Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

TBD





















« The Solution to Media Bias & French Bashing | Main | Shooting Star: Star Clocked At 1.5 Millon MPH »
November 10, 2005

French TV Exec Admits To Censoring Riot Coverage For Political Reasons

Interesting:

One of France's leading TV news executives has admitted censoring his coverage of the riots in the country for fear of encouraging support for far-right politicians.

Jean-Claude Dassier, the director general of the rolling news service TCI, said the prominence given to the rioters on international news networks had been "excessive" and could even be fanning the flames of the violence.

Mr Dassier said his own channel, which is owned by the private broadcaster TF1, recently decided not to show footage of burning cars.

"Politics in France is heading to the right and I don't want rightwing politicians back in second, or even first place because we showed burning cars on television," Mr Dassier told an audience of broadcasters at the News Xchange conference in Amsterdam today.

"Having satellites trained on towns across France 24 hours a day showing the violence would have been wrong and totally disproportionate ... Journalism is not simply a matter of switching on the cameras and letting them roll. You have to think about what you're broadcasting," he said.

Mr Dassier denied he was guilty of "complicity" with the French authorities, which this week invoked an extraordinary state-of-emergency law passed during the country's war with Algeria 50 years ago.

But he admitted his decision was partly motivated by a desire to avoid encouraging the resurgence of extreme rightwing views in France.

French broadcasters have faced criticism for their lack of coverage of the country's worst civil unrest in decades. Public television station France 3 has stopped broadcasting the numbers of torched cars while other TV stations are considering following suit.

"Do we send teams of journalists because cars are burning, or are the cars burning because we sent teams of journalists?" asked Patrick Lecocq, editor-in-chief of France 2.

Gee, that never seemed to give you pause when you were covering bombings in Iraq. And of course that coverage gets watched in French-speaking North Africa, and picked up by Al Jazeera.

I don't know if it's right or wrong to lay off of stuff like this when it may be encouraging more of it. On one hand, it's censorship. On the other hand, major media shouldn't allow itself to be hijacked by terrorists or rioters into becoming a propaganda tool.

I do know, however, that when it comes to terrorism in Iraq, I've never heard a French media type expressing worry that excessive coverage was encouraging more terrorism. Perhaps that wasn't a worry so much as an intention.


posted by Ace at 02:11 PM
Comments



Note also that the French definition of "right wing" is populist racism.

Posted by: SJKevin on November 10, 2005 02:14 PM

Ace, who cares? Where is your opinion on Melissa Theuriau?!!

The people wait for your arbitration.

Posted by: Bill from INDC on November 10, 2005 02:24 PM

Well besides Dassier's worry that this will aid rightwingers, I can't help but sympithize just because we are having the same problem at home. If the international media reports are aiding the riots, then we should stop reporting burning cars in France, just as we should stop reporting burning cars in Iraq. All these images are unnecessary reporting. Dassier is right for the wrong reasons.

Posted by: trey on November 10, 2005 02:26 PM

We have always been at war with Eurasia.

Posted by: George Orwell on November 10, 2005 02:31 PM

All these images are unnecessary reporting.

In that denial of reality exposes the current regime as corrupt, inefficient, and morally bankrupt, this would be very true.

Posted by: Purple Avenger on November 10, 2005 02:33 PM

Fwench hypocrisy and journalistic hypocrisy in the same story?!
Shocking!
(Talk about a two-fer!)

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 10, 2005 02:45 PM

And I presume he said this with a straight face. Quelle ironie!

Bah. What a worthless bunch of useless cowardly pukes.

Posted by: Monty on November 10, 2005 02:52 PM

"Politics in France is heading to the right and I don't want rightwing politicians back in second, or even first place because we showed burning cars on television," Mr Dassier told an audience of broadcasters at the News Xchange conference in Amsterdam today.

Hard to believe that he just came right out and said it. He is supposed to be presenting the news and let people make their judgements based on the facts. He is flat out admiting, proudly, that he is only going to show the news that supports his views and ignore anything that might contradict.

If only we could get all "news" types to be so honest about their actions. How anyone has any respect for the MSM or the slanted journalism they produce is beyond me.

Posted by: JackStraw on November 10, 2005 02:54 PM

So, on one hand we have a media that will only broadcast people on the roofs of their homes as a flood hits, in order to magnify the enormity of the even, for political reasons. This was done (as is everything on the news, to make bush look bad).

And on the other hand, we have news organizations that will look the other way, as cars burn in France, so that the politcals there don't look bad.

If Shakespeare was alive today, not only would he be very old, he would change his line to "First, lets kill all the journalists."

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 10, 2005 03:02 PM

joeindc44 is right.
Shakespeare would then say "And all the lawyers. And lawyers who are journalists. And dogs with bees in their mouths."
Or would that be Homer Simpson?

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 10, 2005 04:37 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Tucker Carlson claims that it's weird that Ted Cruz is interested in the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, because he has "no track record of being interested in Christians," then blows off the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, saying it might or might not be a real concern
Tucker Carlson enjoys using the left-wing tactic of "Tactical Ignorance" to avoid taking positions on topics. Is Hamas really a terrorist organization? Tucker can't say. He hasn't looked into it enough, but "it seems like a political organization to me." Are Muslims slaughtering Christians in Nigeria? Again, Tucker just doesn't know. He hasn't examined the evidence yet. He knows every Palestinian Christian who said he was blocked from visiting holy sites in Bethlehem, but he just hasn't had the time to look into the mass slaughter of Christians in Nigeria that has been going on since (checks watch) 2009. He doesn't know, so he can't offer an opinion. Wouldn't be prudent, you know? Don't rush him! He'll sift through the evidence at some point in the future and render an opinion sometime around 2044.
Of course, if you need an opinion on Jewish Perfidy, he has all the facts at his fingertips and can give you a fully informed opinion pronto. Say, have you ever heard of the USS Liberty incident...?
You'd think that the main issue for Tucker Carlson, who pretends to be so deeply concerned about Palestinian Christians being bullied by Jews in Israel (supposedly), would be the massacre of 185,000 Christians in Nigeria itself. But no, his main problem is that Ted Cruz is talking about it, "who has no track record of being interested in Christians at all." And then he just shrugs as to whether this is even a real issue or not.
Whatever we do we must never "divide the right," huh?
Tucker is attacking Ted Cruz for bringing the issue up because he's acting as an apologist for Jihadism, and he can't cleanly admit that Jihadists are killing any Christians, anywhere. There is no daylight between him and CAIR at this point.
One might conclude that Tucker Carlson himself isn't interested in the plight of Christians -- except as they can be used as a cudgel to attack Jews.
Just gonna ask an Interesting Question myself -- why is it that Tucker Carlson's arguments all track with those shit out by Qatarian propaganda agents and the far left? That if Jews crush an ant underfoot it is worldwide news, but when Muslims slaughter Christians it elicits not even a vigorous shrug?
Garth Merenghi is interviewed by the only man who can fathom his ineffable brilliance -- Garth Merenghi
From the comments:
I once glimpsed Garth in the penumbra betwixt my wake and sleep. He was in my dream, standing afar, not looking my way, nor did he acknowledge me. But I felt seen. And that's when I knew I was a traveler on the right path. I'm glad he's still with us.

Now that's some Merenghian prose.
Garth Merenghi on the writer's craft

Greetings, Traveler. If you still have not experienced Garth Merenghi -- Author, Dream-weaver, Visionary, plus Actor -- the six episodes of his Darkplace are still available on YouTube and supposedly upscaled to HD. (Viewing it now, it doesn't appeared upscaled for shit.)
I think the second episode, "Hell Hath Fury," is the best by a good margin. Try to at least watch through to that one. It's Mereghi's incisive but nuanced take on sexism.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: The elections! NYC, Virginia, New Jersey, Texas, California, and the future prospects of the Republican party...
Update on Scott Adams:
Scott Adams had approval for this cancer drug but they hadn't scheduled him to get it. He was taking a turn for the worse. Trump had told him to call if he needed anything, so he did. Talked to Don Jr (who is in Africa) , then RFK Jr, then Dr Oz. Someone talked to Kaiser and he was scheduled. Shouldn't have needed it but he did and he says it saved his life.
Posted by: Notsothoreau
Funny retro kid costumes, thanks to SMH
Good to see people honoring Lamont the Big Dummy
Four hours of retro Halloween commercials and specials
The first short is the original 1996 appearance of "Sam," the dangerous undead trick-or-treater from Trick r' Treat.
On Wednesday, we'll see the "Beaver Super-Moon." Which sounds hot.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Historian and Pundit Robert Spencer joins us for a wide-ranging discussion about the Islamists in our midst: Mamdani in NYC, all across Europe, and others.
Full Episode: The Hardy Boys (and Nancy Drew) Meet Dracula
I don't remember this show, except for remembering that Nancy Drew was hot and the opening credits were foreboding and exicting
Schmoll: 53% of New Jersey likely voters say their neighbors are voting for Ciattarelli, while 47% say the cheater/grifter Mikie Sherrill
The "who do you think your neighbors are voting for" question is designed to avoid the Shy Tory problem, wherein conservative people lie to schmollsters because they don't want to go on record with a likely left-winger telling them who they're really voting for. So instead the question is who do you think your neighbors are voting for, so people can talk about who they themselves support without actually having to admit it to a left-wing rando stranger recording their answers on the phone.
TJM Complains about Wreck-It Ralph The very topical premiere of TJM's YouTube Channel.
Interesting football history: How the forward pass was created in response to the nineteen -- 19! -- people killed playing football in 1905 alone
The original rules of football did not allow forward passes. The ball was primarily advanced by running, with blockers forming lines with interlocked arms and just smashing into the similarly-interlocked defensive lines. It was basically Greek hoplite spear formations but with a semi-spherical ball. As calls to ban the sport entirely grew, some looked for ways to de-emphasize mass charges as the primary means of advancing the ball, and some specifically championed allowing a passer to throw the ball forward.
Recent Comments
ShainS -- Bury My Heart At a Texas MoMe [/b][/i][/s][/u]: "These days you could have some giant robot forklif ..."

Teresa in Fort Worth, Texas, AoSHQ's Plucky Wee One - Eat the Cheesecake, Buy the Yarn.: "Oh, and that cutie-pie pupper up there makes me wa ..."

neverenoughcaffeine : "Brother in law loves screwball whiskey, I believe ..."

Teresa in Fort Worth, Texas, AoSHQ's Plucky Wee One - Eat the Cheesecake, Buy the Yarn.: "Rats! I had hoped that 1 of my comments this week ..."

Orson: "Peanut Butter Whisky ___________________ I'm g ..."

Anonymous Rogue in Kalifornistan (ARiK): "39 "Coincidently I'm watching 'The Day Mars Invade ..."

Some Rat: "Thank you 3 Ds for another fabulous Club ONT! ..."

ear leader: "54 [i]The dogs were awful.[/i] want me to hook ..."

Semi-Literate Thug: " For the Drink 60 ml Peanut Butter Whisky 40 ml ..."

PaleRider: "I missed who got the nickname of "the Big Dummy" s ..."

Hadrian the Seventh : " We live in a strange world when Texas A&M is #3 ..."

nude kids: "That is really fascinating, You are a very profess ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives