Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« BREAKING NEWS: Yoko Ono Really, Really, Really Sucks | Main | [Retracted] Case Closed: Georg Soros Sponsored Ad Proves, Conclusively, That Karl Rove's Name Begins With K, Just Like the KKK »
July 21, 2005

John Howard, UberMensch

The video. H/t to Traffic Non-Santa.

A quickie transcript:

PRIME MIN. HOWARD: Could I start by saying the prime minister and I were having a discussion when we heard about it. My first reaction was to get some more information. And I really don't want to add to what the prime minister has said. It's a matter for the police and a matter for the British authorities to talk in detail about what has happened here.

Can I just say very directly, Paul, on the issue of the policies of my government and indeed the policies of the British and American governments on Iraq, that the first point of reference is that once a country allows its foreign policy to be determined by terrorism, it's given the game away, to use the vernacular. And no Australian government that I lead will ever have policies determined by terrorism or terrorist threats, and no self-respecting government of any political stripe in Australia would allow that to happen.

Can I remind you that the murder of 88 Australians in Bali took place before the operation in Iraq.

And I remind you that the 11th of September occurred before the operation in Iraq.

Can I also remind you that the very first occasion that bin Laden specifically referred to Australia was in the context of Australia's involvement in liberating the people of East Timor. Are people by implication suggesting we shouldn't have done that?

When a group claimed responsibility on the website for the attacks on the 7th of July, they talked about British policy not just in Iraq, but in Afghanistan. Are people suggesting we shouldn't be in Afghanistan?

When Sergio de Mello was murdered in Iraq -- a brave man, a distinguished international diplomat, a person immensely respected for his work in the United Nations -- when al Qaeda gloated about that, they referred specifically to the role that de Mello had carried out in East Timor because he was the United Nations administrator in East Timor.

Now I don't know the mind of the terrorists. By definition, you can't put yourself in the mind of a successful suicide bomber. I can only look at objective facts, and the objective facts are as I've cited. The objective evidence is that Australia was a terrorist target long before the operation in Iraq. And indeed, all the evidence, as distinct from the suppositions, suggests to me that this is about hatred of a way of life, this is about the perverted use of principles of the great world religion that, at its root, preaches peace and cooperation. And I think we lose sight of the challenge we have if we allow ourselves to see these attacks in the context of particular circumstances rather than the abuse through a perverted ideology of people and their murder.

PRIME MIN. BLAIR: And I agree 100 percent with that. (Laughter.)

Thanks to K-Lo at The Corner.

The left hates the term "appeasement." But the definition of appeasement is giving in to the demands of your enemy in order to placate him.

And the left is urging just that -- mollifying the Islamofascist enemy -- which I'm getting around to calling worse than even the Nazis -- in the hope that doing so will make them less angry with us.

When will they get it?

The Islamofascists do not need fresh provocations for their mass murders. They have 1400 years of greivances they want payback for.

And, by the way, the ideology is expansionist, imperialist, and colonialist-- they want to control all territory they once held, and they want to controll all territory which Muslims have, through immigration, "colonized." They believe it against the demands of Allah for any Muslim to subjugate himself to any authority except a strict Islamic one.

Do you really think they just want Israel and Iraq?

What about the disputed areas of Kashmir? What about Muslim-heavy areas of the Balkans? What about East Timor? What about non-Muslim parts of Lebanon? What about Africa?

What about the scores of smoldering little civil wars going on all over the world, the majority of which involve Muslims fighting non-Muslims?

Why does the left insist on believing that actual diagnosable psychopaths -- and I am NOT using that term hyperbolically; Islamofascists are true psychopathic murderers -- are somehow "reasonable" and if we just give them a little they'll be satisfied with that?

Does a shark stop eating after its third fish?

You can appease to your heart's content, ladies. But they want Spain back too.

So please write out a list of all the territory of the world you are willing to cede to viciously medieval thugocratic rule in the interests of buying "peace" from people who have told you, out of their own mouths and with no equivocation, they simply want to eradicate you and there's nothing you can give them that will change their minds.

Worse Than Neville Chamberlain? Hitler at least promised peace if he was appeased.

Smart people knew he was lying. But at least he claimed he would live in peace with the world if his demands are met.

So, Neville Chamberlain was a naive sap of a punk-assed chump bitch, but at least he had, on paper, a "peace" agreement.

Note to the left: Osama bin Ladin, Al Zarqawi, and the rest of the Islamofascist killers aren't even offering you an armistice. Quite the opposite. They have said, multiple times, that they intend to kill you or subjugate you and you cannot buy their peace simply by giving into their demands.

They're not even trying to lie to you. They are telling you upfront: The world will be under Islamofascist rule or there will be murders until that point.

On that score, they're more honest than Hitler.

But that makes those on the left worse than Chamberlain.

At least the left has found one sort of imperialism, and one sort of viciously anti-modern religious lunacy, it really can get behind. I guess that shows a certain amount of open-mindedness.


posted by Ace at 05:39 PM
Comments



Excellent.

Posted by: max on July 21, 2005 05:55 PM

Don't forget, we trod on their holy Moon in '69., how can we take that back.

Posted by: Norden on July 21, 2005 06:01 PM

If only we had someone at the white house or the pentagon who knew what to do in defeating the terrorists. We have a President who dosen't understand that the battle is just more than dropping bombs and hoping that our "friends" the Saudis will stop giving money to the madrases. How many more soliders and civilians have to die until that they wake up to the fact that poverty, lack of education, and our support of dictaterships are the main causes of thier hatred. Are we to blame for 9/11, of course not, but are we to blame for making the situation worse, yes. This country needs real leadership in this war, not holding hands with the leader of the country that supplied the money and most of the men responsable. Answear this: what country has real WMD, proven links to al-qeda, and is run by a dictator? Pakistan thats who. Saudi Arabia and Pakistan our two biggest allies in the muslim world, yea great allies, great leadership. The right needs to stop being easy on this preident and wake up to the fact that he dosen't know what the hell he is doing.

Posted by: jeff on July 21, 2005 06:17 PM

"How many more soliders and civilians have to die until that they wake up to the fact that poverty, lack of education, and our support of dictaterships are the main causes of thier hatred"

Right. And we used to be told the people in Russia, Poland, Hungary, etc., etc. hated us too. But they didn't and the vast majority of the people of the mideast don't hate us either. What does it say about you that you just can't bring yourself to imagine that these people yearn for freedom just like us and they are too stupid to know that they are really oppressed by their own governments? BTW, if you disagree with the WH and the Pentagon's strategy, what would your's be?

Posted by: BrewFan on July 21, 2005 06:42 PM

If only we had someone at the white house or the pentagon who knew what to do in defeating the terrorists.

Hey, Lefty! Your tradition of rolling over and offering them your butt doesn't work.

Posted by: on July 21, 2005 07:08 PM

The people of the Warsaw Pact freed themselves with the support of the countries of NATO. We in the west did it by showing them that there is better way of life, Reagan with his statement about the shinning building on the hilltop( sorry can't remember the actual quote).As to the Idea that a vast majority don't hate us, I would refer you to the recent poll where 50% responded with a negative attitude towords the U.S..How do we win? It wont be easy, but we can start by stop giving money to those countries that support these terrorists. Economic insentives for holding fair elections, invest money in countries that prove that they want to join the modern world. Education for all, by having the peace corp going in and setting up real schools; the only education many of these people will ever recieve comes from madrases,not good. Lastly support womens rights in all of these countries, look at Turkey, and how well they have done it. It will take a global effort to win this war and we will need every friend we can get, so if that means that we have to be a little humble on the world stage, then thats what we have to do. Lastly, what did more to hasten the fall of the iron curtin, MTV and blue jeans or a strong military? Answear: neither the were equally importent.

Posted by: jeff on July 21, 2005 07:08 PM

Is the "poverty, lack of education, and our support of dictaterships" the reason everyone in South Central and the Appalachias is wearing the ol' BoomBoom Vest? Or is it more the Idahoans concern with them "dictaterships?"

Posted by: Claire on July 21, 2005 07:10 PM

"Lastly, what did more to hasten the fall of the iron curtin, MTV and blue jeans or a strong military? Answear: neither the were equally importent."

I don't know where to start so I won't. Suffice it to say you have left the reality based community and have entered Fantasyland.

Posted by: BrewFan on July 21, 2005 07:22 PM

Claire, as bad as it may be in any area in america, it does not come close to what 90% of the middle east has to live in. P.S. some spelling sucks, does it take away from my argument. Dyslexic of the world untie.

Posted by: jeff on July 21, 2005 07:24 PM

Brewfan,
if that is the best answear you have, then maybe it is time for you wake-up and smell the cat food. Our culture is what makes us unique in the world, many people want to come here and live our lifestyle. Name calling, soooo very grown-up of you. Let me guess, you have no answear to my side because you are fine little republican robot who doesn't know what to do when someone has an actual idea of how to win this war and make our country better. Didn't you get the talking memo about how the left is the coming up with ideas that don't just involve just dropping bombs.

Posted by: jeff on July 21, 2005 07:34 PM

"Let me guess, you have no answear to my side because..."

I don't have time to discuss ideas with somebody who thinks MTV was a major cause of the fall of communism. Its just not worth it, jeff. As far as name calling, I don't think I did but if you want clarification why don't you stop over by the Free Fire Zone thread? You'll find out things about your mother and sister you never knew :)

Posted by: BrewFan on July 21, 2005 08:04 PM

Jeff, you know all that stuff that you want the Bush administration to do?

Guess what? They're already doing everything you mentioned, in addition to the military actions that are sometimes the last resort to free people suffering under complete police states.

If you only get your news from the networks or the NY Times, or AP, I can understand why you would not be aware of this.

Posted by: stace on July 21, 2005 08:30 PM

"[T]his is about the perverted use of principles of the great world religion that, at its root, preaches peace and cooperation."

Either Howard has read Sura 9 of the Koran and knows better, or he has not and does not. He is either lying to the multitude who have never cracked open the Koran, or he is himself one of that multitude.

Posted by: Arafel on July 21, 2005 09:56 PM

John Howard Rocks!

And Jeff, do some research re: the name "Marc Sageman". According to his research into the backgrounds of 500 al-Qaeda members, the typical al-Qaeda recriuit is a well-educated professional. He comes from an middle-upper class family and is likely to have been educated in the West.

Yeah, that damn poverty. Just like that Bin Laden guy...

Posted by: Joe Katzman on July 22, 2005 12:31 AM

Arafel, there's a third possibility. He's a politician, and he's giving a head-nod to all those Muslims out there who are secretly disgusted by Islamic terrorism but may not have the guts to speak out. There are some, you know...maybe not as many as we used to think, but there are some.

It just wouldn't do for John Howard, Tony Blair, George Bush, or any other world leader to stand up and call Islam a religion of bloodshed and murder. It would be a terrible injustice those Muslims who are simply trying to live peaceful lives and follow their God as they understand him.

Posted by: Sloan on July 22, 2005 09:41 AM

Name calling, soooo very grown-up of you. Let me guess, you have no answear to my side because you are fine little republican robot

really, I wasn't paying attention to the rest of it. This just struck me as funny. He makes the move in one sentence, impressive, no?

Posted by: Dave in Texas on July 22, 2005 11:23 AM

:)

Posted by: BrewFan on July 22, 2005 11:35 AM

"If only we had someone at the white house or the pentagon who knew what to do in defeating the terrorists. We have a President who dosen't understand that the battle is just more than dropping bombs and hoping that our "friends" the Saudis will stop giving money to the madrases."

WHOA! Clinton's back in office?

"How many more soliders and civilians have to die until that they wake up to the fact that poverty, lack of education, and our support of dictaterships are the main causes of thier hatred."

Umm, OBL actually has NONE of those issues and REALLY hates us.

You are aware that terrorism isn't caused by poverty, right? The relationship is actually the exact opposite.

"Answear this: what country has real WMD, proven links to al-qeda, and is run by a dictator? Pakistan thats who."

What country has USED WMDs in the past, took in one of Al Qaeda's top lieutenants during their own war, and was run by a dictator?

Iraq.

"The people of the Warsaw Pact freed themselves with the support of the countries of NATO."

Hold on to that one. It was NATO ---not the US dragging them out of bondage. Feel free to believe that. Without us, nothing happens.

I can't think of another NATO country that the same could be said of.

"It wont be easy, but we can start by stop giving money to those countries that support these terrorists."

Drilling in Alaska would help A LOT.

"Economic insentives for holding fair elections, invest money in countries that prove that they want to join the modern world. Education for all, by having the peace corp going in and setting up real schools; the only education many of these people will ever recieve comes from madrases,not good."

OR, in the parlance of the left, we need to colonialize them and run their countries.

"Lastly, what did more to hasten the fall of the iron curtin, MTV and blue jeans or a strong military? Answear: neither the were equally importent."

Yeah, MTV was key. Where else could E. Europeans not watch music videos? Odd that in the 1970's, the USSR was in good shape in the eyes of most.

Reagan comes in, doesn't play nice with them, and lo and behold, they tank. But I'm a coincidence it was.

Posted by: MikeSC on July 22, 2005 12:13 PM

el Jefe spewed: How many more soliders and civilians have to die until that they wake up to the fact that poverty, lack of education, and our support of dictaterships are the main causes of thier hatred
&
It wont be easy, but we can start by stop giving money to those countries that support these terrorists

So if terrorism is caused by poverty, we should fight terrorism by increasing the poverty in terrorist & borderline terrorist nations?

Seriously, I'm trying to comprehend how you can hold two contrary truths at the same time.

Posted by: HowardDevore on July 22, 2005 12:55 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD have a short chat about Iran, the disgusting SAVE Act theater, Mamdani's politicizing of St. Patrick's Day, and more!
Recent Comments
wickedpinto: "BUT THEY DO ANYWAY! "I can't and never will vote. ..."

fentanyl is my only friend: "That story gave me AIDS. ..."

wickedpinto: "These fucking party payed fools were all over the ..."

13times: "Ranked choice or jungle primaries. California i ..."

fentanyl is my only friend: "I say teepee for my bunghole. You say my bunghole ..."

wickedpinto: "I remember, it was the first year I was down here ..."

fentanyl is my only friend: "Why so arngy? Why not take an alcohol? Be calm, li ..."

wickedpinto: "I said, "Kat" I am sorry, I meant "Paul" (paulin ..."

SciVo: "Oops, missed this in my earlier skimming. The myst ..."

wickedpinto: "321 I always thought Australia would be mildly lef ..."

wickedpinto: "and love your country, btw, Australia DOES respect ..."

wickedpinto: "They go into long winded detail as they threaten y ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives