Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« How Could Jack Ryan Lose... | Main | New York Times: Iraq Sought Al Qaeda Alliance (Who Said That? Oh Yeah: The New York Times) »
June 24, 2004

Dick Cheny Slices Like a F'n' Hammer

Cheney to Leahy: "Fuck you." It's about time someone said it.

This may sound alarmist, but the center is not holding, and this country is increasingly fighting a full-scale political civil war.

I sure the hell am not going to criticize Cheney for this, given the crap these scumbags pull on a daily basis. But we are starting to come to the point of no return. There has to be some level of mutual respect and trust for our country to work.

I'm also worried that if politics become nothing more than hatred, that's a battle we just can't win against the left. They're much too good at it.

Thanks to Brian B for the headline.


posted by Ace at 06:21 PM
Comments



Ah, yes, Cheney and the evil Halliburton. Remember when the Left insisted that Cheney had to sell all Halliburton stock when he became Bush's running mate? So he did. Then the same Left howled with indignation because he made a profit by selling his stock. Good grief!

Posted by: Anne L. on June 24, 2004 06:32 PM

Wow. Dick Cheney slices like a fucking hammer.

Posted by: Brian B on June 24, 2004 06:34 PM

Did he say the Leahy is "Major League"? Because Leahy is in a league of his own.

Posted by: Raoul Ortega on June 24, 2004 06:39 PM

Does that mean we can OFFICIALLY designate the senator from Vermont as "Loose Shit Leahy" now?

Posted by: Senator PhilABuster on June 24, 2004 06:45 PM

" Because Leahy is in a league of his own."

Are you sure? 'Cause I could swear the devil's in that league to.

Posted by: Brian B on June 24, 2004 06:49 PM

"Does that mean we can OFFICIALLY designate the senator from Vermont as "Loose Shit Leahy" now?"

Oh, I'd say he earned the SHIT part a loooooong time ago.

Posted by: Brian B on June 24, 2004 06:50 PM

This is encouraging. One can only hope that following a victory in November, Bush and company will become extremely uncivil with the opposition.

Posted by: zetetic on June 24, 2004 07:40 PM

Zetetic,

That would be so amusing to watch. Seriously, every day the news would be the single most entertaining thing around.

But as much as the ten-year-old boy in me wants to see the President calling daily press conferences to announce that, for example, "HAHAHA to you, Kerry, who I beat by one of the widest margins in history. That is all," one of the oldest lessons of war is that you shouldn't fight on two fronts. And we are at war against terrorists, as every sane (read: non-liberal) person knows. We don't need to start a Civil War in America through increasing incivility. I'm disappointed in Cheney, much as Leahy deserved getting cussed out, because, like Ace, I'm afraid the center can't hold.

Counterpoint - would America really be worse off if California and the eastern seaboard were to secede? Think about it. If we were two separate nations, we could demonstrate within a very short time span how well liberal economic policy works. Consider that in post WWII Germany, no one was ever caught trying to sneak into East Berlin. And consider that no one in Florida has ever turned a Buick into a boat and sailed it to Cuba. There would be something mighty satisfying about leaving the Left to stew in its own worthlessness for a while, before crawling back.

Posted by: Aaron on June 24, 2004 08:27 PM

The problem with the "we need a modicum of decency" argument is that WE'RE the only ones trying to be decent, and the strategy hasn't worked. As far as I can tell, the Senate Republicans spend most of their time fretting that they might be offending their leftist counterparts, and not nearly enough time fighting back. The democrats block judges, asserting that there must be a supermajority to confirm them -- an unprecedented act -- and the Republicans just go on talk shows and shake their head mournfully over the matter. The democrats rip Ashcroft a new one during his confirmation hearing (and for Ashcroft you can substitute in any number of Republican nominees going back to Bork), and the Republicans talk about being "compassionate conservatives" and wanting to work with their "friends across the aisle."

In short, the Democrats are already playing mean, and they're playing dirty. Our side has tried being friendly and Duddly Do-Rightish, and it simply hasn't worked. They just continue to out-manuever, out-spin and out-play us.

So I'm sending out big props to Cheney. It's about fucking time someone told that asshole Leahy to stick it where the sun don't shine.

Posted by: Scout on June 24, 2004 08:35 PM

I'm actually with you on that, Aaron. But remember what happened last time a state (my home state, actually) attempted to assert its rightful sovereignty. Those on the other side couldn't stand independence and used slavery as the "reason" for opposing it. It'll never fly.

Posted by: Smack on June 24, 2004 08:41 PM

Sorry, Aaron, I'm afraid I have to side with Zetetic and Scout on this one.

"one of the oldest lessons of war is that you shouldn't fight on two fronts."

Against, say, Germany AND Japan?

"We don't need to start a Civil War in America through increasing incivility."

We already HAVE a Civil War of incivility, we just aren't fighting back. Isn't this the same point we keep having to make to the Liberals about how the Islamofascists brought the war to US?

"I'm disappointed in Cheney, much as Leahy deserved getting cussed out, because, like Ace, I'm afraid the center can't hold."

And I'm afraid the center was already doomed long before this.

"Counterpoint - would America really be worse off if California and the eastern seaboard were to secede? "

Sadly, my beloved home state of Oregon would probably go with them, and I'd be forced to join the resistance movement.

Posted by: Brian B on June 24, 2004 08:45 PM

All,

Yes, I too have mourned the linguini-spinedness (to borrow from Rush) of the Republicans, and I've been infuriated with the problems in the Senate. But call me old-fashioned, I believe in treating people better than they deserve. Saddam does not deserve a trial, but we're giving him one. Child molesters don't deserve to get out of prison other than in a body bag, but we parole them. Michael Moore does not deserve freedom of speech, when his virulent anti-Americanism gets soldiers killed, but we let him flap his gums. If conservatives abandon the moral high-ground, there will be no one left on it.

Smack,

The difference between the Civil War and now is that the Union actually wanted the south and southerners to be part of that Union. What if we took a different approach to California and Massecheusetts?

Brian B,

Regarding the two-front war, I'm not satying it can't be done. It can and has been done. It's just not advisable, and should be avoided where possible. Napoleon and Hitler both learned that important lesson.

Note that the opposite can be true. When we invaded Iraq, we did so from the south and (eventually) the north. That's because we had the logistical wherewithal to do it, and we effectively forced Saddam to fight a two-front war. Granted, the outcome of that invasion was a foregone conclusion - nobody screws with the US armed forces. But the two-front strategy probably made the whole thing even quicker and safer for our guys.

Regarding secession, I'll be living in Nevada soon, and after California leaves, and we nuke it into the ocean, I might enjoy some nice beachfront property. Just one more reason.

Posted by: Aaron on June 24, 2004 08:56 PM

I remembered how worked up the Left was over the "He's an asshole...big time" comment.

Wait until this one hits the papers tomm.

Posted by: sonofnixon on June 24, 2004 10:05 PM

The Lefties and Loonies may be better at invective and disingenuous "dialogue" - but we to the Right of Trotsky, if not Atila The Hun, are better armed.

If they had ClueOne or any sense, the incivilty would have been moderated long ago. Foolishly, they believe that everyone is a wussified New Age Screecher - like themselves - indoctrinated by and subscribing to the New Age Rules Against Violence, thus they believe they can get in your face, daily, and screech - and there is nothing you (or anyone else, for that matter) can do about it.

Wrong. When it begins to melt down - and that's likely before November - the domestic shit will hit the fan. There are some very angry people and they are talking past each other. Total disconnect.

This cannot continue forever. Cheney's pressure release is much like a pre-cursor to an earthquake. If the provocations and bile continue to build at this rate, the buildup will exceed the ability of this fault (heh) to equalize peacefully. Inevitably there will be a cathartic moment, a social earthquake, and either the Loonies will release their fantasies and deal with reality - or...

So common sense suggests, anyway.

Posted by: .com on June 25, 2004 12:30 AM

I still amazed that this is getting so much play, while Gore's Godwin's Law moment isn't. Gore just surrendered - he has finally admitted he has nothing more to say and resorted to the same "republicans-are-Nazis" attack usually reserved for people holding giant puppet heads on a street in San Francisco.

This man was a few hundred votes from being President of the United States of America. Amazing.

Posted by: Ross on June 25, 2004 09:35 AM

Cheney was only verbalizing what many Americans think or verbalize themselves every time that pompous windbag of an empty suit opens his pie-hole to waste even more of our precious oxygen.

I agree that conservatives have been civil to this point, but thus far it has been a unilateral effort.

The best way to end simmering harrassment is to counter with overwhelming force.

Ditto what Mr. Cheney said, 'Senator' and ESFOAD.

Posted by: Joe Mama on June 25, 2004 10:54 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
You know we "joke" about the GOPe just "conserving" leftist things?
David French just posted:

Populists ask what conservativism has ever conserved?
Well its about to conserve birthright citizenship!
Posted by: 18-1

I couldn't hate this queen of the cuck-chair more if it paid seven figures and came with a corner office.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk birthright citizenship, the 14th Amendment and SCOTUS, no boots in Iran, Artemis II and refocusing NASA, the NBA's hatred of everything non-woke, and more!
In more marketing for Project Hail Mary, scientists say they've found the biosigns indicating life growing on an alien planet. It's not proof, just signatures of chemicals that are produced by biological metabolism, and it could be nothing, but scientists think it's a strong sign that this planet is inhabited by something.
In a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a team of scientists announced the detection of dimethyl sulfide (along with a similar detection of dimethyl disulfide) in the atmosphere of an exoplanet called K2-18b. This is actually the second detection of dimethyl sulfide made on this planet, following a tentative detection in 2023.
Tons of chemicals are detected in the atmospheres of celestial objects every day. But dimethyl sulfide is different, because on Earth, it's only produced by living organisms.
"It is a shock to the system," Nikku Madhusudhan, first author on the paper, told the New York Times. "We spent an enormous amount of time just trying to get rid of the signal."

He means they tried to prove the signal was caused by things other than dimethyl sulfide but they could not.
Artemis moon shot a go, scheduled for 6:24 Eastern time tonight
Great marketing arranged by Amazon to promote Project Hail Mary. Okay not really but it does work out that way.
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Recent Comments
Nova Local: "166 162 >To the surprise of no one here, VA govern ..."

pudinhead: "Will probably affect the whole referendum on the r ..."

man: "Iran is threatening to no longer restrain itself" ..."

TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "171 Remember when they were promising the super a ..."

18-1: "[i]To the surprise of no one here, VA governor Spa ..."

Auspex: "Considering the text, I'd assume it's a Honeymoone ..."

Stateless - He ain't heavy, he's my dog. Old, but full of life.: "I...don't think there's much to escalate with anym ..."

Indy in the Oval Office with DJT: "Don't get cocky, kid. ..."

redridinghood: "Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh TYRUS SAYS IT PERFE ..."

Bob Newhart : "Two words: Stop it. ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i] Remember when they were promising the super a ..."

Michelle Fields: "I would like to hear details of those STOL aircraf ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives