| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Book Thread: (03/15/2026) [JTB]
Daily Tech News 15 March 2026 Saturday Night Club ONT - March 14, 2026 [2 Ds] Music Thread: St. Patrick's Day Edition Hobby Thread - March 14, 2026 [TRex] Ace of Spades Pet Thread, March 14 Gardening, Home and Nature Thread, March 14 Talarico's bots are appearing on social media The Classical Saturday Morning Coffee Break & Prayer Revival Daily Tech News 14 March 2026 Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
|
« Was Ann Coulter Right All Along About Judge Roberts? |
Main
| Dogs Used As Suicide Bombers In Iraq »
August 10, 2005
ACLU Refuses Grant From United Way Because It Won't Comply With Anit-Terrorism RestrictionsThey've similarly refused grants from the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations for similar reasons. Kind of unbelievable, but it's not quite as bad as it seems. The United Way requires that it assert it not be "involved" with anyone on the government's terrorist watch list, and, of course, that's half of the ACLU's business lately. Really, they couldn't not be "involved with" anyone suspected of terrorism -- defending them, filing habeas petitions, etc. -- and continue doing their job of Okay, that little bit of snark aside, that's what the ACLU does. It defends the indefensible. Terrorists, Nazis, what have you. So I guess this one I get. posted by Ace at 12:55 AM
CommentsThanks for the link. I get it too, just makes me angry. Defending America's enemies should be treason. Posted by: Jay on August 10, 2005 01:13 AM
Anything, anything AT ALL, that keeps money out of the hands of the ACLU is a Good Thing. Posted by: BrendaK on August 10, 2005 01:18 AM
I agree, if we get enough organizations that contribute to them to draft up similar provisions, they could go broke. I wonder how long before the national ACLU follows suit on this one? Posted by: Jay on August 10, 2005 01:19 AM
By turning down money to avoid complying with counterterrorism measures, it looks to me like the ACLU is silently admitting that they support terrorism. Am I interpreting this correctly or am I way off the mark? Posted by: canuck on August 10, 2005 02:33 AM
Supporting the rights of 'political' Nazis to march and speak is different from assisting a Nazi who ran a death camp from imprisonment, etc. Posted by: Aaron on August 10, 2005 03:26 AM
Speaking of funding questionable enterprises, anyone notice that Ace is being sponsored by the United Nations? Isn't that weird? (Actually it looks like the UN Foundation is the "political arm" of the UN) No wonder he's so soft and squishy and ooey-gooey about Kofiquiddick. He's a cutout for UN propaganda. Posted by: See-Dubya on August 10, 2005 04:16 AM
I know its early, but shouldn't the headline say "Anti"-Terrorism? Posted by: Yojimbo on August 10, 2005 07:18 AM
when I think about the United Way, I think about Goodwill Industries helping retarded citizens with job training and independent living, or the Red Cross helping disaster victims and military families who need to communicate with loved ones deployed overseas. WTF would they even be considering helping underwrite a group like the ACLU????? Posted by: Buddha the Magnificent on August 10, 2005 07:43 AM
The United Way is an extortion racket, plain and simple. They approach corporations, flattering CEOs about the PR benefits of sponsorship; CEOs strong-arm rank-and-file employees for the cash; the UW skims fifteen percent off the top for its trouble and then doles out the rest to charities. You want to support Goodwill? Send them a check. They'll get 15% more than if you launder it through United Way, and you'll know the head of UW isn't driving a Merc on your dime. As for the ACLU, we always cite their famous legal support for that KKK guy as an example of their rigorous fairness in supporting civil liberties. And it used to be true, I guess. They seem a hell of a lot more political and less hard-line now than they were then, though. I wonder if they'd stick up for the rights of the Klan in 2005? Posted by: S. Weasel on August 10, 2005 08:48 AM
I think everyone's too hard on the ACLU. Think about it: they perform two useful services. 1. They are the much-vaunted "guardian of our liberties." Or at least some of them. 2. If someone is represented by the ACLU, that is irrefutable proof that the client is guilty as sin. Perhaps his legal position is correct, perhaps not; but you can't seriously argue that the client is anything more than technically innocent. I think it's helpful to have such a clear and unambiguous marker for the total assholes of the world. Posted by: Pompous on August 10, 2005 09:16 AM
Fine. Starve the bastards of their funding. What in the hell is the United Way doing giving them money anyway? Damn United Way - they actually fund a lot of important things here at home, but I started giving directly instead of channeling anything through those corrupt bastards. Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 10, 2005 09:18 AM
I said "bastards" twice. Loose shit. Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 10, 2005 09:18 AM
Terrorists, nazis, Rush Limbaugh. Posted by: Thomas on August 10, 2005 09:57 AM
All these lib groups give to each other. Its a nice in_cestous relationship they've got going. Ace you gotta get the stupid filters to allow words like i-n-c-e-s-t. How else are we going to have cogent discussions of Cedaford's parentage? Posted by: Iblis on August 10, 2005 10:00 AM
Fine. Starve the bastards of their funding Apparently they think they can get more from the terrorists, and they're probably right! We all better pray for the ACLU, for in the grip of terrorists they could wreak havoc upon this country, as if they hadn't done enough already. Posted by: 72 ACLU Terrorists on August 10, 2005 10:15 AM
Terrorists, nazis, Rush Limbaugh. Har. I've never heard that one before. Haven't you guys updated the playbook yet? Posted by: Rush Limbaugh on August 10, 2005 10:30 AM
Okay let's say for example your mom's pussy happens to be arab and she named you Hussan Ibrahim. Let's also say for example that there is an individual on the terrorist watch list by the same name. Because of this you are barred from flying. Now should Hussan #1 have legal representation? Let's say the ACLU decides to help this individual, they wouldn't be able to do if they lived by the United Way's restrictions. Get it? You are nothing but lucky that your mom's pussy was not Arab. Posted by: Thomas on August 10, 2005 10:39 AM
Who else thinks Thomas posted that common mostly so he could say "mom" and "pussy" together in the same sentence? Posted by: S. Weasel on August 10, 2005 10:54 AM
Oh please, Thomas posted on Ace's board, so the answer is obviously YES! Posted by: Iblis on August 10, 2005 11:08 AM
Thomas if you are trying to make a point at least have it follow logically. You are nothing but lucky that your mom's pussy was not Arab. No , I am lucky if my mom did not give me the same name as a terrorist. Posted by: Dman on August 10, 2005 11:08 AM
72, if you pray for the ACLU, will they sue you? After all, they get taxpayer money. And if they catch you praying for the President and our troops while on public property, watch out. Posted by: lauraw on August 10, 2005 11:09 AM
Hey Thomas, sometimes bad things just happen. For instance, some ignorant person may think that I look 'Arab,' and search me and my bags very thoroughly....VERY THOROUGHLY, while letting the blonde woman next to me go through unmolested. That's what we call 'tough shit.' But don't get cranky if we disagree and think that butching up is better. Posted by: lauraw on August 10, 2005 11:14 AM
Ah, lauraw, I love it when you talk tough. I'm serious. Posted by: Rocketeer on August 10, 2005 11:19 AM
I'm not really like this. Posted by: lauraw on August 10, 2005 11:28 AM
Maybe you should. I'm serious. Posted by: Rocketeer on August 10, 2005 11:41 AM
Seriously serious? Posted by: lauraw on August 10, 2005 11:43 AM
Yeah, seriously serious. I mean, I'd pay you to talk tough to me. Well, tough, and dirty. Posted by: Rocketeer on August 10, 2005 11:53 AM
The ACLU always brings up their defense of Nazis to show they are impartial. But the Nazis were socialists just as left-wing as Communists, many Democrats and terrorists. The ACLU only defends the left-wing causes. The rest of us can go to hell. Posted by: Jake on August 10, 2005 11:53 AM
No blonde woman goes through airport security unmolested. And is it really butching up and being tough to acquiesce to indiscriminate government searches, or is true courage to be found among those who freely go about their daily business knowing there is a chance they could be killed at any moment? Kind of like riding the subway or marrying Robert Blake. Posted by: planetmoron on August 10, 2005 12:01 PM
Rocketeer, if you get lauraw to talk tough and dirty to you, can I get the blonde that was sitting next to her? Thomas, if my mom's Arab genitalia wasn't butchered, is she lucky? Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 10, 2005 12:07 PM
lauraw I pray that even the ACLU will come to know God and (as they used to say in the original old black and white Superman show which I have on video - its a hoot!) embrace the ways of "truth, justice and the American Way." God knows we'd all be a lot better off if they did! Posted by: 72 3-legged dogs on August 10, 2005 12:22 PM
You're being too kind. It is 100% self-serving on the ACLU's part. The "about us" on their website says they are "our nation's guardian of liberty." Why is that incompatiable with not helping those whose intent is to topple liberty? Posted by: on August 10, 2005 12:30 PM
Since we can't stop genitalia from spawning identical names, I guess we need the ACLU to step in and make sure those lists are banned. because that's the only way to tacke this problem. I wonder if they help The John Smiths who have the same problem with mistaken identity? Posted by: Aaron on August 10, 2005 10:10 PM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Some people liked Candace Owens because she was a black woman who told hard truths about BLM and black criminality. But this was always a grift. She started out as a race hustler for a grift, then hustled race the other way to grift conservatives, and now she's back to being a race-hustler for the left again. Specifically, she is now claiming that people pointing out that she is legitimately low-IQ and can't pronounce half the words her AI-generated teleprompter script points out to her is racist and just Ben Shapiro's way of saying the n-word without quite saying it. You see, you can only say that black people are smart, and if you see a dumb one that doesn't know how to pronounce simple words while she poses as an investigatory journalist, you have to pretend she's actually smart or you're a racist. Weird, that doesn't sound very conservative, let alone "#Based," to me. To prove how much she hates racism, she then says that Ben Shapiro's Jew ancestors were masters of the slave trade.
The Oscars: A celebration of thanking. Dave Barry nails it! [CBD]
Ami Kozak: Every single Tucker Carlson episode consists of him claiming he didn't say the things he said in the last episode
Also: this is the manipulation Tucker does that i hate the most. It's so cowardly. All he does is smear people (and Jews, generally), and then claim "I have nothing against [the person or group I just smeared.]" He'll even claim "I love [x], actually." Just again and again and again. It's all a lie, of course. A year ago he smeared Jews but added how beautiful he thought Israel was, and then two weeks ago, he said Israel is ugly as dog-shit and nothing beautiful has been built there "since 1948." Just got this email from Dracula: "I love Van Helsing, actually, he's one of my personal heroes, if I'm being honest. I will claw the heart out of his belly and bathe in his blood before the children of Babylon, but I have nothing but respect for Van Helsing, actually. Love is the answer. Except for the followers of the Christ whom I am commanded to turn into my dark army of Satan. And I totally don't worship Satan, I just think we should listen to both sides. Hugs and kisses, may Van Helsing burn in the blood-red fires of hell throughout eternity, even though I consider him a close and dear friend, Vlad called Dracul."
New CPAC Treasured Guest Speaker drops
He was hard to book, given all of his current commitments, but CPAC landed the man of the hour!
Ana Navarro, on Abby Phillip's show: the terrorists attempted an attack on the Muslim Zohran Mamdani
The usually-reliable Batya-Ungar Sargon is claiming this was an innocent mistake by Abby Phillip but Phillip did not correct Navarro when she lied about the target of the attack. Recent Comments
Castle Guy:
"Last night I purchased "The War of The Spanish Suc ..."
Trimegistus: "On December 8 1941 Churchill's job changed from ma ..." RS: "Well done on the Book Thread!! ..." OrangeEnt: "This one begins just at the Pearl Harbor attack, w ..." Nicless: "I digress. One of the thinks I love about Block is ..." Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing (aka Eloquent Depression): "Speaking of the Hardys and such, there's a series ..." Way, Way Downriver [/i]: "[i]like Byron first opening Chapman's Homer[/i] ..." Wolfus Aurelius, Dreaming of Elsewhere [/i] [/b] [/s]: "[i]I read it as a short story but I believe the no ..." Weak Geek: "Let's see. Off the top of my head, the crimes that ..." r hennigantx: "Going to tackle a reread of Bonfire of The Vanitie ..." Cow Demon: "Can’t really say what made me a reader other ..." Eromero: "‘The Real Shakespeare’ makes me think ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|