| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
The Classical Saturday Morning Coffee Break & Prayer Revival
Daily Tech News 16 May 2026 In Fair Verona, Where We Lay Our ONT Bird-Heavy Cafe The Week In Woke Biden Loyalist and Registered Democrat Eric Ciaramella Perjured Himself in Denying Coordination with Adam Schiff Before Launching ImpeachmentGate 1.0 Sonny Hostin: No Definitely Helen of Troy Probably Was Black. I Read a Stupid Book One Time That Said Greek Culture Came from Africa. Foreign Communist Candidate for LA Mayor Nithya Raman Wants to Ban Backyard BBQs Because the Transnational Invaders Instinctively Make Endless War on American Normies Congress Rejected Biden's Demand for $50 Billion in Extra Spending for Medicaid Programs. On His Own Tyrannical Authority, Biden "Authorized" $46.5 Billion of That Spending Anyway Know the Op: The Entire Machinery of the Left Wing, Including Me-Again Kelly, Is All-In on Thomas Massie Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026 Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« Great Point About Gender/Racial "Balance" on the Supreme Court |
Main
| A Shocker Of A Picture »
November 02, 2005
Authenticity, Extremism, And RacismMichael Steele's black opponents pelt him with Oreos, to symbolize he's an Uncle Tom traitor to his race. "Party trumps race," they say. If only. "Party trumping race" would be a good thing. Indeed, that seems to be what Michael Steele is doing -- choosing a party, or philosophy (and thence a party) without viewing that choice through a racial prism. It is generally a good thing when anything -- personality type, culture, philosophy, politics, even pop-music taste -- trumps race. Would anyone suppose that it's a good thing that there should be a Racially-Authentic Standard for beliefs, tastes, and aspiration? Apparently some do. Those who pelt Steele with Oreos say "Party trumps Race," but they're lying, perhaps to themselves. For them, Race trumps everything else. After all, there are lots of people with similar views to Steele; they're not being pelted with Oreos, or being singled out as "inauthentic" or "traitors." No, what bothers them about Steele is that he's bucking the Racially Correct identity-politics line. If he were white, they would barely care. Just another white Republican they don't like. It's his race, and his presumed betrayal of his racial brethren and their racial interests, that draws the ire. Let's just note something quickly-- I could not call Naked Testicle Spiderman a "traitor to the white race" without being (justifiably) scorned. Were I even to suggest that white people owe fealty to their own racial interests -- the interests of the, for lack of a better word, Volk -- I'd be accused of quasi-Naziism. And rightly so. Nazis talk in precisely that manner. You are to be white-- authentically white, buying all the "real" white beliefs and tastes and manners, and dedicated to advancing the white race -- or you are a traitor to the white race. A sell-out. I don't want to descend into needless vulgarity, but there's another pretty vicious term Nazis use when they see a white person cottoning a little too much to black folks for their liking. Nigger-lover. It's a doubly hateful word-- maybe triply; who can keep track? Is there much difference between Nazis calling black-liking whites "Nigger-lovers" and black racial chauvanists calling Michael Steele an Uncle Tom and Oreo, apart from the use of the forbidden N-word? The charge is the same: You are a traitor to the race. You cravenly and inauthentically have chosen to tolerate or even like another race over your own. The caveat here, as I've said before, is that blacks and other minorities get a little leeway here, due to legitimate past injustices and etc. History mitigates the sin of black racism, or black racial chauvanism. But just because a sin is mitigated and made less egregious does not make it tolerable or praiseworthy. Which brings up the quite-bad disease, most frequently striking the young and intellectually secure, of "authenticity" of some form or another. "Authenticity" is nothing of the sort. Truly authentic people do not have to strive for authenticity; they are authentic and true to themselves. "Authenticity" as it is commonly meant denotes an attempt to model one's personality, tastes, and beliefs upon an external standard. And it's artificial as all get out. Attempting to emulate some sort of paragon of what you think you should be is an artifical subversion of your own personality in favor of someone else's. (Let's ignore, for the moment, the quite-praiseworthy drive for most of us to be better, morally and ethically and such, than our natural drives would dictate.) Teenagers do a lot of this, of course, as far as trivial matters go. They try to figure out what the "cool" stuff to like is and adopt those tastes. And then, when the "cool" stuff changes, they change too. When they get to college, they dump N'Sync and will only listen to brooding, socially-concerned singer-songwriters. Because they're "authentic." Everyone does this to some extent, but the effects are pretty pernicious when the "authenticity" strived for is a racial model of propriety. College kids start liking music they didn't like when they were younger partly out of changing tastes, but partly to differentiate themselves from those younger, less mature, less hip, less educated. An important part of "authenticity" is the feeling of superiority to others it grants you -- you are authentic, others are not. You are therefore better. The Saudi Arabian fatwa against the Western "polytheist" rules of soccer are expressly an attempt at artificial "authenticity" and rejection of The Other, The Inferior. The rules are changed in trivial and silly ways not because it makes the game play better, but so those playing it by the new, Islamically-correct rules can differentiate themselves from, and thereby show their cultural superiority to, the objects of their hatred. Westerners, Americans, and Jews, in ascending order of contempt. Reasonable society recognizes such hateful nonesense for what it is when whites (especially white Christians, of course) practice it. Why is it so difficult to see that what is bad for whites to do must also be bad for blacks, Muslims, and other minorities to practice? The quest for authenticity is simultaneously a quest for insularity, as the entire point of the exercise is to separate oneself from the inauthentic and the sell-outs and the corrupt and the nonbelievers. And that leads to extremism. Because the more like-minded and insular a group is, the more dedicated the group is to promoting an ideal of racial, religious, or cultural authenticity, the more extremists gain in influence. Few young Muslim men in search of an identity they can call their own want to hear an Imam suggesting that the way to beat the West is to adopt the good parts of it and improve upon them. Those seeking an identity want to hear they're already better, that anyone unlike them is not only inferior but perhaps actually evil if not demonic. The more insular a group is, the more succeptible it is to extremist thought. You don't gain attention by saying reasonable things. You gain attention by saying quite unreasonable things. And you count on the group to shout down anyone who might point out what you're saying is hateful or absurd. Thus the Vietnam Veterans Against the War suddenly found themselves in a meeting at which they discussed assassinating US Senators in favor of the war. What is insanity outside a very insular and passionate group becomes heroic and wise inside of it; those who counsel against such extremism are seen as cowards and fools and tools of The Enemy. And so it goes. Committed black-power partisans, dedicated to the notion of black solidarity, revile a black politician in offensive terms of racial treachery. Young Muslim men, searching for an ideology that will assuage their feelings of cultural inferiority, seek out the most radical Imams who preach the most absurd, hateful, and medieval rantings about Christians, Jews, and Muslims who are not sufficiently Muslim. And, yes, po' white trash, also lacking in self-esteem, embrace a racist ideology that says no matter how ugly, mean-tempered, criminal-minded, violent, immoral, stupid, uneducated, or useless you might be, you're one of God's Holy Pale Chosen. You're white, and you're all right. And how do you argue against it from the outside? In all cases, you're not merely arguing with a philosophy or ideology. You're arguing against the major source of a person's sense of self-worth, the thing that makes him feel superior to others who don't share his vaunted "authenticity." You can convince people of a lot of things, but it's pretty hard to get them to give up anything that props up their egos. A person can be convinced that a fact is wrong, but he can almost never be convinced that he, as a person, isn't as special or superior as he's come to believe.
posted by Ace at 01:45 PM
CommentsLet's just note something quickly-- I could not call Naked Testicle Spiderman a "traitor to the white race" without being (justifiably) scorned. Yes, because though Naked Testicle Spidyman has Balls of Blue, cut one open and they are still white (with a whole lot of red. oops!). Posted by: on November 2, 2005 02:46 PM
Excellent post. Not sure why, but their tossing Oreos at the guy disgusted me in a way that the rhetoric, disgusting though it is, never has. Sort of a symbolic stoning. Dare I say, it was gobsmackingly vile. Kudos too to Filet 'o Fish, who managed to slam Steele again today for shrugging off Ehrlich's appearance at a racially restricted club without noting that Democrats have appeared there too. Posted by: Allah on November 2, 2005 02:48 PM
Great minds think alike Ace. I published a piece about this on my site at about the same time you did (after accounting for time zone differences). I won't "link whore" and throw the article down here, but if you get a chance to read it and think it could serve as an update, I'd appreciate it. Thanks! Posted by: Jack M. on November 2, 2005 02:48 PM
Dammit, Ace. Beat my post too, by *this* much. Plus, yours is better. Cheers, Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on November 2, 2005 02:49 PM
And you said, you couldn't handle the show all by yourself 'cus you'd run out of thing to say! Posted by: JFH on November 2, 2005 02:49 PM
Well, Ace has a lot more time to think out his posts now that he has restricted comments and distracts us with naked testicle references. Posted by: on November 2, 2005 02:53 PM
The comments aren't intentionally restricted. It's the monthly mu.nu comment glitch. Posted by: ace on November 2, 2005 02:54 PM
And I suppose you are going to blame the Naked Testicle Spiderman references meant to distract us as a mu.nu glitch, too? Posted by: on November 2, 2005 02:57 PM
Look, if this is the way they want it, fine. The next time Cynthia McKinny says Bush caused 9/11, the next time Louis Farrakhan rails against "whitey," or the next time Al Sharpton says something incredibly stupid, I am just going to attribute those to Oliver Willis and the rest of the black liberal bloggers. Hey, they all think alike anyway, right? Don't tell me they can think for themselves anymore, since they don't seem to want to have independent voices anymore. So my question has to be to Oliver Willis - why DO you think Bush knew about 9/11? Posted by: Mark on November 2, 2005 03:06 PM
The most insidious form of racism is the insistence that people's thoughts, values, and philosophies must conform to their skin color. I've been enheartened by recent indications that ideology was proving to be a stronger delineator than race, but this seems to be making those accustomed to playing the race card very unhappy. Posted by: geoff on November 2, 2005 03:16 PM
I would also like Oliver to explain why he thinks that the CIA developed crack cocaine and introduced it into black neighborhoods. Oh, this can be kind of fun! Is Oliver going to be joining O.J. to find the "real" killers? Stay black, bro! Posted by: Mark on November 2, 2005 03:16 PM
...(T)here's another pretty vicious term Nazis use when they see a white person cottoning a little too much to black folks for their liking. Nigger-lover. Sure, Ace. Go ahead. Steal all my best material. It's okay, maybe I'll just go back to my blog and post a Top-10 ripoff, or link to Paul Anka's home movies or somethin. Lotsa loose shit rollin' around here today. (great post, btw) ;-) Posted by: The Black Republican on November 2, 2005 03:35 PM
50 Cent, the next "race traitor": 50 says he disagrees with West's infamous statement that "George Bush doesn't care about black people," proclaimed during a September telethon for Hurricane Katrina victims. Though I doubt anyone will call him an Oreo. To his face, at least. Posted by: Hubris on November 2, 2005 04:46 PM
Your post rings true on so many levels. It actually struck very close to something I observed earlier today. A girl in one of the classes I teach was wearing a shirt that said, "The best girls are BLACK." That struck me as just dripping with racism. I mean, what if we had her t-shirt say what it only directly says? "White women/latinas are inferior to black women." At least then the racism wouldn't be disguised any longer. What if I wore a t-shirt that said, "The best men are WHITE." IF I made it into the building past the lynching mobs that day, I wouldn't make it inside the next, as Jessie Jackson would be there with a mob to prevent my access to the building! The hypocrisy of racism is so utterly baffling. Apparently only white people are racists, and only non-white people can be the victims of racism (but only when the perpetrators are white themselves). Posted by: Hal on November 2, 2005 05:01 PM
It's too bad that documentaries like this aren't shown on PBS's American Experience. Wake up black people. Posted by: The Ugly American on November 2, 2005 05:38 PM
Can you stop talking about that picture? I'm getting traumatic flashbacks just from its mention. Posted by: someone on November 2, 2005 06:13 PM
One of the best you've ever written, Ace. No joke. Posted by: Robbie on November 2, 2005 06:18 PM
Can we have that statement signed, notarized, and run off a coupla million copies ? We everyday, non-elected, working folks need to be able to hand this stuff out everytime we hear some similar accusation. Posted by: Carl in N.H. on November 2, 2005 06:20 PM
I remember as a child the first black family to move into our area (early sixties). He was a jovial round bellied Santa type personality and we loved the guy. He had a bunch of kids, some older and some younger than us. An equipment operator by trade and lots of the local people (Norwegians, Germans, Finns, Belgians to mention some of the ancestral background ) hired him for various jobs. A fair man and did his job well. Then we got our first television(BW) and to my horror, watched rioting for the first time . I asked mom"What did they do?" and she said something like, "probably nothing... they just aren't liked". I said to her"Why don't they move? There's lots of room around here." Well they did move and if I go to any big city, they don't look happy to see me, even when I tried to be friendly. What did I do? Probably nothing...I'm just not liked. All that to say this- There are thousands of people that think as I. One, we think. Two, due to that process we can make choices based on facts, devoid of the emotional knee jerk reaction that encumbers those who remain enslaved in their pitiful cycle of pointless rhetoric. Three, if good is what you wish for then start doing good things. I realize that as a child I thought as one and some will say I still do. Action will always speak volumes and what do the volumes of actions devoid of the moral and ethical base practiced daily in that one black man I met so many years ago, have to say . We called him Mr. Winston. I think his first name was George (RIP)...if you can. Posted by: Forest Hunter on November 2, 2005 07:12 PM
Steele supports politics/parties/ideologies/whathaveyou out of the mainstream of Black American political thought. Should he have been pelted with oreos? No. Not because he ISNT an oreo, he definitly is, but because its counter productive and serves to only allow white pundits and their lackeys such as yourself to denigrate what are viable complaints w/ the reverse racism brush. I love how majority politicians/pundits/etc decry Black insularity as if its just SO prevalent and so pervasive, when at every turn, the Black community is in fact confronted w/ turncoats such as Steele, Dr. Rice, Judge Thomas, etc who wouldnt have their vaunted positions without the very policies they seek to change. The cardinal sin in Black America is forgetting where you come from. Steele has. Thomas has. Dr. Rice...maybe less so. Posted by: Binlahab on November 2, 2005 11:32 PM
I just can't fathom how you can demand that a community think in lockstep simply based on their skin color. I have much higher hopes for the future of race relations. Posted by: geoff on November 3, 2005 12:15 AM
I can't believe that nobody mentioned the Sneetches until now. Posted by: Chris on November 3, 2005 07:00 AM
Binlahab, First off, you exemplify exactly the kind of mindset that is the "new" (read: Marxist/Adornoean) racism. In your world, one is not black or white, one acts black or white. The logical fact unknown to you, because you've been steeped in illogical Marxist/Gramscian/Ardonoean propaganda for the majority of your formative years, is that attributing particular actions as belonging to particular races is inherently racist. Secondly, fuck right off, racist. Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 3, 2005 09:01 AM
Oops, that should read "Marxist/Gramscian/Adornoean." Need more coffee. Right after Bihabalabablah fucks right off. Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 3, 2005 09:02 AM
You think Binlahab is for real, Sue? Scary. I assumed it was cheap provocation. Considering this is a land famous for people who don't care where they came from but are passionately interested in where they're going, it's hard to imagine someone seriously trying to make the case that it doesn't matter where you end up, as long as you remember where you came from. It's an attitude with "LOSER" embroidered on it in lime green thread. Posted by: S. Weasel on November 3, 2005 09:14 AM
Sorry S. Weasel, this kind of crap gets me wound up. If nothing else, my response was cathartic. Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 3, 2005 09:56 AM
Oh, not complaining! It was a real question. I figured with a name like "Binlahab" he was more likely provocateur than honest broker. I wondered if he thought an uppity message from someone purporting to be black would cause us to break out in...I dunno...wild mockery in a minstrel-show dialect or something. Me, I'm all for engaging trolls. It's just more effective when you know which ones mean what they say, and which are all sockpuppet and posturing. Posted by: S. Weasel on November 3, 2005 10:05 AM
This has to be the best Ace post I have ever read. Posted by: doolz on November 3, 2005 12:32 PM
You really told the truth in this article. I am a white woman who was once married to a black man, I have two mixed grandchildren & my son is going to marry a girl from Kenya next spring. I have gone from admiring to total disgust for the actions & attitudes of blacks I know. You are right, they can't be reasoned with. It's almost diabolical. I did enjoy your words. Posted by: Connie on November 3, 2005 03:26 PM
I think that classism is much more pervasive than racism. What's most interesting is to bring topics of classism into a conversation with a conservative. The immediate accusation is "your inciting class warfare". Maybe, maybe not but there is a truth that as the rich get more and the poor get less it will become more evident. What's unbelevable is the puritanical notion that somehow poor people must've done something to be poor. So I long for the day when we can have an honest conversation about class. Posted by: Michael on November 3, 2005 03:45 PM
No, Michael, you don't have to have done something to be poor. But you have to have done something to stay poor. Depending, of course, on how you define poor. In this country, you can provide yourself with food, clothing, shelter, transportation and a few amenities on minimum wage. And there are plenty of minimum wage-style jobs that don't stay that way. There has to be something pretty significantly wrong with you if you can't hack a burger gig. Posted by: S. Weasel on November 3, 2005 04:33 PM
Wow Ace. This post is so not like your usual faire. I come here for the edgy, tounge-in-cheek humor. This post is your best ever. It is the only one that I was ever compelled to read twice. It is thoughtful, in-depth, surprisingly serious, and most importantly, spot-on on every point! Keep your great sense of humor, but more of this kind of stuff, please. Thanks! Posted by: Doug Purdie on November 3, 2005 06:07 PM
What's unbelevable is the puritanical notion that somehow poor people must've done something to be poor. I may be kidding myself, but it seems to me that the poor were not looked down upon by the middle class until after the War on Poverty began. Prior to that we had memes like: 'poor but honest,' 'poor but hardworking,' 'just needs a hand up,' 'down on their luck,' etc. Now we have middle class resentment towards the semi-permanent welfare class (whose statistics are ballooned by immigration) Posted by: geoff on November 3, 2005 06:18 PM
Sue Dohnim- Its interesting that you can tell me what I have or have not been doing for my formative years, when you know nothing about me. I have been lead to believe from Fox & O'Reilly and the like that is what you call being a smear merchant. Are you in fact a smear merchant, Sue? The bottom line in this country is that ever racial/identity/minority group has used their collective force to increase their collective economic/political power. A chinese person banks at a chinese bank, lives among Chinese people, speaks Cantonese/Mandarin and in general attempts to retain as much of his original culture as possible in the States. Yet when Black people attempt to do the same, we're accused of being reverse racists. How so? Do you have an answer for that, Sue? How is my initial response 'racist' to you? Or where is your "fuck right off, racist!" response to Connie or S. Weasal or anyone of the above? Try to respond to any of the points I brought up in the previous reply, if you can. Or you could continue to name call, if you'd like. I also find it amusing that people in this are assuming I'm a provocateur or some troll simply because of a log in name. Sorry it took me so long to come back, but I'll be checking in regularly from now on. Thanks! Posted by: Binlahab on November 25, 2005 11:52 PM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Mayor Karen is so stung by fan-made AI ads that she's resorting to the shitlibs' go-to demand for an end to criticism -- these ads are "violent" and "hateful" and making me feel unsafe because one video showed AI cartoons throwing tomatoes at me and the tomatoes looked like blood when they squished
This was her actual complaint. The mushed-up tomato looked like blood so it's a death threat and these violent attacks on me must stop. What is dis bitch, CNN?
Few people remember that Norm MacDonald began his career as a ventriloquist
MacDonald's old partner Adam Egot revealed that MacDonald repurposed a bit with one of his ventriloquist dolls -- that he was a "bad guy" who "didn't believe the Holocaust happened" -- for the Norm MacDonald show, in which he claimed Egot didn't believe in the Holocaust. Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?" I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove Chris
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near Somebody else holds your heart, yeah You turn to me with your icy tears And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source" Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held. Basil the Great
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.
Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing. Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult. Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending. (((Dan Hodges))) Nick Lowles
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98. Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years. Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45 Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%. I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens. REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs. Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
![]() That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time. I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Hamas is Humiliating Trump's 'Board of Peace'
[Hat Tip: TC] [CBD] Recent Comments
fd:
"My homeowners insurance is less than $100/month on ..."
Martini Farmer: "Morning peeps. ..." All Hail Eris, She-Wolf of the 'Ettes 'Ettes: "Good morning all. Big thunderstorm rolling thro ..." no one of any consequense: "I live in SC. My house is worth ~280k. The prope ..." Way, Way Downriver [/i]: "@83 [i]We had a gardener who had to be committed. ..." Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "[i]Insurance? My insurance is about $100 per month ..." NaCly Dog: "Blutarski, Gradually then Suddenly Thank you fo ..." Skip: "I have so much I should do today but haven't even ..." no one of any consequense: "Insurance? My insurance is about $100 per month. ..." Cow Demon: "86 Laura was a good performer Posted by: Skip at ..." NaCly Dog: "Good morning! Let's smile & be happy & strike ..." DavidD: "I use em-dashes all the time. ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|