Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« French TV Exec Admits To Censoring Riot Coverage For Political Reasons | Main | Two Indonesian Schoolgirls Shot In Faces »
November 10, 2005

Shooting Star: Star Clocked At 1.5 Millon MPH

You know, if a star hits you moving at 1.5 million MPH, it could probably do some damage.

Astronomers using the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope have recorded a massive star moving at more than 1.5 million mph.

Since stars are not born with such large velocities, its position suggests it was ejected from the Large Magellanic Cloud, perhaps by a massive black hole in the Milky Way's closest neighbor.



posted by Ace at 02:30 PM
Comments



Especially if it's a star of Veronica's Closet

Posted by: sentinel on November 10, 2005 02:32 PM

Oh, that ties in nicely with the Milky Way reference as well.

Posted by: sentinel on November 10, 2005 02:34 PM

Was Tom Cruise on it and heading towards a Volcano?

Posted by: GregS on November 10, 2005 02:36 PM

That makes no sense... 1.5 M mph with respect to what? Everything is relative in space.

Posted by: Dave S on November 10, 2005 02:37 PM

I wish scientists would just admit that they have no freaking clue sometimes. "..its position suggests it was ejected from the Large Magellanic Cloud, perhaps by a massive black hole..." Sure, or perhaps an errant photon torpedo created a quantum wave of tachyon particles.

If they're going to make stuff up, they should at least try to make it interesting.

Posted by: Planet Moron on November 10, 2005 02:46 PM

sorta topical,

ace, if you have a few bucks leftover from the fundraiser, order one of these. Be sure to check out "night mode".

It could be there in time for Christmas. Or Festivus. whatever.


Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 10, 2005 02:54 PM

Um,

A mile is a mile, even in space. So is an hour.

That is all.

Posted by: Rocketeer on November 10, 2005 03:21 PM

Dave S.: It probably means in reference to the center of mass of the milky way galaxy.

By the way, there sortuv is a notion of a rest velocity in space. It's the velocity at which the background radiation is roughly the same frequency in all directions.

Posted by: SJKevin on November 10, 2005 03:34 PM

C'mon Rocketeer. A jet goes 600 MPH. A spacecraft in orbit goes hundreds of thousands of miles an hour. Are you telling me the spaceship's that much faster than the jet?

Once you're in space, your speed is relative to something.

Of course, I'm talking out my ass but it makes sense.

Posted by: spongeworthy on November 10, 2005 03:37 PM

C'mon Rocketeer. A jet goes 600 MPH. A spacecraft in orbit goes hundreds of thousands of miles an hour. Are you telling me the spaceship's that much faster than the jet?

Hate to break this to you, Spongeworthy, but..

yes.

Posted by: on November 10, 2005 03:46 PM

OOPS. Sorry. Above smartass comment was made by me.

Posted by: Rocketeer on November 10, 2005 03:47 PM

I know what you're saying and I expressed this poorly. Let me try again.

If a spaceship breaks orbit with the planet, is it's speed measured by how fast it's thrusters are pushing it or how much space it's covering in an hour? If it's in orbit, do we credit it with the speed of the earth's travel around the sun? If the planet moves around the sun and the sun is flying through space also, what do we gauge it's speed against and how much of that do we credit the object and how much whatever it's orbiting?

Still talking out the ass BTW. Enlighten me.

Posted by: spongeworthy on November 10, 2005 04:27 PM

Ok, look at it this way: Say a space ship is traveling from the Earth to Mars at 1,000,000 mph. Its speed relative to Earth and Mars is 1,000,000 mph. It does not matter that our solar system itself is moving at some high rate of speed through space.

However, if you measure the speed of the spaceship relative to some other star system somewhere outside our solar system, the speed will be something completely different depending on the speed and direction of that star system relative to our solar system.

Think of being in a car and throwing a wad of paper at your sibling in the back seat. The car is traveling at 60 mph, but the relative speed of paper wad is only a few mph (say 10 mph for the purpose of this discussion). But the speed of the paper wad relative to another car on the Autobahn doing 150 mph is another thing altogether. Speed is not absolute, it is relative.

Posted by: F15C on November 10, 2005 04:56 PM

Sponge:

In your question, the Jet would also have all the implict velocity of the earth, the solar system, the galaxy as a whole, the entire expansion of the universe, etc., as part of its speed, too.

I imagine the 1.5 million MPH is over and above such factors. Yes, everything in the universe is moving, but some things, obviously, are moving faster than others.


Posted by: ace on November 10, 2005 05:03 PM

To put it another way, relative to the sun, I am going about 60,000 miles per hour, but relative to my career, I am going nowhere.

Or something like that.

Posted by: Planet Moron on November 10, 2005 05:18 PM

I space, no one can hear you scream.

Posted by: Phinn on November 10, 2005 05:35 PM

Since stars are not born with such large velocities, its position suggests it was ejected from the Large Magellanic Cloud, perhaps by a massive black hole in the Milky Way's closest neighbor.

What does Art Bell say aboout this?

Posted by: on November 10, 2005 05:57 PM

A mile is a mile, even in space. So is an hour.

Well, that isn't exactly true, particularly the second part, but let's assume the premise for a second.

A "mile" is a unit of distance. Distance is a measure of the "space" between TWO POINTS. We know that the star represents one of the two points. What I am asking is "What is the second point?" To measure the "distance" the star travels per unit time, one would need to know that second point.

.its position suggests it was ejected from the Large Magellanic Cloud, perhaps by a massive black hole..."

That leads me to believe that it was measured to be moving 1.5M mph with respect to the position of the LMC.

Posted by: Dave S on November 10, 2005 08:27 PM

How much is that in warp speed? warp 8 or warp 9?

Posted by: SPURWING PLOVER on November 10, 2005 10:05 PM

Mr. Sulu, answer the Captain: is that warp 8 or warp 9 ?

. . .


Mr. Sulu ?

Ohfergawdssakes Mr. Sulu, will you PLEASE stop rubbing the ensign's crotch and pay attention !?!?

Posted by: Carl in N.H. on November 10, 2005 10:23 PM

c, or the speed of light = 670 616 629 mph, so this would be about warp 0.0022 (as I understand such things).

Posted by: cthulhu on November 10, 2005 11:57 PM

Speed is not absolute, it is relative.

So, exactly how do we measure the speed of Ace posting a winner to the bad poetry contest?

Posted by: Michael on November 11, 2005 12:51 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Maori men in NZ do a haka war display for Charlie Kirk
You vicious bastards shot the wrong man. You have set the world on fire. This will be your apocalypse.
Nick Freitas responds to the Left's intentional lies that they are always the victim and the Right is always the oppressor. He refuses to play their game anymore. This is a must view. [dri]
I wonder if he was fearless. I wonder if he was scared. I wonder if he just did it anyway?
-- Mike Rowe
Low-T High-Calorie Potato Brian Stelter: "Matthew Dowd is no longer an MSNBC political analyst, according to a network source."
Matt Dowd, former Disney Groomer Corporation Political Director and John McCain advisor (of course), is the one who blamed Charlie Kirk's shooting on the real assassin, Charlie Kirk, claiming that Charlie's "hateful words lead to hateful actions."
Trump speaks about the "heinous assassination" of Charlie Kirk, notes the left relentlessly demonized him until they radicalized an assassin to kill him
"For years, the radical left has compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to NAZlS... this type of language is DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE for the terrorism we're seeing in our country today.
And it must stop RIGHT NOW!"
Argentinian PM Javier Millei: "The left is always, at all times and places, a violent phenomenon full of hatred."
I disregard their hate. It's the violence that we object to. And we will begin objecting to it with force.
Update: Kash Patel says the person of interest has been interrogated and then released. Wrong guy, I guess.
But as the hours pass without a real suspect, and with the FBI apparently interrogating uninvolved people, I begin to fear the assassin has escaped. I mean, they don't seem to be following a breadcrumb trail, they seem genuinely baffled.
Karol Sheinin: I can confirm the person of interest questioned by the FBI is Zachariah Ahmed Qureshi.
If this is the guy -- apparently he also interned at Heritage.
Update: Source says he's been released? Wrong guy?
Fat-F*ck Pritzker blames Trump's rhetoric for the ramp up of political violence! May he rot in hell! [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Jim Lakely of Heartland.org joins us to discuss the blockbuster polls they have released over the last week. Americans 19-39 seem to be embracing socialism, overt redistributionist policies, destruction of our rights, and international control of our country! But there is hope on the horizon!
Broward County Officials Accused of Adding Over 100,000 Ineligible Voters to the Rolls It is too soon to know how it happened, but...Republicans are watching! And that is how it is done. [CBD]
Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump from firing Federal Reserve Gov Lisa Cook With absolutely nonsensical reasoning, but you already knew that. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: 2A ban for trannies? Venezuela attack is Congress dropping the ball, RFK Jr...Maniac or disrupter? Heartland.org poll is a sad commentary on American education, and more!
James Varney: Reflecting on Hurricane Katrina twenty years later, and the partisan uses Democrats found for it
There was fear aplenty. But the truth is, a lot of the panic Americans saw on television was performative. The throngs of people along Convention Center Boulevard sat patiently in the broiling weather, five or six deep in folding chairs on the sidewalk, waiting for something, someone, to arrive. Then, a television crew or photographer would show up, and people would pour into the street, falling on their knees, screaming and gesticulating to the camera. It was an awful situation, obviously, but when the camera wasn't on them, it was remarkable how patient and orderly everyone was.
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: the most repetitive but catchy earworm of the eighties?
Sometimes, I find you doubt my love for you but I don't mind
Why should I mind? Why should I mind?

It's hard to quote the song while avoiding quoting from the endlessly-repeated chorus.
Wait, my mistake, his other hit from 1985 was the most repetitive new wave hit of the 80s.
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
I'm gonna get high, man, I'm gonna get loose/
Need me a triple shot of that juice
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: 600,000 Chinese spies given visas? Scotland relies on 14-year-old girls for their defense, tariffs work! mortgage fraud is the new thing, and more!
Recent Comments
XTC: "320 $5 says that Tyler Robinson was first radicali ..."

MJ: "This entire debate about 'is it free speech to hav ..."

Lizzy [/i]: ">>When you resort to murder it’s a sign you& ..."

whig: " 317 I suspect, especially for younger people, whe ..."

Bruce's Philosophers Song: "Where did the envisioning of violent crime as the ..."

TheJamesMadison, in a world of gods and monsters with James Whale: "325 Nancy Pelosi says Democrats can't take "respon ..."

SMOD: "Nancy Pelosi says Democrats can't take "responsibi ..."

People's Hippo Voice: "A student of history I watch says the pattern alwa ..."

XTC: "212 He's fucked. The only question is how fucked. ..."

rickb223: "https://cancelthehate.com /expose-evil Remove ..."

whig: "In some quarters. But you may be surprised at the ..."

TheJamesMadison, in a world of gods and monsters with James Whale: "317 I suspect, especially for younger people, when ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives