Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Expanding the Format: Now Wankette HQ Will Begin Doing Poopie-Jokes, Too | Main | Big News: Iraqis Say Shia-Kurd Dispute Resolved »
June 10, 2004

Transcript: Ana Marie Cox's Open-Mike-Night Performance at the Dupont Circle Laff-Shack, circa 1997

Hi. My name is Ana Marie Cox. I just flew in from LA, and boy is my anus tired.

Thank you.

Oh, young people, young people. Who can keep up with young people these days? They're crazy. Crazy I tell you. You know what young people are into these days?

Anal sex.

Thank you.

My mother. My mother is crazy. I can't keep up with her. She's always complaining. She's always like, "When are you going to get married?" She's always saying, "When are you going to get a real job?" She's always asking, "When are you going to stop letting strange men shank you up the craphole?"

Thank you.

I see a lot of people are drinking. Drinking's fun. You know the crazy thing about drinking?

Making a pee-pee.

Thank you.

And what's going on in politics? Politics is crazy. You know what I can't stand about politics?

Closeted Republican homosexuals.

Thank you.

But seriously, stop me if you haven't heard this one before. Two closeted Republican homosexuals are walking down the street. One bends over to pick up a quarter, and the other bumps him right in the ass.

The first homo says, "Hey, I really enjoyed that." The other homo says, "Me too. It just felt right."

Thank you.

Hey, look, I'm holding a microphone. You know what a microphone reminds me of?

A penis.

Thank you.

You know what else is crazy? Getting a rectal exam from a proctologist. He says he wants to insert a rigid seigmoidoscope into my rectum, and I said, "Rectum?!? But I hardly even knew 'em!!!"

He laughed so hard he ended up dorking me up the keister.

Thank you.

Cops. Cops are crazy. They're always pulling me over. But all women know there's a way to get out of a ticket. You ladies know what I'm talking about. Any time you want to get out of a ticket, there's one way to do it:

Anonymous roadside anal sex.

Thank you.

Well, that's all the time for me. You guys have been great. I'll be here until Wednesday. I'm available for children's parties and Bar Mitzvahs.

And when I say "I'm available," that's another delicious double-entendre.

Thank you.

The Point: On the off chance that Ms. Cox is reading this, let me explain the moral of this parody.

A joke isn't just saying "butt-sex" or "penis." See, that's where you're going wrong. "Butt-sex" or "penis" might be part of a joke, but the words themselves are not, in fact, jokes.

You seem under the misimpression that simply larding up your site with the words "butt-sex" and "penis" makes it "funny." It doesn't, actually.

You might think it's "funny," because your male friends seem to enjoy it when you talk about penises and butts and the possible intersection between them. But they don't think you're funny; they just like hearing women yap endlessly about butt-sex. Who doesn't?

But, as enjoyable as that might be, it's not actually funny.

I know this may come as a shock, but "weiner" is not technically a punch-line.

Update: Apparently Wonkette can spot a "painfully obvious pun" when someone else is making it:

The NYT reports on the superpower soiree that ended yesterday, at which pool reporters "luxuriated in their own seven-bedroom house, fully equipped with a formal library, a sunroom with a jukebox, and true to their duty" -- painfully obvious pun alert -- "a small pool."

Ahem. Painfully obvious puns? Welcome to our collective nightmare, Ms. Cox.

Update: "Anal Marie" provided me with an opening line that was too good not to steal, so I stole it.


posted by Ace at 05:42 PM
Comments



I just flew in from D.C. and man is my anus tired. Look out!

Posted by: Anal Marie on June 10, 2004 06:18 PM

Damn! I forgot that one!

Posted by: ace on June 10, 2004 06:23 PM

A Jew, a Catholic, and a Buddhist walk into a bar. Within five minutes, they're all taking turns pounding me in the crapper.

Thank you!

Posted by: ace on June 10, 2004 06:24 PM

Anal jokes aren't funny? But . . . but . . . but . . . but . . . [ad infinitum]

Posted by: ccwbass on June 10, 2004 06:41 PM

still better than Margaret "The Mandarin Manatee" Cho

Posted by: sonofnixon on June 10, 2004 06:42 PM

I just went on a ride. Butt Pirates of the Caribbean.

badabing

Posted by: rdbrewer on June 10, 2004 06:57 PM

I wonder what Denton really thinks of Wonko. Cox has a pretty impressive resume -- executive editor of Suck, for one thing, which was always an interesting read -- and Denton's other blogs are all fun and engaging, so it's hard for me to believe that this is what he had in mind when he hired her.

No doubt the publicity from the Washingtonienne thing makes the pill easier to swallow.

Posted by: Allah on June 10, 2004 07:13 PM

Allah, what the heck are you doing on this blog, when, with all due respect to the Creator of Worlds, you really ought to be photoshopping on your own? You're the reason I started reading blogs in the first place. Well, Neal Boortz' link to your blog is actually the reason.

Posted by: Aaron on June 10, 2004 07:16 PM

You're killing me, Ace.

Posted by: BH on June 10, 2004 08:26 PM

Aaron--Thanks, but I'm too bummed about too many things these days to muster content that isn't unpleasantly angry. I'd just as soon spare you guys the bile.

. . . Although, since you mention it, I did have an idea for a 'Shop this afternoon. The glut of hyper-treacly blog tributes to Reagan has pushed me to the fucking brink, and no doubt we'll be getting another snoutful tomorrow now that Ray Charles has gone and bought it. So I was going to do an image of Reagan and Ray sitting together at a piano in heaven with all clouds and flowers and shit around them, and I was going to erase Ray's shades and replace them with some eyes. Then I was going to have him say, "I can read the music!" and Reagan would be saying, "I can remember the lyrics!", and at the bottom of the photo, in the fanciest, fruitiest fucking scripty font you've ever seen, I was going to title it "Jammin' in Heaven". It would have been funny to see the reactions, 'cause undoubtedly some people would have taken it seriously and found it rilly rilly moving. Alas, I couldn't find suitable photos of R and R to splice together.

Seriously, I love Reagan as much as the next right-winger but people need to dial it down. I read more than one post today by bloggers who claim to have stood in their living rooms while the coffin was being carried up the Capitol steps. I mean, dude.

Posted by: Allah on June 10, 2004 09:01 PM

Allah needs a percocet, a drinky and a nappy.

All this mass tribute is putting the liberal rage-o-meter into the red zone and on the verge of spectacular meltdown.

How can that not please thee?

Posted by: lauraw on June 10, 2004 09:17 PM

I know what you mean, Allah. It's very touching and encouraging that so many care about the former President. And I'm delighted at how angry it makes the left. But Mr. Reagan himself was extremely humble and focused on the needs of others. He probably would have been a little embarrassed--though honored, I'm sure--at all the lavish attention and tributes.

That photoshop idea actually sounds pretty funny. I'm a pianist and Ray is one of my favorite guys. I think they probably would have been the kind of guys to hang out together if they had ever really gotten the chance.

Posted by: Smack on June 10, 2004 10:22 PM

All of the pomp and circumstance for Reagan's funeral may seem overblown, but take a step back and ponder the influence the man had on the last century....read that again CENTURY...and the attention/focus seems about right.

Moreover, from a strictly historical point of view, we may never see such true heartfelt emotion/outpouring for a President in our lifetimes.

Obviously, it goes without saying that Clinton will NEVER receive such affection from the Public (the Press, sure, but not the masses).

Carter's followers could congregate in the phone booth located at the intersection of Wisconsin and M Street. And they would still have room for more...

Ford? (exactly...historical footnote)

Bush I...a man with an incredible resume and contributions to this country (WWII, politician, CIA head, POTUS) but more time is needed to cement his standing...plus Bush II's presence is preventing the settling of the dust on his father's legacy.

So, if the current (and future) Presidents happily grey into old age....this could be the last major state funeral (not to be morbid, but it is fascinating) that many in this generation will ever witness.

In addition, many of us can state that we remember things before, during, and after Reagan. And we are grateful that he changed the course of history.

Forever.

Posted by: sonofnixon on June 10, 2004 11:25 PM

Hmm...more butt-lovin' fun from Ace. I'm sensing a theme here.

Posted by: Da Goddess on June 11, 2004 04:14 AM

You're right about all that, sonof. I guess the two things that are starting to bother me are:

1) People are mostly just repeating the same things about Reagan over and over. I agree with all of those things, of course, but there's only so many times you can say them.

2) A lot of what goes on in certain media outlets looks more like pandering than real feeling. Maybe this is just me, though.

Posted by: on June 11, 2004 08:39 AM

There is far too much talent on this blog to hide it 'behind' this kind of 'bile.' What would Reagan write if he had a blog?

Posted by: tx_993 on June 11, 2004 09:18 AM

I will never again drink water while reading Ace of Spades.

I am only grateful the resulting spray missed the keyboard altogether.

Posted by: Sailor Kenshin on June 11, 2004 09:19 AM

heh heh *** ba dum .. bump ***

The wall-to-wall Reagan coverage has been a bit much.

Posted by: The Commissar on June 11, 2004 09:32 AM

I think we can all agree that

a) The coverage has been a tad excessive, and

b) the liberal bed-wetting over the excessive coverage more than makes up for it. If I had a blog I would not have done more than one post (I'm too young to have anything substantive to contribute, and nobody needs another parrot), but every day we're hearing about Reagan when it's no longer news is better than a day of hearing about Abu Ghraib when it's no longer news.

Posted by: Aaron on June 11, 2004 11:15 AM

The liberal bedwetting you describe is so delightful, so satisfying-

All of this- the heartfeld eulogies, two hundred-thousand ordinary citizens paying their respects, the endless retrospectives and notable quotes....

It all conveys to the liberals what failures they have been. They have been trying to bend this culture for over 50 years...and here we are engaged in full worship of a Conservative icon.

It was probably Reagan's wish to be cloistered for the end of his years, and a very wise decision it was. I'm glad we were spared the view of him in his most pathetic and enfeebled state; imagine what jokes his enemies would have made at his expense, and how sad his legacy would have been, instead of triumphant.

Posted by: lauraw on June 11, 2004 12:24 PM

Ace,

Ms. Cox (in the anus) will probably nnot read this, and if she did would probably just be dismissive, but as for this reader, your point is spot on. I enjoyed when she started because not EVERYTHING was poorly crafted sexual innuendos. But it's like the slutty girl in school, once she starts down that road, the only way to keep the attention coming is to go farther and farther.

It's a ratchet effect. The sad part is, she has a decent understanding of comic situations when she's not obseesing about 8th grade sexual jokes.

Allah,

Your p-shop idea would be sweet if you could pull it off. Wondering if you saw the frontline last night about Abdurahman Khadr? Enough to make one understand how even those on our side could have trouble with the constant pressure. Worry not. There are those who appreciate you without you having to become, as Wonkette has, a self-parody. I can understand also how certain other forums have gotten a little hard for you to deal with (but thankfully not Ace's here).

Posted by: hobgoblin on June 11, 2004 12:39 PM

Escpecially satisfying is hearing liberal media icons expressing their dismay at the extent of the coverage. "Hey," they whine, "Reagan's death is more than two days old. It's no longer news. We need to get back to Abu Ghraib, which is always fresh, interesting, and never gets redundant, even when we mention it in conenction with a story on, say, the rising price of milk."

Sorry, liberal media. You have my sympathies during what must be a very hard time for you.

Posted by: Aaron on June 11, 2004 12:42 PM

Talk about your non-sequiturs here, folks. From Anal Marie to the liberal media whining about excessive coverage of the Gipper. Pretty rich.

Anyhoo, everything will be back to normal come Monday. Reagan will still be dead (God bless him), the media will resume their gay prison porn obsession, and Wonkette will still be talking about...well, you know.

Now, all that has to happen to get the world right again is to get Allah out of his funk and back to some righteous p'shoppin. C'mon, Creator of Worlds, Ace has been carrying the load mightily but we need some A double lizzle, no shizzle.

And, Ace, you're on a roll, man. You keep this up and I smell Instalanch. I mean, c'mon, you've got droll commentary, devoted visitors, obligatory ass-fucking references, all the guys get shirts, oh, and, cowbell. It's almost like when you move you slice like a fuckin' hammer. What's not to link, I ask. What's not to link?

Grok on, dude!

Posted by: kelly on June 12, 2004 05:59 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD have a short chat about Iran, the disgusting SAVE Act theater, Mamdani's politicizing of St. Patrick's Day, and more!
Recent Comments
wickedpinto: "BUT THEY DO ANYWAY! "I can't and never will vote. ..."

fentanyl is my only friend: "That story gave me AIDS. ..."

wickedpinto: "These fucking party payed fools were all over the ..."

13times: "Ranked choice or jungle primaries. California i ..."

fentanyl is my only friend: "I say teepee for my bunghole. You say my bunghole ..."

wickedpinto: "I remember, it was the first year I was down here ..."

fentanyl is my only friend: "Why so arngy? Why not take an alcohol? Be calm, li ..."

wickedpinto: "I said, "Kat" I am sorry, I meant "Paul" (paulin ..."

SciVo: "Oops, missed this in my earlier skimming. The myst ..."

wickedpinto: "321 I always thought Australia would be mildly lef ..."

wickedpinto: "and love your country, btw, Australia DOES respect ..."

wickedpinto: "They go into long winded detail as they threaten y ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives