Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

TBD





















« Status Quo Election | Main | It's Official: CIA Asks For Criminal Investigation Into Leak »
November 09, 2005

"Thinly-Velied Gloating" By Rightwingers Over French Riots

So says this article, and for once, they speak the truth.

Now why would that be? Anne Applebaum of the Washington Post may have reasons for this thinly-veiled gloating:

"Katrina's devastation points the finger at Bush's system . . . Issues forgotten for years are back to the fore: poverty, the state's absence, latent racism."

-- Le Monde, Sept. 8, 2005


The quotation above appeared in a front-page article in France's newspaper of record. Just below was a cartoon showing the American president watching TV footage of black corpses floating in the water. "But, what country is this?" the caption had him saying to his generals: "Is it far away? We absolutely have to do something!"

...

But the insoluble violence in urban France should inspire more than just schadenfreude in this country. Although there isn't yet evidence that this bout of rioting is Islamist in origin, it's pretty clear that large, unintegrated, ungovernable and unemployed Islamic communities in Western Europe will continue to incubate radical Islam. Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker of Sept. 11, is a Frenchman of Moroccan dissent. The Madrid bombings and the London bombings were also proof that the war on terrorism was never as much about rogue nations in the Middle East as it was about the domestic polices of our closest allies.

It is in our own interest, then, to be magnanimous and to come up with ways to assist the French. We could, for example, help them to shatter the myth that they live in an enlightened society, insulated from racial tension, by mass-mailing them copies of Le Monde with the word "America" crossed out in all editorials and the word "France" substituted instead.

It's immoral to take nasty pleasure in frightening riots in France, but somehow, the fundamental arrogant assholishness of the French extirpates the sin.


posted by Ace at 12:28 PM
Comments



The reason I feel fine with my Schadenfreude in this case is because the violence has, with one exception, been non-fatal. Other than that one exception, the riots have done nothing more than a) demonstrate the ineptitude of the French government, and b) destroy a lot of property.

Things can be rebuilt. And when the riots shine the light on how poorly those things were built in the first place, there's always hope that the rebuilding will improve on past mistakes (although there's good reason to believe the French aren't about to fix anything).

But overall, given the relatively harmless nature of the riots, combined with the utter humiliation suffered by Chirac's appeasement monkeys, yeah, is think Schadenfreude is appropriate.

Posted by: Sobek on November 9, 2005 12:37 PM

"nasty pleasure" I'm in

Posted by: BT on November 9, 2005 12:37 PM

Damn, Ace. Extirpates?

Last time I heard that word I was defenestrated.

Posted by: 12" Saturday Night on November 9, 2005 12:40 PM

Indeed.
Le Coq has come home to le roost.
But it will be something more that socialism and multiculturalism could have done, some entitlement that was missed, another failure to understand these 'youths' (the REAL vicitms, of course...)
And ultimately, it will be Bush's fault.
The left will never awaken.
Safe in their dreamworld, reality so far away.
When the monster scares you in the dream, you can look away, and the scene morphs into sunny beaches with light breezes and lapping waves...
Kinda like heroin, but these addicts have a constant supply.

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 9, 2005 12:41 PM

Nothing "veiled" about it in my case. They gloated over Katrina. Fuck 'em.

Posted by: Allah on November 9, 2005 12:47 PM

It surprises me to learn that my gloating had the slightest veil at all. In the aftermath of all the arrogant tripe we came in for after Katrina, I would like to cock a snoot Francewards in the most explicit way I can.

Posted by: S. Weasel on November 9, 2005 12:47 PM

extirpates

Boy! How long have you been waiting to unload that one?

Posted by: Monty on November 9, 2005 12:58 PM

The completely unveiled gloating of Applebaum's last paragraph is classic.

Posted by: someone on November 9, 2005 01:03 PM

And the moral of the story is: Try not to look so shocked when everyone else begins imitating the whole "smug asshole" act that you've been putting on for the past century or so.

Posted by: Sean M. on November 9, 2005 01:04 PM

We have to help the French! If we're lucky they may get so angry and upset with us that they actually poison themselves with their own bilious tongues.

A man can dream, can't he?

Posted by: Mikey on November 9, 2005 01:08 PM

"France: rolling countrysides, sprawling vineyards, quaint cafes. France: home to the world's greatest painters, chefs, and anti-semites. The French: cowardly, yet opinionated; arrogant, yet foul-smelling; anti-Israel, anti-American, and, of course, as always, Jew-hating. Paris: the city of whores, dog feces on every corner, and effete men yelling anti-Semitic remarks at children. The real crème de la crème of world culture. With all that's going on in the world, isn't it about time we got back to hating the French?"

Posted by: on November 9, 2005 01:14 PM

and another one:

Simpsons episode AABF21 "Guess Who's Coming to Criticize Dinner?": After a French pastry chef brusquely shoos Ned Flanders away from a tempting éclair, Ned responds: "A rude Frenchman? Well, I never!"

and another one:

Simpsons episode 1F20 "Secrets of a Successful Marriage": Desperate for reconciliation, Homer pleads to his wife: "Marge, look at me: we've been separated for a day, and I'm as dirty as a Frenchman."

Chalk me up for a dose of gleedul I told you so, a dash of schadenfreude and some up and down fist motions.

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 9, 2005 01:19 PM

I am glad that Applebaum finally identified what was wrong with the white house and Katrina. It took Bush 2 days to deliver a speech. I'm glad we got that straightened out, it sort of puts the whole 400 busses underwater thing in perspective, doesn't it?

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 9, 2005 01:29 PM

Damn, Ace. Extirpates?

It's a perfectly cromulent word.

Posted by: V the K on November 9, 2005 01:46 PM

Damn you, V!
I wish I had remembered that, although, isn't it "promulent?" I think that Wikipedia gets it wrong. Any comments?

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 9, 2005 01:52 PM

Itcan't be that big of a deal. It's not like the french have done anything much to stop it.

Posted by: on November 9, 2005 01:56 PM

It's a perfectly cromulent word.

I agree - my brain is embiggened.

Posted by: Rocketeer on November 9, 2005 01:57 PM

By the way, among other things, the appeasement measures they've unveiled include lowering the age at which you can drop out of school.

Posted by: on November 9, 2005 02:14 PM

Sooner or later we’ll be giving the French some form of support in this conflict, because we have a common interest in *extirpating* (ha!) Islamofascism, not because we’re expecting any of that famous French gratitude. In the meantime, I don’t mind wallowing in a little well-earned Schadenfreude. Payback , she is la chienne, n’est ce pas?

And the word Ace was searching for is “exculpate.”

Posted by: utron on November 9, 2005 02:53 PM

Extirpate is a perfectly marvelous word - it describes what I think should be done to Chirac, de Villepin (who insists in a high whine that he is a man), and the rioters. All of them should be extirpated. Annihilated. By evisceration, if possible.

See: Carthage. (Or rather, you don't. Get it?)

Posted by: Mikey on November 9, 2005 03:11 PM

"It's immoral to take nasty pleasure in frightening riots in France"

Fine. Fuck 'em anyway. Because of French pressure on Turkey just at the start of OIF, our troops are being killed today.

Posted by: ken on November 9, 2005 03:28 PM

Thinly veiled? Fuck you, Jacques. And the horse you rode in on. Your father was a hamster and your mother smells of elderberries.

Was that blunt enough? Your appeasing and treacherous ways have resulted in the lose of many American lives. Reap the whirlwind.

Posted by: JackStraw on November 9, 2005 03:34 PM

I agree with JackStraw. If France and the rest of the assholes were on-board with us, many lives would have been spared -- on both sides.

Fuck them. I hope every single car in France gets burnt and they have to go back to riding bicycles while wearing those silly striped shirts and gay hats.

Posted by: Bart on November 9, 2005 03:53 PM

If France and the rest of the assholes were on-board with us,

Or just stayed out of the way instead of actively thwarting a major component of the invasion plan that would have saved lives on both sides. Was anybody surprised that they apparently caused this needless sacrifice of lives just to cover their petty scams in the Oil for Food scandal? That kind of hypocritical and inhumane ugliness just seems all so gallic.

We don't lose any allies when France suffers. We just see an enemy being crippled. Fuck 'em.

Posted by: VRWC Agent on November 9, 2005 04:08 PM

The irony of the French being screwed over by their "friends" is just too delicious not to gloat over.

Although I have to say European rioters are a bunch of pussies. Thirteen days and only One old guy dead? The fact that these car-b-ques have shaken the french governement just shows how pussified they've become.

Posted by: Iblis on November 9, 2005 05:26 PM

Ain't been nothing veiled 'bout my gloating. It's full-on, in-yo-face-MoFo-type gloating and I'm lovin it.

What's ironic, however, is that all this violence etc has only resulted in one (published) death - whereas a little heatwave a few years ago killed 10,000 +, to frankly very little comment. Just goes to show - not only do they smell bad and surrender on a qhim, they're just plain weird.

Posted by: holdfast on November 9, 2005 05:44 PM

is that all this violence etc has only resulted in one (published) death - whereas a little heatwave a few years ago killed 10,000 +, to frankly very little comment

Easily explained. You can't outrun the heat.

Posted by: VRWC Agent on November 9, 2005 06:08 PM

Looks like the thin veil has gone the way of the burqa

Posted by: ken on November 9, 2005 06:09 PM

Pretty sure it's "cromulent."

Posted by: Knemon on November 9, 2005 09:02 PM

you would want the List of neologisms on The Simpsons from Wikipedia.

it's "cromulent"

Posted by: MacStansbury on November 9, 2005 09:50 PM

Looks like all those Frenchies better get working so they can appease their Muslim masters with economic incentives and fat welfare checks.

Work, motherfuckers. Harder! Your masters demand it! Your time and effort belong to Allah!

Posted by: The Warden on November 9, 2005 10:33 PM

Convert'em, subjugate'em, or kill'em. That's the three choices the Koran offers.

Convert had no shot at all in France, so they're working on subjugation. If that don't work, they'll work on kill.

Posted by: Tony on November 9, 2005 11:55 PM

Anyone remeber one of the Algerian (I think) rabble rousers promising to cause riot and mayhem in France because France was their number 1 enemy? Remeber what he said about teaching France to behave? Chirac and DeVillepin (who probably doesn't have all the equipment to be a man) have signaled that France has learned.

Posted by: rabidfox on November 10, 2005 10:40 AM

I had some cromulents with butter at brunch last week. They were great.

Posted by: Tony on November 10, 2005 12:28 PM

By the way, among other things, the appeasement measures they've unveiled include lowering the age at which you can drop out of school.

Because the best way to deal with the problem of unemployed, disaffected youths is to give more of them a chance to reject the best means of becoming qualified for employment. Brilliant!

Posted by: Brian B on November 10, 2005 01:22 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Tucker Carlson claims that it's weird that Ted Cruz is interested in the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, because he has "no track record of being interested in Christians," then blows off the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, saying it might or might not be a real concern
Tucker Carlson enjoys using the left-wing tactic of "Tactical Ignorance" to avoid taking positions on topics. Is Hamas really a terrorist organization? Tucker can't say. He hasn't looked into it enough, but "it seems like a political organization to me." Are Muslims slaughtering Christians in Nigeria? Again, Tucker just doesn't know. He hasn't examined the evidence yet. He knows every Palestinian Christian who said he was blocked from visiting holy sites in Bethlehem, but he just hasn't had the time to look into the mass slaughter of Christians in Nigeria that has been going on since (checks watch) 2009. He doesn't know, so he can't offer an opinion. Wouldn't be prudent, you know? Don't rush him! He'll sift through the evidence at some point in the future and render an opinion sometime around 2044.
Of course, if you need an opinion on Jewish Perfidy, he has all the facts at his fingertips and can give you a fully informed opinion pronto. Say, have you ever heard of the USS Liberty incident...?
You'd think that the main issue for Tucker Carlson, who pretends to be so deeply concerned about Palestinian Christians being bullied by Jews in Israel (supposedly), would be the massacre of 185,000 Christians in Nigeria itself. But no, his main problem is that Ted Cruz is talking about it, "who has no track record of being interested in Christians at all." And then he just shrugs as to whether this is even a real issue or not.
Whatever we do we must never "divide the right," huh?
Tucker is attacking Ted Cruz for bringing the issue up because he's acting as an apologist for Jihadism, and he can't cleanly admit that Jihadists are killing any Christians, anywhere. There is no daylight between him and CAIR at this point.
One might conclude that Tucker Carlson himself isn't interested in the plight of Christians -- except as they can be used as a cudgel to attack Jews.
Just gonna ask an Interesting Question myself -- why is it that Tucker Carlson's arguments all track with those shit out by Qatarian propaganda agents and the far left? That if Jews crush an ant underfoot it is worldwide news, but when Muslims slaughter Christians it elicits not even a vigorous shrug?
Garth Merenghi is interviewed by the only man who can fathom his ineffable brilliance -- Garth Merenghi
From the comments:
I once glimpsed Garth in the penumbra betwixt my wake and sleep. He was in my dream, standing afar, not looking my way, nor did he acknowledge me. But I felt seen. And that's when I knew I was a traveler on the right path. I'm glad he's still with us.

Now that's some Merenghian prose.
Garth Merenghi on the writer's craft

Greetings, Traveler. If you still have not experienced Garth Merenghi -- Author, Dream-weaver, Visionary, plus Actor -- the six episodes of his Darkplace are still available on YouTube and supposedly upscaled to HD. (Viewing it now, it doesn't appeared upscaled for shit.)
I think the second episode, "Hell Hath Fury," is the best by a good margin. Try to at least watch through to that one. It's Mereghi's incisive but nuanced take on sexism.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: The elections! NYC, Virginia, New Jersey, Texas, California, and the future prospects of the Republican party...
Update on Scott Adams:
Scott Adams had approval for this cancer drug but they hadn't scheduled him to get it. He was taking a turn for the worse. Trump had told him to call if he needed anything, so he did. Talked to Don Jr (who is in Africa) , then RFK Jr, then Dr Oz. Someone talked to Kaiser and he was scheduled. Shouldn't have needed it but he did and he says it saved his life.
Posted by: Notsothoreau
Funny retro kid costumes, thanks to SMH
Good to see people honoring Lamont the Big Dummy
Four hours of retro Halloween commercials and specials
The first short is the original 1996 appearance of "Sam," the dangerous undead trick-or-treater from Trick r' Treat.
On Wednesday, we'll see the "Beaver Super-Moon." Which sounds hot.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Historian and Pundit Robert Spencer joins us for a wide-ranging discussion about the Islamists in our midst: Mamdani in NYC, all across Europe, and others.
Full Episode: The Hardy Boys (and Nancy Drew) Meet Dracula
I don't remember this show, except for remembering that Nancy Drew was hot and the opening credits were foreboding and exicting
Schmoll: 53% of New Jersey likely voters say their neighbors are voting for Ciattarelli, while 47% say the cheater/grifter Mikie Sherrill
The "who do you think your neighbors are voting for" question is designed to avoid the Shy Tory problem, wherein conservative people lie to schmollsters because they don't want to go on record with a likely left-winger telling them who they're really voting for. So instead the question is who do you think your neighbors are voting for, so people can talk about who they themselves support without actually having to admit it to a left-wing rando stranger recording their answers on the phone.
TJM Complains about Wreck-It Ralph The very topical premiere of TJM's YouTube Channel.
Interesting football history: How the forward pass was created in response to the nineteen -- 19! -- people killed playing football in 1905 alone
The original rules of football did not allow forward passes. The ball was primarily advanced by running, with blockers forming lines with interlocked arms and just smashing into the similarly-interlocked defensive lines. It was basically Greek hoplite spear formations but with a semi-spherical ball. As calls to ban the sport entirely grew, some looked for ways to de-emphasize mass charges as the primary means of advancing the ball, and some specifically championed allowing a passer to throw the ball forward.
Recent Comments
Anonosaurus Wrecks, Why Do the Heathen Rage? [/s] [/b] [/i] [/u]: "Tom A Your Zoey is similarly colored to my stan ..."

Boss Moss: "Are things any better in the future? ..."

olddog in mo: "Thanks for the Pet Thread, KT. Always a treat. ..."

toby928(c) has drink taken: "But, a super comeback by Indiana. And that last T ..."

Joyenz: "Hey guys, An update on our cats has been posted ..."

vmom deport deport deport: "Petzzz doggeh says woof ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "Re: wasps Let it all end in fire, Muffy. ..."

Commissar of plenty and festive little hats : "Keep forgetting to check corner beer store for the ..."

Miley, okravangelist: "41 Miley - You are lucky to get the saffron thread ..."

Hadrian the Seventh : " Yo, Pet Morons. ..."

Commissar of plenty and festive little hats : "Those AI video of realistic cat and parrot cakes b ..."

Jacynthe Johnston: "My Boy pal makes $seventy five/hour on net. he has ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives