Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Bill Clinton: "Ya Got Nothin' On Me, Copper!" | Main | Illinois Republican Senate Candidate Rocked By Steamy Sex-Allegations By Former Wife, Jeri "Seven of Nine" Ryan »
June 22, 2004

David Bowie Hit In the Eye With a Lollipop

I tried to think of a cute headline, but honestly, is it necessary?

The headline is accurate. A lollipop was thrown right into his eye, and the stick-end became lodged there.

It's not gory, but the picture is, believe it or not, not for the easily-rattled. You don't appreciate how ugly a sight it is to see a lollipop stuck in someone's eye until you've actually witnessed it.

This is interesting:

One fan said: “He grabbed a mike and called the person responsible a coward and bastard for hiding in the crowd.

Hmmmm... I know someone else who calls shadowy assailants who hide amidst a civilian population "cowards." And swells like David Bowie call him an idiot monster for doing so.

Not to politicize an apolitical event, but here goes: Why is it that liberal politics gives people the confidence to say that things they know in their gut are true -- murder is evil and murderers should be harshly punished; there is no "excuse" for violent crime; people who attack the innocent while hidden in crowds are cowards -- are in fact 100% false? And, indeed, anyone believing in such 100% false ideas is some sort of a racist thug?

Why do they imagine there's such a great divergence between micro-politics (what we say and do and believe in our own small personal lives) and macro-politics (what we say and do and believe about how our nation should behave)?

Hat tip: Right Wing News.


posted by Ace at 02:13 AM
Comments



A woman in her 30s said it was an accident.

She said: “I was dancing, holding the sweet up. Then I was pushed and it flew from my hand.”

They pushed me really hard, that is, and right at the top of my arm movement, someone hit me with a taser gun, causing my wrist to snap forward and release the lollipop at high speed on a flat trajectory up into Bowie's eye.

If not for the taser gun, my lollipop might have just landed on top of someone's head or on the floor. You should be looking for the guy with the taser gun.

Posted by: rdbrewer on June 22, 2004 08:35 AM

It seems that Liberalism also prefers to run an economy with Macroeconomics, while the Reagan revolution was a return to Microeconomics.

Maybe its just in all spheres that the Left believes that 'societies' are wholly different creatures from the individuals within them, and that they respond to different incentives.

For people who believe that 'societies' are creatures with a will of their own, that actually exist apart from any given member, I could see how you might believe that.

But it doesn't make any sense.

Posted by: Brock on June 22, 2004 09:58 AM

Considering it's Bowie, are you sure it wasn't a "little boy lollypop"?

Posted by: Senator PhilABuster on June 22, 2004 10:01 AM
Posted by: Ian Wood on June 22, 2004 02:17 PM

I stumble into town just like a sacred cow
Visions of swastikas in my head
Plans for everyone
It's in the whites of my eyes

And when I get excited
My little China Girl says
Oh baby you should have shut your eye
She says ... sh-sh-shhh

Posted by: glove on June 22, 2004 09:27 PM

Ace,

Who has Bowie called an idiot monster?

GWB?

Just asking.

Posted by: MeTooThen on June 22, 2004 11:56 PM

Arik?

Posted by: MeTooThen on June 22, 2004 11:57 PM

Shit, this may ruin my day.

Posted by: MeTooThen on June 22, 2004 11:58 PM

I wrote,

And swells like David Bowie call him an idiot monster for doing so.

Which was a bit vague about whether David Bowie, or just swells like Bowie, called Bush and Sharon monsters. I meant it to be vague, because I don't know Bowie's actual politics.

I will say, though, that your strong desire to believe that David Bowie isn't a super-leftist reminds me of kids I knew in high school who were quite insistent that Boy George, whose music they liked, was straight as an arrow.

I don't know Bowie's politics. I do know he's 1) British 2) bisexual (this may be redundant with #1) and 3) a trendy, progressive artiste.

This doesn't profile as "conservative" to me.

Posted by: ace on June 23, 2004 01:39 AM

Ace (Smitty),

Actually Bowie appeared resolute in his condemnation of the terrorists that perpetrated the 9-11 attacks. He has lived in NYC and was quite keen to protect it.

Also, at the Bowie concert in Las Vegas this February, before he sang "I'm Afraid of Americans" he said to the crowd (I will have to paraphrase here) something like, "When this song came out I felt it meant one thing, and now after 9-11 I feel it means something else. Good thing to be afraid."

The Vegas crowd cheered.

So I was surprised to read that your post.

And no, despite his life in the arts and his sexuality, he seems to be pretty grounded when it comes to the war, at least the few times I read or heard his statments about it.

And lastly, there are many liberals, moderates, libertarians, etc. who seek to destroy the radical Islamists, not just conservatives. But you knew that.

Posted by: MeTooThen on June 24, 2004 02:18 AM

First of all, I want to make it clear that I was trying to be jocular in making the Boy George comparison. That was intended to make you smile. It wasn't a joke at your expense. I Just thought it was a funny comparison.

Second, as I said, I don't know David Bowie's politics. All that stuff you just said: I didn't know that. Consider me informed.

Although, let's be realistic, a lot of artists said they were all pro-American and anti-terrorist after 9-11, and a lot have become less so since then. Paul McCartney, for example.

And third, yes, you're right, a liberal could favor America defending herself, but that would be a liberal with a conservative view on national defense. That's how I meant "conservatve" -- conservative on this issue.

Posted by: Smitty on June 24, 2004 01:11 PM

Smitty,

Thanks.

And yes, you're correct.

When the "cultural elite" (as VDH so aptly has named them) realize that defending one's country might mean, you know, like going to war with like, guns and stuff, they have been known to explode in spasms of narcissism and lunacy, to wit: "Not in Our Name".

As if.

Posted by: MeTooThen on June 24, 2004 04:27 PM

Smitty,

Paul McCartney.

LOL.

Posted by: MeTooThen on June 24, 2004 04:28 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD have a short chat about Iran, the disgusting SAVE Act theater, Mamdani's politicizing of St. Patrick's Day, and more!
Recent Comments
Candace Owens AS Nathan Thurm: "[i]196 Festive Little Hats is a code word for Jooo ..."

Ian S.: "[i]Well, you'd be wrong. Not posting the link, but ..."

Josephistan: "How did half the country get so f'n weird? How? ..."

XTC: "Nobody ever calls Jharles by his government name, ..."

Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "The "literal Statue of Liberty" (which of course s ..."

Robert: "parody song lyrics are the lowest form of comedy. ..."

Josephistan: "Kamala Harris received 0.0% of the democrat primar ..."

Intercepted Reddit Transmissions brought by the Intrepid AoS Liaison: "Damn. I had so much to share, but stupid WORK had ..."

Rev. Wishbone: ">>>How did half the country get so f'n weird? How? ..."

William F. 'Buck' Dharma: " If people wonder why I didn't just name the guy a ..."

San Franpsycho: "30 MARCH 2026 / SF NEWS / JAY BARMANN Sheryl ..."

Heroq: "You know that scene from Mad Men where Donald Drap ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives