Quick Hits

Well, bye.

TheBlaze @theblaze

18m

Tucker Carlson says he is done with the GOP: "How could I support a party that puts the interests of a foreign country above its own citizens? I have been a consistent defender of the Republican party for 35 years, but there is no defending this. I'm out."

From Axios:

What they are saying: "I'm out," Carlson said on an episode of the "Can't Be Censored" podcast that aired last Thursday but gained traction online Monday.

"And if I'm out, then I think a lot of other people are out."

"I would not support the Republican Party. There's no chance I would support the Republican Party," Carlson said, adding that the GOP has "betrayed" voters by prioritizing Israel's national security over America's.

"How could I or any American voter support a political party that's not loyal to the United States. That puts the interests of a foreign country above those of its own citizens. It's not possible to vote for people like that, and I'm not going to."

Zoom in: Carlson says he's been a fierce defender of the GOP for 35 years, but can no longer do so.

He says he also won't support Democrats and is unsure how he'll vote moving forward.

He's pretending he's leaving. No, we threw your fat Nazi Hunter-Biden-loving ass out.

And I do mean that he's a Nazi. He has called for "violent" revolution (before claiming he never meant to say that). He is attempting to lead a violent overthrow of the US system in order to usher in a new white supremacist concept of the country.

Now I don't like the system any more than you do, but I do not want it challenged by violent revolutionaries led by this fat alcoholic grifter mental patient. I feel like Dirty Harry Callahan having to explain to the four rogue motorcycle cops that just because I hate scumbags doesn't mean I want to murder people in the streets.

JD Vance's efforts to appease the Tucker Carlson Bloc turn out to have been not just wrongheaded and unamerican, but foolish and futile. You can't appease a Nazi and you can't appease a brain-damaged lunatic.

And his new claims are that Al Qaeda didn't do 9/11.

Who did 9/11, then? You know who. Carlson hints that it's Israel but won't say so because he wants plausible deniability.

He also says that Israel killed Charlie Kirk.

Well, what he says is this: He denies that Kirk was killed by the gay furry lover for "transgenderism," and then declares he was killed over "his evolving views on Israel."

Which itself is a lie -- Kirk's views didn't evolve. When Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson kept badgering him to support Hamas' mission to destroy Israel, Kirk eventually gave them a noncommittal response like "Yeah I don't know if Israel should be knocking down buildings over terrorist attacks."

Which these lunatics took not as what it was -- him attempting to defang these lunatics trying to turn TPUSA into a Nazi organization -- but as a deeply-felt, deeply-considered Heel Turn on Israel. (And Kirk continued supporting Israel and denouncing the animals of Hamas until the day he died.)

But now he's saying that Kirk definitely, really turned on Israel and unnamed persons -- who, I wonder? -- shot him over this turn.

Again, this coward wants plausible deniability for what he's plainly implying but too much of a slithering pussy to say straight.

What a fucking disaster of a "man."

Oh, and he also says that Gerald Platner didn't even know about his Nazi tattoo and the only people claiming he did are filthy treasonous Israelis.

Justin JustinUSA

Jun 19

As expected, Tucker Carlson has rushed to Graham Platner's defense.

He claims Platner didn't even know about his Nazi tattoo, and insists the real reason people are attacking him is because he's "not sufficiently supportive of Israel."

I think Tuq'r sees that his grifting potential on the right is very low now. Last week, Me-Again Kelly, who has repeatedly told the Republican Party "f*** you" when we asked her to please do what she promised to do at TPUSA and "protect" Erika Kirk, now says that we all need to unify to fight the left.

We have to join with Me-Again you guys.

Sounds like her ad revenue is taking a hit, too.

Dave Rubin @RubinReport

1h

Told ya that Tucker would leave the Republicans and Megyn would come back to Trump.

For now Tucker will say he isn't a Dem, but watch his guests and topics, they will only be pro Dem and anti Republican.

His goal is to split the Republicans and usher in National Socialism...

Biden tried to block the release of the audio recordings of his "well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory" interviews with special counsel Robert Hur, as well as the interviews he did with his autobiographer. He claims he has a privacy interest in the DOJ interviews and would suffer irreparable reputational damage if they were released.

A judge denied his request to spare him further humiliation and continue the Biden Cover-Up.

Besides the obvious - wanting to establish just how hopelessly pudding-brained the former president was by the stage he was being quizzed by Hur - the Heritage Foundation sued under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to get access to tapes of conversations Biden had with the ghostwriter for his biography to further investigate the claims that Biden had mishandled classified information. The recordings POTATUS made with his ghostwriter are all circa 2016-2017, years before his election.

...The dispute over Biden's discussions stems from a Freedom of Information Act request that the Heritage Foundation filed in March 2024. The group sought records that former special counsel Robert Hur relied on to write specific portions of his report on Biden's handling of sensitive government records, which included passages referring to the former president's recorded conversations with Zwonitzer in 2016 and 2017.

The interviews were used for Biden's 2017 memoir, "Promise Me, Dad."

Hur's report referenced the former president's "diminished faculties and faulty memory" shown in Zwonitzer's recordings, and called Biden's recorded conversations with his ghostwriter "painfully slow, with Mr. Biden struggling to remember events and straining at times to read and relay his own notebook entries."

They might well shed light on the basement campaign strategy, too.

Schumer shrieks that any verification of the voter rolls could remove 25 million "voters" from the lists!

Eric Daugherty
@EricLDaugh

🚨 HOLY CRAP. Sen. Chuck Schumer just sounded the alarm that the SAVE America Act will REMOVE "25 MILLION PEOPLE" from the voter rolls

Keep in mind, the bill is for voter ID and proof of citizenship

If true, that means 25 MILLION people are illegals or not eligible citizens without ID! 🤯

Chuck is either making crap up or HE KNOWS THERE ARE 25 MILLION ILLEGALS VOTING

Which is it, Chuck? PASS THE SAVE AMERICA ACT!

Boy, blocking ineligible foreign invaders from voting could really hurt the Democrat Party!

Don't worry about it -- a foreign invader Biden appointed to be a judge will stop anyone from verifying the voter rolls.

Nick Sortor @nicksortor

🚨 BREAKING: Foreign-born Biden judge Sparkle Sooknanan (yeah, that's her actual name) has just BARRED the Trump admin from checking citizenship data for voters, per AP

Democrats are TERRIFIED about illegals no longer being able to vote

The federal government was using a federal database to PURGE ILLEGAL VOTERS. And a judge just put a stop to that.

Insanity. Bring it all the way up to SCOTUS!

SCOTUS Wire @scotus_wire

🚨 Judge Sparkle Sooknanan has struck down the Trump administration's expanded SAVE voter-verification system, ruling that federal agencies unlawfully created a centralized database containing Social Security and citizenship data to facilitate mass voter verification.

The foreigner making sure her illegal alien cousins can vote says that voters have a "right to privacy" that shields them from having their identities and citizenship verified when voting in United States elections.

By the way: She's actually a citizen of Trinidad and Tobago. She was naturalized under Obama as a US citizenship, but when she was asked in her Senate questionnaire if she would renounce that citizenship if made a judge, she said she would if the law requires it. Which it doesn't (insanely).

So she is in fact a foreigner.

Robert Gouvela argues that she lied at least twice in her Senate confirmation hearings and therefore can be impeached and removed for "high crimes and misdemeanors."

And definitely, we mustn't check to see if people driving on our highways are citizens or can read simple road signs. (That's from June 1.)

The New York Times' "Fathers Day" piece is written by a "trans man" -- that is, a mentally ill woman -- who says that her child has no problem with the idea that her daddy used to have breasts.

They cannot stop using children to advance their cause. I think their idea is that children's minds are open and pure, and so if a child accepts that a man is a woman and a woman is a man, closed-minded, tainted adults should accept it too.

And yes, children's minds are "open" -- meaning untutored and easily swayed -- and "pure," meaning untouched by corruption and the evil of the world.

Children make for good recruits not because they know the truth but because they are easily bullied by agenda-driven adults in positions of power over them, like "teachers" and even "fathers."

And this is a determined trend at the NYT. Almost all of their pieces on "fatherhood" depict fathers as abusive monsters.

Meanwhile, the NYT features pieces about women who abandoned their husbands and children to "find themselves" and showers them with praise for their "bravery."

If financial "disclosures" by Ilhan "Omar" can go from $25 million to zero in a month, then what good are financial "disclosures"?

posted by Disinformation Expert Ace at 06:22 PM

| Access Comments