Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Spielberg Attempts Placating Olympics Terrorists; Murder-Mastermind Says "Just Get Out Of My Face" | Main | Testing "Spooky Action At A Distance" »
December 28, 2005

Allah's Big-Genitals Round-Up

I mean, a round-up of posts, mostly about genitals. And the Vikings sex-cruise.

Circumcision losing popularity in the US.

Health professionals caution women against, um, the "feminine pause that refreshes."

If you're upset you lost your, uhhh, maidenhead to a jackass on Prom Night, plastic surgery can give you a second chance to experience your first time.

All the grim details about the Vikings Sex Cruise. (Warning: this one's particularly frank in its descriptions).

Question: Does Fred Smoot's behavior count as "placating"? I'm not sure. But it's very exciting, to say the least.


posted by Ace at 05:45 PM
Comments



Do I run Google News searches for the word "vagina"?

Why, yes. Yes, I do.

Posted by: Allah on December 28, 2005 05:53 PM

Fred don't placate. Obviously, he thanked one of the dildo'd ladies and told her to get out of his face. On the other hand, Bryant McKinnie told one of the ladies to get on his face!

Posted by: BrewFan on December 28, 2005 05:54 PM

I highly recommend the hymen article, by the way. Sample quote:

Another patient, a 51-year-old Manhattan attorney and mother of three, had him reattach her hymen and tighten her vaginal walls in 2003. "I thought it would add that extra sparkle to our marriage," says the woman.

The key to marital bliss? A tight vagina.

Posted by: Allah on December 28, 2005 05:58 PM

Allah - tell us again why you don't just start blogging again?

Ah well, we can dream...

Posted by: marc on December 28, 2005 06:02 PM

Placate: To soothe or mollify especially by concession: APPEASE

I think we would need more information about the situation to accurately decide whether Mr. Smoot was involved in placation. Doesn't seem likely but definately not out of the realm of possibility.

Posted by: Big E on December 28, 2005 06:03 PM

Culpepper was charged with "putting his hands on the buttocks of a female dancer." That's a crime now? Wow, Clinton and Schwarzenegger better never go to Minnesota.

Posted by: kjones on December 28, 2005 06:25 PM

Allah, where's your @#%#@ blog?

Posted by: someone on December 28, 2005 06:45 PM

I know. I'll set up a fund that will encourage Allah to blog again.

Send ALL donations, via Paypal, to Slublog.

That's S-l-u...

Posted by: Slublog on December 28, 2005 06:50 PM

Ace,

How about a top ten list for reasons Allah should start blogging again?

I could come up with at least 3

Posted by: on December 28, 2005 07:16 PM

Allah, where's your @#%#@ blog?

It's right here:

http://ace.mu.nu/


Posted by: Michael on December 28, 2005 07:18 PM

Allah,

Every man has his price. Well....

Posted by: on December 28, 2005 07:20 PM

Seriously, Allah, if you don't want to blog, you should just get guest-blogger privileges from Ace and drop an article whenever you feel like it. Then, every time Ace gets a traffic spike because of your posts that boosts his ad revenue, he has to take you out to a really nice steak house, a movie, and a club where he will solicit women for you and otherwise act as your wingman.

Dude, you're doing a lot of work around here. It's time for Ace to show some love.

Posted by: Michael on December 28, 2005 07:28 PM

Did anyone notice the "healthwise" ad that shows up on the circumcision article? Refresh a few times and it shows up. Ummmmmm....Is it me, or is the visual of this ad related to the article?

Posted by: JHO on December 28, 2005 07:36 PM

Michael, you and Josie are starting to sound like stalkers.

Posted by: BrewFan on December 28, 2005 07:37 PM

Dude, you're doing a lot of work around here. It's time for Ace to show some love

He already has. Remember the night they got together for the first time to talk about all things gay? Didn't do much posting the next day if I remember correctly.

Posted by: on December 28, 2005 07:39 PM

I've been with a virgin. I'll be damned if I'm going through that all over again.
Anyways, for those who are Cheneyesque, it's allllll tight, baby.

Posted by: The Atom Bomb of Loving Kindness on December 28, 2005 07:47 PM
Dude, you're doing a lot of work around here. It's time for Ace to show some love.

Didn't he say recently that he makes $350 a month on ads? That's not quite twelve bucks a day. Neither he nor any other blogger short of Glenn is in a position to be paying for help.

Twelve bucks a day. When I had my blog, I'd spend at least twelve hours daily reading news, writing posts, and doing Photoshops to keep the content coming. One dollar an hour, in other words. How much per hour does a guy who scrubs toilets make? Five bucks? Six?

Posted by: Allah on December 28, 2005 08:09 PM

Yeah, but did you get into to explicitly to make a buck?

Posted by: Moonbat_One on December 28, 2005 08:16 PM

Now Allah, you know perfectly well that the crazy blog money isn't in the blog ads.

It's in the accessories, like t-shirts.

Ace probably netted about $100 out of that foray. (Or as I like to think of it, a nearly 25% monthly increase in revenue).

And your "Six Days Bitch" t-shirt?

Another pot of gold.

Posted by: Jack M. on December 28, 2005 08:17 PM
Yeah, but did you get into to explicitly to make a buck?

No, but look. To do it right requires a lot of work. It's fun sometimes too, especially at first, but not so fun that you'll devote yourself to it twelve hours a day just for the sheer joy of doing it. You think Ace makes himself post fifteen times a day because he can't get enough of hitting that update button?

Ultimately, there are only two incentives to blog: traffic and money. Building traffic will sustain you for awhile, but sooner or later you realize that it doesn't mean shit. It's nothing but ego juice. So the only incentive left is money, and ad rates aren't even in the ballpark of where they'd have to be to make this a going proposition for mid-level bloggers.

Either build an audience as big as Instapundit's or accept the fact that this will never be more than a hobby. And hobbies don't deserve twelve hours a day of one's time.

Posted by: Allah on December 28, 2005 08:27 PM
And your "Six Days Bitch" t-shirt?

Another pot of gold.

I'm trying to remember how many of those I sold, Jack. I think it was around 75. At a profit margin of three dollars each. Definitely a better return on my labor than blogging, but there wasn't much gold in that pot.

A dirty little secret about t-shirts, which Ace can verify: they don't sell. Ever. The best I ever did was with my Reagan t-shirt, which I think moved around 100 units. The fact is, you guys have better things to spend your cash on than vanity items from your favorite bloggers.

Posted by: Allah on December 28, 2005 08:31 PM

Whats your lips flapping about anyway?

Posted by: spurwing plover on December 28, 2005 08:33 PM

Allah,

I know. I'm just busting your chops a little.

Fact is, I agree with you. Blogging just isn't something that 99.9% of bloggers will ever see a significant amount of cash from engaging in.

We can't all have "bandwidth drives" that net hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Hell...in my entire history as a blogger I've netted $300 in donations.

Which is probably $300 more than my shitty blog musings deserve.

If there is any money to be made in blogging, I think you pretty much have to become a group blog.

It's the only way to even begin to make the time/reward ratios add up favorably.

Posted by: Jack M. on December 28, 2005 08:41 PM

A - yeah, I miss Allah in the House, too.
B - re: new hymens, I'll check the copy I have of one of his old books, but I recall comic Jack Douglas writing about a Japanese doctor who offered to do a new hymen on a woman for something like $83. (This was in Japan around 1963.) Nothing new under the sun, especially when it comes to that subject.

Posted by: Ira on December 28, 2005 09:05 PM

This douching story has been around as long as I can remember. Back in the early '80's the "experts" were telling women the vagina is self-cleaning.

I remember watching a show about it with my friends. After that show, my friends and I (we were 14) thought it was hilarious to tell everyone "you see, the pussy cleans itself" in a serious tone.

Later, in the '90's, it was popular for the feminists and the male feminists to denounce the douche as invention by men who know nothing about a woman's body and all they wanted to do was to make money and women feel self-concious about a perfectly natural function.

Posted by: Bart on December 28, 2005 09:19 PM

Hell...in my entire history as a blogger I've netted $300 in donations.

Well, you've gotten at least that recently from the paid endorsements. Maybe Ace should start pimping his main page.

Posted by: Michael on December 28, 2005 10:20 PM

Listen, Moon God, your linkblog idea might actually work.

(1) You already spend all that time anyway (see this blog, last two days of).
(2) Reynolds has long ago jumped the shark. No one has really tried to compete with him for linky-link volume.
(3) You have lots of built-up goodwill that would ensure a big launch.
(4) Idiots would start mailing YOU links, like you mail Ace.
(5) You don't want to admit it, but you occasionally get a photoshop jones, with no reliable outlet...

Posted by: someone on December 28, 2005 11:16 PM
(5) You don't want to admit it, but you occasionally get a photoshop jones, with no reliable outlet...

I photoshop myself into photos of porn stars.

No, just kidding. Maybe.

If I do a linkblog, I'm going to have to put up with all sorts of shit from people whining about how it's just links, it's not funny, they could do the same thing, blah blah blah. That's worth putting up with if there's money at stake, but there wouldn't be real money at stake for months and months and months. If ever.

Speaking of links, I've sent Ace seven or eight good ones over the last couple of hours. Either he's holding them for tomorrow or he's upped his standards.

Guess he doesn't want any new links tomorrow, huh?

Posted by: Allah on December 28, 2005 11:25 PM

Check the sidebar, dude.

I think you're seriously underestimating the explosion of blog publicity (and hits, and the possibility of crazy blogmoney) your return -- in any form -- would generate.

And if people whine, so what? Make it clear up front what you're doing. (Call it "Allah's Linkblog" if you have to.) And no comments.

But like I say, you're doing most of the work anyway, for none of the money/glory. (Well, unless the favors Ace gave you at Brokeback count...)

Posted by: someone on December 28, 2005 11:36 PM

I'm with someone.

See, Allah, you obviously still enjoy participating in the blogosphere.

The key is to set limits. Make it a hobby, not an occupation.

So, let's say you actually get a job. After work, you could spend an hour a day tossing out links with clever intros, throw in an occasional photoshop, maybe once in a while write something when you're in the mood for a rant. In the meantime, you have a job and are actually, like, dating women and stuff. You know, like living a life.

With your reputation, you'd have a small-medium size blog overnight with almost no effort, some Blogad revenue, and a few random hits on your PayPal account.

For the amount of time you are spending online anyway.

You're right about the incentives; it's either cash or ego-gratification in the form of traffic. Make the cash incidental and let it be a hobby. People like me keep begging you to do so. There's a reason -- you have talent. I'm not aware of any ex-blogger who still has such a following.

Well, maybe Steven Den Beste. When Steven shows up on a comment thread, people get excited.

But you get my point.

Posted by: Michael on December 28, 2005 11:43 PM
After work, you could spend an hour a day tossing out links with clever intros, throw in an occasional photoshop, maybe once in a while write something when you're in the mood for a rant.

Again, I appreciate the encouragement. But the last thing I want to do after ten hours in front of a computer at work is spend another hour or two surfing news sites at night. Not for a few thousand hits a day and a few hundred dollars a year in the PayPal account.

Blogging just isn't worth it, guys. I admire people like Ace who do it and do it well consistently, but the opportunity cost -- even at an hour a day -- is simply too high.

Posted by: Allah on December 28, 2005 11:57 PM

Hell, Allah. Your blog was fun while it lasted, and as a guy who read it at least a few times a week, I'm glad you did it.

I'm sorry you don't do it anymore, but do miss the photoshops. The "Lolita" one you did with Derbyshire was outstanding. I'm looking forward to a Hewitt/Narnia thing.

Hope the job search is going well.

Posted by: Slublog on December 29, 2005 12:12 AM

Thanks. A Hewitt/Narnia 'shop would be fun, wouldn't it? Maybe Aslan reading a copy of "Blog." And jacking off.

I can just imagine Hugh's post in response. "Who is Allah? Is he, as he claims, an anonymous unemployed loser? Or is he, in fact, a member of the mainstream media nursing a grudge against the avatars of the blog revolution? These questions remain unanswered. For now."

Posted by: Allah on December 29, 2005 12:17 AM

He might even get a book deal out of it.

Hewitt really dropped like a stone after Miers, didn't he? Guy was in the New Yorker and everything.

Posted by: Slublog on December 29, 2005 12:21 AM

but the opportunity cost

If you are going to start talking about opportunity costs, an economic concept that I readily identify with, well, then, OK.

Goodbye, Allah.

I promise -- I won't nag you to blog anymore.

Posted by: Michael on December 29, 2005 01:52 AM

Allah,

If you won't or can't blog anymore, could you think about putting your photoshop works on disk and selling them?

Posted by: on December 29, 2005 09:29 AM

Worth a repost:

Allah,

If you won't or can't blog anymore, could you think about putting your photoshop works on disk and selling them?


Posted by at December 29, 2005 09:29 AM
(not me)

Posted by: max on December 29, 2005 05:35 PM

So what I'd like to know, is am I supposed to douche with my new hymen, or not?

Posted by: shell on December 30, 2005 02:49 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Recent Comments
Methos: "Okay, they've just released some of the UFO files. ..."

Cicero (@cicero43): "Man, my IQ must be down like 80 points. I must hav ..."

Pug Mahon, Rock 'n' Roll Martian: "This will be my first Mother's Day since my Mom pa ..."

Have you ever thought about like, water?: "Did I keep losing 20 points for every boat? I m ..."

Krebs 'v' Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) Imprison! Imprison! Imprison! : "[i] "I Fell for the Bullshit About the Wonders of ..."

mindful webworker - but it does move!: "🛸Speaking of extraterrestrial secrets T ..."

Gotta think sales and marketing: "How about a "I Fell for the Bullshit About the ..."

JackStraw: ">>d. Buying a boat. Did I keep losing 20 points ..."

Krebs 'v' Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) Imprison! Imprison! Imprison! : " Fuck Off, You Perverts Day fixed! ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "Holy carp. Seattle media is promoting Other’ ..."

Krebs 'v' Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) Imprison! Imprison! Imprison! : "[i] The crew took photos. Posted by: publius, Ra ..."

four seasons: " Howz about Fuck Off Day you perverts. ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives