Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Poll: SwiftVets Swing Swing-Voters | Main | "I am a Corrupt-American" »
August 21, 2004

Two Updates: Oliver "Grimmace" Willis and John Forbes Kerry's Silver Star

Earlier I posted an article questioning why John Forbes Kerry had a 1986 citation for his Silver Star, signed during Reagan's second term by the then-Secretary of the Navy John Lehmann.

The facts most likely are on Kerry's side. There is the possibility of shenaningans here, but it's not a strong possibility, and it's less likely that we're talking major shenanigans.

First: I asked if there were earlier reports of Kerry's Silver Star. This was a rather ignorant question. Several posters informed me he got his Silver Star in 1969 or so. The actual question about the citation is over the citation itself, not the actual Silver Star, which wasn't issued in 1986, but fairly contemporaneously with the war.

I was "wrong" in the sense that I was asking a dumb question because I didn't know enough not to ask it.

On Thursday's Brit Hume (I love DVR), Brit Hume asked a Lt. General Cowell (?) about this, and he said he didn't know why a 1986 citation was issued, nor why that fresh citation contained new, more glowing language about John Kerry's alleged heroics. He guessed that Kerry simply asked for copies of his previous citations (they are often lost, and sometimes vets want good, fresh copies for framing), and the Navy sent along the new citation -- with new language -- gratis.

He and Brit Hume seem to think it most likely that the Navy did this of its own accord. And its reason for doing so? John Forbes Kerry was now the junior Senator from Massachusetts. Both men said this wouldn't be the first time one of the services had kissed up to a Senator or an important Congressmen in the hopes that somewhere down the line they might receive a positive vote on a weapons system. (Of course, in the case of John Forbes Kerry, all such hopes were dashed.)

That doesn't exactly settle the issue, and it's possible that Kerry requested new language making him seem more heroic, but it does suggest that this is probably not something which will end in some juicy revelation.

Now that that's out of the way, let's get to the important stuff:

Over at Shamu's House of Fish Stix, a commenter made this point:

Some of your posts (and the resulting threads) have focused on how Malkin looks in these unflattering shots from the interview. Because of remarks you've made in the past about certain types of personal attacks against you, it surprises me that you would resort to such petty teasing when there is so much actual content to debate.

Sort of a good point, no? Especially considering that Grimmace cries foul when you point out that he looks like Weeble with a metabolic imbalance.

But Grimmace doesn't back down:

I think she has crazy eyes. I'm sorry but it's true. I also think she's quite attractive. She can call me beady-eyed if she wants, because I am.

Well, Oliver sure seems highly restrictive about what personal, looks-based insults Ms. Malkin can offer in return. He deigns to allow her to respond that he's beady-eyed.

Well, he is beady-eyed. But, on the list of things that are unappetizing about Shamu's appearance, anything involving his eyes clocks in no higher than Number 657. The very fact that he has two of them counts in his favor, given his other, rather more compelling problems.

With all due respect, Chubbsy McLipidsac, if you attack someone on what you find to be the worst aspect of their appearance, they're allowed to attack you back on whichever part of your appearance they find most disagreeable, not just some minor flaw you've come to grips with.

And I'm no bodyist or whatnot, but I would say that your biggest problem involves, how do I put this delicately?, your gigantic sagging man-ass and big flopping he-tits.

I'm sorry but it's true. If you must, you can criticize me for my eyelashes, which have just never been as lush or as sultry as I might like. I, like most other men of my age group, have just never gotten over the fact that I didn't grow up to be Nick Rhodes of Duran Duran.


posted by Ace at 01:22 AM
Comments



I can't breathe after "Chubbsy McLipidsac." I only have enough lung capacity left...FOR A HAIKU...

Michelle's beady eyes
Stir Chubbsy McLipidsac.
If he's brown she's down.

Posted by: Joe R. on August 21, 2004 02:42 AM

Has Willis ever made any TV appearances? Surely any animated discussion of his caught on videotape would offer numerous frames to be extracted out of context and scorn applied. See how he likes it.

Problem is, Malkin, old married with children sort though she may be, is a fox even when caught in a goofy expression but Willis the ugly going 24/7/365.

Posted by: Eric Pobirs on August 21, 2004 03:44 AM

I think OTubb's most fetching feature is his huge, buddah-like head.

which brings to mind a line from one of my favorite movies:

"I'm not kidding, that boy's head is like Sputnik; spherical but quite pointy at parts! Aye, now that was offsides, now wasn't it? He'll be crying himself to sleep tonight, on his huge pillow."

Posted by: Matt Navarre on August 21, 2004 06:05 AM

Hmmm...don't you think all this O-Dub thwacking is getting gratuitously mean?

I mean, it's fucking funny as hell - Chubbsy McLipidsac will live in infamy, oh yes - but still, it seems a bit around the bend. Sure he's a tired hack who coincidentally happens to be grotesquely, revoltingly overweight, but it seems to be in bad taste to constantly harp on it.

Perhaps the Ace has a link to previous posts which explain why he's conceived such contempt for Willis? (I'm open to being convinced!)

Posted by: Jeff B. on August 21, 2004 08:52 AM

Ahh, but lets see how many people are talking about Michelle Malkin versus Ollie (I also added in cowbells)

http://www.blogpulse.com/trend?query1=%22Oliver+Willis%22&label1=Olliver+%22Biggie%22+Willis&query2=%22Michelle+Malkin%22&label2=Michelle+%22Hottie%22+Malkin&query3=cowbell&label3=

Notice that more people talk about cowbells than they do Oliver. That's gotta hurt.

Posted by: Sharp as a Marble on August 21, 2004 10:12 AM

Perhaps the Ace has a link to previous posts which explain why he's conceived such contempt for Willis? (I'm open to being convinced!)

1) Willis is a facile hypocrite. I've previously linked how he became so pro Bush and a hawk immediately post 911 (including saying we needed to take out Saddam). Yet, for example, today he says "the candidate of the Democratic party is John Kerry, and he’s seen this president preside over the largest terrorist attack ever in the history of this nation, responding by a half-assed attack in Afghanistan...."

Afghanistan? Willis backed Afghanistan to the hilt.

2) Look at what Willis is currently advertising on his side bar: "Checkpoint, a novel by Nicholson Baker."

Do you know what this book is about? Whether assassinating President Bush is justified.

Yet hypocrite Willis talks about how he "believes in the heroic ideal," whereas Republicans must be stopped because they're a "perversion of democracy" and "they’re destroying the soul of America."

I think "Magnetite to Stupid" deserves at the least a few fat jokes.

Posted by: Nicholas Kronos on August 21, 2004 01:23 PM

Taking still frames from a video to make people look weird is an old trick. I suggest people set their vcrs, tivos, whatever, to record their favorite lefty bloggers and do the same to them and post them. I would love to see stills from a video of atrios.

Posted by: julie on August 21, 2004 01:45 PM

Taking still frames from a video to make people look weird is an old trick. I suggest people set their vcrs, tivos, whatever, to record their favorite lefty bloggers and do the same to them and post them.

Could this be the secret motivation behind Professor Reynolds' oft repeated claim that Oliver Willis is "perfect for TV?"

Oh, that would be sweet.

I do believe, however, that Instapundit's seeming endorsement on that front IS a cloaked insult. (Notice how sparing he is with truly harsh words for bloggers? He went off - relatively speaking - on Joshua Micah Ezekiel Haggai Amos Nahum Zechariah Marshall once and I was taken aback since it was so out of character.)

Posted by: Jeff B. on August 21, 2004 02:40 PM

Perhaps the Ace has a link to previous posts which explain why he's conceived such contempt for Willis? (I'm open to being convinced!)

Well, I echo everything Nick said.

My main beefs with Willis are these:

1) Willis got linked by Instapundit a lot in the beginning.

Honesty compels me to admit this. So chalk some of this up to envy. (I don't really need to envy him anymore as regards traffic, but then, he is getting those Soros-bucks.)

But part of the problem I have with Willis is that he is overhyped and overread for the pitifully poor writer and thinker he is. If he were only getting a couple of hundred visits per day, I wouldn't pick on him, because he wouldn't be getting traffic disproportionate to his talent, and because I wouldn't probably even have heard of him.

Josh Marshall has an undeserved reputation for being a "reasonable liberal." Oliver Willis has an undeserved reputation. Period. No one should have ever heard of him, and I'm physically angry that I am confronted on a daily basis with the evidence of his insignificant existence.

2) Building on point 1: He's not funny. He has never written a single funny line. And yet he's one of those guys who thinks he's funny.

I find this personally offensive. A man should know his limitations.

3) Also building on point 1: He has nothing interesting to say. Has Willis ever written a post that took on an issue in a novel or interesting way? No, he has not, and I've checked.

All he does is link Josh Marshall or whatnot or whoever. This is especially repulsive, because he, in his not-funny way, "invented" the phrase "Right Wing Wurlitzer" to (poorly and unhumorously) describe right wing bloggers who do little but link/parrot the opinions of others.

One would think that someone making such a charge would be required, at least once per month, to come up with his own new take on things-- something original, something interesting. Not only doesn't he do this (it's beyond his capacity), but he furthermore doesn't even make an effort.

I've never even seen him attempt to write an "Important Post" and then fail.

4) He cries racism over fat-jokes. "Fat" is not a race, first of all. And then this Double-D Darling calls people like Limbaugh fat.

5) He cries foul over "attacks on his looks." But then he attacks others on their looks-- even if they're smokin' hot, like Michelle Malkin.

6) He's a kneejerk Kool-Aid leftist.

I could go on and on, but it would get repetitive. I can only repeat: Unfunny, untalented, unoriginal, uninteresting, unperceptive, wildly hypocritical, often dishonest, but sadly not unread.

Posted by: ace on August 21, 2004 03:46 PM

Well, in that case...pass the filet-o-fish.

Posted by: Jeff B. on August 21, 2004 04:59 PM

He cries foul over "attacks on his looks." But then he attacks others on their looks. . .

Have a video of him??

Posted by: julie on August 21, 2004 07:22 PM

I have fabulous eyelashes.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on August 21, 2004 10:53 PM

I love Britt. He can convey so much with a look and a tone of voice.

Posted by: Jane on August 22, 2004 01:28 PM

"...didn't grow up to be Nick Rhodes..."
I'm freakin' crying and my wife's looking in the office wondering what the hell I'm doing that is so damn funny.

Posted by: TC-LeatherPenguin on August 22, 2004 01:59 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
On "Professor" Arday:
He was their living lawn jockey, period. They won't say that 'cause they're sensitive and down with his struggle and all. He was there to appease and flatter their sense of being uplifters of the oppressed. In truth, he served as their living lawn jockey -- no more, no less, and unworthy of even a second thought on their part. Tokenism, pure and simple.
-- Krebs v Carnot
Ireland's 'Air Force One' lacks a key safety system for fog -- thanks to country's ban on Israeli products
Ireland's best emigrated 150 years ago. The current Ireland is a sad joke. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: More Iran bluster from Trump? Enough! Deportations hit a record, and that is a good thing for all, Todd Blanche's nomination is out of committee, the DSA is on the march, and more!
The Short Unhappy Life of a Russian Soldier: Why recruits die in 20-30 minutes
Interesting video. Some key parts: drones were responsible for 70-80% of all battlefield deaths in mid-2025, and I bet it's higher now. The Russian army is incredibly corrupt. Men get assigned to the most dangerous frontline units, the "Storm" units, unless they pay a superior $2,000 to be assigned to a different unit. Furthermore, there is often no real training for recruits -- commanders pocket the money that would have gone towards fuel and ammo costs incurred during training. Much "training" consists just of taking a single picture of soldiers doing something soldier-y, like fording a river, and publishing that as proof that the training was done. Even when it is done, training is only two weeks long.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton discuss the Berlin attack, Iran...Again! Sefton's mini Odyssey review, Data Republican's blockbuster reveal about the DNC, and more!
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click
She's totally committed to major independence
She's a lady through and through
She gives them quite a battle, all that they can handle
She'll bruise some, she'll hurt some too
I got something done yesterday and am exhausted.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky
[CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Illegals registered and voted in NJ! Leftist violence is baked into the Democrat cake, Iran's capabilities are being degraded, Londonistan? And...come on SC...no senate dynasties!
Update to the video of a Russian soldier being spun around and thrown by the machinegun he was operating: The soldier was testing an old, archaic Russian machinegun intended to be mounted to a helicopter. The old gun was pressed into service as a possible anti-drone gun. The Russian army is generally depleted and being forced to bring a lot of old, unreliable weapons and platforms to the front.
Also: Ukranian drones have destroyed damaged [CBD] over 147 Russian warships and shadow fleet oil tankers in the Black Sea over the past ten days.
Top Men!
FDA is providing an update regarding the sample of lettuce supplied by Taylor Farms de Mexico which was reported positive on July 18, 2026. Due to the complexity in detection of Cyclospora, FDA laboratory experts re-reviewed the sample results and have concluded that the finding does not represent true amplification and should be considered a false positive. Information about the sample has been removed from the July 18, 2026, update below. FDA has notified Taylor Farms and continues working with the firm to ensure product implicated in this outbreak has been removed from the market. FDA and state partners continue to collect and analyze product samples. As of July 19, 2026, there are no confirmed positive sample results for product testing for Cyclospora.
[CBD]
Recent Comments
Crusader: "And then proceeded to let the plane full of White ..."

four seasons: " Gref, That is cool ..."

Count de Monet: "Alien space queen Doll Eyes Alex now looking for a ..."

Mark Andrew Edwards, buy ammo [/b][/i]: "116 D-Lamp was a man before his time. Posted by: ..."

Mike Hammer, etc., etc.: "But the NTSB and the FAA will firmly declare that ..."

fd: "AOC is not hot. I don't care what anybody says. Sh ..."

Gref: "Here's a 'The War Zone' story about a US Army HUMV ..."

Anna Puma: "Fran Drescher > Francesca Hong ..."

[/b][/i][/u][/s]I used to have a different nic: "[i]Hey everyone, AOC broke up with her boyfriend. ..."

Geckos Anonymous: "Why does Francesca Hong look like a hung over geck ..."

Count de Monet: "And the yeast shall inherit the earth. We've ta ..."

fd: "Broke up with her boyfriend and is freezing her eg ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives