| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Sunday Overnight Open Thread - November 2, 2025 [Doof]
Gun Thread: First November Edition! Food Thread: I Say Whisky...You Say Whiskey? Let's Call The Whole Thing Off! First-World Problems... Voting: A Right, A Responsibility, And An Unalloyed Pleasure! Sunday Morning Book Thread - 11-02-2025 ["Perfessor" Squirrel] Daily Tech News 2 November 2025 Saturday Night "Club ONT" November 1, 2025 [The 3 Ds] Saturday Evening Movie Thread - 11/01/2025 Hobby Thread - November 1, 2025 [TRex] Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
TBD |
« Anatomy of a Rollback |
Main
| Pace of Economic Growth Quickens; Economy Grows 3.7% in 3rd Q »
October 29, 2004
Andrew Sullivan: John Kerry's Unofficial Secretary of State (and Defense!)Reading Kausfiles, I came across this interesting link: I approve of [the Economists' endorsement of Kerry]--though it's always a shaky moment in these non-peacenik endorsements when the writer tries to convince himself or herself that Kerry won't bail out on Iraq prematurely, isn't it? (Kerry has been "forthright about the need to win in Iraq," but do you trust him and if so why? Because Andrew Sullivan's blogging will keep him honest?) ... What on earth could he man by that last question? Did Andrew Sullivan actually suggest that he'd keep Kerry focused like a laser on victory in Iraq? It couldn't be. It just could not be. Not even someone as obviously vain and solipsistic as the Shrill Shill could possible suggest something like that. Then again: Maybe he could after all. John Kerry speaks, not unfairly, of George W. Bush's habits of denial. But Kerry himself is in denial. He is in denial about the United Nations. He is in denial about the Australian election that returned to office for an unprecedented fourth term its prime minister who has been, with his country, a pillar of the Iraq coalition. He is in denial about Japan, whose government, unlike Germany's and France's, does not carp at the United States. He is in denial about Afghanistan, where, for the first time in history, men and women, riding on donkeys and walking barefoot across great distances, have exercised the right to choose those who govern them. He is in denial about Iraq itself. The Jordanian daily Al Ra'i recently called Moqtada Al Sadr's apparent retreat from armed struggle "a farewell to arms" that is as politically significant as the establishment of the provisional authority. Has Kerry come close to recognizing this? Has he acknowledged that the Bush administration has negotiated with nato a plan to send, starting in November, up to 3,000 soldiers to train Iraqi troops? These soldiers will be under the command of General David Petraeus, who is mustering the military might and political will to retake much of the Sunni triangle. Many Iraqis now have second thoughts about opposing the coalition. Even the BBC has said as much. But Kerry hasn't. Sounds pretty damning. What's Sullivan's response? Yes, there's denial on both sides. Whose is more dangerous? That's the question. And if Kerry wins, he can expect to be subjected to relentless scrutiny from pro-war types like Marty and, ahem, your humble blogger. Ah. I see. Sullivan is now making the case to "independent eagles" that it's safe to vote for Kerry -- despite his profoundly McGovernite worldview -- because, after all, Andrew Sullivan and his scary-important blog will make the world safe for democracy. Are. You. Kidding. Me. Is Ecstacy a hallucinogen? How about a euphoric? It's both, right? Just checking. posted by Ace at 03:10 AM
CommentsYou underestimate the power of Sully and his mighty blog. Not only will he keep the world safe for Democracy, but also gain the endorsement of Jesus Christ Himself of the most important issue in all of human history, "homosexual marriage". By the way, I saw Team America recently and I got a hunch that earning Sullivan's trust is similiar to the way of earning Spottswoode's. Posted by: Capp on October 29, 2004 04:00 AM
Wow, this is just laughable. If Sullivan's scrutiny is what keeps the ship of state on an even keel, why hasn't it worked for this administration? I mean, I can remember the days when Rumsfeld was a golden god in Sully's estimation and the war was a dazzling success. Why hasn't his deadly earnest [suppressing snigger] criticism set things right? In fact, why didn't the Bushies just appoint him to administer the Coalition Provisional Authority? If Waffles gets elected (please, God, nooooo!!!), I think we'll see some bold pronouncements from Sullivan on how masterfully the war is being handled, how Kerry is a bigger hawk than Bush ever was, and how America's foreign policy is clearly on the right track again... ...That is, until Kerry is forced to come out against full gay-marriage rights because of a decision from some leftist State Supreme Court, at which time Iraq will again become a quagmire, and the Provincetown pendulum will swing once again. Posted by: Sean M. on October 29, 2004 04:06 AM
Sullivan is one of many on the left who have a brain but can't use it because their ideology only allows their thoughts to follow certain well-ingrained tracks. I thought he was near a derailment earlier in this campaign (A profoundly earth-shattering experience, as I as a "recovering" liberal can attest), but his fragile ego kept his caboose upright. Even as powerful *snicker* and influential *eye roll* as he is, I'm betting the prospect that he wouldn't be invited to the trendy leftist parties anymore was just too much for him to contemplate. So, he wimped out and endorsed Jean Francois Kerry: The most self-serving, dishonest, and treasonous candidate ever to get any party's nomination for the presidency. The profound pathos and abjectitude of anyone with an IQ of over 100 being able to cast a ballot for that scuzz-bucket is simply incomprehensible (I've come a long way). Posted by: Bloghorn Bleghorn on October 29, 2004 04:31 AM
"Who the fuck cares what Andrew Sullivan thinks?" On a more serious electoral note: Does anyone have a good election night drinking game? My friends and I are in desperate need of one. Networks call a state, take a drink. Networks withdraw a state, take a shot. Rove cackles like a Bond villain, down a fifth. Etc. I *will* be drunk by 8 PM Tuesday. An election this close demands it. Posted by: Rob on October 29, 2004 07:19 AM
Yes, ecstasy is a hallucinogen. Posted by: Bill from INDC on October 29, 2004 07:24 AM
WTFCWASS If u do one more post on Andrew, we're doing an intervention. NOT WORTH THE BANDWIDTH Posted by: jeff on October 29, 2004 08:03 AM
Ok, I get WTF, but what is CWASS? Posted by: Eric Blair on October 29, 2004 08:13 AM
'cares what Andrew Sullivan says' ISAIETM - I'm Seahay and I endorse this message Posted by: Seahay on October 29, 2004 08:39 AM
At a guess, CWASS = "Cares What Andrew Sullivan Says". Posted by: Kerry on October 29, 2004 08:41 AM
Being an observer, supporter, and reader of Sullivan's site, I payed close attention to his positions earlier this year. He seemed to understand the stakes in this election and the importance of a second term for the president. And he knew what a dishonest and principle-free poor candidate Kerry is. But then along came talk of Gay Marriage and everything else was thrown out the window. I have lost all respect for Sullivan. It would be one thing if he was honest enough to say that Gay Marriage trumps all other issues for him, but instead he just begain dubiuosly morphing his positions to *allow* him to support Kerry. I have little doubt that he would vote for Nader if Ralphie was openly supportive of gay marriage. I understand one-issue voting sometimes (I will never support a politician that does not strongly support gun rights), but I am honest about why I support someone. That candy-a-- from Provincetown is not. Posted by: Rob on October 29, 2004 08:55 AM
EVERYONE HAS AIDS (spoken) (singing again) Posted by: Once met Sully in a Burger King bathroom on October 29, 2004 09:06 AM
Everyone has AIDS...Even Ace of Spades....AIDS AIDS AIDS!!!!! Ace, I still maintain that your blog (Ace of Spades HQ) is the powerful force that keeps this nation on course. Your writing provides the moral compass, pointing the way towards American Exceptionalism. One can chart a straight line from Thomas Jefferson, to Alexander Hamilton, to Abraham Lincoln, to Theodore Roosevelt to Ronald Reagan to you! Forget Sully (Who the fuck is Sully, anyway?). Forget "Wonkette!!!!!". Forget Kos. Forget even the esteemed Instapundit, National Review, and Weekly Standard. When the full measure of American greatness is assessed by hisorians, their will be one new face on Mount Rushmore: That of Ace of Spades HQ. Although if I had my way, I would put Johnny Coldcuts up there instead. Posted by: Senator PhilABuster on October 29, 2004 10:35 AM
Quick question: Now that Sullivan has, uh, come out of the closet as a Kerry supporter, are his old friends on the left now treating him as some sort of a hero--the Prodigal Son come back to his senses, so to speak--or is Silly Sully as pathetic a figure to them as he is to us? Posted by: Lisa on October 29, 2004 10:57 AM
I don't know the answer to that one, Lisa, but I guess if they can believe in David "Trust me, I lied" Brock they can believe in anyone. Posted by: Paul Zrimsek on October 29, 2004 11:30 AM
Lisa: Yes This is my favorite line from Sully's 'endorsement': "I completely understand those who look at this man's record and deduce that he is simply unfit to fight a war for our survival. They have an important point." Ever get the feeling someone is trying to hold a watermelon seed between their butt cheeks while writing? Posted by: jeff on October 29, 2004 11:31 AM
Senator, Thank you! But of course you can't mean that! (Please say you do.) You're embarassing me. (Keep it coming.) Posted by: ace on October 29, 2004 12:12 PM
Oh, but I do mean it Ace! One of these days, our great-grandchildren will be visiting the National Archives, where their gaze will fall upon the 3 most sacred documents known to this country: The Declaration of Independence, The Constitution, and the Collected Works of Ace of Spades HQ (2003-2008). In one spot our children will be able to learn of the fundamental principles that made this country great: a firm belief that freedom and liberty are gifts from God; that Government exists to serve the people only by the people's consent; and that international order could only be maintained by someone with the internal strength of Sonny Crockett. As the tour guide explains about our current polarized years, and the existential threat of Islamic terrorism that we are called upon to face, they will leave knowing full well that we succeeded as a nation by adhering to our deepest and best principles, strengthened in our resolve to do so by the rousing, patriotic Filet o Fish beat downs on this blog. Then, as they leave the archive building, they will glance down at the loose change in their tiny pockets and finally understand why "In God and Ace of Spades we Trust" has been emblazoned on all their currency. Posted by: Senator PhilABuster on October 29, 2004 12:41 PM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Funny retro kid costumes, thanks to SMH
Good to see people honoring Lamont the Big Dummy
Four hours of retro Halloween commercials and specials
The first short is the original 1996 appearance of "Sam," the dangerous undead trick-or-treater from Trick r' Treat.
ICYMI: Australian journalist actually presses Kamala Harris when she repeatedly dodges questions about Biden's mental fitness
Kamala admits she didn't have the stamina to run for president, while continuing to insist he had the mental capacity to serve as president. He was too frail to run but perfectly strong enough to govern. Yeah sure whatever lying whore.
On Wednesday, we'll see the "Beaver Super-Moon." Which sounds hot.
Full Episode: The Hardy Boys (and Nancy Drew) Meet Dracula
I don't remember this show, except for remembering that Nancy Drew was hot and the opening credits were foreboding and exicting
According to Grok, Latrine John-Pissoir has never failed to mention she is "black" (or "queer") during her book interviews
She may not know what the hell her book is about, but she definitely knows that "every day I wake up black and queer." Join the club, sister!
Schmoll: 53% of New Jersey likely voters say their neighbors are voting for Ciattarelli, while 47% say the cheater/grifter Mikie Sherrill
The "who do you think your neighbors are voting for" question is designed to avoid the Shy Tory problem, wherein conservative people lie to schmollsters because they don't want to go on record with a likely left-winger telling them who they're really voting for. So instead the question is who do you think your neighbors are voting for, so people can talk about who they themselves support without actually having to admit it to a left-wing rando stranger recording their answers on the phone.
Hackers take over University of Penn website, calling the school a "dogshit elitist institution full of woke retards" and threatening to release its admissions files to prove illegal racial discrimination
No lies detected so far
TJM Complains about Wreck-It Ralph
The very topical premiere of TJM's YouTube Channel.
Interesting football history: How the forward pass was created in response to the nineteen -- 19! -- people killed playing football in 1905 alone
The original rules of football did not allow forward passes. The ball was primarily advanced by running, with blockers forming lines with interlocked arms and just smashing into the similarly-interlocked defensive lines. It was basically Greek hoplite spear formations but with a semi-spherical ball. As calls to ban the sport entirely grew, some looked for ways to de-emphasize mass charges as the primary means of advancing the ball, and some specifically championed allowing a passer to throw the ball forward.
1977 ABC Afterschool Special: "The Pinballs," starring Kristy McNichol
Garrett told me this film changed his life.
Sydney Sweeney unleashes the silver orbs
Thanks to @PatriarchTree Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.-- G.K. Chesterton [CBD]
Latrine John-Pissoir can't explain her book -- an Inside Look at a Broken White House, but she says she means the Trump White House, which she had no inside look at -- even to friendly leftwing media interviewers
Speaking as a black woman and black LGBT woman and black immigrant... Bonus points all day on Tuesday to anyone who begins all of his or her posts with "Speaking as a black LGBT woman..."
Atari to release former competitor Intellivision with 45 games for $149
I always thought Intellivision was kinda lame (to the extent a cutting edge videogame box can be lame). Intellivision insists upon itself. Pitfall was a really good game. I don't know if it was available on Intellivision. Update: It was. But I don't know if it's included in the new unit.
Terrorist-aligned AP: "Reporter describes shock at witnessing East Wing's demolition"
White House press corps: "SO TRUMP CAN DEMOLISH ANYTHING HE WANTS TO?!?!" Yes. Thank you for acknowledging that. Recent Comments
Berserker-Dragonheads Division :
"Because for some manufacturers, "pre-ban" guns are ..."
GWB: "but whats the difference in pre ban and stuff made ..." rhomboid: "Ed L, interesting info re H&K and the "ban". The ..." scampydog: "Have fun at deer camp this year with the family! ..." Ed L: "Whats the deal with this pre ban stuff I read abou ..." CharlieBrown'sDildo [Flying the American Flag!]: "whats the difference in pre ban and stuff made now ..." Pillage Idiot: "[i]Neither made it out of their case. Did shoot th ..." Berserker-Dragonheads Division : "Whats the deal with this pre ban stuff I read abou ..." rickb223 Acehole Extraordinaire coined by JSpicy [/b][/s][/u][/i]: "The problems with high back pressure cans on M4s i ..." Pillage Idiot: "[i]Quite possible. Did you check beneath the grips ..." Schnorflepuppy (OT but harmless) [/s] [/b] [/i] [/u]: "[i]One more thing. Don't hesitate to replace all t ..." TRex - free range dino: "Thanks Weasel and thanks Horde! ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|