Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

TBD





















« Andrew Sullivan: John Kerry's Unofficial Secretary of State (and Defense!) | Main | Explosives Fraud Blows Up in MSM's Face »
October 29, 2004

Pace of Economic Growth Quickens; Economy Grows 3.7% in 3rd Q

Sweet:

Real gross domestic product -- the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States -- increased at an annual rate of 3.7 percent in the third quarter of 2004, according to advance estimates released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the second quarter, real GDP increased 3.3 percent.

I kinda don't want this guy around, because he scares Kim Richards (and who could blame her?), but conservatism is nothing if not a respect for tradition, so:


posted by Ace at 10:11 AM
Comments



Weren't the predictions for 4.3%?

Posted by: R on October 29, 2004 10:47 AM

Um, no, I don't remember that, R.

Posted by: ace on October 29, 2004 11:06 AM

And this is how CNN radio reported:

"Growth in the thrid quarter was a disappointing 3.7%"

Posted by: Clark on October 29, 2004 11:12 AM

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20041029/ap_on_bi_go_ec_fi/economy&e=1&ncid=

Posted by: R on October 29, 2004 11:20 AM

yeah i read a Reauters story about how disappointing it was too. Ya just know that if it had been a great number the angle would be 'the economy is overheating'or 'new worries about inflation'

Posted by: atomic_amish on October 29, 2004 11:28 AM

Fuck Reuters. I'd trust DNCBS before I believe anything I read from Reuters.

Posted by: zetetic on October 29, 2004 11:48 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Funny retro kid costumes, thanks to SMH
Good to see people honoring Lamont the Big Dummy
Four hours of retro Halloween commercials and specials
The first short is the original 1996 appearance of "Sam," the dangerous undead trick-or-treater from Trick r' Treat.
On Wednesday, we'll see the "Beaver Super-Moon." Which sounds hot.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Historian and Pundit Robert Spencer joins us for a wide-ranging discussion about the Islamists in our midst: Mamdani in NYC, all across Europe, and others.
Full Episode: The Hardy Boys (and Nancy Drew) Meet Dracula
I don't remember this show, except for remembering that Nancy Drew was hot and the opening credits were foreboding and exicting
Schmoll: 53% of New Jersey likely voters say their neighbors are voting for Ciattarelli, while 47% say the cheater/grifter Mikie Sherrill
The "who do you think your neighbors are voting for" question is designed to avoid the Shy Tory problem, wherein conservative people lie to schmollsters because they don't want to go on record with a likely left-winger telling them who they're really voting for. So instead the question is who do you think your neighbors are voting for, so people can talk about who they themselves support without actually having to admit it to a left-wing rando stranger recording their answers on the phone.
TJM Complains about Wreck-It Ralph The very topical premiere of TJM's YouTube Channel.
Interesting football history: How the forward pass was created in response to the nineteen -- 19! -- people killed playing football in 1905 alone
The original rules of football did not allow forward passes. The ball was primarily advanced by running, with blockers forming lines with interlocked arms and just smashing into the similarly-interlocked defensive lines. It was basically Greek hoplite spear formations but with a semi-spherical ball. As calls to ban the sport entirely grew, some looked for ways to de-emphasize mass charges as the primary means of advancing the ball, and some specifically championed allowing a passer to throw the ball forward.
Sydney Sweeney unleashes the silver orbs
Thanks to @PatriarchTree
Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions.
-- G.K. Chesterton
[CBD]
Atari to release former competitor Intellivision with 45 games for $149
I always thought Intellivision was kinda lame (to the extent a cutting edge videogame box can be lame).
Intellivision insists upon itself.
Pitfall was a really good game. I don't know if it was available on Intellivision. Update: It was. But I don't know if it's included in the new unit.
Recent Comments
JTB: "279 ... "Could you pickle Brussels sprouts in wine ..."

sock_rat_eez[/i][/s][/b][/u]: "*clink!* ..."

Skip : "Last call for drinks ..."

sock_rat_eez[/i][/s][/b][/u]: "huh, cool, I'w'l have to try that, thank you! ..."

barbarausa: "Ben Had, have you ever seen Babette's Feast? ..."

CharlieBrown'sDildo [Flying the American Flag!]: "Okay folks, it is time for a cocktail. Or maybe a ..."

Kindltot: "sock_rat_eez, if you use malt it will rise faster. ..."

sock_rat_eez[/i][/s][/b][/u]: "291, innit? ..."

sock_rat_eez[/i][/s][/b][/u]: "grrr is right! but it IS lit up in multi-colors ..."

CharlieBrown'sDildo [Flying the American Flag!]: "I think the flour is now about .75 per loaf [i] ..."

sock_rat_eez[/i][/s][/b][/u]: "yeah, she's on the phone ... ..."

Alberta Oil Peon: "whoopsie, read AOP Posted by: sock_rat_eez at Nov ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives