Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Hidden Message from Bill Burkett Discusses Giving "Information" to the DNC? | Main | Nothin' But Class: The "Candid, Refreshing" Terezzza Refreshes Her Critics by Calling Them "Scumbags" »
September 20, 2004

BREAKING: CBSNews Admits the Rather Obvious-- Docs Are Forgeries

Dan Rather cops to the obvious a mere twelve days after everyone ele in the world knew in this statement:

Last week, amid increasing questions about the authenticity of documents used in support of a 60 MINUTES WEDNESDAY story about President Bush's time in the Texas Air National Guard, CBS News vowed to re-examine the documents in question—and their source—vigorously. And we promised that we would let the American public know what this examination turned up, whatever the outcome.

Now, after extensive additional interviews, I no longer have the confidence in these documents that would allow us to continue vouching for them journalistically.

Why the continued, face-saving reluctance to simply say, "They're forged"? Note how he phrases it-- he just "no longer has the confidence" in the documents.

They're proven forgeries, Dan.

I find we have been misled on the key question of how our source for the documents came into possession of these papers. That, combined with some of the questions that have been raised in public and in the press, leads me to a point where—if I knew then what I know now—I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in question.

But we did use the documents. We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry. It was an error that was made, however, in good faith and in the spirit of trying to carry on a CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism.

Please know that nothing is more important to us than people's trust in our ability and our commitment to report fairly and truthfully.

Except, of course, getting the President and swinging the election the Democratic candidate you claim you're not biased in favor of.


The New York Times reports on CBS' too-reluctant recognition of the transparently obvious:

Mr. Rather interviewed Mr. Burkett on camera this weekend, and several people close to the reporting process said his answers to Mr. Rather's questions led officials to conclude that their initial confidence that the memos had come from Mr. Killian's own files was not warranted. These people indicated that Mr. Burkett had previously led the producer of the piece, Mary Mapes, to have the utmost confidence in the material.

It was unclear last night if Mr. Burkett had told Mr. Rather that he had been misled about the documents' provenance or that he had been the one who did the misleading.

In an e-mail message yesterday, Mr. Burkett declined to answer any questions about the documents.

But CBS News continues spinning anyway:

Yesterday, Emily J. Will, a document specialist who inspected the records for CBS News and said last week that she had raised concerns about their authenticity with CBS News producers, confirmed a report in Newsweek that a producer had told her that the source of the documents said they had been obtained anonymously and through the mail.

They ran with documents received anonymously and with no actual human being willing to vouch for their authenticity and provenance?

In court, you can't just peddle documents to the jury. Records usually require "authentication" -- some live human witness capable of saying, "These documents are genuine; I have first hand knowledge of their making."

How on earth did CBS News decide it wasn't obligated to similarly authenticate the forgeries?

In an interview last night she declined to name the producer who told her this but said the producer was in a position to know. CBS News officials have disputed her contention that she warned the network the night before the initial "60 Minutes'' report that it would face questions from documents experts.

Let's just say that I have a greater confidence in Ms. Will's word than Ms. Mapes'. Ms. Will hasn't proveably lied to me yet-- something that can't be said for the "highly respected" Mapes.

In the coming days CBS News officials plan to focus on how the network moved ahead with the report when there were warning signs that the memorandums were not genuine.

Ms. Will is one of two documents experts consulted by the network who said they raised doubts about the material before the segment was broadcast. Another expert, Marcel B. Matley, said in interviews that he had vouched only for Colonel Killian's signatures on the records and not the authenticity of the records themselves. Mr. Matley said he could not rule out that the signatures had been cut and pasted from official records pertaining to Colonel Killian.

In examining where the network had gone wrong, officials at CBS News turning their attention to Ms. Mapes, one of their most respected producers, who was riding particularly high this year after breaking news about the Abu Ghraib prison scandal for the network.

In a telephone interview this weekend, Josh Howard, the executive producer of the "60 Minutes'' Wednesday edition, said that he did not initially know who was Ms. Mapes' primary source for the documents but that he did not see any reason to doubt them. He said he believed Ms. Mapes and her team had appropriately answered all questions about the documents' authenticity and, he noted, no one seemed to be casting doubt upon the essential thrust of the report.

"The editorial story line was still intact, and still is, to this day,'' he said, "and the reporting that was done in it was by a person who has turned in decades of flawless reporting with no challenge to her credibility.''

Fake but accurate. Fake but accurate. Stonewall. Spin. Rinse. Repeat.

Not good enough, Mr. Rather.

Not nearly good enough. The boycott continues until CBS News admits precisely what it did, and why it did it. And until the responsible parties are fired -- including Andrew Heyward and Dan Rather and, of course, Mary Mapes (but she's already getting her resume together-- "When in doubt, fire a producer").

Update: American Daughter has video of what she claims is a an F-16 targetting Fallujah terrorists, but my "sources" inform me it's actually a "recreation" -- fake, yet accurate -- of bloggers bringing down CBS News.


posted by Ace at 12:09 PM
Comments



I think it goes deeper. I want to know what CBS gave Bill Burkett to take the rap. At this point I am firmly convinced that the Kerry camp was involved in some fashion and that Burkett was offered something to say the story started and ended with him.

Posted by: Sydney T on September 20, 2004 12:35 PM

I agree with Syd. The Kerry camp is, to me, deeply involved in this.

But I think we aren't going to get much more than what we are seeing.... Someone will get fired, Maples it seems, they will pursue the "fake but accurate" and maybe Dan will go on extended holidays...maybe.

But will we see this going to the Kerry camp?
I doubt it. CBS and Danny Boy will go down, but they won't take the Dems with them...

Unless the MSM gets on it "shark mode". But even so...

Posted by: on September 20, 2004 12:55 PM

I agree with Syd. The Kerry camp is, to me, deeply involved in this.

But I think we aren't going to get much more than what we are seeing.... Someone will get fired, Maples it seems, they will pursue the "fake but accurate" and maybe Dan will go on extended holidays...maybe.

But will we see this going to the Kerry camp?
I doubt it. CBS and Danny Boy will go down, but they won't take the Dems with them...

Unless the MSM gets on it "shark mode". But even so...

Posted by: Sofia on September 20, 2004 12:56 PM

OK, maybe they did get them anonymously, but how do you know it wasn't an unimpeachable anonymous source?

(Just practicing liberal talking points).

Posted by: Phil on September 20, 2004 01:10 PM

This Fox News story is worth a look. Burkett admits being the source, and also says he passed the documents to Cleland.

I hope that html tag worked right. If not, here it is again to cut & paste:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,132906,00.html

Posted by: Mike on September 20, 2004 01:19 PM

I don't think they had to give Bill Burkett anything beyond a promise not to file a civil suit against him. It's apparently unlikely criminal charges are possible.

I wonder if Burkett realizes he has now poisoned his obsession now and forever? No respectable organization will pursue this any longer. Not that the DNC is a respectable organization. Bush is now a much more 'Fortunate Son' than the DNC wants people to believe he was 30 years ago. What can be better than seeing your enemies destroy themselves like this?

Posted by: Eric Pobirs on September 20, 2004 01:26 PM

"Update: American Daughter has video of what she claims is a an F-16 targetting Fallujah terrorists, but my "sources" inform me it's actually a "recreation" -- fake, yet accurate -- of bloggers bringing down CBS News."

I wish.....We must keep up the pressure.

American Daughter

Posted by: American Daughter on September 20, 2004 01:56 PM

Congrats, ACE! You were part of it!

Pour yourself a big dollop of that cheap vodka into a tin can - salute the cars passing by -

I would say that I'm not watching CBS, and the boycott shouldn't just be about who CBS fires. For all I care they can keep their tarnished employees......what I care about is twofold:

1. That CBS makes internal reforms. In vetting documents and sources far more carefully, and finally recognizing that they have to have a more balanced newsroom that eschews political agenda. When you have a roomful of newsmen, executives, writers, and producers all united as liberal Democrats deciding to run a story on a President they all hate - they lose judgement and objectivity. They have to recognize that unless they fix that, gain journalistic philosophical diversity and implant a devil's advocate or two with real power - they will screw up badly again.

2. CBS needs to come clean with everything they know, on who was involved, in the forgery, and the apparant coordination with the Democrats on the Bush TAND attacks that day. It was the day that McAufliffe's "Fortunate Son" media campaign lauches, Texans for the Truth put out their screed, Ben Barnes "came clean" (ha!), and the Dem candidates and surrogates had speeches mentioning Bush's National Guard "shortfalls".

Without assigning guilt, CBS has to say who they talked to about the documents, and details of those messages and conversations with Cleland, Kerry's Headquarters, James C. Moore, Ben Barnes, and the forgery suspect Burkett - over the past several months.

*************

If CBS does those two things, it would go a long way towards restoring good will.

**********

OK, you're right. Add a 3rd thing that has to be done....heads must roll...I'm feeling less generous....it's gotta be done to restore credibility. Mapes and the executive that stopped all document research once the White House failed to cry that they were fake. A couple of CBS lawyers who failed their duty to warn of danger. Dan Rather? Don't fire him. Keep him around as a de-balled memento. I think a worse punishment would be a suspension. A two-month suspension that admits he is in disgrace, removes him from any election coverage.....and.....spells him with the ditsy ill-prepared, Connie Chung.

Posted by: cedarford on September 20, 2004 02:00 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys
Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map
Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton Charge the Democrats with fomenting violence against the nation with their rhetoric, Virginia redistricting going down the tubes? Trump's bully pulpit is not censorship, Lee Zeldin is a star, J.B. Pritzker is an idiot, and more!
Recent Comments
gnats local 678: "ho la ..."

TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "424 Listening to people who were cheated by the la ..."

Thanatopsis: "Hola ..."

Stateless - He ain't heavy, he's my dog: "But the Iranians are the most peaceful, trustworth ..."

Smell the Glove: "Heh someone just said this is worst defeat for Vir ..."

On the Up and Up: "Listening to people who were cheated by the last c ..."

Truck Monkey: "Was the SCOVA ruling unanimous? I don’t see ..."

whig: "408 Genuinely shocked a blue state Supreme Court w ..."

LASue: "Seattle Times headline Seattle Business lobby h ..."

Oldcat: "They have used him for the last two years to catch ..."

...: "I don’t see a breakdown. Posted by: Bulg ..."

People's Hippo Voice: "The rest of the state GOPs are not as feckless as ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives