@LeatherPenguin on November 28, 2005 01:00 PM

Oh, I think there's zero chance McCain gets the nod. The press loves him, so they exaggerate his fortunes. The Republican base loathes him, and nobody takes the primaries without his party base.

Posted by: S. Weasel on November 28, 2005 01:02 PM

Weasel's right...look what happened when they gleaned on Dean.

Posted by: TC on November 28, 2005 01:07 PM

In the last WSJ/CNN poll, something like 20 percent of Republicans said they wouldn't vote for McCain--not in the primaries, not in the general election, not under any cicumstances whatsoever. The man's negatives are astoundingly bad.

I don't like the man, and I detest McCain-Feingold, but the visceral loathing a lot of the party base feels for McCain has always been a little mysterious to me. In fairness, it's no more mysterious than that Tiger Beat crush most of the national media feels for him.

Posted by: utron on November 28, 2005 01:11 PM

Ixnay on the Ickainmay, guys. You want Ace to have to pay a fine or something?

Posted by: Sean M. on November 28, 2005 01:26 PM

Utron? At least my from my experience, here the explanation why this piece of crap should be thrown on a pile of scrap:
Viet vet: god bless, but so what? I've been shot and stabbed but that doesn't make me King High when talking about it or what should be done to stop it. And that he and Froggy Kerry conspired to make nice with the ruling Viet while shoving under the rug a boatload of POW questions paints his butt in an unsightly color.

Keating Five: in my book, you are damn well GONE from the "money" conversation. You should not be allowed to even SEE the table, nevermind sit at it.

Posted by: TC on November 28, 2005 01:34 PM

I have to admit. I have MDS.

Posted by: polynikes on November 28, 2005 01:37 PM

McCain his done an excellent job of showing his true colors. Conservatives will not be fooled.

Posted by: Nickie Goomba on November 28, 2005 01:59 PM

Uh, I don't think you should ever use that phrase without pointing out that Peter Arnett made the whole thing up.

Arnett may have made up the phrase and the Tailwind bullshit, but My Lai wasn't made up. Granted, the massacre was an isolated incident perpetrated by some sick bastards, but it did happen.

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 28, 2005 02:44 PM

Living in the Seattle area, I can tell you that the campaign finance attack on Kirby, John, and KVI has wholly to do with protecting the entrenched legacy government here, and little to do with the guys themselves. Seattle is the next Chicago, is the next New Jersey. The rest of the state is desperate to quarantine Seattle's policies to Seattle. Heck there is even a movement to split off suburban King County from Seattle and create a new county. Happily even traditional libs are getting fed up with the legacy government here as witnessed by Rossi's close race and the passing of local agitator Tim Eyeman's iniative.

Posted by: Taleena on November 28, 2005 02:46 PM

I've got several domestic policy disagreements with McCain, but I'm really pretty much a one issue voter right now when it comes to electing the Commander in Chief of this country. While I would probably prefer Condi Rice or Giuliani, McCain looks a hell of a lot better than anything out there in the Democratic Party. George Allen and Mitt Romney are really non-starters for me.

Posted by: NCVOL on November 28, 2005 03:19 PM

Sue, the quote had nothing to do with My Lai. And oh, yeah

It wasn't the United States that destroyed Ben Tre (a town, not a village), but the Vietcong.

Posted by: someone on November 28, 2005 03:48 PM

I do agree that Peter Arnett should go shark hunting in sirloin suit.

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 28, 2005 04:24 PM

Who needs McCain when you have Joe Lieberman.

Lieberman wrote an editorial for the WSJ.
Our Troops Must Stay --

America can't abandon 27 million Iraqis to 10,000 terrorists.

Here is an ironic finding I brought back from Iraq. While U.S. public opinion polls show serious declines in support for the war and increasing pessimism about how it will end, polls conducted by Iraqis for Iraqi universities show increasing optimism. Two-thirds say they are better off than they were under Saddam, and a resounding 82% are confident their lives in Iraq will be better a year from now than they are today. What a colossal mistake it would be for America's bipartisan political leadership to choose this moment in history to lose its will and, in the famous phrase, to seize defeat from the jaws of the coming victory.

Check it out.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110007611

P.S. Fuck you, Tubino.


Posted by: Bart on November 29, 2005 02:16 AM

Isn't McVain planning to be Mrs Clinton's running mate. The 2 pols I hate most.

Posted by: on November 29, 2005 02:30 AM

McCain's long descent from war hero to authoritarian, egomaniacal blowhard and busybody has not been pretty. It mystifies me that any Republican can consider him presidential timber.

Posted by: Axel Kassel on November 29, 2005 12:05 PM

Here's a terrifying thought for the next presidential election - Hillary vs McCain. Talk about not having a vote. That would definitely be a reason for 3rd party or writein candidate. However, I agree that McCain is not likely to be the Republican candidate.

Posted by: docdave on November 29, 2005 01:19 PM

Anybody read Lieberman's piece in WSJ that I linked in this thread lastnight?


P.S. Fuck you, Tubino, again.

Posted by: Bart on November 29, 2005 02:59 PM

What is anyone actually going to do about the overthrow of the Constitution? Is McCain's revolution any less revolutionary for being a creeping revolution? Are we ever permitted to say that the men who were once our constitutional officeholders have rebelled against constitutional government? What ought to be done about rebels who continue to wear the name of "Senator"?

Posted by: Kralizec on November 30, 2005 11:49 AM

Very nice. I hope you'll update very soon. Greedy is feature of Black Gnome: http://www.forbes.com/ , right Opponents will Double Pair without any questions Memorizing is feature of Curious Grass , when Plane is Cosmos it will Make Table Love Corner is very good Plane

Posted by: Nicholas Jones on December 7, 2005 01:41 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
BIG NEWS UPDATE NOT FIRED

From her lawyer

"The irresponsible reports that have been published stating that Maria Bartiromo was fired or is no longer an employee of Fox are absolutely and unequivocally false," Freedman said Friday. "Make no mistake, we have the receipts and witnesses and they will come out whether through the courthouse or otherwise."

He added: "Those reporting her firing or the incredulous facts supporting that fiction have exhibited a complete and utter reckless disregard for the truth."

from anon2020
So what, she quit?
Megyn Kelly (accursed be her name) used to say all the time that Fox has a top female PR person who is a nasty pitbull and leaks nasty claims about anyone Fox is at war with, including those who have left the network. So I guess maybe she technically resigned? I don't know.
NEW: @FoxNews has obtained Lindsay Clancy defense attorney Kevin Reddington's appeal filing to the MA Supreme Court, which includes Reddington accusing the lone holdout juror of being "biased" against those with "debilitating mental illness", which he says is a protected category.

Thanks to Mark1971
Holiday Break: I've had a rough couple of weeks -- the shoulder is healing now and I'm finally getting decent sleep -- and I've decided to take a long weekend.
I'm taking Friday off, and then Monday off, too.
I have Open Threads for both days and I will post if big news breaks, but if it doesn't -- and it probably won't, news is slow before a holiday weekend -- I'm going to take a four day weekend.
Sh0eOnHead discusses the Psychotic Cult of Lindsay
Real quotes:
"This case has me feeling like I'm on Law & Order with you guys!"
"We literally binge true crime as a hobby, we've been trained for this moment"
Worth the watch. If you haven't seen the genuinely upsetting insanity motivating thousands of women, you should watch this just to see how society is crumbling.
Ban TikTok, Trump. I don't care if Barron tells you it's popular with the yutes. It is an evil Communist China op and it is driving women insane.
Dolly Parton tells the story of the supposedly real-life Jolene
As Andrew Branca says, can we see this Jolene, finally? Who was this hottie that was a genuine sexual threat to Dolly Parton?
I think this is Fake News personally. When a magician claims he learned a trick from a Himalayan wise man, I don't believe him either.
Peter Cullen, voice actor for Optimus Prime (among many others) dies at home surrounded by family at age 85
RIP and Roll Out!
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Dolly Parton...an American classic, Michigan's El Sayed is part of our future destruction, More Global Warming nonsense, mail-in balloting restrictions, Darline Graham? Get rid of family dynasties...and more!
Breaking news: Dolly Parton had a real pair of 38s
Or at least one. She carried it everywhere for protection.
This joke brought to you by Benny Hill. And speaking of the British: The Buckingham Palace guard tributed her yesterday
1977 interview shows that Barbara Walters has always been a seaward and Dolly Parton always had "country class"
Walters actually asks Dolly Parton if she knows that people think she's a joke. This because Walters can't get over the fact that a show-woman has 1, big breasts, and 2, dresses a bit outrageously because, get this, she's an entertainer. A stage performer. You know, someone people pay money to see live and expect them to put on a show.
She never would attack Liberace for wearing glitter-tuxedos. But she's mad that Dolly Parton makes Barbara Walters look bad through association (by being a woman). Babs, you wish people associated the two of you. Believe me, we can tell the difference.
Recent Comments
Village Idiot's Apprentice: "Is it my imagination or is the unhingement of the ..."

Don Black: "present ..."

"Perfessor" Squirrel: "Hunter Biden Says He ‘May Have To’ Run ..."

Hawkpilot[/i]: "Mornin’ Horde! ..."

Hadrian the Seventh: " [i]Your package will be delayed. Posted by: Iro ..."

Ironwood: "Your package will be delayed. ..."

Hadrian the Seventh: " [i]ESPONJA!1!!1!! Posted by: AltonJackson at Se ..."

AltonJackson: " ESPONJA!1!!1!! ..."

AltonJackson: " JJ es nood ..."

AltonJackson: " ESPONJA!!11!!1! ..."

Skip: "Couldn't get the link but the Europeans let the in ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "Time to slop the furry hogs! ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives