Ace: aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info: maildrop62 at proton dot me
Today, the BBC claims it has identified EL. He's a 23-year-old Russian diplomat with close ties to the Kremlin.
The handler EL, who directed Lavrynovych, offered Russian citizenship in return for other attacks and glorified President Vladimir Putin, messages the BBC has uncovered show.
We have identified evidence suggesting that EL is a young Russian diplomat, schooled in information warfare by spies and propagandists, who is close to the highest levels of power in Moscow. His name is Evgeny Lyukshin. He is 23 and the son of a senior official...
Lyukshin allegedly set up a fake far-right group called Direct Action which was completely fabricated.
The group sought to appear as an organic British creation. But we found that Direct Action was created online by Russian operatives to cause division among ordinary people in the UK.
Messages sent in the group bore a Moscow timestamp, used Cyrillic letters, and placed pound signs at the end of numbers, rather than at the start - as in Russian...
But Lyukshin was plaing both sides. Before he invented Direct Action he also created an extremist Muslim group called Takbir Foundation.
The foundation sought to recruit Muslims to spray-paint "sacred graffiti" in the UK. But its real goal was obvious: to inflame the far right with this vandalism. Telegram accounts that pretended to be those of devout Muslims later switched seamlessly to an aggressive anti-Islam agenda with Direct Action.
So this is the same "election rigging" effort Russia deployed in America in 2016, spending a couple hundred thousand in ads to both inflame the right against the left and to inflame the left against the right, by spending money to stoke anti-white rage, for example.
The American media always, always forgets to mention that part when "reporting" on the Russian "interference" in the 2016 election.
Based on my belief that Ukranian models were targeting him based on something personal like an argument over payment or failure to comply with blackmail demands, I falsely concluded that Keir Starmer must have been a patron of rent-boys, and thus a homosexual.
I apologize for that false claim and withdraw it completely.
It was an absurd conclusion to come to and I'm ashamed to have made it.