Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Erosion Continues: Bush Slips Behind Nationally, and in Ohio | Main | *Which Party* Is Committing Voter Fraud? »
October 13, 2004

O'Reilly Producer Claims "Forced Into Phone Sex"

I am not saying it's true. But it's not as if it can be overlooked.

The Smoking Gun has the dirty details from Mackris' complaint, and they are in fact dirty.

Not filthy-dirty, but dirty.

Update: Let me recommend again Jim Lindgren's discussion of when "negotiations incidental to a possible bona fide lawsuit" become criminal extortion.


posted by Ace at 06:47 PM
Comments



How do you force someone into Phone sex? How do you Force someone to do anything when you are not in the same room? Where they sitting next to each other on a sofa talking on the same extension.

60 million dollars, unbelievable. Maybe her lawyer is part of Edwards firm.

Posted by: Jennifer on October 13, 2004 07:09 PM

That seemed to be a bit more like a transcript, not merely a recounting of the details. What, with the "um"s included in the conversation.

Great. Just when you think that Franken has disappeared...

Posted by: jmflynny on October 13, 2004 07:13 PM

I have always thought O'Reilly to be a bloviating asshole (and am I the ONLY one who remembers that he got his start in tabloid television shows?) but even this seems a bit, well, unseemly.

Phone sex. :: GUFFAW :: Forced phone sex? Pul-eeze.

Posted by: Margi on October 13, 2004 07:44 PM

Well, we're not talking about "forced" as in physically forced. We're talking about "pressure" from a boss.

Allegedly, of course.

Posted by: ace on October 13, 2004 08:08 PM
Posted by: Joe R. the Unabrewer on October 13, 2004 08:09 PM

Yeah, I know. I was splitting hairs, actually.

It's like I said before. Now that I'm mature enough to know exactly how to handle sexual harassment in the work place I: a) no longer work in an office and, b) am of the age-group no longer to be considered harassworthy.

Aheh.

Posted by: Margi on October 13, 2004 08:18 PM

Sorry. I don't believe the woman. Go read the whole thing at Smoking Gun. Then tell me if you find it believable. There are two huge issues: 1) If you were harrassed, why go gack to Fox after having left. 2) Hang up the phone! Walk away from the dinner table (if there were dinners).

Now if tapes show up, I'll reconsider (i.e. if there not "faked" ala CBS memos).

Posted by: Charlie on October 13, 2004 09:38 PM

I was in a dating situation with a guy when I was single.
We had phone sex a coupla times, I ain't too proud to admit.

Now. At one point in our LAST phone 'chat,' he was saying that he was doing things to me, and that I was doing things, that I find...diabolical. And Deviant, with a capital DEVIANT.
I did not end the phone call. I kept silent until he was done.
And never saw or spoke to the dude again, though he kept trying for a while.

Granted, I didn't work with him. But its really not that difficult to hang up the phone, if I did.

ESPECIALLY in this age of sexual harassment training, that every executive has to go through.

Great joke that actually happened in the office of someone I knew;

A guy was hanging around the office right after the mandatory sexual harassment training meeting. His boss (female) walks in, after a walk outside on a glorious day. She says, "It feels so good out!"
He says, "Then leave it out,"

"IN MY OFFICE!!"

Posted by: lauraw on October 13, 2004 10:13 PM

A-hem.

Dianna and LauraW are both determined to take this very-respectable site down into the dirty-tubes with them.

Let's keep it out of the gutter, ladies.

Posted by: ace on October 13, 2004 11:23 PM

Just kidding, of course.

But seriously, in the words of One Night in Bangkok, let's get our fun above the waistline, sunshine.

No, really, I'm just kidding.

Posted by: ace on October 13, 2004 11:30 PM

Ace, the line is, 'I get my kicks above the waist.'

After reading her complaint, I think she watched too much of Sex and the City, or whatever that show was that all the women I knew kept talking about.

Sorry, but this is just supposed to embarass Fox. This doesn't pass the laugh test; imagine a woman asking to come back to a job where someone sexually harassed her! And not some pitiful minimum wage cleaning lady, but a woman who can pull down $93,000.

Posted by: Dianna on October 14, 2004 12:24 AM

Well, okay, it's "kicks," but it is "waistLINE," because that rhymes with sunshine.

Posted by: ace on October 14, 2004 12:27 AM

I've noticed over the past month or two O'Baby, I mean O'Reily, has been sliding to a more moderate tone... Not wanting to judge Dan Rather, Martha Stewart, etc.

I think the woman is a flea trying ping him, but that said, it's pretty clear the speaking style, the detailed comments and style of speech are clearly classic O'Reilly.

It's not good for him or Fox. Time for the right to steal the conspiracy stick from the looney libs:

She left Fox... went to CNN, became the Manchurian Producer, infiltrated back into Fox just to ping the "Big" guy. :-o

The sad part is, a very articulate person, in regards to some conservative matters, is GOING to take a massive credibility hit. I hate that.

But if there's one thing about most conservatives, we DO NOT- as the dems do- blindly follow. We do have standards.

Watching O'Reilly talk about this on his "talking points" segment tonight, I kept thinking about Clinton wagging his fingers and talking about "that woman" and also how he cornered Dan Rather on if he thought Clinton was honest.

We MUST be intellectually honest in our dealings.

Posted by: Bladebender on October 14, 2004 01:50 AM

I think the $60m is ridiculous, of course, but it also sounds like the chick has a tape. That exchange about the what he'd like to do to her with a loofah/falafel (!) looked like it was a transcript, particularly since other conversations were merely paraphrased.

Posted by: Scout on October 14, 2004 08:21 AM

Now we know why O'Reilly has been taking it easy on the big networks, especially Rather.

Posted by: rdbrewer on October 14, 2004 11:47 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
On "Professor" Arday:
He was their living lawn jockey, period. They won't say that 'cause they're sensitive and down with his struggle and all. He was there to appease and flatter their sense of being uplifters of the oppressed. In truth, he served as their living lawn jockey -- no more, no less, and unworthy of even a second thought on their part. Tokenism, pure and simple.
-- Krebs v Carnot
Ireland's 'Air Force One' lacks a key safety system for fog -- thanks to country's ban on Israeli products
Ireland's best emigrated 150 years ago. The current Ireland is a sad joke. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: More Iran bluster from Trump? Enough! Deportations hit a record, and that is a good thing for all, Todd Blanche's nomination is out of committee, the DSA is on the march, and more!
The Short Unhappy Life of a Russian Soldier: Why recruits die in 20-30 minutes
Interesting video. Some key parts: drones were responsible for 70-80% of all battlefield deaths in mid-2025, and I bet it's higher now. The Russian army is incredibly corrupt. Men get assigned to the most dangerous frontline units, the "Storm" units, unless they pay a superior $2,000 to be assigned to a different unit. Furthermore, there is often no real training for recruits -- commanders pocket the money that would have gone towards fuel and ammo costs incurred during training. Much "training" consists just of taking a single picture of soldiers doing something soldier-y, like fording a river, and publishing that as proof that the training was done. Even when it is done, training is only two weeks long.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton discuss the Berlin attack, Iran...Again! Sefton's mini Odyssey review, Data Republican's blockbuster reveal about the DNC, and more!
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
She's totally committed to major independence
She's a lady through and through
She gives them quite a battle, all that they can handle
She'll bruise some, she'll hurt some too
I got something done yesterday and am exhausted.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky
[CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Illegals registered and voted in NJ! Leftist violence is baked into the Democrat cake, Iran's capabilities are being degraded, Londonistan? And...come on SC...no senate dynasties!
Update to the video of a Russian soldier being spun around and thrown by the machinegun he was operating: The soldier was testing an old, archaic Russian machinegun intended to be mounted to a helicopter. The old gun was pressed into service as a possible anti-drone gun. The Russian army is generally depleted and being forced to bring a lot of old, unreliable weapons and platforms to the front.
Also: Ukranian drones have destroyed damaged [CBD] over 147 Russian warships and shadow fleet oil tankers in the Black Sea over the past ten days.
Top Men!
FDA is providing an update regarding the sample of lettuce supplied by Taylor Farms de Mexico which was reported positive on July 18, 2026. Due to the complexity in detection of Cyclospora, FDA laboratory experts re-reviewed the sample results and have concluded that the finding does not represent true amplification and should be considered a false positive. Information about the sample has been removed from the July 18, 2026, update below. FDA has notified Taylor Farms and continues working with the firm to ensure product implicated in this outbreak has been removed from the market. FDA and state partners continue to collect and analyze product samples. As of July 19, 2026, there are no confirmed positive sample results for product testing for Cyclospora.
[CBD]
FEDERAL APPEALS COURT STRIKES DOWN NJ "ASSAULT WEAPONS" BAN/MAGAZINE BAN! Let's see if it reverts to the previous 15 round limit or I can actually run my weapons as God intended! [CBD]
Recent Comments
Anonosaurus Wrecks, Fear Me![/s] [/i] [/u] [/b]: "Hasan Piker telling it like it is! OLD HASAN CL ..."

Skip: "Tolle Lege ..."

Richie Rich: "234 Well that PT ain't gonna do itself. Posted by ..."

Martini Farmer: "Minorities have been conditioned to resent the maj ..."

vmom deport deport stab deport: "Perfesser! ..."

fd: "Lefty nitwits should be forced to wear underwear m ..."

Jumbo's Pawn Shop: "Give Obama his due. He was an excellent Gun Salesm ..."

JackStraw: "Well that PT ain't gonna do itself. ..."

m: ">>>Five of America's top tech companies - Amazon, ..."

The Green Orange: "I'm wearing bamboo pants for the Book Thread. ..."

JackStraw: ">>Obama and his crew are all Maoists, I'm convince ..."

fd: "5 year old refub HP workstations are a bargain and ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives