Uh, I know John Cole's had his anti-conservative meltdown moments, but don't you mean Juan Cole?

Meanwhile, looks like Zarqawi's stealing your schtick.

You mean they weren't hand delivering ballots to registered voters? Fascists.

So all human elections prior to the invention of the internal combuston engine are invalid too? That completely sucks.

I was wondering how the leftist/liberals were going to dismiss the election.

But this...this is totally unexpected. It just goes to show you, no matter how hard you try you can't think like a moonbat.

Yeah...

It sort of reminds me of people whining that filtering porn out of library computers violates the first amendment rights of the patrons. That sort of implies that nobody EVER had first amendment rights until internet porn was invented.

let's watch the lefties strain a muscle trying to put a negative spin on the election...

Timmy said "Think" and "Moonbat" in the same sentence. Ah, the innocence of youth....

Good ol' Rush.
He just said, "The Democrats lose another election...the Iraqi election...they couldn't stop it."

That man is worth every penny he earns.

I bet we can find this guy, or someone like him, decrying a the proposed requirement that voters actually identify themselves.

Imagine, trying to keep people from voting more than once, or from getting blown up whilst voting.

By this reasoning, we should throw out every single vote ever to be cast in New York City. Fine by me.

I hope someone is archiving "Informed Comment"; it will be useful in the future to illustrate just how spectacularly wrong an American academic can be.

The fact that, oh, 15 million people still managed to vote won't matter to Cole.

Heck next they're gonna start banning explosive vests - this election simply cannot be described as free or fair! No! It can't I tell you! It can't!! Don't you dare say otherwise - I say no one caan call this election free and fair! Why is no one listening to meeee?????

Seeing that the number of cars in Iraq increased tenfold after our liberation, his statement makes even less sense.

Democrats will complain if turnouts are too low, they'll complain if they're too high. Who knows what the ideal Goldilocks turnout for them is?

Remember Ohio 2004? First the Democrats spend months registering people and getting out the vote, then they actually COMPLAIN when the poll lines are so long from the record turn outs, to the point they start accusing Republicans of somehow rigging the polls for this to happen. Their get-out-the-vote efforts and even Democrats moving to Ohio so they can vote in a swing state played no role, it had to be a Republican conspiracy.

Well said. I totally agree with you. The point you are making here does make sense.