Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« "Thinly-Velied Gloating" By Rightwingers Over French Riots | Main | Selective Declassification To Undermine the Bush Administration »
November 09, 2005

It's Official: CIA Asks For Criminal Investigation Into Leak

Here's the comically predictable part: the Democrats want this investigation, into a a specific leak in 2005, to also include the "twisting of intelligence" in 2002 and the "outing" of husband-outed soccer mom Valerie Plame in 2003.

Democrats, meanwhile, said that if Republicans wanted to pursue an inquiry, it should go beyond any leak related to secret detention facilities and cover a range of other issues that Democrats say are ripe for investigation.

"That includes the possible manipulation of prewar intelligence on Iraq, and the disclosure for political purposes of classified information involving the identity of the C.I.A. officer," said the House minority leader, Representative Nancy Pelosi of California.

Oh, and remember that New York Times piece, which revealed the CIA's secret air fleet? Apparently that information might have been used in conjunction with the WaPo leak to ID the countries helping us imprison terrorists:

The Post, citing a "request of senior U.S. officials," did not identify the Eastern European countries. But the mention of Eastern Europe stirred anxiety at the intelligence agency, particularly after Human Rights Watch, a group that has opposed American detention policies, issued a statement on Monday saying its research had tracked C.I.A. aircraft in 2003 and 2004 making flights from Afghanistan to remote airfields in Poland and Romania. The group said aircraft used in the flights had been previously flown by the C.I.A. for prisoner transport.

Investigate that leak too. Put the journalists under oath and force them to reveal their criminal sources.


posted by Ace at 12:33 PM
Comments



Shhhh, guys, forget this whole leaked covert op thingy, CNN is gonna report - any minute now - that they learned of this on Ronald Reagan's deathbed. I think all us neo-cons can see that this is simply gonna be eggs on our face if we press this.

I have it on great authority that every leadership position in the GOP gave the Wash Post and NYT's this information on background in order to support Kilgore's campaign.

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 9, 2005 12:52 PM

Joe, I don't know if you realize that Berry Princess has been operating under very deep cover, and you're outing of her is a very serious offense.

Posted by: DB on November 9, 2005 01:08 PM

Gargamel told me this in the Green Room, I was shocked to learn it.

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 9, 2005 01:11 PM
Oh, and remember that New York Times piece, which revealed the CIA's secret air fleet? Apparently that information might have been used in conjunction with the WaPo leak to ID the countries helping us imprison terrorists:

No, I don't remember the NYT piece, but unless it's a few years old, how could it have anything to do with Human Rights Watch ID of planes in 2003 and 2004?

Probably no connection. The carriers used by the CIA have been detected at least since the 80s, when you could read about the carriers used during Iran-contra even before the investigation. It's not easy to keep a secret about planes flying into airports...

Posted by: tubino on November 9, 2005 03:13 PM

Yes, I do remember the NY Times piece. I also remember that the paper received clearance from the CIA before publishing the story. Somehow that part always gets left out.

Posted by: Chris on November 9, 2005 03:25 PM

How are we doing on that investigation into the allegations that Chalabi leaked info about CODES being BROKEN to our Iranian enemies in the Axis of Evil?

Oh, he's meeting with members of the Bush admin TODAY? Will he be interviewed by the FBI? Wearing handcuffs? No?

Wake me up when you guys OR this administration gets serious about security risks, instead of hosting them for talks, or maintaining their security clearances.

Posted by: tubino on November 9, 2005 03:31 PM

Just call me Johnny One-Note.

This entire campaign of mine has been centered around one theme: Republicans are crooks and liars.

I read the same 5 lefty blogs all day long and steal all their ideas, arguments, and quotes. Then, I regurgitate it back to the dunces at AoS.

Watergate. Iran-Contra-gate. Plamegate.
National Guard-gate. Whatever-gate.

I'll keep weaving in all the loony conspiracies, rumors, and investigations against the Republicans into my many, many boring, repetitive, humourless, dry, insipid, baseless, and contrived posts.

Soon, you'll realize what I already know. Republicans are bad. Very bad.


Posted by: Toobeano on November 9, 2005 03:39 PM

I also remember that the paper received clearance from the CIA before publishing the story.

Not quite correct - the CIA had 'no comment' when the story was submitted, probably because the NYT compiled the story from non-classified sources.

Posted by: geoff on November 9, 2005 03:52 PM

So was the NYT story so far back in time that it could have been a source for 2003 HRW reports, as Ace says?

Posted by: sockpuppet on November 9, 2005 03:58 PM

Great read. How bush lets his administration get accused of manufacturing information is a mystery. Seems anyone with have a brain and an interest in the facts would draw a completely different conclusion.

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/Production/files/podhoretz1205advance.html

Sorry. I have no clue on the linking stuff. Oh and spinning gay hat tip to LGF.

Posted by: JackStraw on November 9, 2005 05:00 PM

have = half which apparently I do not have.

Posted by: JackStraw on November 9, 2005 05:08 PM

Tubino,

Were you "serious" about security risks when Clinton was selling out national secrets to the chinese for campaign contributions? Somehow, I doubt it.

Were you serious when Sandy Bergler was stealing and destroying classified materials to protect the previous admin? Somehow I doubt it.

When did the left ever care about the military and intelligence operations in the last 30 years - aside from using them as the boogeyman and doing everything they could to dismantle same? Your (the left's) sudden embrace of american intelligence and the military fools no one. That is why, no matter what histrionics the left displays, no one takes the Dems seriously on national security.

When the left establishes a true history of seriousness on national security issues (rather than partisan emphasis that changes daily for political purposes), American might take democrats seriously on issues involving national security. Until then, they shouldn't, they don't, and they won't.

Posted by: on November 9, 2005 05:25 PM

Hey hey hey.
Who's the self-righteous liberal liar, here?

That's right. Se Moi.
So I ask the questions, and you dunces try to answer them. Got it?

I know nothing of all those alleged crimes by democrats. Probably all part of a smear campaign by the Right and have not a kernel of truth.

Only MY charges of high crimes and misdemeanors are important and relevant. All that crap about Sandy Berger and the Chinese is ancient history. Let's stick with the here and now: Plamegate, Iran-Contra, and Watergate.

The Democrats are as pure as the driven snow. Therefore I can, with good conscience, claim I'm only after truth, justice, and the American way. Even though I'm only interested in spinning for my liberal, socialist comrades in America.

When George Soros is president of the United States, he will make Canadia the 51st state in the union. And my hometown of Toronto will be the new capital of the nation.

Remember, my arrogance is only exceeded by my stupidity. So...

Don't mess with Canadia!

Posted by: Toobeano on November 9, 2005 07:49 PM

Hey Toobeano

Every right wing blog has someone doing what you do, and it gets old really fast. The only people saying things like Bush lied and people died anymore are idiot right wingers who think they've stumbled onto comedy gold. Get a fresh act.

Posted by: Chris on November 9, 2005 07:55 PM

Hey Chris, what's the deal-i-o?
We're on the same side, remember?

Posted by: Toobeano on November 9, 2005 08:10 PM

The only people saying things like Bush lied and people died anymore are idiot right wingers

Not from where we're sitting. We just got a flood of Bush-Lied/People-Died types in the last couple of weeks. And they were nowhere near the right. Even Tubino flirts with it. I'm willing to concede that there are more reasonable attitudes among the left, but they're buried in the political jingoism of the Kos-Kids.

Posted by: geoff on November 9, 2005 08:48 PM

Sh*t, go ahead and let the U.N. set up their own internet (in their accustomed Private Idaho). They are setting up their own radio broadcast division now.

We'll just set up our own CIA. Shut the old one down. Fire every last gall dang one of those turds. We couldn't possibly do it any worse.

Forty four billion per annum.

Posted by: Elmo on November 9, 2005 09:44 PM

The only people saying things like Bush lied and people died anymore are idiot right wingers

Then there's the old 'repeat a lie often enough' method, and just look at the results:

New NBC poll just out says 57% think BUSH intentionally misled Americans in the run up to the Iraq war.

[From a commenter at John Cole's site, H/T to Jeff Goldstein]

Posted by: geoff on November 9, 2005 10:03 PM

Every news report for 3 years says the same thing, that, basically Bush lied, and then they sample a hefty extra 10% democrat to get that poll.

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 10, 2005 01:19 AM

Why isnt there a investigation into clintons dirty dealing what about all of clintons dirty dealings?

Posted by: spurwing plover on November 10, 2005 08:14 AM

There were Clinton investigations, and there were indictments and there were convictions. You may not have heard about them because they didn't hurt Bush.

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 10, 2005 09:55 AM

I was referring specifically to the phrase "Bush lied, people died." I realize a lot of people are accusing Bush of lying, but I see that phrase used in a weak attempt at sarcasm way more than it's used by lefties, on a scale of about 20:1.

Posted by: Chris on November 10, 2005 11:56 AM

Gee, Chris, apparently you don't get out much.
From bumper stickers to hand-held signs, that lil' slogan is all around.
Perhaps here in 'cyberspace' the lefties have taken it to a new level, changed the wording perhaps, but the message is still the same.
And of course, as mentioned above, the left-leaning polls (redundant redundant) echo that.

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 10, 2005 12:33 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Elric the Blade says he's no longer sure that Trump will have the right to appeal in the NY fraud case:
Yesterday, I thought that Trump had an appeal as of right on the fraud liability, based upon news reports that cited the second opinion as declining to find in favor of liability. That would give Trump at least 2 dissenting judges for an appeal as of right.
But now, after seeing the actual decisions, I'm not so sure. Sorry, guys. I've never seen or heard of what the second opinion did. They dissented, but ... decided not to dissent? I'm not sure what the effect is in terms of whether Trump has a right to appeal. I doubt anyone does.
I think even if Trump doesn't have a right of appeal, the Court of Appeals (NY's highest court) will take the case. But ... it's a liberal court so who knows how they'll rule. I have the docket number so I can track what gets appealed to the Court of Appeals. If Trump wants to appeal, I think he might file an appeal as of right and a petition for permission to appeal. His lawyers know this case much better than I, but even they might know what the effect of all the opinions are.
I don't think they'll take the appeal. Judges are lazy and cowardly and will duck any hot potato case they can. These judges are also liberal hacks, and do not want to deliver Trump a full victory.
FBI raids home of John Bolton, former Trump national security advisor "The probe is eyeing multiple instances of the use of classified documents in leaks to news media. NBC reported that the investigation into Bolton began during the Biden administration, but did not go further before President Joe Biden left office in January." [CBD]
Money Wired to Mexico Hits a Decade Low as US Immigration Policies Take Hold
Now bump the fee to 10%, and mandate proof of legal residence for all money transfers out of the United States [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Boots on the ground in Ukraine? We're against it! Trump shines a light on voting, Miss Universe wearing a suicide vest? And more!
"As the discussion continued, Fox News host Charlie Hurt asked Trump directly to confirm there will be no U.S. troops involved in this potential security umbrella for Ukraine. "Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president," Trump replied."
Good! I hope I am wrong! [CBD]
Lost Seventies Mystery Click: The Darkest Song Ever Recorded?
I think Professor of Rock (on YouTube) claimed this song was so upsetting that people used to pull over to the side of the road when it came on the radio. It's about a fatal plane crash, but obviously it suggests a fatal car crash too, which could wig out a driver.
It's like one of those nasty 70s anti-war body horror movies. Not for the squeamish. I'm not even going to post the lyrics because they're upsetting too.
Compilation of Naked Gun intros
That theme gets me charged.
Compilation of all Police Squad! openings. They're all the same except for the last few seconds where they reveal the Special Guest Star and the title(s).
Pitch Meeting: Amazon's new, terrible War of the Worlds
I don't know why these tech monopolists spend so much money on ripoff/sequel/remake slop. I like popcorn entertainment but is it legally required to be terrible?
Lost 90s Mystery Click: College Radio Edition
Well you look fantastic in your cast-off casket
At least the thing still runs
This nine to five bullshit don't let you forget
Whose suicide you're on.

Also:
You wax poetic about things pathetic
As long as you look so cute
Believe these hills are starting to roll
Believe these stars are starting to shoot
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: In the last Episode of the season CBD and J.J. Sefton chat about Texas Gerrymandering, The Islamist who is about to be the mayor of NYC, Jim Acosta's ghoulish interview, Israel needs a new strategy for Gaza, and more!
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Garrett's Favorite Band Edition
Everybody wants you
Everybody wants your love
I'd just like to make you mine, all mine
I'm frankly surprised the title is 107 Days. I would have thought it would be:

Days Are Important: The Amount of Days Was a Number and That Number Was 100 Plus 7 Which is 107. 107. One Hundred and Seven. It's a Memoir and Memoirs are About Remembering Things Because Remembering Things is Good. Not Bad. Good. Memoir. A Memoir. Like a Reservoir But With Memory. We Have to Let it Flow. We Have to Let It Flow Into the Reservoir of Our Mind and Our Heart. Our Heart Which is the Beating Heart of Not Just Our Blood, But Our Progress. And Our People. And Democracy. The End.

Posted by: ...
Recent Comments
screaming in digital: "SiD, imma make a serious suggestion. Go to EweToob ..."

Ben Had: " I love good food and living alone doesn't dampe ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "Yes. And they have now started putting on the old ..."

bluebell: "SiD, imma make a serious suggestion. Go to EweToob ..."

Gordon Scott: "Hire Elon Musk to tunnel between LA and SF. He'd h ..."

bluebell: "Thank you, Buck, for coming to the rescue with thi ..."

rickb223 [/s][/b][/u][/i]: "Lots of really good cooks in my family and we ate ..."

screaming in digital: "tcn, my mom called it "goop" as well. I thought it ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "I feel like I need remedial food education reading ..."

Ben Had: "Lots of really good cooks in my family and we ate ..."

tcn, Pickle Queen of Alaska: "278 Rhomboid, I learned to drink coffee that was b ..."

bluebell: "We got a great squirrel recipe when we did The Dep ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives