Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Canadian Imam Warns: Stop "Terrorizing" Canadian Muslims Or Young Muslims May Become Uncontrollably Sassy | Main | Ghost Ship Haunts Columbia River »
July 25, 2005

A Genetic Test For Intelligence?

Claim: Most differences in IQ are due to two sequences of DNA

Good. Someone can prick my finger and find out I'm a genius. I'm so tired of the bother of those grueling on-line IQ tests with all those funny geometric shapes and strange words, or constantly having to argue with people how damn scary-smart I am.

In related news (kinda), pointy-heads say that blinking causes parts of your brain to actually turn off during each 100-150 milisecond snap of the eyelid.

Which is why, they say, we don't notice our own blinking. Which, you know, is pure ass, because after reading this article, I can't stop noticing my own blinking, and it's driving me a little bit batty.

Stupid pointy-heads.


posted by Ace at 05:11 PM
Comments



Yeah, we need a genetic test for intelligence, because you just can't tell. I mean, is Bill Gates really that smart? Can't we just get a blood sample from him to confirm it? And that dumbass missing half his teeth on the Jerry Springer show might not be as dumb as he looks or acts. He could be as smart as Einstein and dream up the solution to the unification theory that Einstein spent 40 years researching. But we'll never know without some idiotic genetic test.

Posted by: kbiel on July 25, 2005 05:47 PM

and it's driving me a little bit batty

didn't take much, eh?

Posted by: harrison on July 25, 2005 06:35 PM

I had to go and read that bit about blinking - and now I'm noticing every time I blink. Grrr.

Posted by: Kathy K on July 25, 2005 06:36 PM

"Someone can prick my finger and find out I'm a genius."

And if someone fingers your prick, what do they learn?

(Never mind - I don't want to know ...)

Posted by: Doug on July 25, 2005 06:46 PM

Damn your eyes!

Posted by: Karl Maher on July 25, 2005 06:51 PM

The genetics of intelligence is going to have to be handled very carefully. I want the truth to be known, whatever it is, and in the short run, that may require keeping some knowledge back or keeping the implications unexplored. If the distribution of different alleles of genes affecting intelligence varies across races, I want to have that information. But it may have to be concealed or obscured until the evidence is abundantly confirmed and widely acknowledged by neuroscientists.

Posted by: Kralizec on July 25, 2005 09:55 PM

Makes your brain turn off huh? I guess that explains why women who bat their eyes at men are so stupid...;-)

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on July 25, 2005 11:53 PM

Goddammit, Ace, couldn't you find a version of this story that didn't require registration?

Posted by: CraigC on July 26, 2005 02:49 AM

It's unnerving to me how they are supposedly finding all of this genetic basis for most of the things that we're pretty sure are heavily influenced by environment. Things like religion, sexual "orientation," and now intelligence.

As I look at that in juxtaposition with the expansion of "bioethics," I become more than just unnerved. It's positively bone-chilling to me.

Posted by: Sue Dohnim on July 26, 2005 08:42 AM

You Klonopin newbies. Sheesh.

Here's what you do: Take the phone off the hook. Go get your pills. Count out 20 of them. That's right, 20. Don't worry, I've done this and it works.

Now, go get the Valu-rite from the top of the icebox. That's it. Bugger the ice, too. You're going to slam this--ice gets in the way and cracks your teeth.

Okay, all set? Now, dump the pills in about 10 oz. of Valu-rite, stir twice and pound it down.

Get some duct tape, cut a piece about 20 inches long and wrap it around your head, covering your mouth. See? The damned blinking's stopped, hasn't it?

Posted by: spongey's revenge on July 26, 2005 08:46 AM

The eye-blinking thing reminds me of a golf joke (althought it would probably work in other areas). If you really want to screw up a golfer, ask him just before the start of a round if he inhales or exhales on his backswing.

Posted by: ArmedGeek on July 26, 2005 09:15 AM

Sounds like some more geneticists want some grant money. Seems like everything is found to be genetic these days. And some of these discoveries, if they are true, seem like they could be put to some pretty bad uses. But of course, if any of these discoveries cast a negative light on a protected minority group, you will never hear about it again.

Posted by: brak on July 26, 2005 09:19 AM

I've been told by blacks that they are superior to whites in athletics. And that this is because they come from a continent where natural selection made them that way. To which I always reply that if it is true that physical traits are genetic, then mental traits are genetic too. If one believes that physical prowess can be passed on in genetically in groups, one must accept that mental traits, including IQ, can be passed on too.

They don't like that.

Posted by: 72 3-legged dogs on July 26, 2005 11:16 AM

That bugeyed runaway bride must be a f'ing genius if blinking is a measurement.

Posted by: Dman on July 26, 2005 12:45 PM

I too have doubt about that blinking thing. For a century, movies have been possible by "persistence of vision": it takes roughly one-sixteenth of a second for the brain to stop processing visual input - at least eighty times longer than a blink.

That's why early movies were shot at sixteen frames per second. Later that standard was changed to tweny for smoother appearance, which is why old films shown with newer projectors seem to run in fast motion.

Posted by: John Anderson on July 26, 2005 04:39 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
This is the dumbest AI bullslop I've seen in a while: the CIA can use "quantum magnetometry" to track an individual man's heartbeat from twelve miles away
I wouldn't click on it, it's not interesting, it's just stupid clickslop. I just want to share my annoyance with you.
Oil prices plunge on bizarre realization that Eric Swalwell may actually be straight. A rapey molester, allegedly, but a straight one.
Classic Rock Mystery Click
This is super-obscure and I only barely remember it. Given that, I'll give you the hint that it's by the Red Rocker.
And I guess you think you've got it made
Oh, but then, you never were afraid
Of anything that you've left behind
Oh, but it's alright with me now
'Cause I'll get back up somehow
And with a little luck, yes, I'm bound to win

Now twenty people will tell me it's not obscure, it was huge in their hometown and played at their prom. That's how it usually goes. When I linked Donnie Iris's "Love is Like a Rock," everyone said they knew that one and that his other song (which I didn't know at all) Ah Leah! was huge in their area.
You know we "joke" about the GOPe just "conserving" leftist things?
David French just posted:

Populists ask what conservativism has ever conserved?
Well its about to conserve birthright citizenship!
Posted by: 18-1

I couldn't hate this queen of the cuck-chair more if it paid seven figures and came with a corner office.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk birthright citizenship, the 14th Amendment and SCOTUS, no boots in Iran, Artemis II and refocusing NASA, the NBA's hatred of everything non-woke, and more!
In more marketing for Project Hail Mary, scientists say they've found the biosigns indicating life growing on an alien planet. It's not proof, just signatures of chemicals that are produced by biological metabolism, and it could be nothing, but scientists think it's a strong sign that this planet is inhabited by something.
In a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a team of scientists announced the detection of dimethyl sulfide (along with a similar detection of dimethyl disulfide) in the atmosphere of an exoplanet called K2-18b. This is actually the second detection of dimethyl sulfide made on this planet, following a tentative detection in 2023.
Tons of chemicals are detected in the atmospheres of celestial objects every day. But dimethyl sulfide is different, because on Earth, it's only produced by living organisms.
"It is a shock to the system," Nikku Madhusudhan, first author on the paper, told the New York Times. "We spent an enormous amount of time just trying to get rid of the signal."

He means they tried to prove the signal was caused by things other than dimethyl sulfide but they could not.
Artemis moon shot a go, scheduled for 6:24 Eastern time tonight
Great marketing arranged by Amazon to promote Project Hail Mary. Okay not really but it does work out that way.
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
Recent Comments
Pug Mahon, Trumpy can do magic: "Whatever happened to the English thugs like Brickt ..."

Joemarine: "243 >>The original Layla the best part if the song ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "245 I saw Clapton last year. He showed up, play ..."

Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "London Thugs London Inbreds London IEDs. ..."

gKWVE: "[i]Disgraced attorney and former anti-Trump pundit ..."

mikeski: "[i]@InsiderWire #BREAKING: U.S. Border Patrol det ..."

four seasons: " Those four "British" assholes figured out they ..."

Cicero (@cicero43): "I saw Clapton last year. He showed up, played a ..."

Joemarine: "209 So I just looked it up, and Michigan still has ..."

garrett: ">>The original Layla the best part if the song was ..."

Marcus T: "Commonwealth Passport from about 20 commonwealth c ..."

Joemarine: "172 Clapton has been mailing it in since 74. And h ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives