Meh. Allah got it right way back in July:

Isn't it a fact that Victor Davis Hanson has basically been re-writing the same column for three years now?

Phrase the question this way: "On a scale of 1 to 10, how likely is it that VDH's next column will explain how the west will always prevail because of our open markets, freedom of expression, emphasis on science and technology, and robust military tradition?"

This is just more of the same. Not that VDH's points aren't valid, but jeez, get a new routine.

Come now, Megan, don't be so harsh. You wouldn't criticize a math professor for always ranting about how 2 + 2 = 4, would you?

VDH may be saying the same things over and over again, but at least he says *the right things*, and says them well. I cut him slack for the repetition (not to mention his excellent books).

That, and Ace told me to stick up for him when you punch him. He's either a gentleman who won't stand up to girls, or a drunken coward afraid of fightin' vagina.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

The Islamist seduction also includes disturbed souls here in the U.S. who belong to no formal terrorist group but who emulate jihadists after exposure to their ideas.

And while these terrorists are in jail, receiving care paid for by law abiding, tax paying American citizens, they are recruiting more terrorists from within.

To hell with deportation. The same with putting them in prison where they can recruit and spread their poison. Conviction should result either in the death penalty or an attitude adjustment by semi-daily electro-shock therapy.

Well we could just turn it into a contest? (Yes, I'm sure it's been done before). What to name the war against the bugs?

Bug stomp?
La Cucaracha?
International conspiracy to do the right thing?

As far as liberals and the gwot? Ignore them. In a pinch .... be nice to them (I know, easier said than done. Thinking of them as 'challenged' can mnake it easier though).

Isn't it a fact that Victor Davis Hanson has basically been re-writing the same column for three years now?

Staying on message ain't a sin.

If VDH repeats himself (and he does), it's because his numbingly obvious points need to be repeated. A newspaper columnist in 1945 who said, "People, we're fighting the Germans and Japanese!" would have sounded kind of dumb. Then again, FDR didn't spend four years skirting the issue.

Yeah, considering other media outlets lack of focus/patriotism etc. Its good to see someone beat the drum, especially when they're so eloquent doing it.

Isn't it a fact that Victor Davis Hanson has basically been re-writing the same column for three years now?

Someone really needs to pay attention more.

"an ideology that supports polygamy, gender apartheid, religious intolerance, hatred of homosexuals, and patriarchy..."

Is he talking about Islamists? He sounds like the left talking about us rednecks.

“No one has paused to ask what would cause a seemingly normal young Christian or Jew to strap himself into a warplane and drop bombs on a village, knowing full well his bombs will inevitably kill civilians (and, of course, soldiers).”

Why asky why? A Jewish or Christian person would bomb civilians under only one condition - if he or she were a liberal leftist. The liberal left support the terrorists and every nasty regime they can find because they are afraid. They are afraid of going hungry and afraid of being sick and afraid of heat and afraid of cold and afraid of every damn thing, but they are most afraid of terrorists. Their solution is to capitulate, in the obvious and completely vain hope that if they take it up the ass they will be spared.

Lord God spare us those who hide their sniveling cowardice behind so-called 'principles.'

“No one has paused to ask what would cause a seemingly normal young Christian or Jew to strap himself into a warplane and drop bombs on a village, knowing full well his bombs will inevitably kill civilians (and, of course, soldiers).”

That's because it's a very, very stupid question.

Why am I not surprised that it's coming from a UCLA English professor?

I read this article a while back, it explains why these leftists look at these third world terrorists with such admiration:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=4954

Its by a lefty who explains the whole idea behind immizeration and how the third world is the newest source of revolutionaries to the communist mind (since America has failed to produce immizerated workers. Instead, we have soccer moms and NASCAR dads).