Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Chuck Norris Moonlights As Cop, Kicks Down Doors, Makes Drug Arrests | Main | Last Time I'll Post This: Mystic Lion Beats Giant Ape »
December 28, 2005

Paleontologists Consider Possibility First Hominids Arose in Asia

Lucy Liu?

[Two archeologists] believe that early-human fossil discoveries over the past ten years suggest very different conclusions about where humans, or humanlike beings, first walked the Earth.

New Asian finds are significant, they say, especially the 1.75 million-year-old small-brained early-human fossils found in Dmanisi, Georgia, and the 18,000-year-old "hobbit" fossils (Homo floresiensis) discovered on the island of Flores in Indonesia.

Such finds suggest that Asia's earliest human ancestors may be older by hundreds of thousands of years than previously believed, the scientists say.

"What seems reasonably clear now," Dennell said, "is that the earliest hominins in Asia did not need large brains or bodies." These attributes are usually thought to be prerequisites for migration.

Not when you gots the mad kung-fu skillz, foolz!


posted by Ace at 08:50 PM
Comments



They are comparing fossils from supposedly 1,750,000 B.C. and 18,000 B.C. Interesting.

So the early humans were smaller for a long period of time and then suddenly had a growth spurt?

Aren't Asians generally small people?

Posted by: Bart on December 28, 2005 09:09 PM

Lots of paleontologists think that there were multiple emigrations out of Africa, and even some waves that returned and left again many eons later. The whole question of where Homo Sapiens comes from is kind of pointless: there were probably multiple lines of ancestry from Africa, Asia, and the European continent.

Interesting stuff.

Posted by: Monty on December 28, 2005 09:13 PM

What is this "originated from" bullshit?

All peoples of the world - all races: Asians, blacks, whites - were designed and placed in their respective dominant geographic regions by the intelligent designer, 25,000 years ago.

Right Brewfan? Bart? Tell these jerk-offs what's up!

Posted by: Bill from INDC on December 28, 2005 09:36 PM

I wouldn't be so bold and arrogant to pretend to know the origin of life.

You've got to love the round numbers that the scientists throw around - 1.75 million, 18 thousand. Oh look, a rock. Let me test it and determine its age. Gee, it's 2 million years old.

Really, Mr. Peabody? Wow, the Wayback Machine is awaesome and so smart.

No, Sherman, machines aren't smart, you silly boy. People are smart, and talking dogs are smart.

Posted by: Homo Erectus on December 28, 2005 09:47 PM

Why does human historical record begin less than 10,000 years ago?

Doesn't it strike any of you evolved apes that the human race lived like savages for millions of years and suddenly pyramids pop up and the technological and civil advances are, by comparison to the previous periods, are exponential in occurence?

Posted by: Godless Chimp on December 28, 2005 09:53 PM

Humans didn't arise until about 100,000 years ago, dude.

At what point do you imagine they should have begun great civilizations with permanent, lasting buildings and survivable writings? A thousand years after their appearance?

Whatever. The earth is 6,000 years old, however you like it. Dinosaur bones were buried by Satan to mislead us.

Posted by: ace on December 28, 2005 09:57 PM
Dinosaur bones were buried by Satan to mislead us.

That's why they call him the Wily Magician, my friend. If he's not stirring up rancor over the president's Supreme Court nominations, he's building fake triceratops heads.

Posted by: Allah on December 28, 2005 10:08 PM

Humans didn't arise until about 100,000 years ago, dude.

Well...depends on what you mean when you say human. Are you talking about Homo Sapiens? If so, you've got maybe 80,000 years back. Homo Erectus? Homo Habilis? The dividing line between other apes and human beings isn't a razor-sharp line; the common ancestor of Chimpanzees and modern humans lived about six million years ago, so any primate on the human side of that branch could be called "human".

Posted by: Monty on December 28, 2005 10:09 PM

Technology has a way of accelerating, once there are enough individuals with free time to think up shit.

Think of what has changed in just the last 50-100 yrs.

My grandmother died in 1994, and I never told her what a computer was, because I never figured out how to describe it to her.

My own grandmother, whose generation crossed into mine, had lived an agrarian lifestyle, and had cooked all food over a fire, and had lived in a house with no heat or electricity.

She was in her forties the first time she saw ice.
The Ice Man would regularly bring a big block of it for her new High Tech refrigerator.

And here I am, talking to you, wherever you are in the world, on my home computer.

That should seem even stranger to you, than how bands of primitive man, preyed upon by animals, living hand to mouth hadn't up and built gigantic monuments sooner.

Posted by: lauraw on December 28, 2005 10:24 PM

lauraw:

I know what you mean. One of the most amazing facts of the 20th century was that we went from Kitty Hawk to landing men on the moon in a little over sixty years. The technical-knowledge curve tends to be asymptotic; it has a sharp "elbow" at a certain point in technical development. Ray Kurzweil posits a notion of a singularity where humans essentially become trans-human -- technologies like nanotech and biotech will allow humans to live for centuries, if not longer. (His most recent book is called The Singularity is Near; it's a little over-the-top, but interesting speculation.)

Posted by: Monty on December 28, 2005 10:34 PM

My pet theory of why the Sumerians seem to have been illiterate for so long, and then sudenly produced all of these elaborite cuneoform documents is that they were just using sun dried clay for a long time. What they left behind where only the later oven baked recipts and stuff. Actually, that might not be my own pet theory, maybe I read it somewhere.

Posted by: Dave Munger on December 28, 2005 10:43 PM

66 years if memory serves Monty

Posted by: Dave in Texas on December 28, 2005 10:58 PM

Ray Kurzweil posits a notion of a singularity where humans essentially become trans-human -- technologies like nanotech and biotech will allow humans to live for centuries, if not longer.

Yeah, and beyond the theory of biological life extension (almost a minor corollary of the book) are the greater implications of the singularity - namely, that machine intelligence will surpass biological intelligence yet also further it as a technological extension of biological evolution, changing the nature of humanity and "non-humanity," and - eventually, theoretically - all the matter of the universe itself (the seemingly over-the-top part), if self-reinforcing technological innovation and paradigm shifts continue to accumulate exponentially. Think of thinking machines innovating thinking machines, biology and matter and energy themselves, all at will, in ways we don't currently have the intellectual processing power to fathom, and exponentially faster and faster, all the time. The best part being - we're entering the knee of the curve.

it all seems like bs, until you get some perspective at how quickly change has been accelerating, and review the old fable about the grain of rice.

http://www.punahou.edu/acad/sanders/geometrypages/GP11Fable.html

Posted by: Bill from INDC on December 28, 2005 11:02 PM

Resistance is futile.

Posted by: borg on December 28, 2005 11:12 PM
Think of thinking machines innovating thinking machines, biology and matter and energy themselves, all at will, in ways we don't currently have the intellectual processing power to fathom

...then becoming self-aware and (a) launching tactical nuclear strikes on major population centers to eliminate their human rivals, and (b) building a race of killer mesomorph robots with Austrian accents to mop up the nuke survivors.

Except the joke's on them. Because at the eleventh hour, Hugh Hewitt's going to appear, riding on the back of a magical talking lion, to smite the robot heathens in the valley of Megiddo. "Blog" will become the Bible of a post-apocalyptic world.

Looking forward to it!

Posted by: Allah on December 28, 2005 11:17 PM

This is the voice of World Control.

Posted by: forbin on December 28, 2005 11:27 PM

then becoming self-aware and (a) launching tactical nuclear strikes on major population centers to eliminate their human rivals,

Shortly after machines gain self-awareness, humans will probably be about as relevant to higher intelligence as the microscopic mites on your skin are to you. ("natural" humans, that is)

And another hole in your scenario: Hugh Hewitt IS a cyborg, designed, built and deployed by MIT researchers working from an RNC/Heritage Foundation grant.

Dumbass.

Posted by: Bill from INDC on December 28, 2005 11:38 PM
Shortly after machines gain self-awareness, humans will probably be about as relevant to higher intelligence as the microscopic mites on your skin are to you. ("natural" humans, that is)

You think you're formulating those thoughts on your own, Bill, but you know who's really responsible, don't you?

Right. The wily magician.

You probably opposed Harriet Miers, too. Figures.

Posted by: Allah on December 28, 2005 11:41 PM

I find your mockery of the destruction of the human race most peculiar.

Posted by: Data on December 28, 2005 11:45 PM
I find your mockery of the destruction of the human race most peculiar.

Some futurists are actually looking forward to it.

Which way, do you suppose, that guy leans politically?

Posted by: Allah on December 28, 2005 11:50 PM

To you, he is Professor de Garis.
To me, he is Father.

Posted by: Data on December 28, 2005 11:54 PM

You guys are getting weird. So I guess I can to.

(Isa 13:6-11 NIV) Wail, for the day of the LORD is near; it will come like destruction from the Almighty. {7} Because of this, all hands will go limp, every man's heart will melt. {8} Terror will seize them, pain and anguish will grip them; they will writhe like a woman in labor. They will look aghast at each other, their faces aflame. {9} See, the day of the LORD is coming --a cruel day, with wrath and fierce anger-- to make the land desolate and destroy the sinners within it. {10} The stars of heaven and their constellations will not show their light. The rising sun will be darkened and the moon will not give its light. {11} I will punish the world for its evil, the wicked for their sins. I will put an end to the arrogance of the haughty and will humble the pride of the ruthless.

Posted by: Michael on December 29, 2005 12:49 AM

Or, I could do Batman quotes, if you prefer.

Posted by: Michael on December 29, 2005 12:52 AM

Based on many other biblical descriptions of the "day of the Lord," I'm guessing that the Battle of Armegeddon will be fought with space-based energy weapons that have planet-destroying potential.

Understand, I'm just guessing.

These weapons are currently technologically possible. The engineering just needs to catch up.

Kind of like, ten years ago my cell phone was the size and shape of a brick. Now, it fits comfortably in my shirt pocket and I can take digital pictures with it.

Posted by: Michael on December 29, 2005 01:13 AM

Yeah they can fly a man to the moon only 66 years after the first powered flight but they can't get me a flying car. Exponential my ass.

Posted by: roc ingersol on December 29, 2005 09:35 AM

Gee according to those paliobable nit wits we were all suppst to have origionanted in africa from a dumb looking ape woman named LUCY looks to me like them evolutionists are the biggist liars or their just plan out of their minds

Posted by: spurwing plover on December 29, 2005 10:28 AM

You know, R Buckminster Fuller was pushing this idea 25 years ago in his book.

Posted by: TallDave on December 29, 2005 02:50 PM

Jared Diamond's The Third Chimpanzee asserts the first real humans evolved the voicebox around 100,000 years ago, allowing us to communicate in a much more meaningful way than had been possible up to that post.

Fuller, in Critical Path, noted that humans are odd in having no fur and being one of only 3 mammal species that cry saltwater tears (one of the others are dolphins), and speculated that this means at some point in human development all of protohumanity lived in the Asian atolls. He cites as further evidence of this some very old irrigation canals in the region.

Posted by: TallDave on December 29, 2005 03:11 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Chris
@chriswithans

aaahahaa.jpg


"Ahhhhh ahh I put my career on the line for Louise Lucas and Jay Jones thinking they'd vault me into presidential contention and we ended up costing Democrats 20 House seats and unleashing a Reverse Dobbs ahhhhh ahhh"
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near
Somebody else holds your heart, yeah
You turn to me with your icy tears
And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source"
Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held.
Basil the Great
@BasilTheGreat

🚨ED MILIBAND [a Minister in Starmer's government] SAYS KEIR STARMER WILL RESIGN AS PRIME MINISTER

He has reportedly reassured Labour MP's that Starmer will be resigning following the disastrous results tonight

It's over
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.

Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg
@zatzi
If this continues Labour loses 2,148 seats tonight.

That is much worse than the worst case predictions I’ve seen.

Cataclysmic

Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot
@TheBritLad

🚨 BREAKING: Labour have lost 80% of all seats contested as of 2:25 AM.<
br> If this continues, Keir Starmer will be out of office next week.

Reform has surged and projected to pick up between 1700-2100 seats.


Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing.
Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult.
Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending.
(((Dan Hodges)))
@DPJHodges

Reform are basically wiping Labour out in the North. It's not a defeat. It's not even a rout. Labour are simply ceasing to exist.


Nick Lowles
@lowles_nick

Tonight’s results are calamitous for Labour. Not just for Keir Starmer's leadership, but for the very future of the party
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98.
Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years.
Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour
Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45
Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%.
I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens.
REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs.
Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
spidermanthreatormenace.jpg

That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time.
I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Starting a new season, CBD and Sefton discuss their personal journeys to conservative principles, is Nick Shirley the beginning of a trend?, Iran trying to reignite the war, the Left attacks itself, even on "Best Guitarist" lists, and more!
Recent Comments
Methos: "Okay, they've just released some of the UFO files. ..."

Cicero (@cicero43): "Man, my IQ must be down like 80 points. I must hav ..."

Pug Mahon, Rock 'n' Roll Martian: "This will be my first Mother's Day since my Mom pa ..."

Have you ever thought about like, water?: "Did I keep losing 20 points for every boat? I m ..."

Krebs 'v' Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) Imprison! Imprison! Imprison! : "[i] "I Fell for the Bullshit About the Wonders of ..."

mindful webworker - but it does move!: "🛸Speaking of extraterrestrial secrets T ..."

Gotta think sales and marketing: "How about a "I Fell for the Bullshit About the ..."

JackStraw: ">>d. Buying a boat. Did I keep losing 20 points ..."

Krebs 'v' Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) Imprison! Imprison! Imprison! : " Fuck Off, You Perverts Day fixed! ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "Holy carp. Seattle media is promoting Other’ ..."

Krebs 'v' Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) Imprison! Imprison! Imprison! : "[i] The crew took photos. Posted by: publius, Ra ..."

four seasons: " Howz about Fuck Off Day you perverts. ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives