| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Daily Tech News 11 May 2026
Sunday Overnight Open Thread - May 10, 2026 [Doof] Gun Thread: Mother's Day Edition! Food Thread: Was The Original Yorkshire Pudding Made From Yorkshiremen, Or Yorkshire Terrier? First World Problems... The Food Fanatics Will Never Stop! Book Thread: 05/10/2026 [MP4] Daily Tech News 10 May 2026 Saturday Night Club ONT - May 9, 2026 [D & D] Saturday Evening Movie Thread - 5/9/2026 Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026 Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« Moving Tribute To Our Troops |
Main
| The Law of Gravity Sucks, Maybe »
December 21, 2004
"The Separation of Church and Society"... seems to be what the secularist project is ultimately about: We waged war on teaching and practicing religion in the public schools on the flimsy grounds of separation of church and state and the First Amendment. But there can be no real separation of religion and society. The president, his Cabinet, the Congress and the courts are full of men and women who are members of churches and other religious institutions. Their decisions are influenced in some measure by their religious traditions. The president has made it abundantly clear he feels inspired by his higher power when he makes decisions. Like it or not, a huge number of U.S. citizens say they are members of some religion. I think that's about right. "Separation of church and state" is a nice slogan, but it what it tends to mean in practice -- given the massive and omnipresent government plays in our lives today -- is the separation of church and public life altogether. I don't see how the Doyennes of Tolerance can fail to understand that it is not "tolerant" to insist that people hide their religion, as if it were some sorty of perversion, whenever they step into the public square. H/t to Pundit Guy, who praises the author for exhibiting rare liberal candor. posted by Ace at 02:59 PM
CommentsThe separation of Church and State is a very simple issue. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." The Unites States Congress can't pass a law with respect to a religious organization (such as the Catholic Church, or the Episcopal Church, or your lcoal church). That's the ONLY restriction on religion in gov't. Notice it says nothing about a manger scene in a county square. That's the overactive imagination of anti-religion zealots. Posted by: TallDave on December 21, 2004 03:34 PM
As long as I'm plugging books, there's a couple non-fiction by Brian Greene - "Fabric of the Cosmos" and "The Elegant Universe" that are excellent for laypeople. I've read both of them several times, and each time through I'm amazed and fascinated anew. "Elegant Universe" has by far the best examples of the double-slit experiment and relativity I've ever read. Posted by: TallDave on December 21, 2004 03:42 PM
Just think of all the fun we could have if we could declare secularism a religion. Posted by: Iblis on December 21, 2004 04:28 PM
The author is a retired Episcopalian priest. Maybe not the most un-biased opinion out there? There is a huge problem with what he is asking to be done.....it can't be done. Keep in mind, this guy is a self-admited ACLU supporter, at one point. What kind of 'religious' teaching do you think he would support? Hell-fire and brimstone Biblical literalism or liberal Christian figurative interpretations? You can't 'teach' either (or even both) without offending someone. Think about it. I do have to say, however, that the ACLU has come up with some really stupid things to litigate, like taking the cross out of the LA county seal. That was retarded. However, it should be noted that when over-zealous teachers or administrators try to restrict students' religious expression, the ACLU does sometimes come in to help. It's just that the ACLU is so inconsistent in what they do, that causes the administrators to be so paranoid in the first place. The bottom line is this: I don't pay taxes to have students get religious indocrination. That's what churches are for, and these churches generate huge sums of tax-free money. And, Ace, as a side note -- that's where you've screwed up. The mad-crazy money ain't in Bloggin' but in Preachifyin'. Posted by: Eric on December 21, 2004 05:44 PM
Remember, it was Thomas Jefferson who stated that there should be a separation of church and STATE. Posted by: Magnum Serpentine on December 21, 2004 06:38 PM
I'm not sure what you're getting at Magnum S but let me assure you that Thomas Jefferson understood the role religion played in society and was the sponsor of legislation to pay chaplains, authorize days of prayer and thanksgiving etc. His famous letter with the phrase separation of church and state was reinforcing the idea put forth in the constitution; that government was not allowed to establish a religion. Never, ever, did any founding father intend a country where the ten commandments could not be hung on the schoolhouse wall. That concept is the stuff of moral relativists. Posted by: BrewFan on December 21, 2004 08:53 PM
Iblis, Posted by: Kathy K on December 21, 2004 09:05 PM
Well shit. Let the fun begin! Posted by: Iblis on December 22, 2004 12:08 AM
TallDave forgot the "free exercise" clause: " ... or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". And this is the part that all the militant secularist types forget about. The "free exercise" clause has been regularly trampled by the courts, according to some. Posted by: Jeff Brokaw on December 22, 2004 07:24 AM
That's a great point that's too overlooked Jeff. Posted by: TallDave on December 22, 2004 10:32 AM
Remove God from public life and money, sex and power become God. Without a power greater than ourselves to whom we are accontable, anything becomes permissable to WIN those things, just as long as we can "legally" get away with it. Then instead of right and wrong, "the Law" and lawyers becomes the final arbiter of everything we do! Ensuring a quick degeneration to the Rule of Fang and Claw. These Liberal wolves-in-sheep's-clothing like this guy merely want to "educate" so they can pick apart the Bible and Christianity with scholarly sounding bullshit and ignorant arrogance. For as Ecclesiastes 10:3 says: "When the fool walks throught the street, in his lack of understanding he calls everything foolish." Liberalism is breathtaking in its foolishness. Posted by: 72VIRGINS on December 22, 2004 03:59 PM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?" I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove Chris
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near Somebody else holds your heart, yeah You turn to me with your icy tears And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source" Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held. Basil the Great
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.
Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing. Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult. Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending. (((Dan Hodges))) Nick Lowles
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98. Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years. Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45 Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%. I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens. REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs. Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
![]() That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time. I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Hamas is Humiliating Trump's 'Board of Peace'
[Hat Tip: TC] [CBD]
Ted Turner Dies At 87 [CBD]
Recent Comments
m:
"from Genius lyrics; on Portal - Still Alive:
Th ..."
clarence: "Guten morgen, horde. ..." Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: " Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, Can ..." Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "The penalty of a long nap. ..." Braenyard - some Absent Friends are more equal than others _: "Biden's Dog sniffs a whole lotta malarkey, Can' ..." m: " Portal - Still Alive Look at me, still talkin ..." m: "A trifecta, of sorts! ..." m: "w00t ..." Skip: "TECH THREAD IS NOOD ..." clarence: "!! ..." Skip: "G'Day everyone ..." m: "Pixy's up! ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|