Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Hidden Message from Bill Burkett Discusses Giving "Information" to the DNC? | Main | Nothin' But Class: The "Candid, Refreshing" Terezzza Refreshes Her Critics by Calling Them "Scumbags" »
September 20, 2004

BREAKING: CBSNews Admits the Rather Obvious-- Docs Are Forgeries

Dan Rather cops to the obvious a mere twelve days after everyone ele in the world knew in this statement:

Last week, amid increasing questions about the authenticity of documents used in support of a 60 MINUTES WEDNESDAY story about President Bush's time in the Texas Air National Guard, CBS News vowed to re-examine the documents in question—and their source—vigorously. And we promised that we would let the American public know what this examination turned up, whatever the outcome.

Now, after extensive additional interviews, I no longer have the confidence in these documents that would allow us to continue vouching for them journalistically.

Why the continued, face-saving reluctance to simply say, "They're forged"? Note how he phrases it-- he just "no longer has the confidence" in the documents.

They're proven forgeries, Dan.

I find we have been misled on the key question of how our source for the documents came into possession of these papers. That, combined with some of the questions that have been raised in public and in the press, leads me to a point where—if I knew then what I know now—I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in question.

But we did use the documents. We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry. It was an error that was made, however, in good faith and in the spirit of trying to carry on a CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism.

Please know that nothing is more important to us than people's trust in our ability and our commitment to report fairly and truthfully.

Except, of course, getting the President and swinging the election the Democratic candidate you claim you're not biased in favor of.


The New York Times reports on CBS' too-reluctant recognition of the transparently obvious:

Mr. Rather interviewed Mr. Burkett on camera this weekend, and several people close to the reporting process said his answers to Mr. Rather's questions led officials to conclude that their initial confidence that the memos had come from Mr. Killian's own files was not warranted. These people indicated that Mr. Burkett had previously led the producer of the piece, Mary Mapes, to have the utmost confidence in the material.

It was unclear last night if Mr. Burkett had told Mr. Rather that he had been misled about the documents' provenance or that he had been the one who did the misleading.

In an e-mail message yesterday, Mr. Burkett declined to answer any questions about the documents.

But CBS News continues spinning anyway:

Yesterday, Emily J. Will, a document specialist who inspected the records for CBS News and said last week that she had raised concerns about their authenticity with CBS News producers, confirmed a report in Newsweek that a producer had told her that the source of the documents said they had been obtained anonymously and through the mail.

They ran with documents received anonymously and with no actual human being willing to vouch for their authenticity and provenance?

In court, you can't just peddle documents to the jury. Records usually require "authentication" -- some live human witness capable of saying, "These documents are genuine; I have first hand knowledge of their making."

How on earth did CBS News decide it wasn't obligated to similarly authenticate the forgeries?

In an interview last night she declined to name the producer who told her this but said the producer was in a position to know. CBS News officials have disputed her contention that she warned the network the night before the initial "60 Minutes'' report that it would face questions from documents experts.

Let's just say that I have a greater confidence in Ms. Will's word than Ms. Mapes'. Ms. Will hasn't proveably lied to me yet-- something that can't be said for the "highly respected" Mapes.

In the coming days CBS News officials plan to focus on how the network moved ahead with the report when there were warning signs that the memorandums were not genuine.

Ms. Will is one of two documents experts consulted by the network who said they raised doubts about the material before the segment was broadcast. Another expert, Marcel B. Matley, said in interviews that he had vouched only for Colonel Killian's signatures on the records and not the authenticity of the records themselves. Mr. Matley said he could not rule out that the signatures had been cut and pasted from official records pertaining to Colonel Killian.

In examining where the network had gone wrong, officials at CBS News turning their attention to Ms. Mapes, one of their most respected producers, who was riding particularly high this year after breaking news about the Abu Ghraib prison scandal for the network.

In a telephone interview this weekend, Josh Howard, the executive producer of the "60 Minutes'' Wednesday edition, said that he did not initially know who was Ms. Mapes' primary source for the documents but that he did not see any reason to doubt them. He said he believed Ms. Mapes and her team had appropriately answered all questions about the documents' authenticity and, he noted, no one seemed to be casting doubt upon the essential thrust of the report.

"The editorial story line was still intact, and still is, to this day,'' he said, "and the reporting that was done in it was by a person who has turned in decades of flawless reporting with no challenge to her credibility.''

Fake but accurate. Fake but accurate. Stonewall. Spin. Rinse. Repeat.

Not good enough, Mr. Rather.

Not nearly good enough. The boycott continues until CBS News admits precisely what it did, and why it did it. And until the responsible parties are fired -- including Andrew Heyward and Dan Rather and, of course, Mary Mapes (but she's already getting her resume together-- "When in doubt, fire a producer").

Update: American Daughter has video of what she claims is a an F-16 targetting Fallujah terrorists, but my "sources" inform me it's actually a "recreation" -- fake, yet accurate -- of bloggers bringing down CBS News.


posted by Ace at 12:09 PM
Comments



I think it goes deeper. I want to know what CBS gave Bill Burkett to take the rap. At this point I am firmly convinced that the Kerry camp was involved in some fashion and that Burkett was offered something to say the story started and ended with him.

Posted by: Sydney T on September 20, 2004 12:35 PM

I agree with Syd. The Kerry camp is, to me, deeply involved in this.

But I think we aren't going to get much more than what we are seeing.... Someone will get fired, Maples it seems, they will pursue the "fake but accurate" and maybe Dan will go on extended holidays...maybe.

But will we see this going to the Kerry camp?
I doubt it. CBS and Danny Boy will go down, but they won't take the Dems with them...

Unless the MSM gets on it "shark mode". But even so...

Posted by: on September 20, 2004 12:55 PM

I agree with Syd. The Kerry camp is, to me, deeply involved in this.

But I think we aren't going to get much more than what we are seeing.... Someone will get fired, Maples it seems, they will pursue the "fake but accurate" and maybe Dan will go on extended holidays...maybe.

But will we see this going to the Kerry camp?
I doubt it. CBS and Danny Boy will go down, but they won't take the Dems with them...

Unless the MSM gets on it "shark mode". But even so...

Posted by: Sofia on September 20, 2004 12:56 PM

OK, maybe they did get them anonymously, but how do you know it wasn't an unimpeachable anonymous source?

(Just practicing liberal talking points).

Posted by: Phil on September 20, 2004 01:10 PM

This Fox News story is worth a look. Burkett admits being the source, and also says he passed the documents to Cleland.

I hope that html tag worked right. If not, here it is again to cut & paste:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,132906,00.html

Posted by: Mike on September 20, 2004 01:19 PM

I don't think they had to give Bill Burkett anything beyond a promise not to file a civil suit against him. It's apparently unlikely criminal charges are possible.

I wonder if Burkett realizes he has now poisoned his obsession now and forever? No respectable organization will pursue this any longer. Not that the DNC is a respectable organization. Bush is now a much more 'Fortunate Son' than the DNC wants people to believe he was 30 years ago. What can be better than seeing your enemies destroy themselves like this?

Posted by: Eric Pobirs on September 20, 2004 01:26 PM

"Update: American Daughter has video of what she claims is a an F-16 targetting Fallujah terrorists, but my "sources" inform me it's actually a "recreation" -- fake, yet accurate -- of bloggers bringing down CBS News."

I wish.....We must keep up the pressure.

American Daughter

Posted by: American Daughter on September 20, 2004 01:56 PM

Congrats, ACE! You were part of it!

Pour yourself a big dollop of that cheap vodka into a tin can - salute the cars passing by -

I would say that I'm not watching CBS, and the boycott shouldn't just be about who CBS fires. For all I care they can keep their tarnished employees......what I care about is twofold:

1. That CBS makes internal reforms. In vetting documents and sources far more carefully, and finally recognizing that they have to have a more balanced newsroom that eschews political agenda. When you have a roomful of newsmen, executives, writers, and producers all united as liberal Democrats deciding to run a story on a President they all hate - they lose judgement and objectivity. They have to recognize that unless they fix that, gain journalistic philosophical diversity and implant a devil's advocate or two with real power - they will screw up badly again.

2. CBS needs to come clean with everything they know, on who was involved, in the forgery, and the apparant coordination with the Democrats on the Bush TAND attacks that day. It was the day that McAufliffe's "Fortunate Son" media campaign lauches, Texans for the Truth put out their screed, Ben Barnes "came clean" (ha!), and the Dem candidates and surrogates had speeches mentioning Bush's National Guard "shortfalls".

Without assigning guilt, CBS has to say who they talked to about the documents, and details of those messages and conversations with Cleland, Kerry's Headquarters, James C. Moore, Ben Barnes, and the forgery suspect Burkett - over the past several months.

*************

If CBS does those two things, it would go a long way towards restoring good will.

**********

OK, you're right. Add a 3rd thing that has to be done....heads must roll...I'm feeling less generous....it's gotta be done to restore credibility. Mapes and the executive that stopped all document research once the White House failed to cry that they were fake. A couple of CBS lawyers who failed their duty to warn of danger. Dan Rather? Don't fire him. Keep him around as a de-balled memento. I think a worse punishment would be a suspension. A two-month suspension that admits he is in disgrace, removes him from any election coverage.....and.....spells him with the ditsy ill-prepared, Connie Chung.

Posted by: cedarford on September 20, 2004 02:00 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Money Wired to Mexico Hits a Decade Low as US Immigration Policies Take Hold
Now bump the fee to 10%, and mandate proof of legal residence for all money transfers out of the United States [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Boots on the ground in Ukraine? We're against it! Trump shines a light on voting, Miss Universe wearing a suicide vest? And more!
"As the discussion continued, Fox News host Charlie Hurt asked Trump directly to confirm there will be no U.S. troops involved in this potential security umbrella for Ukraine. "Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president," Trump replied."
Good! I hope I am wrong! [CBD]
Lost Seventies Mystery Click: The Darkest Song Ever Recorded?
I think Professor of Rock (on YouTube) claimed this song was so upsetting that people used to pull over to the side of the road when it came on the radio. It's about a fatal plane crash, but obviously it suggests a fatal car crash too, which could wig out a driver.
It's like one of those nasty 70s anti-war body horror movies. Not for the squeamish. I'm not even going to post the lyrics because they're upsetting too.
Compilation of Naked Gun intros
That theme gets me charged.
Compilation of all Police Squad! openings. They're all the same except for the last few seconds where they reveal the Special Guest Star and the title(s).
Pitch Meeting: Amazon's new, terrible War of the Worlds
I don't know why these tech monopolists spend so much money on ripoff/sequel/remake slop. I like popcorn entertainment but is it legally required to be terrible?
Lost 90s Mystery Click: College Radio Edition
Well you look fantastic in your cast-off casket
At least the thing still runs
This nine to five bullshit don't let you forget
Whose suicide you're on.

Also:
You wax poetic about things pathetic
As long as you look so cute
Believe these hills are starting to roll
Believe these stars are starting to shoot
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: In the last Episode of the season CBD and J.J. Sefton chat about Texas Gerrymandering, The Islamist who is about to be the mayor of NYC, Jim Acosta's ghoulish interview, Israel needs a new strategy for Gaza, and more!
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click: Garrett's Favorite Band Edition
Everybody wants you
Everybody wants your love
I'd just like to make you mine, all mine
I'm frankly surprised the title is 107 Days. I would have thought it would be:

Days Are Important: The Amount of Days Was a Number and That Number Was 100 Plus 7 Which is 107. 107. One Hundred and Seven. It's a Memoir and Memoirs are About Remembering Things Because Remembering Things is Good. Not Bad. Good. Memoir. A Memoir. Like a Reservoir But With Memory. We Have to Let it Flow. We Have to Let It Flow Into the Reservoir of Our Mind and Our Heart. Our Heart Which is the Beating Heart of Not Just Our Blood, But Our Progress. And Our People. And Democracy. The End.

Posted by: ...
Soft weak poop from the early 80s Mystery Click
I never liked this song, but it is memorable. In a weak, annoying way.
The kid's in shock up and down the block
The folks are home playing beat the clock
Down at the golden cup
They set the young ones up
Under the neon light
Selling day for night
It's alright
Nobody rides for free (nobody, nobody)
Nobody gets it like they want it to be (nobody, nobody)
Nobody hands you any guarantee (nobody, nobody)
Nobody
Recent Comments
Learn to coal: "Mikeroweworks dot com ..."

m: "122 Something else that seems to be lost is mentor ..."

Hadrian the Seventh: " Executive bonuses. When the company is doing wel ..."

m: ">>>Labubu could make $1 billion this year. I re ..."

Hadrian the Seventh: " [i]Companies need to advertise for positions alr ..."

no one of any consequence: "Companies need to advertise for positions already ..."

CrotchetyOldJarhead : "Something else that seems to be lost is mentorship ..."

Kreskin: "Far Side and Calvin and Hobbes - no notes; just ge ..."

Kreskin: "Bloom County - great in its first run, my second f ..."

I used to have a different nic[/s][/b][/i][/u]: "[i]When did quarterly earnings become so important ..."

Hadrian the Seventh: " Talk about something that can be replaced by AI, ..."

NaCly Dog: "More about fires on ships: We rarely learn new ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives