| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
"Republicans for Talarico" Turns Out To Be, Get This, A Bunch of Lifelong Democrat Donors ("And Other Losers," Says the RNC)
More Fauci Texts: Fauci Was Warned by Surgeon General That Fake Vaccine Could Cause Mutations in Fetuses Tuq'r Qarlson Has On His Old Addict-Pal Hunter Biden to Explain That the Laptop Was a Fake Created By (Get This) Jews Presumptive DSA Candidate for Wisconsin Governor Once Voted Against a Law to Prohibit Teachers from Sexually Grooming Young Children The Morning Rant: The Terrorists Have Won (At Least In The UK) Mid-Morning Art Thread The Morning Report — 8/ 11 /26 Daily Tech News 11 August 2026 Monday Night ONT - August 10, 2026 [TRex] Monday Night Cafe Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026 Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
|
« Anatomy of a Rollback |
Main
| Pace of Economic Growth Quickens; Economy Grows 3.7% in 3rd Q »
October 29, 2004
Andrew Sullivan: John Kerry's Unofficial Secretary of State (and Defense!)Reading Kausfiles, I came across this interesting link: I approve of [the Economists' endorsement of Kerry]--though it's always a shaky moment in these non-peacenik endorsements when the writer tries to convince himself or herself that Kerry won't bail out on Iraq prematurely, isn't it? (Kerry has been "forthright about the need to win in Iraq," but do you trust him and if so why? Because Andrew Sullivan's blogging will keep him honest?) ... What on earth could he man by that last question? Did Andrew Sullivan actually suggest that he'd keep Kerry focused like a laser on victory in Iraq? It couldn't be. It just could not be. Not even someone as obviously vain and solipsistic as the Shrill Shill could possible suggest something like that. Then again: Maybe he could after all. John Kerry speaks, not unfairly, of George W. Bush's habits of denial. But Kerry himself is in denial. He is in denial about the United Nations. He is in denial about the Australian election that returned to office for an unprecedented fourth term its prime minister who has been, with his country, a pillar of the Iraq coalition. He is in denial about Japan, whose government, unlike Germany's and France's, does not carp at the United States. He is in denial about Afghanistan, where, for the first time in history, men and women, riding on donkeys and walking barefoot across great distances, have exercised the right to choose those who govern them. He is in denial about Iraq itself. The Jordanian daily Al Ra'i recently called Moqtada Al Sadr's apparent retreat from armed struggle "a farewell to arms" that is as politically significant as the establishment of the provisional authority. Has Kerry come close to recognizing this? Has he acknowledged that the Bush administration has negotiated with nato a plan to send, starting in November, up to 3,000 soldiers to train Iraqi troops? These soldiers will be under the command of General David Petraeus, who is mustering the military might and political will to retake much of the Sunni triangle. Many Iraqis now have second thoughts about opposing the coalition. Even the BBC has said as much. But Kerry hasn't. Sounds pretty damning. What's Sullivan's response? Yes, there's denial on both sides. Whose is more dangerous? That's the question. And if Kerry wins, he can expect to be subjected to relentless scrutiny from pro-war types like Marty and, ahem, your humble blogger. Ah. I see. Sullivan is now making the case to "independent eagles" that it's safe to vote for Kerry -- despite his profoundly McGovernite worldview -- because, after all, Andrew Sullivan and his scary-important blog will make the world safe for democracy. Are. You. Kidding. Me. Is Ecstacy a hallucinogen? How about a euphoric? It's both, right? Just checking. posted by Ace at 03:10 AM
CommentsYou underestimate the power of Sully and his mighty blog. Not only will he keep the world safe for Democracy, but also gain the endorsement of Jesus Christ Himself of the most important issue in all of human history, "homosexual marriage". By the way, I saw Team America recently and I got a hunch that earning Sullivan's trust is similiar to the way of earning Spottswoode's. Posted by: Capp on October 29, 2004 04:00 AM
Wow, this is just laughable. If Sullivan's scrutiny is what keeps the ship of state on an even keel, why hasn't it worked for this administration? I mean, I can remember the days when Rumsfeld was a golden god in Sully's estimation and the war was a dazzling success. Why hasn't his deadly earnest [suppressing snigger] criticism set things right? In fact, why didn't the Bushies just appoint him to administer the Coalition Provisional Authority? If Waffles gets elected (please, God, nooooo!!!), I think we'll see some bold pronouncements from Sullivan on how masterfully the war is being handled, how Kerry is a bigger hawk than Bush ever was, and how America's foreign policy is clearly on the right track again... ...That is, until Kerry is forced to come out against full gay-marriage rights because of a decision from some leftist State Supreme Court, at which time Iraq will again become a quagmire, and the Provincetown pendulum will swing once again. Posted by: Sean M. on October 29, 2004 04:06 AM
Sullivan is one of many on the left who have a brain but can't use it because their ideology only allows their thoughts to follow certain well-ingrained tracks. I thought he was near a derailment earlier in this campaign (A profoundly earth-shattering experience, as I as a "recovering" liberal can attest), but his fragile ego kept his caboose upright. Even as powerful *snicker* and influential *eye roll* as he is, I'm betting the prospect that he wouldn't be invited to the trendy leftist parties anymore was just too much for him to contemplate. So, he wimped out and endorsed Jean Francois Kerry: The most self-serving, dishonest, and treasonous candidate ever to get any party's nomination for the presidency. The profound pathos and abjectitude of anyone with an IQ of over 100 being able to cast a ballot for that scuzz-bucket is simply incomprehensible (I've come a long way). Posted by: Bloghorn Bleghorn on October 29, 2004 04:31 AM
"Who the fuck cares what Andrew Sullivan thinks?" On a more serious electoral note: Does anyone have a good election night drinking game? My friends and I are in desperate need of one. Networks call a state, take a drink. Networks withdraw a state, take a shot. Rove cackles like a Bond villain, down a fifth. Etc. I *will* be drunk by 8 PM Tuesday. An election this close demands it. Posted by: Rob on October 29, 2004 07:19 AM
Yes, ecstasy is a hallucinogen. Posted by: Bill from INDC on October 29, 2004 07:24 AM
WTFCWASS If u do one more post on Andrew, we're doing an intervention. NOT WORTH THE BANDWIDTH Posted by: jeff on October 29, 2004 08:03 AM
Ok, I get WTF, but what is CWASS? Posted by: Eric Blair on October 29, 2004 08:13 AM
'cares what Andrew Sullivan says' ISAIETM - I'm Seahay and I endorse this message Posted by: Seahay on October 29, 2004 08:39 AM
At a guess, CWASS = "Cares What Andrew Sullivan Says". Posted by: Kerry on October 29, 2004 08:41 AM
Being an observer, supporter, and reader of Sullivan's site, I payed close attention to his positions earlier this year. He seemed to understand the stakes in this election and the importance of a second term for the president. And he knew what a dishonest and principle-free poor candidate Kerry is. But then along came talk of Gay Marriage and everything else was thrown out the window. I have lost all respect for Sullivan. It would be one thing if he was honest enough to say that Gay Marriage trumps all other issues for him, but instead he just begain dubiuosly morphing his positions to *allow* him to support Kerry. I have little doubt that he would vote for Nader if Ralphie was openly supportive of gay marriage. I understand one-issue voting sometimes (I will never support a politician that does not strongly support gun rights), but I am honest about why I support someone. That candy-a-- from Provincetown is not. Posted by: Rob on October 29, 2004 08:55 AM
EVERYONE HAS AIDS (spoken) (singing again) Posted by: Once met Sully in a Burger King bathroom on October 29, 2004 09:06 AM
Everyone has AIDS...Even Ace of Spades....AIDS AIDS AIDS!!!!! Ace, I still maintain that your blog (Ace of Spades HQ) is the powerful force that keeps this nation on course. Your writing provides the moral compass, pointing the way towards American Exceptionalism. One can chart a straight line from Thomas Jefferson, to Alexander Hamilton, to Abraham Lincoln, to Theodore Roosevelt to Ronald Reagan to you! Forget Sully (Who the fuck is Sully, anyway?). Forget "Wonkette!!!!!". Forget Kos. Forget even the esteemed Instapundit, National Review, and Weekly Standard. When the full measure of American greatness is assessed by hisorians, their will be one new face on Mount Rushmore: That of Ace of Spades HQ. Although if I had my way, I would put Johnny Coldcuts up there instead. Posted by: Senator PhilABuster on October 29, 2004 10:35 AM
Quick question: Now that Sullivan has, uh, come out of the closet as a Kerry supporter, are his old friends on the left now treating him as some sort of a hero--the Prodigal Son come back to his senses, so to speak--or is Silly Sully as pathetic a figure to them as he is to us? Posted by: Lisa on October 29, 2004 10:57 AM
I don't know the answer to that one, Lisa, but I guess if they can believe in David "Trust me, I lied" Brock they can believe in anyone. Posted by: Paul Zrimsek on October 29, 2004 11:30 AM
Lisa: Yes This is my favorite line from Sully's 'endorsement': "I completely understand those who look at this man's record and deduce that he is simply unfit to fight a war for our survival. They have an important point." Ever get the feeling someone is trying to hold a watermelon seed between their butt cheeks while writing? Posted by: jeff on October 29, 2004 11:31 AM
Senator, Thank you! But of course you can't mean that! (Please say you do.) You're embarassing me. (Keep it coming.) Posted by: ace on October 29, 2004 12:12 PM
Oh, but I do mean it Ace! One of these days, our great-grandchildren will be visiting the National Archives, where their gaze will fall upon the 3 most sacred documents known to this country: The Declaration of Independence, The Constitution, and the Collected Works of Ace of Spades HQ (2003-2008). In one spot our children will be able to learn of the fundamental principles that made this country great: a firm belief that freedom and liberty are gifts from God; that Government exists to serve the people only by the people's consent; and that international order could only be maintained by someone with the internal strength of Sonny Crockett. As the tour guide explains about our current polarized years, and the existential threat of Islamic terrorism that we are called upon to face, they will leave knowing full well that we succeeded as a nation by adhering to our deepest and best principles, strengthened in our resolve to do so by the rousing, patriotic Filet o Fish beat downs on this blog. Then, as they leave the archive building, they will glance down at the loose change in their tiny pockets and finally understand why "In God and Ace of Spades we Trust" has been emblazoned on all their currency. Posted by: Senator PhilABuster on October 29, 2004 12:41 PM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
On "Professor" Arday:
He was their living lawn jockey, period. They won't say that 'cause they're sensitive and down with his struggle and all. He was there to appease and flatter their sense of being uplifters of the oppressed. In truth, he served as their living lawn jockey -- no more, no less, and unworthy of even a second thought on their part. Tokenism, pure and simple.-- Krebs v Carnot
Ireland's 'Air Force One' lacks a key safety system for fog -- thanks to country's ban on Israeli products
Ireland's best emigrated 150 years ago. The current Ireland is a sad joke. [CBD]
The Short Unhappy Life of a Russian Soldier: Why recruits die in 20-30 minutes
Interesting video. Some key parts: drones were responsible for 70-80% of all battlefield deaths in mid-2025, and I bet it's higher now. The Russian army is incredibly corrupt. Men get assigned to the most dangerous frontline units, the "Storm" units, unless they pay a superior $2,000 to be assigned to a different unit. Furthermore, there is often no real training for recruits -- commanders pocket the money that would have gone towards fuel and ammo costs incurred during training. Much "training" consists just of taking a single picture of soldiers doing something soldier-y, like fording a river, and publishing that as proof that the training was done. Even when it is done, training is only two weeks long.
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
She's totally committed to major independence She's a lady through and through She gives them quite a battle, all that they can handle She'll bruise some, she'll hurt some too
Update to the video of a Russian soldier being spun around and thrown by the machinegun he was operating: The soldier was testing an old, archaic Russian machinegun intended to be mounted to a helicopter. The old gun was pressed into service as a possible anti-drone gun. The Russian army is generally depleted and being forced to bring a lot of old, unreliable weapons and platforms to the front.
Also: Ukranian drones have
Top Men!
FDA is providing an update regarding the sample of lettuce supplied by Taylor Farms de Mexico which was reported positive on July 18, 2026. Due to the complexity in detection of Cyclospora, FDA laboratory experts re-reviewed the sample results and have concluded that the finding does not represent true amplification and should be considered a false positive. Information about the sample has been removed from the July 18, 2026, update below. FDA has notified Taylor Farms and continues working with the firm to ensure product implicated in this outbreak has been removed from the market. FDA and state partners continue to collect and analyze product samples. As of July 19, 2026, there are no confirmed positive sample results for product testing for Cyclospora.[CBD] Recent Comments
mikeski:
"[i]Does a condom qualify as a festive little hat?
..."
toby928(c) : "[i]A movie? What is it? Posted by: TheJamesMad ..." Citizen Cake: "I am still estranged from some friends and family ..." Bulg: "There has to be something less boring to talk abou ..." beckster: "Interesting......from the NY Post: Mayor Zohran ..." ...: "See, I knew we could do it. Posted by: JackStra ..." thatcrazyjerseyguy: "The random pop-ups are gone for me. Back to only g ..." JackStraw: "Time to die, er fly. ..." Ann: "Funny - I still remember a Trump interview when he ..." Oldcat: ""What's a Palestinian?" I know the term 'Palest ..." NemoMeImpuneLacessit[/i][/b][/u][/s]: "The popup ads are annoying as they [i]keep[/i] pop ..." TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "249 Hey, TJM, did you see this morning's movie-the ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|