Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Canadian Election Results | Main | Claim: Wal-Mart Can Make You Impotent »
January 23, 2006

Terrorist Stronghold Retaken

Those terrorist-loving, John Murtha-hugging, communist-supporting twits at Code Pink have been protesting outside Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C. for quite some time now. (They have also been doing the same thing outside the Balboa Naval Hospital in San Diego, California).

Fortunately, the cadre running the operation at Walter Reed took too many hits of the wacky weed, and failed to renew the protest permits for "their corners."

The Good Guys were vigilant.

The Good Guys attacked.

To make the point to Code Pink and the general public, some of The Good Guys advertised that things had changed:

NewCorner.JPG

Watch and weep, treasonous weasels.


posted by Harry Callahan at 10:11 PM
Comments



Beautiful.

Good to have ya back Ace.

Posted by: Amish on January 23, 2006 10:19 PM

Thanks for the compliment, but check the byline.

Posted by: Harry Callahan on January 23, 2006 10:26 PM

Goddamnit. Sorry about that. Fuckin byline. Are you sure your not Ace?

Posted by: Amish on January 23, 2006 10:41 PM

Thanks for the link, Harry, and for stopping by. Pathetic that these Pinkos hold their anti-war protests, disguised as "vigils", outside of military hospitals. And that's why we're there, so the troops don't have just them to see.

Stay tuned for next week....

Posted by: Tom the Redhunter on January 23, 2006 10:53 PM

Is it just me or does our side have a lot more fun than theirs?

Posted by: Sortelli on January 23, 2006 11:23 PM

I make a point of 'visiting' the hippies in my town each Thursday night, to remind them who provides them the freedom to exercise their rights of assembly and free speech.
And to tell them that they are shit-for-brains hippies.
But I'm grateful to those that keep vigil for the Troops, especially in front of our hospitals.
The last thing they need is to see those anti-American sons-of-bitches 'supporting' them, after losing a limb or worse.
What callous, selfish pigs.
Useful idiots.

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on January 23, 2006 11:24 PM

Good job outta these guys. Now I hope they've learned the lesson of the First Battle of Fallujah: Never pay for the same ground twice.

Their permit renewal committee should have more redundancy than the safety systems on a nuclear reactor.

Posted by: Russ from Winterset on January 23, 2006 11:28 PM

Today is a great day. First Portugal, then Canada, now this. We have crushed the moonbats, seen them driven before us, and heard the lamentation of their girly-men.

Posted by: MMDeuce on January 23, 2006 11:52 PM

God bless 'em.

Posted by: shawn on January 24, 2006 01:03 AM

Sorry, I don't find the whole "Sign calling the other guy an asshole" thing to be that witty.

Posted by: scarshapedstar on January 24, 2006 04:21 AM

Sorry, I don't find the whole "Sign calling the other guy an asshole" thing to be that witty.

And the award for "Completely Missing the Point of the Effing Post and Consequently Setting Up Yet Another Dumb-Ass Strawman" goes to . . . SSS!!

Posted by: geoff on January 24, 2006 04:28 AM

Not to mention "imagining a sign that isn't in the picture." The only signs I see say "This corner under new non-commie management," "support our troops," and "U tha ou mil" -- which probably in its entirety reads "US (something?) thanks our military."

Glad to help.

Posted by: Andrea Harris on January 24, 2006 06:56 AM

I think starshapedscar has been hitting the same wacky weed as the code-pink-commies.

Posted by: Xoxotl on January 24, 2006 08:33 AM

Time for CODESISSYPINK to go home and make themselves usful

Posted by: spurwing plover on January 24, 2006 09:50 AM

I wonder where Code Pink gets their money from. Someone is giving Medea Benjamin $$ to fly all over the place to be obnoxious.

Posted by: shawn on January 24, 2006 10:09 AM

It would be interesting to do an actual auditing of the protest industry, to see who pays for how much of what.
And to see what hotels the big names get to stay in (my bet it isn't the airport Days Inn).

Posted by: mikey on January 24, 2006 10:17 AM

It would be interesting to do an actual auditing of the protest industry, to see who pays for how much of what.

This might be a good place to start.

Posted by: VRWC Agent on January 24, 2006 11:14 AM

My husband did two tours in Vietnam and when he came home he joined up with a number of these "pinko" organizations as you people call them, protesting outside hospitals and government buildings.

Why?

Because, after seeing and experiencing what he had in the war zone, losing many friends and being wounded himself, came to realize the American people were being led astray by the likes of Johnson and Nixon, all in the name of the political downside of "America losing a war."

Someday, many of you people, who my husband referred to as, "talkers, but not walkers" (not that some of you haven't served) will see the light and understand that Iraq is proving to be just as big a mistake as Vietnam ever was.

What's most disheartening, is that right now, it appears that anyone who doesn't agree with the current policies is considered unpatriotic, and treasonous, and I think that is not only unfair, it is un-American.

Maybe, instead of taking over the sidewalks outside the hospitals, the pro-war protesters could step inside and see what this fiasco has wrought.

Posted by: Martha on January 24, 2006 12:01 PM

Martha:

We don't really mind if protests are held outside government buildings. We do think it's heinous and despicable when protests are held outside a medical facility. The "pro-war" protestors are not "taking over the sidewalks" to send a message, but to stop the liberal hyenas from demoralizing patients and their loved ones during their recuperation.

Posted by: geoff on January 24, 2006 12:12 PM

geoff:
Have you ever visited any of the wounded?

I spend 20 hours a week doing so, and believe me, if you think the anti-war protesters are "demoralizing" these people, you are dreaming.

There are certainly some who are still as gung-ho as ever, but at least 90% of those who are free to voice their concerns and opinions say that it's the actual war itself, the rationale behind the initial invasion, and the realization that their wounds will forever effect their lives, that has them wondering why they were there in the first place and if and when their fellow soldiers will ever return.

Posted by: Martha on January 24, 2006 12:27 PM

That "at least 90%" sounds kinda like Kerry's claim that 3/4 of the military planned to vote for him 2004.

Posted by: RDub on January 24, 2006 12:45 PM

Someday, many of you people...will see the light and understand that Iraq is proving to be just as big a mistake as Vietnam ever was.
That'll happen only if we (again) turn our backs on the aspirations of a people seeking to live with a government of their own choosing.

Cordially...

Posted by: on January 24, 2006 12:46 PM

Have you ever visited any of the wounded?

No I haven't (they closed the military hospital here years ago). I make it a point to donate, though, and I religiously read the BlackFive site to hear the stories of the wounded, dead, and active military personnel in Afghanistan and Iraq. None of them sound anything like what you describe - most are trying to get back to their units as soon as they can, and most believe that they're doing a tremendous amount of good for the Iraqi people.

So I'm sorry, but your account sounds a lot like projection and selective filtering to me. But I think we'd all agree that peace, quiet, and a non-political atmosphere would be the best environment for the patients.

Posted by: geoff on January 24, 2006 12:53 PM

There are certainly some who are still as gung-ho as ever, but at least 90% of those who are free to voice their concerns and opinions say that it's the actual war itself, the rationale behind the initial invasion, and the realization that their wounds will forever effect their lives, that has them wondering why they were there in the first place and if and when their fellow soldiers will ever return.

Martha. Is. Full. Of. Shit.

She thinks that if the soldiers she supposedly visits do not tell her what whe wants to hear then they are simply not free to speak out. Bullshit.

I'm sure she goes down like a turd in a punchbowl in a military hospital.

Not that I believe she actually visits. She's like PLV or Micah Wright: a shameless liar.

Now--wait for it--

"How many hospitals have YOU visited Lipstick?"

Posted by: Lipstick on January 24, 2006 12:54 PM

Oh, she beat me to it with geoff.

Totally predictable and pathetic.

Now, time for her to go kill some penguins in the "Artic".

Posted by: Lipstick on January 24, 2006 01:00 PM

Martha,

I'll have to take your claim that your husband served in Vietnam. While his alleged service carries a demand for some well-deserved respect, it's not about to convince me to toe some ridiculous lefty line.

As for the comment about not 'Walking the Walk', I guess you mean serving in the military. I don't know who on this page has actually served in the military, but let me clear something up for you: The military serves the civilians. I pay for it every day. For that support, and for that money, I expect the military to protect me and my interests AGAINST ALL THREATS, FOREIGN. Are they braver than me? After watching Band of Brothers, and reading the book, I have to reply with an unqualified 'Yes'. But nobody, NOBODY, is going to tell me to stop operating in the interest of my own preservation, or the preservation of my way of life, just because I don't "Walk the Walk."

You see, we're different from the banana republics that the libs love so much, like Cuba, in that CIVILIANS call the shots, not the military. Imagine that.

Finally, you're right: This is in many ways just like Vietnam, in that we are operating in the interests in our country, and there are idiots out there who would like to see America back down again, to prove that we can be pushed around, so another 15 years of terrorist pinpricks can be endured, until they set us up for the knockout punch.

In short, nothing you've said so far matters. Murtha served in the military and he can sit and spin on it too. Your comment about military kids losing their support for the mission is a load of bull in any event.

Over and out.

Posted by: Fox on January 24, 2006 01:05 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD are joined by Jeff Carter, candidate for NV treasurer, and seasoned finance professional, for a discussion of the issues facing Nevadans, and the larger financial challenges in America.
Few people remember that Norm MacDonald began his career as a ventriloquist
MacDonald's old partner Adam Egot revealed that MacDonald repurposed a bit with one of his ventriloquist dolls -- that he was a "bad guy" who "didn't believe the Holocaust happened" -- for the Norm MacDonald show, in which he claimed Egot didn't believe in the Holocaust.
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Recent Comments
PaleRider: "I think the big issue with the OPT program is that ..."

Brother Tim (102mm/W59), Keeper of the Tim Continuum: "[i]keep recalling Vivek's cracks about American sc ..."

Smell the Glove: "You might not like Vivek, but he can't be worse th ..."

Heroq: "American college kids are taking a year to find a ..."

Lizzy: "Vivek is a scammer. Latest video I saw of him fro ..."

SMOD: "Lightning Literally Strikes Just Feet From Anti-Er ..."

four seasons : " Lol AOP ..."

SMOD: "Lightning Literally Strikes Just Feet From Anti-Er ..."

Alberta Oil Peon: "Anyone here good at meme-making? How about this: t ..."

Elric the Blade: "‘Fraud, waste, and abuse is at least 20% of ..."

Ex Rex Reeder: "If I pull up my social security statement and look ..."

goatexchange: "I am starting to suspect ALL foreigners as agents ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives