Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Court: Intelligent Design a "Pretext" For Religious Instruction | Main | Summer Growth Revised Down To Merely Be Fastest Growth In A Year And A Half »
December 21, 2005

Bush's Poll Number Surge

WaPo/ABCNews Poll:

Bush's overall approval rating rose to 47 percent, from 39 percent in early November, with 52 percent saying they disapprove of how he is handling his job. His approval rating on Iraq jumped 10 percentage points since early November, to 46 percent, while his rating on the economy rose 11 points, to 47 percent. A clear majority, 56 percent, said they approve of the way Bush is handling the fight against terrorism -- a traditional strong point in his reputation that nonetheless had flagged to 48 percent in the November poll.

...

Bush's pre-Christmas rebound was fueled largely by a sharp increase in support among his core supporters. In the past month, the proportion of Republicans approving of the president's performance rose 9 percentage points, to 87 percent. And among conservatives, three in four said Bush was doing a good job, up 12 points from November. Among Democrats, independents and moderates Bush's support remained unchanged or increased only modestly.

...

The other cautionary note for the administration is that Bush's approval ratings and public optimism about Iraq have spiked in the past after instances of positive news, such as the capture of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein or the election in January of this year, only to recede later. But the gains in the latest poll represent a larger one-time jump than on previous occasions of favorable news from Iraq. Currently, 54 percent say they are optimistic about the situation in Iraq, up from 46 percent a year ago.

Rasmussen: Approve 47/Disapprove 51 (still an uptick).

Only CNN/Gallup is a recent sourpuss, putting Bush's approval at a weak 41%.

Bush Finally Woke Up? Update: Bush's father said he lost the 1992 election because he was low on energy and down a quart of charisma. The younger Bush has more charisma, but he seems to have inhereted his father's phlegmatic political stylings.

But perhaps he finally gets it that this "Reign not Rule" paradigm isn't working. The business of politics requires, it turns out, a lot of politics.

With the president's poll numbers hovering between 35% and 40% ever since Hurricane Katrina, it seemed as if the White House had entirely given up in the press war. And in giving up in that war, they were putting the real war at risk. Public support can only go so low before troops must come home.

If Sunday night's speech is a sign of things to come, then it will go down as a decisive break not just from the Bush of the past few months, but from the Bush of the past few years. In bringing his argument directly into people's living rooms--with candid, intelligent words--the president and his team finally may have realized that they've been a punching bag for far too long, and they actually have a case to make.

Over the past few years, the hardest thing for any conservative journalist to admit is that the White House has been entirely unhelpful. When the Clinton team had positive economic news, his Cabinet secretaries appeared on every morning talk show--perfectly happy to give Bill all the credit. With the Bush White House, we're lucky if economic figures even make the news. This despite the fact that we're enjoying a red-hot economy.

...

If it weren't for FOX News, talk radio, conservative magazines, and the blogosphere, it's doubtful that any good news would be heard over the chorus of the administration's critics.

I voted for Clinton in 1992 to help the economy. It's not that I thought his program was actually better than Bush the Elder's -- I thought meddling in the economy would only do harm (and fortunately that turned out to be more Clinton campaign vaporware) -- it's that Clinton expressed optimism, confidence, and energy regarding getting the economy moving again, whereas Bush the Elder seemed to be taking a wait-and-see attitude.

Confidence and energy count for a lot in life. And in politics. You can't change the facts on the ground, economically or militarily, but you sure the hell can stress the positive news and lay out strong case for yourself.

Bush has seemed quite willing to just let the National Review and Weekly Standard and, a bit, the blogosphere carry his water for him. We don't really mind doing that, but really, at some point you have to be your own Gunga Din.

Read the whole thing.


posted by Ace at 10:08 AM
Comments



Wow, you voted for Clinton in 1992?

Huh.

Nice enough guy, not as bad as folks made him out to be, but sheesh, how could you NOT tell he was going to be trouble in '92?

That, and since I've always been a single-issue voter (national security, duh), I could tell from the get-go that Clinton was going to be bad news.

And guess what! He was!

I hate being right. Thankfully, it doesn't happen all that often.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 21, 2005 10:53 AM

Oh, and Ace? Check your email please.

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on December 21, 2005 10:55 AM

But But But 57%, right Tubino? Remember, it was a warm November, and this one poll was supposed to be the last one you would ever need. But then they took a new one and its positive.

If you want to read some crazy people gnashing their teeth and shooting the messenger, read this online transcript of upset progressives trying to accuse the pollster of having not enough libs, or that the numbers auger well for impeachment:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2005/12/19/DI2005121900972.html

Posted by: joeindc44 on December 21, 2005 12:03 PM

You voted for Clinton in '92?
To help the economy?

What, was it your first presidential election and you were young and dumb?

Everyone knew the economy was about to recover from the real estate/stock market bubble.

Posted by: Bart on December 21, 2005 12:30 PM

I think Cheney finally gave him the old pat on the back, took him aside and said, "The Ace of Spades HQ bully pulpit just one do on this one, brau. Time to sharpen the knives, to wade into the sissified sea of humanity that is the Washington press corps, and kick some ass."

But that's what you'd expect from DC.

Posted by: DeeDaGo on December 21, 2005 01:12 PM

Bush Sr. didn't lose simply because he didn't have energy. He lost because he didn't provide anybody with a very compelling reason to vote for him.

Posted by: SJKevin on December 21, 2005 03:22 PM

I'm just surprised it took this long for the Prez to fight back. Despite lefty bleatings, he's a likable, forthright guy, and I think history is on his side. But no one can bunker in and let the sharks of the media circle and bite constantly. The American people generally dislike the media, and they really dislike defeatists and opportunists, so W should have gone on the offensive long ago against these craven weasels.

Posted by: UGAdawg on December 21, 2005 06:28 PM

You voted for Clinton?

Thanks for 9-11 bro.

Posted by: lloyd on December 21, 2005 10:41 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Update to Gavin Newsom Under Investigation story: This investigation was begun under Senor Dementia:
Adam Housley
@adamhousley

As I have reported several times and now acknowledged by the Governor of California... Gavin and his wife are under federal investigation... what he failed to tell you... This began during the Biden Admin. Kind of a big detail.
Teen Driver Tayvin Galanakis Wins Jury Trial Against Officers Who Charged Him With DUI Even After He Blew 0.0 on A Breathalyzer And Passed Sobriety Tests. One Officer Accounted For 72% of All DUI Arrests For That PD [dri]
Days before the woman was stabbed in the neck by a taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer, in the same general area, another taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer attacked a boy and bloodied his head with a brick.
What is the UK Regime's plan for protecting the citizens from the savage criminals they've foisted on the populace? They offer NONE. They do, however, have a plan for protecting the savage criminals from the citizens: The citizens must STAY CALM and not get angry and not share videos of citizens being attacked by savage criminals.
The public keeps saying "protect us from the foreign savages you have imported against our wishes and over our objections" and the UK branch of The Regime keeps proposing plans to protect the foreign savages from the public. Soclose to what the public is demanding, just, you know, the complete opposite.
Just a thought: Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about the public attacking the savage criminals if you actually introduced a plan to protect the public from the savage criminals. Maybe they wouldn't feel as if it was necessary for them to protect the public through self-help.
Courtney Subramiam, one of the "journalists" who "previewed" her questions for the decrepit and demented Biden so that he could "answer" it with a pre-scripted response, rewarded by promotion to president of the White House Press Corps
Bonchie
@bonchieredstate

hahahahaha

This is the lady who gave her question to Biden beforehand, and he had it written verbatim in his notes with her picture.

You know what's really terrible? There are Daily Signal reporters in the press room. That's the Real Scandal Here!
You might think that movie critics by nature are effeminate and bitchy, but, did you know that grass is green and red peppers are red?
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD bounce around from Maine and its pet Nazi, to the cracks in the Democrat messaging, to the failure of California and its effect on the 2028 election, sea drones rescuing Apache crews, and more!
Seattle mayor shrugs off millionaire-tax concerns as 44% of business leaders consider leaving
It happens in all the blue states, but WA and Seattle will be different! [CBD]
Mary Margaret Olohan
@MaryMargOlohan

NEW: Five FBI employees were fired today over the infamous Richmond Catholic memo on "radical traditionalist Catholics," FBI source confirms to @realDailyWire.
Oof. Reviewers do not like Scary Movie 6. The criticism I keep hearing is that the movie mistakes a reference for an actual joke. The movie (they say) keeps Key Jangling a reference to another movie (or some other pop culture ephemera) and you expect there to be a joke but nope, the Key Jangle was the joke. Other reviewers say that the promise that "no lines will be uncrossed" is a fake-out, and that the movie is bland and inoffensively corporate.
Whoops! I posted about Dan Goldman losing the NY congressional primary. He might do that, but it won't be tonight -- the primary isn't held until June 23.
One race to keep an eye on: the Levi's heir nepo baby and egregious "Designated Liar" Dan Goldman -- one of the Democrats from a safe district Democrats send out to spread their most indefensible lies -- may actually lose his lower Manhattan/Brooklyn set due to, get this, antisemitism in the Democrat primary electorate.
Antisemitism? In the anti-Nazi Democrat Party? Sounds crazy, I know, but apparently the anti-Nazi Party wants to eliminate Jews.
Henry Rosoff
@HenryRosoff

🚨EXCLUSIVE POLL:

Brad Lander is 34-pts ahead of Congressman Dan Goldman with #NY10 Democratic Primary voters. @ZohranKMamdani is backing the former Comptroller.

@bradlander: 57%

@danielsgoldman: 23%



Poll by @PIX11News & @EmersonPolling.

MORE: http://pix11.com

Oh my Totenkopf Tattoo, that is a DRUBBING!
I'm usually very anti-antisemitism but if the Communist Antisemite Jihadists can pull this one off, Go Communist Antisemite Jihadists, Go!
Recent Comments
JackStraw : ">>When that’s the conclusion of a war you st ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i]Diesel dropped a dollar a gallon here yesterday ..."

Don Black: ">One thing is becoming obvious about the “de ..."

SMOD: "Serious Six: “This administration is pitting ..."

Ben Had: "Diesel dropped a dollar a gallon here yesterday. ..."

Rodrigo Borgia: "I'm betting on either Rubio/Vance or Vance/Rubio. ..."

496: "Sure, but have they audited the gold at Fort Knox ..."

Auspex: " Yeah, the "No Kings" and the geezer sing alongs ..."

gp: ""FWIW, there is, (at least in my circles) a sense ..."

LinusVanPelt: "LinusVanPelt, do you know what the deal is? Poste ..."

runner: " One thing is becoming obvious about the “d ..."

CrotchetyOldJarhead : "[i]Sometimes the best deal you can get is one that ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives