Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Canadian Imam Warns: Stop "Terrorizing" Canadian Muslims Or Young Muslims May Become Uncontrollably Sassy | Main | Ghost Ship Haunts Columbia River »
July 25, 2005

A Genetic Test For Intelligence?

Claim: Most differences in IQ are due to two sequences of DNA

Good. Someone can prick my finger and find out I'm a genius. I'm so tired of the bother of those grueling on-line IQ tests with all those funny geometric shapes and strange words, or constantly having to argue with people how damn scary-smart I am.

In related news (kinda), pointy-heads say that blinking causes parts of your brain to actually turn off during each 100-150 milisecond snap of the eyelid.

Which is why, they say, we don't notice our own blinking. Which, you know, is pure ass, because after reading this article, I can't stop noticing my own blinking, and it's driving me a little bit batty.

Stupid pointy-heads.


posted by Ace at 05:11 PM
Comments



Yeah, we need a genetic test for intelligence, because you just can't tell. I mean, is Bill Gates really that smart? Can't we just get a blood sample from him to confirm it? And that dumbass missing half his teeth on the Jerry Springer show might not be as dumb as he looks or acts. He could be as smart as Einstein and dream up the solution to the unification theory that Einstein spent 40 years researching. But we'll never know without some idiotic genetic test.

Posted by: kbiel on July 25, 2005 05:47 PM

and it's driving me a little bit batty

didn't take much, eh?

Posted by: harrison on July 25, 2005 06:35 PM

I had to go and read that bit about blinking - and now I'm noticing every time I blink. Grrr.

Posted by: Kathy K on July 25, 2005 06:36 PM

"Someone can prick my finger and find out I'm a genius."

And if someone fingers your prick, what do they learn?

(Never mind - I don't want to know ...)

Posted by: Doug on July 25, 2005 06:46 PM

Damn your eyes!

Posted by: Karl Maher on July 25, 2005 06:51 PM

The genetics of intelligence is going to have to be handled very carefully. I want the truth to be known, whatever it is, and in the short run, that may require keeping some knowledge back or keeping the implications unexplored. If the distribution of different alleles of genes affecting intelligence varies across races, I want to have that information. But it may have to be concealed or obscured until the evidence is abundantly confirmed and widely acknowledged by neuroscientists.

Posted by: Kralizec on July 25, 2005 09:55 PM

Makes your brain turn off huh? I guess that explains why women who bat their eyes at men are so stupid...;-)

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on July 25, 2005 11:53 PM

Goddammit, Ace, couldn't you find a version of this story that didn't require registration?

Posted by: CraigC on July 26, 2005 02:49 AM

It's unnerving to me how they are supposedly finding all of this genetic basis for most of the things that we're pretty sure are heavily influenced by environment. Things like religion, sexual "orientation," and now intelligence.

As I look at that in juxtaposition with the expansion of "bioethics," I become more than just unnerved. It's positively bone-chilling to me.

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on July 26, 2005 08:42 AM

You Klonopin newbies. Sheesh.

Here's what you do: Take the phone off the hook. Go get your pills. Count out 20 of them. That's right, 20. Don't worry, I've done this and it works.

Now, go get the Valu-rite from the top of the icebox. That's it. Bugger the ice, too. You're going to slam this--ice gets in the way and cracks your teeth.

Okay, all set? Now, dump the pills in about 10 oz. of Valu-rite, stir twice and pound it down.

Get some duct tape, cut a piece about 20 inches long and wrap it around your head, covering your mouth. See? The damned blinking's stopped, hasn't it?

Posted by: spongey's revenge on July 26, 2005 08:46 AM

The eye-blinking thing reminds me of a golf joke (althought it would probably work in other areas). If you really want to screw up a golfer, ask him just before the start of a round if he inhales or exhales on his backswing.

Posted by: ArmedGeek on July 26, 2005 09:15 AM

Sounds like some more geneticists want some grant money. Seems like everything is found to be genetic these days. And some of these discoveries, if they are true, seem like they could be put to some pretty bad uses. But of course, if any of these discoveries cast a negative light on a protected minority group, you will never hear about it again.

Posted by: brak on July 26, 2005 09:19 AM

I've been told by blacks that they are superior to whites in athletics. And that this is because they come from a continent where natural selection made them that way. To which I always reply that if it is true that physical traits are genetic, then mental traits are genetic too. If one believes that physical prowess can be passed on in genetically in groups, one must accept that mental traits, including IQ, can be passed on too.

They don't like that.

Posted by: 72 3-legged dogs on July 26, 2005 11:16 AM

That bugeyed runaway bride must be a f'ing genius if blinking is a measurement.

Posted by: Dman on July 26, 2005 12:45 PM

I too have doubt about that blinking thing. For a century, movies have been possible by "persistence of vision": it takes roughly one-sixteenth of a second for the brain to stop processing visual input - at least eighty times longer than a blink.

That's why early movies were shot at sixteen frames per second. Later that standard was changed to tweny for smoother appearance, which is why old films shown with newer projectors seem to run in fast motion.

Posted by: John Anderson on July 26, 2005 04:39 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Jim Lakely of Heartland.org joins us to discuss the blockbuster polls they have released over the last week. Americans 19-39 seem to be embracing socialism, overt redistributionist policies, destruction of our rights, and international control of our country! But there is hope on the horizon!
Fat-F*ck Pritzker blames Trump's rhetoric for the ramp up of political violence! May he rot in hell! [CBD]
Broward County Officials Accused of Adding Over 100,000 Ineligible Voters to the Rolls It is too soon to know how it happened, but...Republicans are watching! And that is how it is done. [CBD]
Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump from firing Federal Reserve Gov Lisa Cook With absolutely nonsensical reasoning, but you already knew that. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: 2A ban for trannies? Venezuela attack is Congress dropping the ball, RFK Jr...Maniac or disrupter? Heartland.org poll is a sad commentary on American education, and more!
James Varney: Reflecting on Hurricane Katrina twenty years later, and the partisan uses Democrats found for it
There was fear aplenty. But the truth is, a lot of the panic Americans saw on television was performative. The throngs of people along Convention Center Boulevard sat patiently in the broiling weather, five or six deep in folding chairs on the sidewalk, waiting for something, someone, to arrive. Then, a television crew or photographer would show up, and people would pour into the street, falling on their knees, screaming and gesticulating to the camera. It was an awful situation, obviously, but when the camera wasn't on them, it was remarkable how patient and orderly everyone was.
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: the most repetitive but catchy earworm of the eighties?
Sometimes, I find you doubt my love for you but I don't mind
Why should I mind? Why should I mind?

It's hard to quote the song while avoiding quoting from the endlessly-repeated chorus.
Wait, my mistake, his other hit from 1985 was the most repetitive new wave hit of the 80s.
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
I'm gonna get high, man, I'm gonna get loose/
Need me a triple shot of that juice
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: 600,000 Chinese spies given visas? Scotland relies on 14-year-old girls for their defense, tariffs work! mortgage fraud is the new thing, and more!
I guess yesterday's Starship test flight was cancelled. They're counting down to another launch, NOW. Lift-off!
The "hip" gray corporate slop era of Cracker Barrel is put on hold (supposedly):
Bret Baier
@BretBaier

Cracker Barrel is going back to the old logo. Company statement: "We thank our guests for sharing your voices and love for Cracker Barrel. We said we would listen, and we have. Our new logo is going away and our "Old Timer" will remain. At Cracker Barrel, it's always been - and always will be - about serving up delicious food, warm welcomes, and the kind of country hospitality that feels like family. As a proud American institution, our 70,000 hardworking employees look forward to welcoming you to our table soon."
Elric the Blade says he's no longer sure that Trump will have the right to appeal in the NY fraud case:
Yesterday, I thought that Trump had an appeal as of right on the fraud liability, based upon news reports that cited the second opinion as declining to find in favor of liability. That would give Trump at least 2 dissenting judges for an appeal as of right.
But now, after seeing the actual decisions, I'm not so sure. Sorry, guys. I've never seen or heard of what the second opinion did. They dissented, but ... decided not to dissent? I'm not sure what the effect is in terms of whether Trump has a right to appeal. I doubt anyone does.
I think even if Trump doesn't have a right of appeal, the Court of Appeals (NY's highest court) will take the case. But ... it's a liberal court so who knows how they'll rule. I have the docket number so I can track what gets appealed to the Court of Appeals. If Trump wants to appeal, I think he might file an appeal as of right and a petition for permission to appeal. His lawyers know this case much better than I, but even they might know what the effect of all the opinions are.
I don't think they'll take the appeal. Judges are lazy and cowardly and will duck any hot potato case they can. These judges are also liberal hacks, and do not want to deliver Trump a full victory.
FBI raids home of John Bolton, former Trump national security advisor "The probe is eyeing multiple instances of the use of classified documents in leaks to news media. NBC reported that the investigation into Bolton began during the Biden administration, but did not go further before President Joe Biden left office in January." [CBD]
Money Wired to Mexico Hits a Decade Low as US Immigration Policies Take Hold
Now bump the fee to 10%, and mandate proof of legal residence for all money transfers out of the United States [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Boots on the ground in Ukraine? We're against it! Trump shines a light on voting, Miss Universe wearing a suicide vest? And more!
"As the discussion continued, Fox News host Charlie Hurt asked Trump directly to confirm there will be no U.S. troops involved in this potential security umbrella for Ukraine. "Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president," Trump replied."
Good! I hope I am wrong! [CBD]
Recent Comments
Romeo13: "Posted by: Chuck Martel at September 10, 2025 05:1 ..."

... : "I'm going to set this marker on the table. When th ..."

zombie: "The wikipedia page (to this moment) for Charlie Ki ..."

Blonde Morticia: " James Woods: It's not gun violence. It's Democra ..."

Diogenes: "Pritzker blamed Trump's rhetoric. Posted by: Ch ..."

Itinerant Alley Butcher: "I am desperately trying not to vent murderous hatr ..."

Tom Servo: "352 I don't think violence from our side is the an ..."

Smell the Glove: "Prediction: I hope it doesn't happen but some unhi ..."

haffhowershower: " Why the heck did they truss that guy up and haul ..."

... : "Message....if you are on the right, and you are ef ..."

Cheri: "My daughter just texted me at work in tears about ..."

Get angry. Stay angry. Don't forget. : "Fuck. I can usually stay pretty detached but this ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives