Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Hillary! Caught Between Iraq And A Hard Base | Main | Terrorists Iz Dumb: Kidnappers Force Peace-Warriors To Call For Withdrawal of US/UK Forces »
December 07, 2005

Chicago-Area Confirmation Requested: Peanuts Christmas Special Censored? [STATUS: False.]

This is completely unconfirmed as of yet, so holding-one's-fire is appropriate.

If anyone caught the Peanuts Christmas special airing on Chicago's channel 7 last night, can you confirm or deny that Linus' speech about Jesus was cut out of the show?

But remember, before getting too upset, it's not confirmed. It was tipped to a blogger. This is a question, not a statement.

It does seem very unlikely to me they'd cut such a crucial scene out of a beloved classic. But who knows.

Chicago-Based AoSHQ Virtual Stormtroopers Say: Nope, it ran with the quote from Luke just as it always has.


posted by Ace at 05:00 PM
Comments



It gets worse. I hear Michael Newdow is fighting to have all mentions of the Great Pumpkin removed from public schools.

Posted by: Good Grief Im Amish on December 7, 2005 05:06 PM

I live in chicago, I watched the special, the speech was in the show.

Posted by: Greg K on December 7, 2005 05:08 PM

Finally a chance to show case my ignorance about an unconfirmed meaningless story. God I love the internet!

God damn ABC affiliate! I say we should boycot ESPN and disneyworld! Who's with me. Their ruining X-mas. I can't even find any Christmas songs anymore on the radio. This makes me boil. When will it end! Oh the humanity.

I feel a little better but I feel I could have been a lot stupider. I guess I'll have to wait for the next meaningless unconfirmed internet based rumor. Damn I'm not sure I can hold out for another 5 minutes.

Posted by: Shtetl G on December 7, 2005 05:11 PM

It was on the DishTV/local ABC affiliate feed. Luke 2: 8-14, just like always.

Posted by: Jeff on December 7, 2005 05:13 PM

Indeed, I took a break from cramming an entire quarter's worth of CivPro into my skull last night to watch the Peanuts Christmas special...it was there.

Stupid internet rumors.

Posted by: Jeff B. on December 7, 2005 05:15 PM

Thanks!

Posted by: ace on December 7, 2005 05:19 PM

Jeff, Jeff B., Gregg K:

I'm not buying it. It's just too convinient that all 3 of you "remember" seeing the scene in question. I'm not going to let any facts detract from my new crusade. Let's start an email campaign to Dan Patrick! Who's with me! I think he's a real tool anyway. They are ruining Chistmas. Why can't you see that.

Posted by: Shtetl G on December 7, 2005 05:21 PM

As the guy who started this ball rolling let me just say, I don't know what the hell people are smoking sometimes.

But hey, I did say it was unconfirmed, I say it was a CIA HAARP project. The new version was beamed into people's fillings.

mmmm...CIA

Posted by: Jake Jacobsen on December 7, 2005 05:34 PM

Doesn't matter whether they cut the scene or not. They were thinking about it, and as far as I'm concerned, that's good enough to disenfranchise the lot of 'em.

Posted by: Sobek on December 7, 2005 05:46 PM

Good thing the GOD WARRIORS didn't need to MOUNT UP on this one!

Stand down, brave soldiers, stand down.

Posted by: Bill from INDC on December 7, 2005 05:48 PM

I'm with Sobek. The fact that we can imagine this happening is close enough to it really happening.


FREE LINUS!!!

Posted by: ace on December 7, 2005 05:49 PM

Bill,

Do you believe in God or organized religion? Do you support the conservative Christian political movement?

I'm never really sure. You're always so nuanced and subtle on these issues.

Posted by: ace on December 7, 2005 05:51 PM

Good thing the GOD WARRIORS didn't need to MOUNT UP on this one!

Prepare to be smited by the wrath of GOD, pagan warrior.

Posted by: God Warrior on December 7, 2005 05:51 PM

Do you believe in God or organized religion? Do you support the conservative Christian political movement?

It's okay. Jesus loves Bill.

Everyone else thinks he's an asshole.

Posted by: Pope Benedict XVI on December 7, 2005 06:05 PM

Pope Benedict XVI,

You should have submitted that statement anonymously. That drives Bill crazy. In fact, he's been known to urge the outing of IP addresses to folks who comment about him like that.

Posted by: Jack M. on December 7, 2005 06:09 PM

Do I look like I need an IP address?

I'm the frickin' pope, man!

Plus, the big pointy hat makes anonymity pretty hard, know what I'm sayin'?

Posted by: Pope Benedict XVI on December 7, 2005 06:13 PM

In fact, he's been known to urge the outing of IP addresses to folks who comment about him like that.

Does Bill really do such a thing? Because that's just cold.

Posted by: Pope Benedict XVI on December 7, 2005 06:22 PM

That reminds me: anyone else catch Hewitt's fearless prediction the other day that Narnia's going to blow Kong out of the water at the box office?

Damn right. You know why?

Because Jesus would want it that way.

Posted by: Allah on December 7, 2005 06:25 PM

I don't think that's an absurd prediction.

They're both going to be huge. We'll see.

Narnia's getting five-star reveiws, too.

Plus... kids see movies like that two or three times.

Posted by: ace on December 7, 2005 06:28 PM

Narnia beating Kong?

Well, I know I'm going to do my part to support both movies. Tickets in hand already for Narnia, will go see Kong first or second night.

Posted by: Slublog on December 7, 2005 06:31 PM

Include me in the "both Narnia and Kong" camp. I'll see both -- but during the week, to avoid the inevitable crush over the weekends.

Posted by: Monty on December 7, 2005 06:34 PM

Narnia will do nine figures, but they're talking Titanic numbers for Kong. And if it's as good as they say, it'll get plenty of repeat viewings from kids too.

Anyway, what do you think Hugh's reason is for picking Narnia to win the battle of box office? Because he's crunched the numbers, screened the films, and made an educated guess?

Or because Jesus is in Aslan's corner?

Posted by: Allah on December 7, 2005 06:34 PM

Allah,

I think a less antagonistic view of his thinking -- that there is a large audience hungry for even metaphorically-Christian fare -- is sound.

I think Kong will most likely win. But we have no idea. Critics, you know, are, what is the word, total fucking morons. Kong may be good -- but remember, it's a three-hour movie about a very camp premise.

It's got a good chance to succeed, as it attracts just about everyone. Some will go for the CGI and giant slugs and dinosuars, some will go because it has a classic pedigree. You've got the lowbrow and highbrow and medium brow all well-covered.

But from the commercials, the special effects look bad, and while I'm a sucker for a rousing escapist fantasy movie, I'm not sure that three hours of Kong is going to wear very well.

If it does, Peter Jackson is as brilliant as many think he is.

Some movies are just going to get good reviews because of the audacity of the director's venture, etc.

I'm more interested in Kong now than I was (based on reviews), and do think it has a chance to top Titanic, but it could also be a box office disappointment.

Remember, no matter how you slice it, it's a three hour movie about a 50 foot gorilla.

Posted by: ace on December 7, 2005 06:44 PM

Allah, I'm not so sure what Jesus wants but I think it'll be closer than what you and the Galley Slaves think. King Kong is just not a scary monster. He's a big ape. That was so awesome sixty years ago but now---big monkey movie just doesn't really do it for me. Kind of like Pearl Harbo or the Alamo (for each of which I could tell you right off that a movie about America getting its ass kicked wasn't going to fire up the public), this is just flawed at the concept level.

I'm just not excited about seeing it, even if Peter Jackson does a great job and the monkey looks really really cool. If I want to see cool monkeys I'll click over to Garfield Ridge. This just reeks of utterly unnecessary remake.

Meanwhile, if Narnia keeps the Jesus angle in there, we might see churches renting out whole theaters like they did with the Passion. If this creates enough buzz within the, to reclaim a phrase, "God Warrior" community then it could really take off. I don't know that that element is still there to justify that kind of buzz. If the filmmakers were smart, they'll really lean on it in the marketing.

I think both movies will do well; Kong will probably do a little better, but I don't think Hewitt's as far off base with that as you do.

Posted by: See-Dubya on December 7, 2005 06:45 PM

Well, DUH! Of course Jesus loves Bill. It's his freakin' job. Believe you me, if Jesus' dad wasn't making him be nice to that asshat, we'd be talking "Plagues of Egypt", baby.

Posted by: Russ from Winterset on December 7, 2005 06:46 PM

Dude. Jesus IS Aslan.

;-)

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on December 7, 2005 06:46 PM

Three hour movies are like three minutes of sex -- too much of a good thing.

Posted by: ace on December 7, 2005 06:49 PM

Also, the clips from King Kong look pretty lame to me. Plus, some reviewer called it "tender." So I am thinking you guys might not LOVE it.

Now, resume Bill bashing. I so enjoy it.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on December 7, 2005 06:50 PM

Too many generalites here. Lets see some numbers. Narn v. KK first comparative weekend grosses. Total gross comparison.

Posted by: Dr. Reo Symes on December 7, 2005 06:52 PM

Doc--the big variable I need to know is the amount of Jesusness in Narnia. If it's good and Jesusy it'l catch fire. If it's just a magical fairyland romp with a lion, it'll do well when parents take their kids to it, but not so much. Quanitfy the Jesiosity and maybe I'll give you a number.

Posted by: See-Dub on December 7, 2005 06:55 PM

Well, dude, yeah. But at that point it becomes not a prediction but an accomplished fact.

(Assuming no strange Titanic multiple-viewings-over-six-months-of-box-office domination thing.)

Posted by: ace on December 7, 2005 06:55 PM

Jesus can't be constrained by numbers.

I'll stand by the following. Opening weekend" King Kong does at least 2.5 times Narnia. Over the long haul, 4X Narnia minimum.

Of course, these numbers are null and void should I discover Ryan 'money in the bank" Reynolds has even a Narnia walk-on.

Posted by: Dr. Reo Symes on December 7, 2005 06:57 PM

Don't knock an actor just because he isn't a draw. Most of the bankable asses-in-seats actors suck.

Posted by: ace on December 7, 2005 07:01 PM

OK, I'll say KK does one and a half times Narnia on opening weekend. By long haul--and I assume you mean including DVD sales, foreign screenings, and such?--in about a year or year and a half they'll be even.

I'll probably see Narnia and be buying the Narnia DVD for my kid. KK I can live without. Or I can rent it. I don't think I'm alone there.

Posted by: See-Dubya on December 7, 2005 07:02 PM

Whoa, that was bossy. What am I, Ryan Reynolds' PR bitch?

Edit out the inadvertant aggressiveness and the point still stands.

I see Tom Cruise movies despite Tom Cruise, not because of him. He just happens to be in big movies.

George Clooney, Julia Roberts, etc. -- so many of the actors who make millions for being draws are really just not great.

Posted by: ace on December 7, 2005 07:03 PM

Why don't you just marry Reynolds if you love him so much?

"I'm Ace. I love Reynolds" *smooch* *smooch*

Posted by: Dr. Reo Symes on December 7, 2005 07:04 PM

Mrs. Ace Spades-Reynolds.

Sigh.

I write that over and over in my Dream Journal.

Posted by: ace on December 7, 2005 07:07 PM

I mean, isn't KK just Jurassic Park, except with a monkey instead of a Tyrannosaurus?

Tyrannosauruses are cooler than monkeys. Though if the monkey flings Kong-sized gobs of feces at various overpaid actors that would be edgy and different.

Posted by: See-Dubya on December 7, 2005 07:09 PM

Ace and See-Dub: We shall see. Both flicks have a good mix of action, fantasy, and romance (of a sort in Narnia), so both will do well. But the anticipation for Kong has been building for months now, and it's being hyped to the skies. Unless every indicator is wrong, it'll be huge. At the very least, Hewitt's crazy to think that Narnia, which opens first, is going to beat Kong on its own opening day/weekend.

Also, I don't think Kong's necessarily meant to be scary. You're supposed to sympathize with him, at least in part. I watched the original again a few weeks ago, and let me tell you: the climax at the top of the ESB is one of the more gut-wrenching things you'll ever see on a movie screen. If Jackson fucks up the remake, it'll be because he made Kong either too feral or too romantic, and thereby ruined the audience's ambivalence towards the character. I'm curious to know if he pulled it off.

As I say, we shall see.

Posted by: Allah on December 7, 2005 07:10 PM

Have you guys not read "The Chronicles Of Narnia????"

It is a beautiful wonderful story. It is all symbolism. Someone who didn't know it had Christian allegory wouldn't see it in the movie.

I hear the movie is as good as the book. If that is true then it will certainly do better than Kong.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on December 7, 2005 07:10 PM

Ace and Ryan
Sittin' in a tree
K-I-S-S-I-N-G...

Man, you'd think they were gay cowboys or something.

Posted by: Slublog on December 7, 2005 07:10 PM

If Jackson fucks up the remake, it'll be because he made Kong either too feral or too romantic, and thereby ruined the audience's ambivalence towards the character. I'm curious to know if he pulled it off.

I have faith in Jackson. He made us care about Gollum in LOTR, he can make me care about a monkey.

Posted by: Slublog on December 7, 2005 07:13 PM

I understand Jackson's monkey climbs the Empire State Building and begins masturbating furiously.

It's feral, yet romantic.

Posted by: See-Dubya on December 7, 2005 07:18 PM

Meh.

Wake me when they get to "Voyage of the Dawn Treader."

Posted by: Knemon on December 7, 2005 07:21 PM

Who's Ryan Reynolds, by the way?

Seriously.

Posted by: Slublog on December 7, 2005 07:26 PM

Slu,

Only if they were eating pudding, my friend.

Posted by: Jack M. on December 7, 2005 07:30 PM

Slu, ixnay on the Yanray Enoldsray talk.

Needless to say, it's a very, very touchy subject round here. Just let it go.

Posted by: Dr. Reo Symes on December 7, 2005 07:35 PM

Needless to say, it's a very, very touchy subject round here. Just let it go.

Noted.

So how about those Patriots?

Boy, it's cold here in Maine.

Posted by: Slublog on December 7, 2005 07:38 PM

Kong will not perform per hollywood expectations. isn't it one of the most expensive movies ever? the few clips i've seen look cheesy, and i don't see a lot of excitement for it...but maybe i'm missing it. i predict it will be much more like "pearl harbor" than "titanic"

Posted by: brak on December 7, 2005 08:08 PM

Three hour movies are like three minutes of sex -- too much of a good thing.

Sometimes you gotta say, "Thanks for the attention. Now get out of my face." You can't placate.

Posted by: VRWC Agent on December 7, 2005 08:11 PM

Of course Jesus loves Bill

Even I'm not that religious!

Posted by: BrewFan on December 7, 2005 08:17 PM

There's a new King Kong movie coming out? And they made a film out of The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe?

wow.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on December 7, 2005 09:48 PM

That reminds me: anyone else catch Hewitt's fearless prediction the other day that Narnia's going to blow Kong out of the water at the box office?

Yes, but you need to realize that Hugh is about the biggest, cheesiest fanboy there is. Remember he also predicted Bush in a landslide over Kerry in 2004. I mean, I would certainly like to see Narnia blow Kong out of the water, too, but it doesn't mean it's going to happen . Hugh's wishful thinking will not make it so.,

And I intend to see both movies. Got opening night tickets for Narnia, and will see Kong in a couple of weeks.

Posted by: OregonMuse on December 7, 2005 10:07 PM

I'm going to see Narnia dressed as Jesus. I'm hoping they'll let me in half-price.

Posted by: Allah on December 7, 2005 10:10 PM

Just be sure and post a pic of it here..;-)

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on December 7, 2005 10:21 PM

I am going to see both, and am more excited about Narnia. However, the key factor in narnia will be if turkish delight can match up to bertie bots. I'm skeptical, even with the power of christ compelling it.

In addition, the witch will have to bring something to the table and at the end of the day will be cooking the food or else I'm just not interested.

Posted by: Defense Guy on December 7, 2005 11:45 PM

I am also planning on seeing both, probably on their opening nights. But as much as I'm looking forward to Narnia, I'm more excited about King Kong.

Why?

Kyle "God's Gift to Humanity" Chandler

Boo-yeah

Posted by: mary on December 8, 2005 01:03 AM

as for Hewitt's predictions, I wrote off to him in September 2004 because he'd left Tom Coburn off his list of Senate campaigns to contribute to. At that point Coburn was down six or seven points to Brad Carson.

Hugh wrote back on Sept. 7th to tell me

Tom's going to win by ten points.--HH

He was wrong; Coburn won by twelve.

So I'll sit up and listen when he makes these counterintuitive predictions. He certainly burned my bohiney with that NYTimes op-ed on Miers, but no one ought to call him dumb.

Posted by: See-Dubya on December 8, 2005 01:09 AM

Micheal Newdow and the other atheist blockheads strike again CHARLES SHULTZ must be spinning in his grave GOOD GREIF

Posted by: spurwing plover on December 8, 2005 10:28 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD bounce around from Maine and its pet Nazi, to the cracks in the Democrat messaging, to the failure of California and its effect on the 2028 election, sea drones rescuing Apache crews, and more!
Seattle mayor shrugs off millionaire-tax concerns as 44% of business leaders consider leaving
It happens in all the blue states, but WA and Seattle will be different! [CBD]
Mary Margaret Olohan
@MaryMargOlohan

NEW: Five FBI employees were fired today over the infamous Richmond Catholic memo on "radical traditionalist Catholics," FBI source confirms to @realDailyWire.
Oof. Reviewers do not like Scary Movie 6. The criticism I keep hearing is that the movie mistakes a reference for an actual joke. The movie (they say) keeps Key Jangling a reference to another movie (or some other pop culture ephemera) and you expect there to be a joke but nope, the Key Jangle was the joke. Other reviewers say that the promise that "no lines will be uncrossed" is a fake-out, and that the movie is bland and inoffensively corporate.
Whoops! I posted about Dan Goldman losing the NY congressional primary. He might do that, but it won't be tonight -- the primary isn't held until June 23.
One race to keep an eye on: the Levi's heir nepo baby and egregious "Designated Liar" Dan Goldman -- one of the Democrats from a safe district Democrats send out to spread their most indefensible lies -- may actually lose his lower Manhattan/Brooklyn set due to, get this, antisemitism in the Democrat primary electorate.
Antisemitism? In the anti-Nazi Democrat Party? Sounds crazy, I know, but apparently the anti-Nazi Party wants to eliminate Jews.
Henry Rosoff
@HenryRosoff

🚨EXCLUSIVE POLL:

Brad Lander is 34-pts ahead of Congressman Dan Goldman with #NY10 Democratic Primary voters. @ZohranKMamdani is backing the former Comptroller.

@bradlander: 57%

@danielsgoldman: 23%



Poll by @PIX11News & @EmersonPolling.

MORE: http://pix11.com

Oh my Totenkopf Tattoo, that is a DRUBBING!
I'm usually very anti-antisemitism but if the Communist Antisemite Jihadists can pull this one off, Go Communist Antisemite Jihadists, Go!
Democrat Senator Rueben Gallego, who served his wife with divorce papers when she was nine months pregnant so that he could marry his side-piece, counsels us that we should not judge Graham Platner for his infidelity because these things are personal matters, Racists:

Sahil Kapur
@sahilkapur

Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., on Platner: "We know that Graham has lived not your typical political experience. He's been very clear and open with his wife, and they worked through whatever they worked through. At the end of the day, this man has had 60 more town halls than Susan Collins has. He's winning the polls, he's willing to accept that he has grown as a person, and I think we should accept that."

Gallego says the drip-drip of revelations won't harm Platner's campaign.

"I think you guys are all in a bubble here right now. The drip, drip that's actually happening is Americans are really, really hurt the fact that gas is still high, food is still high, they can't buy a home, you can't afford rent. They're not going to care about text messages and everything else like that that happened years ago, especially when it was worked out between spouses."

I like that he says that it's okay that Graham Platner sexted 12 different women within months of marrying the woman to sponge off her because he wasn't then "living a political life" -- the clear meaning being, "We all cheat, we just don't cheat when we're running for office, and he didn't know he was running for office when he was sending dicpics to half the women he ran into."
Except he was running: His own wife turned the sexts over to his campaign.
And obviously Reuben Gallego didn't let his "political life" get in the way of his extramarital dating life:
likelytogivebirth.jpg
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD goes solo in a short segment...talking about Iran, the nativist issues surrounding Reform and Restore in the UK, and the delicious pain of an imploding Democrat Party, courtesy of Talerico and Platner!
Funny -- if you don't mind clicking on TikTok. "Amy.Pranks.22" set up an AI scam-call screener which replies to a foreign scammer trying to get her bank information with Trumpian bluster. This might be fake because I don't see how a program can respond in real time, but it's funny.
Food Thread Pizza Dough Recipe
The ULA rocket just launched
Thanks to Joyenz
The rocket's enormous engines are fueled by "the volcanic heterosexual lust between James Talarico and his Neighbor With a Uterus 'girlfriend'"
I hope Amazon's rocket works better than the Amazon Prime app does as far as allowing people to watch the black and white version of "Spider-Noir"
From the CA Post:

Spencer Pratt is now Karen Bass' biggest headache.

A bombshell California Post poll conducted with McLaughlin & Associates shows the reality TV star-turned-mayoral candidate has surged to a statistical tie with the incumbent mayor.

And voters blame homelessness, affordability and the direction of Los Angeles as the reason for turning on Bass.

Pratt now leads the field with 30.1% support, compared with 29.5% for Bass, setting up a razor-thin race heading into next week's primary.

Socialist councilwoman Nithya Raman sits in third place at 23.4%.

Thanks to beckster
Just like "Spartacus" Corey Booker, now that James Talarico is running for a higher office, he unveils his previously-unknown "girlfriend" and hooboy, it just so happens she used to work for him, and, get this, likes to "dance the night away" at gay bars
Gee I wonder where they might have met
Oh and she's a vegan
When Corey Booker needed a "girlfriend," he conjured up known LGBTQ activist Rosario Dawson. How convenient that when these guys need a girlfriend to show off to the normies that just happen to find an activist with a strong history of and interest in Supporting Gay Men
But seriously, this James Talarico romance with a Neighbor with a Uterus is a love story for the ages. The passion of their lovemaking is hotter than a blue star with a core of Primordial Sex Atoms created in the Big Bang
And just like that, #PunchANazi became Punch a Ballot for a Nazi
Recent Comments
TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "545 22 year old white college kid recently shot an ..."

Cow Demon: " Five and out. Free to go as stabby and murdery a ..."

Tom Servo: "A unanimous verdict with only 3 hours deliberation ..."

polynikes: "22 year old white college kid recently shot and ki ..."

Our Country is Screwed: "541 “That young boy, he was DEFENDING his go ..."

Comrade Flounder, Disinformation Demon: "The Trayvon Martin episode taught me that there is ..."

TheJamesMadison, discovering British horror with Hammer Films: "539 There was a song by rapper Too Short about the ..."

bonhomme[/i][/i][/i][/b][/b][/b][/s][/s][/s][/u][/u][/u]: "[i]“That young boy, he was DEFENDING his god ..."

Mark Andrew Edwards, buy ammo [/b][/i]: "508 492 Mercy to thugs is cruelty to the innocent. ..."

Sponge - F*ck Cancer: "[i] The problem isn't skin color, it's culture. G ..."

IYKYK: "[i]525 The Irish are revolting. Posted by: Boss M ..."

fd: ""“That young boy, he was DEFENDING his godd* ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives