Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Ace's Application For An Austrian Artistic Grant | Main | Suspected DU Poster Arrested »
December 29, 2005

Bahraini Feminist Tees Off On Islamic Pedophilia, Subjugation of Women

By Allah:

Ghada Jamshir: "Does the Islamic Shari'a authorize mut'ah marriages? Does the Islamic Shari'a authorize mut'ah according to the following classification: 'Pleasure from sexual contact with her thighs.' They have: 'Pleasure from sexual touching,' 'pleasure from sexual contact with her breasts.' 'Pleasure from a little girl.' Do you know what 'pleasure from a little girl' means? It means that they derive sexual pleasure from a girl aged two, three, or four."

Interviewer: "Let's not go into details..."

Ghada Jamshir: "Let me tell you what 'pleasure from sexual contact with her thighs' means..."

Interviewer: "Don't give me the details..."

Ghada Jamshir: "This is a violation of children's rights! This constitutes sexual assault of the girl. What does 'pleasure from sexual contact with her thighs' mean? It means deriving sexual pleasure from an infant. How old is an infant? One year, a year and a half, a few months?

"Is it conceivable for a grown man to have sex with an infant girl? And you people tell me that the Islamic Shari'a authorizes this? Forget about the mut'ah. Let's talk about misyar. What do misyar marriages mean? You said that I'm a Sunni and that's why I'm attacking the Shiites. No!"

Interviewer: "Some people claim that."

Ghada Jamshir: "No, no. What does the misyar marriage mean? A man marries a woman from another town, and goes to her once a month. He 'visits' her. He calls her his 'wife.'"

Interviewer: "Not necessarily once a month. He might go there every day."

Ghada Jamshir: "Brother Turki, this kind of marriage, this kind of behavior, diminishes the woman's honor as a human being."

[...]

"All her life, the woman is a prisoner in her own home. In the past, she would not go out to work, or to study abroad. Very few women would go to university outside Bahrain. She is at home in order to cook, sweep, and raise the children. How will she get an education? There are women whose families are extremist. They even force them to marry against their will.

"You tell me, why is female circumcision still practiced in the Arab world? Why? Because there is no education, no awareness. A few days ago, a four-year-old girl called An'am died in Sudan."

Interviewer: "Why?"

Ghada Jamshir: "Because she had been circumcised. Four years old, and she died of blood poisoning."

At the end, the interviewer brings up the fact that she's (obviously) been accused of heresy, and she basically says she doesn't give a wet shit.

I'm not a Freudian. Or at least I wasn't. I probably don't believe in the particulars of his theories (I don't know what they are, except that he thinks that pooping affects your psychological make-up), but I am starting to believe that sex is the motivation for 90% of the goofy, bizarre, and cruel things humans do.

Why don't more feminists support women like this, and women generally in the Islamic world? I know Jay Leno's wife, a liberal feminist, was a pretty big advocate for women in Afghanistan; I just wish there were more like her.

Why do we only hear about this woman from MEMRI? Why doesn't Katie Freaking Couric interview her on the Today Show?

It's the liberation of women that hardline psychosexual-dysfunctional Islamist men fear the most. And it may end up being that Islamic women wind up bringing the mullahs to bear.

And then, a hundred years from now, they'll screw everything up, like they've done in America. But let's just kick that particular can down the road and deal with it later.

Related: In France, a Muslim girl has broke her silence about the repeated gang-rapes she was subjected to and has written a book about it.


posted by Ace at 03:38 PM
Comments



I was amazed at that interview. BIG BALLS that woman has. Feminism (over here and in Europe) is all blather compared to what this woman is fighting against. And, crickets from them (because it doesn't fit into their anti-war, anti-interventionist attitude. )

Posted by: carin on December 29, 2005 03:41 PM

I'm all hot and bothered by this - because American Feminist NEVER EVER EVER had to face this type of crap. The right to vote or work is nothing compared to their life. Compared to the feminists at Planned parenthood ( crying over the slippery slope of late-term abortion leading to back alley abortions) - well, it's just silly.

Posted by: carin on December 29, 2005 03:45 PM
Why don't more feminists support women like this, and women generally in the Islamic world? I know Jay Leno's wife, a liberal feminist, was a pretty big advocate for women in Afghanistan; I just wish there were more like her.

I got into it with Hubris about this on Goldstein's blog a few weeks ago. The exchange picks up here. His point was that just because feminist bloggers don't write a particular incident of misogyny in the Third World doesn't mean they don't care about it. My point was that it's not just a single incident here and there; it's a pattern of omission, and patterns are significant. We also disagreed about the extent to which American feminists could influence conditions for Muslim women simply by writing it about here.

Posted by: Allah on December 29, 2005 03:51 PM

For me, it's the ridiculousness of the situation. Here, women are fighting for ... what? The morning-after pill? And, in Bahrain they want to go though life with their clitori intact. To not be forced into marriage at the age of 11 to some old goat.

Feminist don't want to talk about it, here, because it doesn't fit in with the leftist agenda they've signed up for.

Posted by: carin on December 29, 2005 04:01 PM

Damn, remind me to make sure Carin is on my side in an argument/knife fight.....

Righteous anger rocks!

Posted by: WunderKraut on December 29, 2005 04:04 PM
Feminist don't want to talk about it, here, because it doesn't fit in with the leftist agenda they've signed up for.

Yes, there's much truth to that. I had a big blow-up with one of the Feministas over a post she wrote asking whether the hijab might be a source of empowerment. Dress up misogyny in brown skin and poverty and America's women warriors suddenly turn gun-shy. Highly illuminating.

So that's one reason they duck Third-World women-hatred: as white girls, they've been taught they have no right to judge. The other reason? It simply doesn't affect them. Sure, little girls by the thousands get their clits burned off; but it's not like America can do anything about that, right? Besides, there's some dude in South Dakota who's mouthing off about abortion. We'd better take care of him before we start worrying about burqas.

Like I said to Hubris, it seems that sisterhood ends at the water's edge.

Posted by: Allah on December 29, 2005 04:08 PM

Let's see what's on the home page of the National Organization for Women:

Enraged & Engaged: Women's Campaign to Defeat Alito

Take Action to Defeat Alito

Cheney's Vote Ensures Passage of Senate Bill to Cut Services

Senate Democrats Block Reauthorization; House Briefly Extends Current Act

Women and Abortions: The Reasoning Behind the Decision

Conservatives Oppose New Cervical Cancer Vaccine

Effort to Reinstate Data Collection on Women Workers Stalled

VAWA Passes in Congress, Ready for President's Signature

News on Mentor Corp. Reveals Disdain for Women's Health

NOW Joins Protest of FEMA Response to Hurricane Katrina (editorial note: you have got to be f'in kidding me)

NOW Fights Clinic Violence in Cases Before Supreme Court

Hundreds March from El Paso to Mexico in Protest of Femicide

NOW Backs Plaintiffs in New Hampshire Abortion Notice Case

Year-End Tax Deduction

Posted by: Slublog on December 29, 2005 04:09 PM

It's the liberation of women that hardline psychosexual-dysfunctional Islamist men fear the most.

Yup, that's it.

Remember that bandwagon about Afghanistan's women, with Laura Bush at the lead? How long did THAT concern last, and the Taliban is surging back now...

OT, but remember that thread about how great the Kurds were doing, and why doesn't the press cover it more?

Ooops.

KIRKUK, Iraq - Kurdish leaders have inserted more than 10,000 of their militia members into Iraqi army divisions in northern Iraq to lay the groundwork to swarm south, seize the oil-rich city of Kirkuk and possibly half of Mosul, Iraq's third-largest city, and secure the borders of an independent Kurdistan.

Five days of interviews with Kurdish leaders and troops in the region suggest that U.S. plans to bring unity to Iraq before withdrawing American troops by training and equipping a national army aren't gaining traction. Instead, some troops that are formally under U.S. and Iraqi national command are preparing to protect territory and ethnic and religious interests in the event of Iraq's fragmentation, which many of them think is inevitable.

The soldiers said that while they wore Iraqi army uniforms they still considered themselves members of the Peshmerga - the Kurdish militia - and were awaiting orders from Kurdish leaders to break ranks. Many said they wouldn't hesitate to kill their Iraqi army comrades, especially Arabs, if a fight for an independent Kurdistan erupted.

"It doesn't matter if we have to fight the Arabs in our own battalion," said Gabriel Mohammed, a Kurdish soldier in the Iraqi army who was escorting a Knight Ridder reporter through Kirkuk. "Kirkuk will be ours."

Read the whole thing, linked on the OOPS. I pointed this out a few days ago, which put lots of folks here in a tizzy (= lots ofperonal insults, virtually no one addressing the issue). Funny how that works.

Posted by: tubino on December 29, 2005 04:16 PM

Way to avoid the issue though.

Good job!

Posted by: Coalition to Stop Threadjacking on December 29, 2005 04:20 PM

The Muslim woman in France wrote that book a couple of years ago, she has since died of stomach cancer. Just a really sad life. You should see pictures of her though. Very pretty. Bellil is her last name.

Posted by: michele on December 29, 2005 04:30 PM

"Dress up misogyny in brown skin and poverty and America's women warriors suddenly turn gun-shy."
-posted by Allah

You have no idea how true this is. It reminds me of a conversation I had with a feminist prof that was teaching a course on Women and Religion. She admitted to me that women were treated badly by Islam but she didn't want to bring too much attention to it (or atleast tried to balance it out by talking about the misogynistic things about Early Christianity and Orthodox Judaism) mainly because she didn't want to play into the "racists" and she didn't want to offend her female students that came from that part of the world. This feminist went as far as to give the "context" for FGM lest we jumped to racist/patriarchal/imperialistic/triumphalist conclusions. It's kind of ironic though. These type of feminists think that this sort of treatment is good enough for brown women and that we should not judge but once it starts to effect their sisters and their daughters, they get all uppity and shit. Imagine that.

Posted by: arch on December 29, 2005 04:33 PM
How long did THAT concern last, and the Taliban is surging back now...

Any minute now. The last four years? Just a fake-out to lull us to sleep. Someday soon we'll all wake up to news of the mighty Talib war machine rolling down main street in Kabul. The trap is sprung.

Re: the Kurds, that'll be a neat trick having to fight the Iraqi and Turkish militaries at the same time. But we'll see. If only Saddam were there to lay down the law.

I'm just grateful we have honorable critics like you, tubby, who want so desperately for us to win that you'd risk the mockery of the Ace of Spades commenter contingent to bring us the day's bad news. Day after day. As they say, eternal vigilance is the price of defeatism.

Posted by: Allah on December 29, 2005 04:37 PM

I think Allah pretty much nailed it. Several of my female friends regard themselves as serious feminists and gay-rights advocates--and, of course, foes of the evil W. When I ask how they can be so apathetic about a culture that's so virulently homophobic and misogynistic, they basically get embarrassed and sort of look down and scuff their feet.

The reason, of course, is that multi-culti PC forbids one to have an opinion about what non-Westerners do. This leads to a sort of benign but thoroughgoing racism, where it's assumed that non-white, non-Christian people don't have the same feelings as People Like Us. You see the same thing in the anti-globalization movement, which would love to see people in Thailand living in villages of bamboo huts that the protestors would never consider living in.

Strange. In the "progressive" worldview, it's barbaric to catch a trout because they feel pain just like we do. But little Muslim girls getting their genitals mutilated don't get much attention, because their feelings are completely different. The progressive mindset gets a little uglier every time you look at it.

Posted by: utron on December 29, 2005 04:45 PM

Oh Moon God--

As a wise man noted: it's not who they are underneath, it's what they do that defines them.

Posted by: someone on December 29, 2005 04:46 PM

Yeah, funny how the only patriarchal oppressors are white guys in suits who tell dirty jokes and belong to all male card clubs, as far as some are concerned. State run "virtue" police who beat the shit out of women for showing ankle skin and swarthy gentlemen who murder their daughters for dating get a pass. Oh, yeah, and so do octopus former presidents, provided they spout the right watery platitudes.

Posted by: UGAdawg on December 29, 2005 05:04 PM

and the Taliban is surging back now...

Don't let that little gem slip past you. The implication there is the US fucking military is l.o.s.i.n.g. in Afghanistan.

It's a total failure, my good people. You're being led by bad people. Get out while you can. Save your country from defeat.

Posted by: tubino on December 29, 2005 05:10 PM

Ha ha, very funny. Looks like we have an imposter in our presence.

Posted by: the real tubino on December 29, 2005 05:11 PM

I'm sure troll will be the first to weep when the "surging" taleban retakes Afghanistan. So, how does this l.o.s.i.n.g. occur? Will the taliban storm the cities, take over the roads? Will our bombs and bullets suddently go silent, unable to shoot? This troll is consistently unable to offer any thoughts that contribute anything other than chicken little, we are all gonna die because of W bullshit.

If there has been an accurate prediction made by guys like this, I'd like to know.

How'd ya make out this Fitzmas, anyway? You know, I think that if you keep this up, you might just get W out of office, around Jan 2008, but still, its the thought that counts.

Posted by: joeindc44 on December 29, 2005 05:15 PM

Jesus tapdancing Christ, isn't one tubino more than enough already?

Posted by: zetetic on December 29, 2005 05:15 PM

This is like a bad 80's TV show where the villian is cornered in the hall of mirrors. I can't tell who is who! To tell the truth, phony tubino probably just cut and pasted an earlier tubino post.

Posted by: joeindc44 on December 29, 2005 05:19 PM

It's easy to tell that I am the original tubino. Who else uses "oops" to label links?

Who else would enter a thread about a subject -- countering the abuse of women -- we ALL could agree on but use it to rant against Bush and the war effort?

Posted by: tubino on December 29, 2005 05:25 PM

*I'm* Tubino!

Posted by: tubino on December 29, 2005 05:28 PM

C'mon, only the real tubino would say UR-tubino.

I don't know about getting a pass on misogynism. I move around in lib circles (imagine that!), and ALL are QUICK to point out the absolute unlivability for women in an Islamic fundamentalist society. Of course the same is said about a CHRISTIAN fundamentalist society, but no one imagines one is as bad as the other. I think you are attacking your own straw man.

If you think that a resurgence of the Taliban = US losing militarily, you are wrong. (Why are some able to only think of binary oppositions???)

Check out Juan Cole's top 10 myths about Iraq to see another way.

Myth #3 is 3. The guerrillas are winning the war against US forces.

He tosses that out thusly:
The guerrillas are really no more than mosquitos to US forces. The casualties they have inflicted on the US military, of over 2000 dead and some 15,000 wounded, are deeply regrettable and no one should make light of them. But this level of insurgency could never defeat the US military in the field.

But the Taliban in Afghanistan does not have to defeat the US militarily. It just has to outlast them.

Read the rest of Cole's piece. Great stuff.

Posted by: The Ur-tubino on December 29, 2005 05:29 PM

No! *I'm* Tubino!

Posted by: tubino on December 29, 2005 05:29 PM

I am tubino!

Posted by: Spartacus on December 29, 2005 05:29 PM

*I'm* Tubino, and so is my wife!

Posted by: tubino and his wife on December 29, 2005 05:30 PM

The real tubino

Redundant. Ridiculous. Remonstrative.

accept no substitute

Posted by: Dave in Texas on December 29, 2005 05:30 PM

I am Spartacus!

Posted by: Tony Curtis on December 29, 2005 05:31 PM

Okay, I'm getting really confused. Spartacus is Tubino, and Dave in Texas is Don King?

Posted by: utron on December 29, 2005 05:32 PM

Nice try, fake tubino.
I told you all before that I don't link to the "loony" left sites. You all think I do, but I don't.

Posted by: tubino on December 29, 2005 05:32 PM

You like me! You really like me!

Posted by: Yet another tubino on December 29, 2005 05:35 PM

Only trust the LONG posts to be by the real tubino.

I wish I could be tubino. When is he going to get a blog?

Posted by: tubino wanna-be on December 29, 2005 05:38 PM

and she didn't want to offend her female students that came from that part of the world.
Arch

It's not just offending those that come from "that part of the world". They ( meaning the left leaning anti-war feminist educators/bloggers/writers) know in no uncertain terms that should they cross the "agenda line" they run the risk of losing audience because they no longer focus on issues that directly impact ( insert name) personal gripes or desires. And would therefore become noise because the flavor of ice cream wasn't to the liking of the group du jour. Not exactly enlightened or progressive but then again how much of that niche really wants equality for all women v.s. the ones that just focus in on why they can't have what they want when they want it, and who they get to nail to the cross because of it .

Posted by: Tres on December 29, 2005 05:38 PM

Its outrageous but typically arrogant for Americans to assume that their society is qualitatively better than that of Middle Eastern countries.

Some of these countries have excellent socialized medicine, and clitorectimies are provided to children FREE OF CHARGE.

Can we say the same in Chimpy's Merka?

Didn't think so.

Posted by: very small tube on December 29, 2005 05:41 PM

He only links to websites that argue that the NYT's is carrying W's water. Or that 4 roadside bombs a day will drive the US from Iraq or Afghanistan.

Real middle of the road website.

Posted by: joeindc44 on December 29, 2005 05:42 PM

My name is Tubino, Lib of Libs
Look on my links ye Rethuglicans and despair.

Posted by: percy bysshe tubino on December 29, 2005 05:44 PM

Come on, guys. I thought you were above this sort of nonsense. I don't link to Jaun Cole. Tom Friedman, maybe, but not Cole.

Posted by: tubino on December 29, 2005 05:48 PM

Damn the f**cking military, full screed ahead!

Posted by: Admiral David tubino Farragut on December 29, 2005 05:49 PM
Read the rest of Cole's piece. Great stuff.

Left-wingers come in here all the time and whine that Ace and his readers see the war through rose-colored glasses. Fair enough; it's no secret that most of us desperately want the news to be good, and are willing to emphasize the positive in a story when the news is mixed.

But Juan Cole does precisely the same thing, only from the other end. In fact, he's far more willing to spin the news negatively than we are to spin it positively, since his academic reputation is to some degree on the line here. So why should anyone treat him as some sort of objective analyst? He's the doomsayer di tutti doomsayers.

Believe me, I understand not trusting a guy who sees only good no matter how bad things get. That's one of my big problems with Hewitt. Why would I give Juan Cole the benefit of the doubt when he's Hewitt's mirror image?

Posted by: Allah on December 29, 2005 05:56 PM

Yes, Juan, another umbrella drink coming up!!!

Posted by: cabana tubino on December 29, 2005 06:00 PM

I said "great stuff." That means bad for America. It doesn't necessarily mean it is worthwhile reading or particular good insight.

Geez, you'd think you guys would know me by now.

Posted by: tubino on December 29, 2005 06:04 PM

The organization those poor girls need is not NOW, it's NRA.

Posted by: vivi on December 29, 2005 06:15 PM

You guys are missing the point. It's NOW -- the National Organization of Women. As in, who gives a crap about all those women in other countries, I WANT MY DAMNED ABORTIONS AND I WANT REDNECK JESUS-FREAKS FROM MISSISSIPPI TO PAY FOR THEM!!!

Freakin' fetuses. Always making me buy large tubs of mayonaise...

Posted by: Sobek on December 29, 2005 07:31 PM

I call upon G-d to strike American feminists with dumb tongues and dumb minds until they are willing to use their steel-tipped boots to knock down the doors of the abuse of women and children in backwards parts of the world. It is utter hypocrisy and worthy of all peoples' complete disdain and unfettered condemnation that these proponents of women, and their equality in all areas, will be so cowardly as to run away from such issues that matter. While campaigning with words filled with vitriol, hatred, and fear-mongering, they strike those who do not oppress while they remain silent and mute when it comes to the tears, sighs, cries, and shrieks of misery from the women of other areas of the world. How can we consider ourselves one humanity when we do not care about others?

I have read conservatives condemn these...inhuman spawn of Hell--these oppressors and abusers--with more regularity and vehemence than anyone on the Left, who seem to be more interested in relativism and coddling the primitive, misogynist, and violence-prone practices of others. I spit in their general direction. I flick my chin at them. I bite my thumb at them. To them I show mano cornuta. I display my open palm in their faces.

The blood of these abused women, it is on their heads.
The blood of their mutilations, it is on their heads.
Their deaths by abusive spouses, they are on their heads.
Their deaths by their own hands, to escape their utterly miserable existence with no say or rights, they are on their heads.
The tears and cries of the abused and oppressed, they are on their heads.

They who refuse to speak out against these atrocities are complicit in it. May G-d avenge the innocents who have been oppressed and abused. All the peoples of the world: may their eyes become opened to these unacceptable abominations, may their mouths open in unreserved condemnation, and may their feet and hands move as one to bring down these regimes of abuse and inequality.

It is unacceptable for anyone to hide behind culture, tradition, or religion to preserve their abominable practices. The practices are an abomination, period. May the abominations be wiped out.

(Can you tell this boils my blood?)

Posted by: Muslihoon on December 29, 2005 10:00 PM

Well, you've seen it, and we have not.

Posted by: lauraw on December 29, 2005 10:36 PM

The greatest power of the Muslim man against his women is the ability to cloister and isolate them.

Posted by: lauraw on December 29, 2005 10:39 PM

Wait, Juan Cole opposed Harriet Miers?

I'm going to have to give him another chance.

Posted by: someone on December 29, 2005 10:55 PM

Qualification: in the comments posted above, posted at "10:00 PM," the condemnation and other negative sentiments expressed are directed solely to those feminists who do not speak up against the abominable atrocities mentioned in the same set of comments.

Regarding those who speak up, we impore G-d to bless them abundantly, and hope that their efforts shall bear plentiful fruit.

Posted by: Muslihoon on December 29, 2005 11:16 PM

lauraw: Very correct. A woman who would disobey her husband in this regard would be considered a wanton (as opposed to wonton) woman, deserving whatever might happen to her. Women are not supposed to speak up.

What the hadith (sayings of Muhammad) and even the Qur'an say about women is simply reprehensible. Perhaps they have been better than general sentiments at that time, but the world has moved far beyond both the level of non-Muslims and the level of Islam's official pronouncements.

Islamists say that Islam put an end to female infanticide. Seems like this was only to repress them while they're alive.

I never thought I would ever say this publicly, but Islam is primitive (relatively), misogynist, and violent in essence.

Posted by: Muslihoon on December 29, 2005 11:20 PM

100,000 battered women in America, and all this time I've been eating mine plain.

Posted by: Insensitive Jerk on December 29, 2005 11:22 PM

Good point, IJ. But battering women is not culturally or socially accepted in America. Society looks down on men who batter their significant others.

Islam not only permits it, it recommends it. Verse 34, chapter 4 (surat-an-nisaa').

I don't want to come across as an irrational Islamophobe. I just believe there are significant issues Islam needs to sort out, and others need to be aware of this. Christianity and Judaism are criticized enough; now it's Islam's turn.

Posted by: Muslihoon on December 29, 2005 11:37 PM

Muslihoon, did you issue a "fatwa" in your earlier post at 10:00?

By the way, Mus, I agree the abuse of women is a serious problem. Growing up an to this day, I have no tolerance for bullies -- people who take advantage of the defenseless.

Posted by: Bart on December 29, 2005 11:42 PM

Good question, Bart. As the Self-Proclaimed Grand Mufti and Grand Ayatollah of Muslim Apostates, I issue it as a fatwaa. "wallaahu aa'lam."

:-)

Posted by: Muslihoon on December 29, 2005 11:54 PM

All Things Beautiful TrackBack 'Fatwas Authorizing Sexual Abuse Of Infants':

A piece of advice: take your blood pressure medication first, click on play below second. Thank you to Sigmund Carl & Alfred for the email, alerting me to this gem from the Muslim 'religion of peace'.....Ace Of Spades tells it like it is"

Posted by: Alexandra on December 30, 2005 05:03 AM

100,000 battered women in America, and all this time I've been eating mine plain.

I feel my earlier comment didn't get the traction it so deserved.

Posted by: Insensitive Jerk on December 30, 2005 01:55 PM

Why would you expect to get traction? I'm not going to placate ya--batter makes 'em go down smooth.

Posted by: The Emperor of Icrecream on December 30, 2005 02:03 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Leftists who have been drawing Frankendistricts for decades are suddenly upset about Republican line-drawing
Socialist usurper Obama cut commercials urging Virginians to vote for the bizarre "lobster" gerrymander -- but now says gerrymanders are so racist you guys
Obama is complaining about the new Louisiana map -- but here's the thing, the new map has much more compact and rational borders than the old racial gerrymander map
Pete Bootyjudge is whining too. But here's the Illinois gerrymander he supports.
Big Bonus! Under the new Florida congressional map, Debbie Wasserman Schultz will probably lose her seat
And she can't even go on The View because she's ugly a clump of stranger's hair in the bath-drain
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton Charge the Democrats with fomenting violence against the nation with their rhetoric, Virginia redistricting going down the tubes? Trump's bully pulpit is not censorship, Lee Zeldin is a star, J.B. Pritzker is an idiot, and more!
Recent Comments
Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "SO...Starmer is getting his ass kicked. Nice. ..."

...: "Posted by: nurse ratched at May 07, 2026 09:38 PM ..."

mikeski: "[i]ace is sort of updating it in the Side Bar Pos ..."

...: "Fetterman should change his name to Will Fetterman ..."

The rest of Tennessee: "[i]167 The left has killed itself through mal-educ ..."

runner: "ace is sort of updating it in the Side Bar ..."

runner: "Labour is having a very very very bad night! ..."

clarence: "GIB = Guy in Back or in this case Goober in Back. ..."

Itinerant Alley Butcher: " The left has killed itself through mal-education ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: "I don't allow my kids on social media. I guess the ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: " May I please ask for prayers for Zoe. Her gran ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: "I just heard a cool saying on an old episode of Wa ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives