Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Repeating Myself | Main | Put Some Ditties In Your Titties »
October 13, 2005

Wooden Shoes and Burkas

Dutch moving to ban burkas in public?

The country’s hardline Integration Minister, Rita Verdonk, known as the Iron Lady for her series of tough anti-immigration measures, told Parliament that she was going to investigate where and when the burka should be banned. The burka, traditional clothing in some Islamic societies, covers a woman’s face and body, leaving only a strip of gauze for the eyes.

Mrs Verdonk gave warning that the “time of cosy tea-drinking” with Muslim groups had passed and that natives and immigrants should have the courage to be critical of each other. She recently cancelled a meeting with Muslim leaders who refused to shake her hand because she was a woman.

The proposals are likely to win the support of Parliament because of the expected backing by right-wing parties. But they have caused outrage among Muslim and human rights groups, who say that the Government is pandering to the far Right.

After that Theo Van Gogh wake up, it’s good to see some Europeans step up to the plate, face down the euro-weenie, open culture suicide pact mentality and recognize a problem growing in their midst.

Still though, bans on clothing?

It’d be nice if Europe could find some middle ground. Stop it’s cycling between a caricature of some spineless lefty-librarian, mamby-pamby and the freedom trampling “Hammer Party” from The Wall

Europe’s a funny place. Reminds me of an alcoholic, always talking bout the evils of drink, lecturing everyone on that Great Satan, droning on how it’s the furthest thing from their minds and lips.

Despite their protests though, every now and then you see a flash, letting you know somewhere, deep inside, they still itch to get their hands on a flask, guzzle down some of the good stuff – and when they do, brother, look out, cause they’re going on a bender.


posted by Dr. Reo Symes at 01:29 PM
Comments



I think you will find that Europe is most likely to spin on a dime. You are right, they are either liberal weenies or hard righters.

After the murder of Theo Van Gogh, there were plenty of cases of anti-muslim violence, and yet we heard nary a word about them . OTOH, in the US, some muslim gets cut off in traffic after 9/11 and it's regarded as a hate crime and splashed over the media with the world condemning the US for a lack of tolerance. Europe was far more swift and accepting in it's own retribution of muslims compared to the US.

The point being is that Europe has a short fuse. All it takes is a couple of incidents and tolerance goes out of the window.

While it may seem odd to ban clothing, the opposite of that is accepting the wearing of Burkhas, and as they say, give them an inch and they'll take a yard, a practice that the followers of Islam have utilized a great deal in order to bring their warped culture to acceptance in the US.

Personally, I'd ban the religion as you would a dangerous cult, but then I'm just one of those wacky Europeans.

Posted by: Ring on October 13, 2005 01:40 PM

Still though, bans on clothing?

Low slung bags where the guy's shorts have obvious skid marks on them are kinda disgusting.

I always tell those characters: "Hey kid, your mother let you out of the house looking like that? Damn."

Posted by: Purple Avenger on October 13, 2005 01:59 PM

I think the two "sides" of European reaction are really two sides of the same coin. The key is that for continental Europeans, heavyhanded statist solutions tend to be the *first* impulse for addressing perceived problems, not the last.

The two responses - either drafting a 500-page Tolerance Code, strictly enforced from Brussels, making Tolerance mandatory and the lack of same thoughtcrime, or making laws against the preferred clothing styles of the people you're not tolerant of anymore - are much the same, at their root - it's about control.

The illustrative example that always drives this home for me is that most countries in continental Europe regulate the naming of children! You can't necessarily give your kid any name you want, it has to be cleared with the government first. Apparently most countries use a pretty light hand with this and aren't really overbearing about it, but the fact in itself is repugnant to Americans, who may be against it, but will fight to the death for your right to name your kid Dweezil if you want to.

Posted by: David C on October 13, 2005 02:13 PM

This stuff is just beginning. I predict a MUCh larger, much less controlled and much more violent mob/government backlash against Muslims in France within the next 5 years. Unseemly things will happen in Britain, as well, though the most the government itself will do will probably be lots of deportations and jailings.

Europe's M.O. has always been to ignore problems until they become hopeless and intractable, and only then "solve" them the way a kid losing at checkers fixes his dilemma - by picking up the board and throwing it across the room in a tantrum.

Immigration and Islam is just one example of this currently at work.

Another is the social welfare situation. I doubt they'll do anything meaningful to correct those problems until it leads to national bankruptcy and breakdowns of the basic social fabric.

Posted by: Russell Wardlow on October 13, 2005 02:25 PM

"Please don't make us angry. You wouldn't like us when we're angry."

Posted by: tachyonshuggy on October 13, 2005 02:42 PM

Europeans are f*cking crazy and need to be Tasered. That won't sane them up, but they'll be twitching for a while and won't do anything really bad.

Posted by: Pompous on October 13, 2005 02:42 PM

Plus, they're kinda fun to watch when they're just lyin' there on the ground in their berets and twitchin' a lot....

Posted by: David C on October 13, 2005 03:13 PM

Fascism is just below the surface in Europe, biding its time, waiting to resurface again. Clinton sent troops to Europe to defend muslims against genocide. A future US president may do the same thing again. They never learn. "Never again" doesn't mean the same thing to them that it means to us.

They coddle islamofascists and then act surprised when they get bit and go burn down a bunch of muslim schools, all the while smirking about how stupid and racist Americans are. A few hundred Americans die in an awful hurricane and they eat it up; never mind the 30000 or so Europeans who died because of a minor heatwave.

Sorry for the rant. I've just had it up to here with much of Europe.

Posted by: on October 13, 2005 04:26 PM

If we're still looking for similies, European governments remind me of public-school administrators of the "zero-tolerance" variety: they've at long last acquired the vague idea that they're supposed to make a show of authority once in a while but they still haven't a clue as to WHY, so they end up cracking down at random, without logic or proportion-- one day letting gangs roam the halls shaking down the other kids for their lunch money, the next expelling the honor student with a squirt pistol in his backpack.

Posted by: Paul Zrimsek on October 13, 2005 06:23 PM

I,ll bet a dutchman could do a lot of conking by throwing their wooden shoes and AL QUEDA terrorists it would look like something out of the 3 stooges BONK BANK BANK KNUCKLEHEAD

Posted by: spurwing plover on October 15, 2005 08:51 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?"
Posted by: Smell the Glove

I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Recent Comments
RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "Talk at you later, Horde. Airplane mode activated ..."

Skip: "I didn't get to bed until way late, but I might ge ..."

FenelonSpoke: "But "Got questions" has some thoughts about innoce ..."

FenelonSpoke: "MS church was singing "Amazing Grace" as tornado h ..."

Ray's Cyst: "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0JIT62oxU ..."

Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, : "https://youtu.be/dSQ40d8uoOI ..."

JQ: "Good night, horde! Sweet dreams to all of you and ..."

JQ: "https://tinyurl.com/4uu86wsc Posted by: Biden's D ..."

RedMindBlueState[/i][/b][/s][/u]: "So close to Pride Month! https://tinyurl.com/4u ..."

tcn in AK: "370 Santana is overrated like Clapton. Technicians ..."

Cow Demon: "I have a very bad feeling about The Odyssey. ..."

Deicide: "My cantor cousin said, and I quote " fuck god, som ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives