Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« John Kerry's Achilles Heel | Main | Let's Be Honest: The World Press Can Eat Our Shorts »
November 07, 2004

Pardon Our Wardrobe Malfunction

Standards and tastes differ, and I guess Hoke's is a little different than mine. I don't think that racy entry should have run, and I apologize if anyone was offended.

Hoke says he's been Dixie-Chicked.* To be honest, I've been looking for the opportunity to chill someone's right to free expression, so everything worked out for the good.

*Kidding, of course.


posted by Ace at 04:22 PM
Comments



(Nerdy kid near the back, waving wildly)
Ooh! Ooh! Ooh! Mr. Ace! Mr. Ace! Chill my speech, too!

PS. If you're keeping track, I thought the faux porno was funny. But I liked Orgazmo too, so what do you expect?

Posted by: Rich on November 7, 2004 05:44 PM

Oh, is that what the problem was? I couldn't figure it out =p. Didn't bother me, heh.

Posted by: Elric on November 7, 2004 06:00 PM

Awww...I missed it!

That'll learn me not to miss a day.
Wanted to ask a question; why the cleaner language?

Posted by: lauraw on November 7, 2004 06:27 PM

Ace speaks power to truth.

Posted by: See Dubya on November 8, 2004 12:12 AM

Well, it included the word "cunt," too, which is a word I wrote like twice before and then retracted and apologized for.

Wanted to ask a question; why the cleaner language?

There are a couple of reasons.

First of all, I'm not completely cleaning things up. My schtick is to be kinda dirty, and I can't see abandoning that now.

But when I was burned out on blogging, I was really overdoing it with profanity and shock-value jokes that weren't even especially funny. One reader told me he was dropping me out of the first-read category for that reason.

I still think that curses are occasionally useful and effective. But for a while there, I really couldn't think of anything funny or interesting to say, and I was pretty much letting fly with the word "cocksucker" left and right because, well, I don't know why. I guess I thought if I just amped up the profanity it might disguise the fact that I was really, really slipping.

And then there's the advertiser issue. This is a sell-out kinda thing, I know, but if I'm going to keep doing this, I feel I have to get some jack out of it. And so I think I've just got to cool it on the outright vulgar stuff if people are going to advertise here. Not get rid of it completely, just be more selective about when it's worth it.

A really funny joke that needs the word "fuck" will get the word "fuck." On the other hand, if fuck isn't absolutely called for, I'm looking for alternatives, rather than just saying fuckety-fuckety-fuck all the time.

I don't know if this is going to piss people off or not. I hope not. But this is a sort of muddle-through-and-guestimate type of thing. I don't know where the line is; I don't know at what point I'm losing more readers from being too vulgar than from suddenly being Mr. Propriety.

I'm just trying to be a little more careful about pushing the obscenity button when I don't have anything else to say.

Posted by: ace on November 8, 2004 12:34 AM

We can still swear freely, though, right? (I'd put one of those smily things here but I don't use them.)

Posted by: zetetic on November 8, 2004 08:48 AM

The exclusion or inclusion of profanity on this site has no impact whatsoever on my enjoyment of this blog. Just please don't start using any stupid euphamisms, like doody, frick, or c-word. I mean sometimes a cunt is just a cunt.

Posted by: on November 8, 2004 09:25 AM

I have to agree with both sides (looking at John Kerry reflection in the mirror) - I think at one point the profanity was overdone and I kind of missed the point of the whole thing, but on the other hand I also agree with the above comment and sometimes a cunt is a cunt and you have to call it like you see it. Just keep the balance. I enjoy the site more with the balance you've found so far...you're doing a good job. Keep it up.

Posted by: rorochub on November 8, 2004 11:20 AM

We can still swear freely, though, right?

Yeah, the comments are still fine for whatever, except like, you know, hardcore racism and the like.

Posted by: ace on November 8, 2004 01:48 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Oh, I forgot to mention this quote from Pete Hegseth, reported by Roger Kimball: "We are sharing the ocean with the Iranian Navy. We're giving them the bottom half."
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Red Leather Suit and Sweatband Edition
And I was here to please
I'm even on knees
Makin' love to whoever I please
I gotta do it my way
Or no way at all
Tomorrow is March 25th, "Tolkien Reading Day," because March 25th is the day when the Ring is destroyed in the book. I think I'm going to start the Hobbit tomorrow and read all four books this time.
The only bad part of the trilogy are the Frodo/Sam chapters in The Two Towers. They're repetitive, slow, and mostly about the weather and terrain. But most everything else is good. Weirdly, the Frodo-Sam chapters in Return of the King are exciting and action-packed and among the best in the trilogy. (Though the chapters with everyone else in Return of the King get pretty slow again. Mostly people talking about marching towards war, and then marching towards war.)
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
One day I'm gonna write a poem in a letter
One day I'm gonna get that faculty together
Remember that everybody has to wait in line
Oh, [Song Title], look out world, oh, you know I've got mine
US decimation of Iran's ICBM forces is due to Space Force's instant detection of launches -- and the launchers' hiding places -- and rapid counter-attack via missiles
AI is doing a lot of the work in analyzing images to find the exact hiding place of the launchers. Counter-strikes are now coming in four hours after a launch, whereas previously it might have taken days for humans to go over the imagery and data.
Robert Mueller, Former Special Counsel Who Probed Trump, Dies
“robert mueller just died,” trump wrote in a truth social post on march 21. “good, i’m glad he’s dead. he can no longer hurt innocent people! president donald j. trump.”
Canadian School Designates Cafeteria And Lunchroom As "No Food Zones" For Ramadan
Canada and the UK are neck and neck in the race to become the first western country to fall to Islam [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD have a short chat about Iran, the disgusting SAVE Act theater, Mamdani's politicizing of St. Patrick's Day, and more!
Recent Comments
CharlieBrown'sDildo: "center-blob. [i] Posted by: Weasel at March 29, ..."

mindful webworker - blows the dog whistle: "NOOD ONT https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=419101 ..."

Tonypete: "Good evening good people. ..."

four seasons: " Hello All! ..."

Puddleglum, cheer up for the worst is yet to come: "Evenin' ..."

mindful webworker - on the dot: "You had to be there. Or were you? ..."

Weasel: "Posted by: Sam Adams at March 29, 2026 09:57 PM (X ..."

mindful webworker - on the dot: "Terror From The Year 5000! Not 4999. Not 5001. ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "Compared to the PPK, the Beretta 80 series guns ho ..."

toby928(c) : "[i]You do you, man. But that sounds like a dangero ..."

vmom deport deport deport: "My vision sucks I probably need the kind of sight ..."

Sam Adams: "Really appreciate the help. If I focus on the sigh ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives