Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Now Twenty Towns Around Paris Engulfed In Rioting | Main | [ C O R R E C T E D ] Michael Moore Owns Two Thousand Shares... of Halliburton? »
November 03, 2005

Email of the Day: Andrew Sullivan, Bipolar Bloviator

I've said similar stuff before, but I'll post alex's musings on Excitable Boy:

I hate to think what Andrew Sullivan's exes must all have endured--the man simply has no 'lukewarm' valve--he's either scalding hot or freezing cold. There's just no getting out of a relationship with a man like that on a 'lets be friends' level--I suspect Sullivan's not on speaking terms with a single old boyfriend. And whether or not Sullivan ever decides to settle down for good with the current boyfriend (which, by MA law, he can do if he cares to), he's certainly not about to marry any particular idea and settle down with it any time soon, or accept responsibility for any idea after he's fallen out of love with it--the man's an intellectual Casanova.

It's one thing to be a genuine iconoclast like Sullivan's hero Orwell--that is, to have consistent, strong personal beliefs which simply don't fit neatly into any one prepackaged ideology. It's one thing to have one major life-changing 'conversion' experience a la Christopher Hitchens. It's another thing entirely to exist with one's beliefs in a constant, unexplained, unrestrained, and uninterrogated state of flux.

Sullivan's hardly politically consistent--he reliably self-defines as conservative, but seems to expect the term to bend to his own ever-changing definition--for Sullivan, 'conservative' (like 'Catholic') is defined as 'wherever and whatever Andrew Sullivan now is'.

Exactly. It's one thing to have a change of mind. But usually people who do are a bit apologetic, a bit embarassed, and have a bit of sympathy for their one-time allies who they've now left behind. Were I to suddenly decide Bush erred in going to war with Iraq, I would make my case, but I would certainly not be venomous to war-supporters, whose opinion I had shared just a few weeks before.

With Sullivan, it's unapologetic, unabased self-righteousness on every single idea that enters his brain, even regarding those upon which he had the precise opposite opinion a few months ago.

The man went from sarcastically mocking those concerned with abusing terrorists to screeching about the US being a "rogue state" without ever proceeding through even a "conflicted rumination" phase.

The man doesn't have a philosophy. He has a Tiger Beat What's Hot/What's Not list in his brain that changes as quickly as Madonna's costumes at a concert-slash-kabbalah-ceremony.

And the emotion...! My god, the emotion! I found it exhausting to even attempt parodying Sullivan's, let us say, rather passionate form of "analysis." Who the hell can be that outraged and/or exhilerated that many times a day? He's like a five-year-old kid whose every schoolday features three Christmasses and three trips to the dentist.

I suppose one could say he's being "honest," giving us the "unfiltered Sullivan," except 1) he's pretty dishonest (still making his mind up about Bush, $100,000 bandwidth costs, etc.) and 2) please, if I must have Sullivan at all, let me have a filter. A really, really strong one.

Only an absolute narcissist could be so in love with his own musings, and so convinced of the complete righteousness of crap he just thought up five seconds ago.

Andrew Sullivan is the high priest of his own personal Cult of Personality.


posted by Ace at 06:27 PM
Comments



One of the many, many things that bothers me about the Excitable One is his absolute refusal to see anyone but himself acting in good faith. If you disagree with homosexuality, you're not acting out of religious conviction, you're a theocrat bent on stripping gays and lesbians of their civil rights.

I simply cannot read his rants anymore. The man has no political conviction - just vitriol for anyone who isn't exactly just like him on every issue.

Posted by: Slublog on November 3, 2005 06:47 PM

Yeah, Don Luskin pointed that out years ago, and I followed up on the point. Sullivan's rhetoric is nonstop ad hominem (yes, okay, mine too) but then, get this, interrupted by pious calls for "civility" in debate.

One or the other, asshole. One or the other.

Posted by: ace on November 3, 2005 06:49 PM

You called Sullivan an "asshole?" What are you, some kind of bigot sending subliminal messages that gays and lesbians are less deserving of civil rights than you are?!?

Friggin' theocrat.

Posted by: Slublog on November 3, 2005 06:52 PM

Andrew Sullivan is the high priest of his own personal Cult of Personality.

At the rate his traffic is dropping off, Andy will be ready for his close-up very soon, Mr. DeMille.

Posted by: BumperStickerist on November 3, 2005 07:13 PM

You're right about his accusations of bad faith. Goldstein wrote today about the same trend in feminist bloggers, but Sullivan's as guilty of it as they are.

I think a big reason he blows so hot and cold is because of the attention it gets him. That's not to say his opinions aren't honestly held, but the guy fancies himself as highly infuential -- and there's not much influence to be had in cautious, circumspect criticism. Note that when OJR took a poll of A-list bloggers in 2003 to find out who was the most influential of them all, Sullivan pointed to ... himself. Not an untenable argument, especially at the time, but it does make you wonder how heavily this stuff weighs in his decision to drop bombs about "rogue states" and such.

Posted by: Allah on November 3, 2005 07:16 PM
At the rate his traffic is dropping off

According to Truth Laid Bear, he's getting 72,000+ hits a day, BS. Hewitt, by comparison, only gets 50,000.

Posted by: Allah on November 3, 2005 07:21 PM

One or the other, asshole. One or the other.--Ace


Right you are ,sir, right you are. It is blindingly self-worshipping to engage in the type of arguments Sullivan makes as a matter of course, and then turn around and pat oneself on the back as one pleads that everyone else show some class.

Posted by: dougf on November 3, 2005 07:26 PM

Yet he's a frequent commentator on Chris Matthews show (yah yah, I know no one watches it but..) representing the more conservative viewpoint. Allegedly. I guess according to Chris, Andy is indeed conservative.

Posted by: Kina on November 3, 2005 07:27 PM

I really can't think of one conservative blogger who even links to his postings anymore....at least not any self-respecting ones.

Other than his appearances on a fellow effeminate male's cable program and the occasional talking head stint, he's fast becoming a non-player in the world of serious political commentary.

Personally, I find his nearly constant gay-baiting antics as equally annoying as Jesse Jackson's race-baiting rants.

Just the name of his blog alone, The Daily Dish, was enough to annoy the fuck out of me.

Perhaps Tammy Bruce should've reconsidered naming her blog The Carpetlicker Conservative....Tee Hee!.....Get it?...she's a lesbian and that would be soooooo tongue in cheek! Like oh my gawwwwd!

Posted by: The Ugly American on November 3, 2005 07:34 PM

The Ugly American: Excitable Andy probably should just call it "Felch Blog". That's pretty "tongue in cheek", too.

Sulli sees the world through Sperm-Colored Glasses. IOW, his analysis on every issue is just a bit clouded. When his homosexuality is a major factor in how he thinks about everything from the war to friggin' party invitations, it is no wonder he's so gobsmackingly difficult to put up with these days.

Posted by: Sharkman on November 3, 2005 08:02 PM

Umm... it's "WHOM they've now left behind."

Posted by: Mark V. on November 3, 2005 09:47 PM

I quit reading Sullivan's scream-a-palooza after he took such umbrage with "The Passion of the Christ". He couldn't just say he didn't like the film and explain why. No, he had to accuse Mel Gibson of being some closeted sexual sadist. Gibson wasn't allowed to make an uncompromising movie according to his own vision, he was pushing some highbrow snuff film on an unsuspecting America. What a fucking self-righteous douche.

Posted by: UGAdawg on November 3, 2005 10:01 PM

I imposed a Sullivan ban on myself back in January, after he decided to define the gay slang term "santorum" for us. I said "no more" at that point, this man has nothing of value to say.

In March, I did the same thing for O-Dub.

Yeah, I occasionally peek to see what they're writing about, but only to laugh at them. No linkage, no promoting them, no writing angry screeds attacking them. They are too ridiculous, and life is too short. I was getting too worked up over their posts, so I simply said "no more." I don't regret it at all.

Next up, Juan Cole. The guy is just pure negativity, defeatism, and gloom. He's a soul-destroying prick who feels obligated to note every last car bomb, and who cannot acknowledge anything positive that came out of the fall of Saddam. I'm done with him. In my world, he's officially a non-person.

Posted by: The Colossus on November 3, 2005 10:41 PM

I never was a fan of Sullivans, but you're way too hard on the guy. He's just a poseur who is very good at self promotion. Why anyone ever took this weirdo seriously at any time is beyond me. He is entertaining to some, sort of like a watching a guy eat his own vomit. The only constant with Sullivan is that he will say anything that will get him attention.

Posted by: john on November 3, 2005 11:58 PM

I see the ASFOA has been on Gobsmack for a while, now. I would imagine anyone on that constant a level that high must be counting his heartbeats before the big one.

Posted by: Tom M on November 4, 2005 12:14 AM

Allah: like Hewitt's on an upward trend?

Posted by: someone on November 4, 2005 03:57 AM

Andrew is just peeved that not only hasn’t he been invited to a White House dinner, but he hasn’t even been invited to join the Pajama Media.

Posted by: tefta on November 4, 2005 05:48 AM

Seems like Sullivan's mind is so twisted by BDS that he can't think straight about Bush. Which makes me wonder: Was his thinking this bad back when I agreed with him? Objectivity don't come easy.

Posted by: Myrhaf on November 4, 2005 08:15 AM

Ace = Theocon

He probably supports putting fake menstral blood on terrorists, to torture them by making them think they had contact with evil vaginas.

Anyone who supports vaginal contact is a Theocon. You are worse than Hitler.

Posted by: on November 4, 2005 08:56 AM


Ace,
Please recall Mr. Sullivan gets regular depo-testosterone shots(and talks of how,well.manly they make him feel).My point is that the depo shots give a supra-physiologic level immediately post injection followed by a leveling into the normal range of testosterone followed by a sub physiologic level if the initial level was high enough to suppress the gonadotropins.To keep from getting the sub physiologic days one must schedule shots more closely together.(And yes,I'm a MD)
If Mr. Sullivan is getting "too much" testosterone
he has a real reason for being hyper.

Posted by: murgen on November 4, 2005 10:57 AM

I've really been enjoying your site recently, definately real amusing and fun but you spend an inordinate ammount of time posting about excitable Andy. Some of them are amusing (I liked the menstrual post) but a lot of them seem a little repetative(I get it, Andy's a mood fakin' conservative, that's why I stopped reading his site too). Do you at least get a reward named after you on Andy's site?

Props for the lack of homo cracks in this post. I find it almost impossible to make a critisism of Sully without something about riding a baloney poney or packing fudge. Maybe its how he represents so many steriotypes.

Posted by: Shtetl G on November 4, 2005 11:00 AM

There weren't any homo cracks on this thread? Damn! Whose turn was it?!?

(Heh heh. He said "homo cracks")

Posted by: S. Weasel on November 4, 2005 11:02 AM

Ace, I'm glad you've figured out that Sullivan is narcissistic, not solipsistic.

Posted by: on November 4, 2005 06:14 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Mayor Karen is so stung by fan-made AI ads that she's resorting to the shitlibs' go-to demand for an end to criticism -- these ads are "violent" and "hateful" and making me feel unsafe because one video showed AI cartoons throwing tomatoes at me and the tomatoes looked like blood when they squished
This was her actual complaint. The mushed-up tomato looked like blood so it's a death threat and these violent attacks on me must stop. What is dis bitch, CNN?
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD are joined by Jeff Carter, candidate for NV treasurer, and seasoned finance professional, for a discussion of the issues facing Nevadans, and the larger financial challenges in America.
Few people remember that Norm MacDonald began his career as a ventriloquist
MacDonald's old partner Adam Egot revealed that MacDonald repurposed a bit with one of his ventriloquist dolls -- that he was a "bad guy" who "didn't believe the Holocaust happened" -- for the Norm MacDonald show, in which he claimed Egot didn't believe in the Holocaust.
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Recent Comments
CharlieBrown'sDildo: "We don't celebrate July 4th. We celebrate Indepen ..."

Diogenes : "Wakes up Scratches Looks around Dang. I like ..."

Quarter Twenty : "Best Western. Mexia. Just saying. ..."

lin-duh in Texas: "She hobbit, Hampton Inn has no rooms. I'll either ..."

naturalfake: " [i]Did you know that Johann Pachelbel...[/i] ..."

Anonosaurus Wrecks, Fat, Dumb, and Happy[/s] [/i] [/u] [/b]: "JD calls for "the Fraudsters". ie. the foreign loo ..."

Kindltot: "[i]Chicharrones. Posted by: jim (in Kalifornia) a ..."

Zombie Robbo the Llama Butcher: "Horde Mind - ACTIVATE! ..."

tankdemon: "Sock removal comment. Feel free to ignore the cont ..."

Bulg: "264 Did he have a cannon? ..."

Anonosaurus Wrecks, Fat, Dumb, and Happy[/s] [/i] [/u] [/b]: "Did you know that Johann Pachelbel had a son, Char ..."

naturalfake: "[i]Headquarters @HQNewsNow JD Vance appears to c ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives