Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Jeff Gannon Speaks | Main | Paradigm Shift of Attitude at the New York Times Editorial Page »
March 01, 2005

Someone Had To Say It

I don't like to think of myself as sexist, but when Nancy Hopkins of Harvard stated that she had to flee from the room to keep from passing out or throwing up in response to Larry Summers' rather anondyne remarks, you begin to wonder if at least some anti-woman stereotypes might just have some foundation in fact.

Football Fans and Beyond quotes a Harvard professor on this, err, floridly emotional behavior:

It takes one's breath away to watch feminist women at work. At the same time that they denounce traditional stereotypes they conform to them. If at the back of your sexist mind you think that women are emotional, you listen agape as professor Nancy Hopkins of MIT comes out with the threat that she will be sick if she has to hear too much of what she doesn't agree with. If you think women are suggestible, you hear it said that the mere suggestion of an innate inequality in women will keep them from stirring themselves to excel. While denouncing the feminine mystique, feminists behave as if they were devoted to it. They are women who assert their independence but still depend on men to keep women secure and comfortable while admiring their independence. Even in the gender-neutral society, men are expected by feminists to open doors for women. If men do not, they are intimidating women.

Hit the link for the full article, as well as a transcript of an NPR article in which Nancy Hopkins admits there may in fact be some inherent gender differences between men and women in cognitive ability, and yet she manages not to swoon while saying so.

So maybe women don't go all to pieces just because they see or hear something they find objectionable. And perhaps this Nancy Hopkins woman is deliberately attempting to portray women in a bad light by suggesting they do.

I suspect Karl Rove had something to do with getting her academic "credentials."


posted by Ace at 02:21 PM
Comments



Hey, in some places its just flat out against the law to suggest that the brains of men and women differ.

You might be interested in an article I read in Slate to that effect.

http://blogs.salon.com/0001561/2005/02/12.html#a6795

Posted by: PiratePundit on March 1, 2005 02:27 PM

I agree. Feminists are into drama.

Posted by: lauraw on March 1, 2005 02:30 PM

Perhaps the dear lady's whalebone corset was drawn too tight:

" The female waistline has been moved up and down over the passage of time, but this became a real health hazard when whalebone corsets came into use during the last part of the 19th and early part of the 20th centuries, because they constricted the vital organs in the body - especially those of the respiratory and digestive systems. Women with "wasp-like" waists fainted so often that those who were well-off purchased "fainting" couches; and when a woman "swooned," the cry, "Cut her laces!" often allowed her enough air to recover. "

http://www.innerbody.com/text/card11.html

Posted by: gail on March 1, 2005 02:57 PM

George Will on Nancy Hopkins:

"Is this the fruit of feminism? A woman at the peak of the academic pyramid becomes theatrically flurried by an unwelcome idea and, like a Victorian maiden exposed to male coarseness, suffers the vapors and collapses on the drawing room carpet in a heap of crinolines until revived by smelling salts and the offending brute's contrition."

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/georgewill/gw20050127.shtml

Posted by: Jason in TX-07 on March 1, 2005 03:34 PM

Thank you, George Will. I was afraid I was the only one whose first reaction to her was, "My goodness, she's caught the vapors!"

Posted by: Brian B on March 1, 2005 04:13 PM

Nancy Hopkins is from MIT, not Harvard...Harvard has enough such people on its own without adding the ones from down Mass Ave.

Posted by: on March 1, 2005 05:43 PM

When does the "masculinism" movement start?

Posted by: TallDave on March 1, 2005 08:28 PM

George Will hit the nail on the head (yes, I'm using deliberately phallic/violent imagery here). I can't even bring myself to read much about the Summers case, because I'm too appalled at how these allegedly-professional "feminists" had fainting attacks and made hysterical charges against perfectly legitimate scientific statements.

Women didn't start earning PhDs in my field until the 1950's. If we let women like Nancy Hopkins take over, it won't be long before certain types of men start wondering (again) if women really ARE too hysterical to undertake scientific study.

Posted by: Kimberly on March 1, 2005 08:36 PM

I swear, if you all don't STOP saying mean things about us women and our emotions then I am going to cry.

And if you can't figure out why it's so upsetting then I'm certainly not going to TELL you...

Later,
bbeck

Posted by: bbeck on March 1, 2005 10:41 PM

Two points:
1) This FEMALE is into censorship and
2) is using a stereotypical (but not common) female behavior to vent her feelings. In the past we'd get up and swear rather than get faint or nauseated. Frankly, although I was an early feminist, I've long ago grown to be embarassed by these FEMALES.

Posted by: rabidfox on March 1, 2005 11:25 PM

Definition of "The Vapors"

vapors
Archaic.
A nervous disorder such as depression or hysteria. Used with "the".

Example Usage: "Madame was so shocked by the display of the barbarians bare ankles that she swooned, overcome by the vapors"

Posted by: rcl on March 2, 2005 06:19 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Trump: Ukraine War 'Thousands of Miles Away' is 'Nothing to Do' with America Russia isn't threatening to kill Americans! [CBD]
Update to Gavin Newsom Under Investigation story: This investigation was begun under Senor Dementia:
Adam Housley
@adamhousley

As I have reported several times and now acknowledged by the Governor of California... Gavin and his wife are under federal investigation... what he failed to tell you... This began during the Biden Admin. Kind of a big detail.
Teen Driver Tayvin Galanakis Wins Jury Trial Against Officers Who Charged Him With DUI Even After He Blew 0.0 on A Breathalyzer And Passed Sobriety Tests. One Officer Accounted For 72% of All DUI Arrests For That PD [dri]
Days before the woman was stabbed in the neck by a taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer, in the same general area, another taxpayer-supported Cultural Enrichment Officer attacked a boy and bloodied his head with a brick.
What is the UK Regime's plan for protecting the citizens from the savage criminals they've foisted on the populace? They offer NONE. They do, however, have a plan for protecting the savage criminals from the citizens: The citizens must STAY CALM and not get angry and not share videos of citizens being attacked by savage criminals.
The public keeps saying "protect us from the foreign savages you have imported against our wishes and over our objections" and the UK branch of The Regime keeps proposing plans to protect the foreign savages from the public. Soclose to what the public is demanding, just, you know, the complete opposite.
Just a thought: Maybe you wouldn't have to worry about the public attacking the savage criminals if you actually introduced a plan to protect the public from the savage criminals. Maybe they wouldn't feel as if it was necessary for them to protect the public through self-help.
Courtney Subramiam, one of the "journalists" who "previewed" her questions for the decrepit and demented Biden so that he could "answer" it with a pre-scripted response, rewarded by promotion to president of the White House Press Corps
Bonchie
@bonchieredstate

hahahahaha

This is the lady who gave her question to Biden beforehand, and he had it written verbatim in his notes with her picture.

You know what's really terrible? There are Daily Signal reporters in the press room. That's the Real Scandal Here!
You might think that movie critics by nature are effeminate and bitchy, but, did you know that grass is green and red peppers are red?
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD bounce around from Maine and its pet Nazi, to the cracks in the Democrat messaging, to the failure of California and its effect on the 2028 election, sea drones rescuing Apache crews, and more!
Seattle mayor shrugs off millionaire-tax concerns as 44% of business leaders consider leaving
It happens in all the blue states, but WA and Seattle will be different! [CBD]
Mary Margaret Olohan
@MaryMargOlohan

NEW: Five FBI employees were fired today over the infamous Richmond Catholic memo on "radical traditionalist Catholics," FBI source confirms to @realDailyWire.
Oof. Reviewers do not like Scary Movie 6. The criticism I keep hearing is that the movie mistakes a reference for an actual joke. The movie (they say) keeps Key Jangling a reference to another movie (or some other pop culture ephemera) and you expect there to be a joke but nope, the Key Jangle was the joke. Other reviewers say that the promise that "no lines will be uncrossed" is a fake-out, and that the movie is bland and inoffensively corporate.
Recent Comments
far cry: "I heard Ben Affleck banged Greta in an uncomfortab ..."

Bulg: "See, this is why Americans have no use for interna ..."

L - No nic, another fine day: "John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt His name is my na ..."

TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "225 I don't think that's something Thune could do. ..."

gp: ""The turd cutter" Blowout preventer. I learned ..."

banana Dream - Greta?: ">>> This is the story of how Trump lost 2024. Pos ..."

four seasons : " 496, Do you have a new hip yet? I hope y ..."

Hour of the Wolf: "Time for something better than Greta https://yo ..."

Eromero: "Take away their federal pensions and 80% of their ..."

gKWVE: "I just have the sound off for the problematic game ..."

Teresa in Fort Worth, Texas, AoSHQ's Plucky Wee One - Eat the Cheesecake, Buy the Yarn.: "Also, I never understood why all of these men are ..."

Contestant 2: "Greta is unfuckable ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives