Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

TBD





















« The Price of a Mistake | Main | "Thinly-Velied Gloating" By Rightwingers Over French Riots »
November 09, 2005

Status Quo Election

Bad news for Bush? Well, not really:

Now, it's true that George W. Bush won Virginia by 8 percentage points in 2004, while Republican candidate Jerry Kilgore appears to have lost by 5 points. But if you think Kilgore's loss reflects Bush's weakness and a nightmare for the GOP in 2006, consider this:

Bush won Virginia by eight points in 2000, too — and the following year Democrat Mark Warner became governor with a 5-point margin of victory. The next year, in 2002, Republicans won a stunning midterm victory, taking four Senate seats and expanding their majority in the House of Representatives.

Summing up: In New York City, New Jersey, California, Ohio, and Virginia, voters cast their ballots for as-is governance. No big offices changed party ownership, no initiatives passed. (Except for several banning gay marriage.)

And a Republican picked up Democratic House seat in a special election.


posted by Ace at 12:18 PM
Comments



And Ohio rammed all four of George Soros' outsider-influenced propositions back up his ass. And King Mike crushed Ferrer in the Big Apple.

Yehp. The Dems certainly have Joe-mentum now.

Posted by: Blacksheep on November 9, 2005 12:25 PM

I would also point out, that in VA, the dem won by hiding his liveralism and trying to pretend he is a fairly conservative dem (like Bill Clinton did).

So, even though I would not paint this as everything is rosy for the GOP, I think it clearly was not a victory for the KOS, DU crowd. I don't believe that Corzine even ran as a liberal.

The only place that someone ran as a true liberal was NYC (Ferrer) where he was trounced. If a true blue liberal can't even win in a true blue liberal city like NYC, it sort of proves our point that America is much, much more conservative than the KOS, DUer's seem to think. And, that dems can only win when they lie and pretend NOT to be liberals.

Posted by: Vanilla Thunder on November 9, 2005 12:29 PM

So we're finally leaving Berkeley ... and moving to Virginia.

Dems from coast to coast!

VA residents, and others well-informed - was Kilgore's (huh-huh, Kill Gore, heh heh hack cough spit) campaign as incompetent as people say?

Posted by: Knemon on November 9, 2005 12:29 PM

Whaaaaa?!?

We picked up a House Seat too?

Although, as Rush is pointing out, a GOP house seat win is really a loss because, well I don't know why, but apparently it has something to do with minority rights in the legislative bodies of our country. And that Ohio goofball who ran as a Bush loving vetran supported by Moveon.org.

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 9, 2005 12:31 PM

Yeah but the Dems really won Ohio. It was Diebold again doncha know.

Posted by: HowardDevore on November 9, 2005 12:32 PM

Let's be honest. Last night sucked for the GOP. The big winner, though, was corruption and sleaze. NJ replaced the sleazy Gov. McGreevey with Uber-Scumbag John Corzine. Detroit re-elected a mayor who flaunted his corruption. And in California, the sleazebag unions succeeded in keeping the budget fat, keeping the graft flowing, and keeping incompetent teachers drawing paychecks.

Gotta love that culture of corruption.

Posted by: V the K on November 9, 2005 12:34 PM

I tried to vote in Va's election last night, and I was totally, like, intimidated and kept from voting. It all happenend when I crossed the border, I was on 395 southbound and I saw a police car. I turned tail and ran back home in Md. I have never been so scared in my life.

So how does this work for the GOP anyway, does Bush get to resign with dignity, or will the secret service frog-march him and all his cronies out. I mean this means we lost right? And with one less seat in the House, how much more powerful will the Dems' minority rights be now? Does every DNC congressman get 2 votes plus a mulligan? Should Tom Delay even bother coming back once the "charges" are laughed out of court?

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 9, 2005 12:46 PM

V the K-
None of this should surprise anyone.
All blue states mentioned above, no?
And non-national elections are historically low voter turnout.
Who always wins with low voter turnout??

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 9, 2005 12:47 PM

The new talking point in Ohio is that issues 2-5 were difficult to understand, that's why they failed. Yet, issue 1 was far more difficult to understand and it passed (although I voted against it).

But here is a simple explanation of the Issues: 2 would make voting by absentee ballot easier, 3 would put caps on campaign contributions (with some exceptions including unions), 4 would change who is in charge of drawing legislative districts, and 5 would change who is in charge of overseeing elections.

Difficult to understand, huh?

From the Akron Beacon Journal:

Keary McCarthy, a spokesman for Reform Ohio Now, said the issues were difficult to explain. He said it was the supporters' job to inform voters.

``We just came up short tonight,'' he said.

No, you got spanked. Apparently there's a few things Keary doesn't understand.

Posted by: Jason on November 9, 2005 12:56 PM

Unfortunately, Uncle Jefe is right. The unions and other leftist groups succeeded with their FUD campaign in California.

We're kind of funny, really. We Californians complain constantly about our state government: too high taxes, too much bureaucracy, too much catering to special interests, etc. Problem is, we never seem to want to do anything about it. I was arguing with some guy online yesterday who basically agreed that the state government is corrupt and unaccountable, but then opposed the initatives because they were "circumventing the Legislature," which somehow proves all Republicans are hypocrites. Apparently, he can't see that the Legislature /is/ the problem.

Posted by: on November 9, 2005 12:58 PM

Knemon

>>was Kilgore's campaign really as incompetent as people say?

Incompetent? Hmmm...Nuanced? Nope. Kilgore's 11th-hour "Kaine wouldn't execute Hitler" type ads probably cost him more votes than they earned him. Cognitive dissonance between genteel Kilgore's Gate City accent and his campaign's take-no-prisoners ads. Polls had Kilgore ahead by a couple points until his people tried to lock it up with the ads (my read on it, anyway); Kaine, boosted by the easily-offended sentiments of Northern Virginia moderates (read: feddle gummint employees, infrastructure-heavy businesses and gummint contractor types), their rice-bowl instincts intact, put Kaine over the top. The math is, and has always been: Dems take Richmond, NoVa, and Tidewater, and GOP candidates poach voters from the latter two and take the west and south of the state. Worked for "centrist" Kaine this time.

Additionally, Mark Warner is incredibly popular in the state, and Kaine rode his coattails in. Kilgore seemed like a decent guy, but I'm not sure he was the right horse for the race.

You'll notice, btw, that governor-elect Kaine bears a disturbing resemblance to Battlestar Galactica's Baltar.

blah.

Posted by: VA Dave on November 9, 2005 03:26 PM

The dems own MA, NY and CA yet they all have nominally republican governors.

I'm not sure the VA thing demonstrates anything at all.

Posted by: Purple Avenger on November 9, 2005 03:37 PM

The big winner, though, was corruption and sleaze.

The culture of corruption in Ohio remains alive and well.

But here is a simple explanation of the Issues: 2 would make voting by absentee ballot easier, 3 would put caps on campaign contributions (with some exceptions including unions), 4 would change who is in charge of drawing legislative districts, and 5 would change who is in charge of overseeing elections.

Close enough. The Taft-Noe story *should* have made those issues winners, and all lost.

I don't know why Jason seems to feel this is a win? Objectively pro-corruption?
-----------------------------------
Hey, I just thought of something! If McCain was the leaker, you all can subject him to torture -- his second time!

Posted by: tubino on November 9, 2005 04:29 PM

Notice how much of a lying hypocrite I am?
I have the nerve to claim that Ohio's election process is corrupt, but I never acknowledge all the REAL and documented corruption and illegality by Democratic election officials.

You dummies.

Posted by: Toobeano on November 9, 2005 08:08 PM

" "Kaine wouldn't execute Hitler" type ads "

Yeah, what was up with that?

Just how centrist/liberal is Kaine? Liberal for southern VA, liberal for all of VA, liberal by national Democratic standards ... help me out here.

Posted by: Knemon on November 9, 2005 08:18 PM

And Ohio rammed all four of George Soros' outsider-influenced propositions back up his ass. And King Mike crushed Ferrer in the Big Apple.

I'm proud to say that my wife and I played a role in this ass ramming. I see from the comments above that it has upset Tubino, which makes the 2-1 crushing of this leftist attempt to legislate election fraud all the more sweet.

My five minutes in a voting booth has more impact on politics in this country than a thousand of Tubino's boring, dishonest lectures. I can only imagine the time he must put into the lengthy dissertations that I merely scroll past.

Oh, well, Tubino. Keep at it. We Americans will come around someday, if only you just work harder.

Posted by: The Warden on November 9, 2005 10:47 PM

>>just how liberal is Kaine

On the Virginia political spectrum, pretty liberal. By national standards, right of center. Virginia Democrats are to the right of the national party as a (general) rule. That said, his bread-and-circuses pitch, portrayed as being "more practical" in the 'burbs, played better this time out than Kilgore's "socially conservative" line. Not terribly surprising, really.

Posted by: VA Dave on November 11, 2005 07:56 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Tucker Carlson claims that it's weird that Ted Cruz is interested in the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, because he has "no track record of being interested in Christians," then blows off the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, saying it might or might not be a real concern
Tucker Carlson enjoys using the left-wing tactic of "Tactical Ignorance" to avoid taking positions on topics. Is Hamas really a terrorist organization? Tucker can't say. He hasn't looked into it enough, but "it seems like a political organization to me." Are Muslims slaughtering Christians in Nigeria? Again, Tucker just doesn't know. He hasn't examined the evidence yet. He knows every Palestinian Christian who said he was blocked from visiting holy sites in Bethlehem, but he just hasn't had the time to look into the mass slaughter of Christians in Nigeria that has been going on since (checks watch) 2009. He doesn't know, so he can't offer an opinion. Wouldn't be prudent, you know? Don't rush him! He'll sift through the evidence at some point in the future and render an opinion sometime around 2044.
Of course, if you need an opinion on Jewish Perfidy, he has all the facts at his fingertips and can give you a fully informed opinion pronto. Say, have you ever heard of the USS Liberty incident...?
You'd think that the main issue for Tucker Carlson, who pretends to be so deeply concerned about Palestinian Christians being bullied by Jews in Israel (supposedly), would be the massacre of 185,000 Christians in Nigeria itself. But no, his main problem is that Ted Cruz is talking about it, "who has no track record of being interested in Christians at all." And then he just shrugs as to whether this is even a real issue or not.
Whatever we do we must never "divide the right," huh?
Tucker is attacking Ted Cruz for bringing the issue up because he's acting as an apologist for Jihadism, and he can't cleanly admit that Jihadists are killing any Christians, anywhere. There is no daylight between him and CAIR at this point.
One might conclude that Tucker Carlson himself isn't interested in the plight of Christians -- except as they can be used as a cudgel to attack Jews.
Just gonna ask an Interesting Question myself -- why is it that Tucker Carlson's arguments all track with those shit out by Qatarian propaganda agents and the far left? That if Jews crush an ant underfoot it is worldwide news, but when Muslims slaughter Christians it elicits not even a vigorous shrug?
Garth Merenghi is interviewed by the only man who can fathom his ineffable brilliance -- Garth Merenghi
From the comments:
I once glimpsed Garth in the penumbra betwixt my wake and sleep. He was in my dream, standing afar, not looking my way, nor did he acknowledge me. But I felt seen. And that's when I knew I was a traveler on the right path. I'm glad he's still with us.

Now that's some Merenghian prose.
Garth Merenghi on the writer's craft

Greetings, Traveler. If you still have not experienced Garth Merenghi -- Author, Dream-weaver, Visionary, plus Actor -- the six episodes of his Darkplace are still available on YouTube and supposedly upscaled to HD. (Viewing it now, it doesn't appeared upscaled for shit.)
I think the second episode, "Hell Hath Fury," is the best by a good margin. Try to at least watch through to that one. It's Mereghi's incisive but nuanced take on sexism.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: The elections! NYC, Virginia, New Jersey, Texas, California, and the future prospects of the Republican party...
Update on Scott Adams:
Scott Adams had approval for this cancer drug but they hadn't scheduled him to get it. He was taking a turn for the worse. Trump had told him to call if he needed anything, so he did. Talked to Don Jr (who is in Africa) , then RFK Jr, then Dr Oz. Someone talked to Kaiser and he was scheduled. Shouldn't have needed it but he did and he says it saved his life.
Posted by: Notsothoreau
Funny retro kid costumes, thanks to SMH
Good to see people honoring Lamont the Big Dummy
Four hours of retro Halloween commercials and specials
The first short is the original 1996 appearance of "Sam," the dangerous undead trick-or-treater from Trick r' Treat.
On Wednesday, we'll see the "Beaver Super-Moon." Which sounds hot.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Historian and Pundit Robert Spencer joins us for a wide-ranging discussion about the Islamists in our midst: Mamdani in NYC, all across Europe, and others.
Full Episode: The Hardy Boys (and Nancy Drew) Meet Dracula
I don't remember this show, except for remembering that Nancy Drew was hot and the opening credits were foreboding and exicting
Schmoll: 53% of New Jersey likely voters say their neighbors are voting for Ciattarelli, while 47% say the cheater/grifter Mikie Sherrill
The "who do you think your neighbors are voting for" question is designed to avoid the Shy Tory problem, wherein conservative people lie to schmollsters because they don't want to go on record with a likely left-winger telling them who they're really voting for. So instead the question is who do you think your neighbors are voting for, so people can talk about who they themselves support without actually having to admit it to a left-wing rando stranger recording their answers on the phone.
TJM Complains about Wreck-It Ralph The very topical premiere of TJM's YouTube Channel.
Interesting football history: How the forward pass was created in response to the nineteen -- 19! -- people killed playing football in 1905 alone
The original rules of football did not allow forward passes. The ball was primarily advanced by running, with blockers forming lines with interlocked arms and just smashing into the similarly-interlocked defensive lines. It was basically Greek hoplite spear formations but with a semi-spherical ball. As calls to ban the sport entirely grew, some looked for ways to de-emphasize mass charges as the primary means of advancing the ball, and some specifically championed allowing a passer to throw the ball forward.
Recent Comments
Posted by: Stateless - VERY GRATEFUL, BLESSED, LOVED AND HAPPY! -- - New Life Creation - 18.1%: "I'm in Canada, it's in the 40's or so and I'm mowi ..."

AliasJonesJones: "210. Hilarious. I'm not panicking at all. ..."

m: "220 >>>I got to sit through a trial where part of ..."

Weekend Work Overseer: "I am practically stunned to see Ace posting today. ..."

Stu Podaso: "I have seen things you people wouldn't believe; pi ..."

ace: ">>>I got to sit through a trial where part of the ..."

BurtTC: "The source is a fed who may or may not have been i ..."

Kindltot: "[i]OOOh I like the "leave it at a bar" deal! Post ..."

ace: "thanks for the update, it's me donna. guess thi ..."

Aliassmithsmith: "Yes the left is pretty excited about the new mayor ..."

It's me donna: "212 >>> Cameras have time stamps wear a light d ..."

Huck Follywood: "Trump appointed DOJ prosecutor Ed Martin, who is p ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives