| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Daily Tech News 12 May 2026
Monday Overnight Open Thread (5/11/26) Someone's Got a Case of the Mondays Cafe Quick Hits Washington Post: 42% of Democrats Think the Butler PA Assassination Attempt that Killed One Man Was "Staged" Unfunny Anti-Childbirth Hag Chelsea Handler Gets Destroyed at Netflix Roast of Kevin Hart Keir Starmer Vows to Remain in Office for Ten Years, Double Downs on Endless Illegal Immigration, Calls Immigration Reformers "Dangerous" and Warns They Are Taking the UK Down a "Dark Path" Virginia Democrats Seethe and Scheme to Mass-Fire All Seven Supreme Court Justices to Replace Them With Compliant Communist Operatives, but Senate Leader Says It's No-Go Be Back Soon MORNING RANT - The War on Labor Expense: There Never Was a Truck Driver Shortage Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026 Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« Schizophrenia Causes Crazy-Cat-Lady-ism? Or Do Cats Cause Schizophrenia? |
Main
| 47% of Women Dig On Bush »
December 04, 2005
I Kid Because I LoveI seem to have angered a lot of women with my crack about them all being polymorphously perverse bi-curious pseudolesbian pleasure-thralls. I'm kidding. It's an overstatement for comic effect. There's a lot more experimentation among women (especially young women) than among men, of course. When's the last time you saw two straight guys making out at a party to titilate the women? Or a straight guy "playfully" feeling up a guy's joint as a "joke"? The "Lesbian Until Graduation" phenomenon is well-documented (if overstated and overpublicized, just because it's so titillating); there is no "Gay Until Graduation" phenomenon sweeping the undergraduate male population. The thing about "all women are just three cocktails away from some hot girl-on-girl action" comes from David Spade, as Dennis Finch on Just Shoot Me. It's not as of yet a peer-reviewed hypothesis. So, you know, just ribbing. It's not a true theory of mine that a majority of women are that way. More like a hope. An intense yearning so powerful it gives me night-sweats. But the dream continues: 14% of young women report having same-sex encounters; 57% of college age women say they would like to have sex with Angelina Jolie. posted by Ace at 05:11 PM
CommentsAce, they can do backbone transplants now. I only bring it up because your current one seems to not be working. Posted by: Pepys on December 4, 2005 05:16 PM
Not peer reviewed, but that article you linked in the gay post put some science behind it. ...More surprising was just how different the story with women turned out to be. Most women, whether they identified as straight, lesbian, or bisexual, were significantly aroused [measured response to picture stimulus of] straight, gay, and lesbian sex. "I'm not suggesting that most women are bisexual," says Michael Bailey, the psychology professor whose lab conducted the studies. "I'm suggesting that whatever a woman's sexual arousal pattern is, it has little to do with her sexual orientation." That's fundamentally different from men. "In men, arousal is orientation. It's as simple as that. That's how gay men learn they are gay."In short, sounds like he's saying women can be sexually aroused a lot easier than men by stuff that's not in their 'sexual orientation' ballpark. I take this to mean that chicks are just horny 'take it where you find it' pleasure sluts. Again, you don't hate me, you hate science. Posted by: Dr. Reo Symes on December 4, 2005 05:21 PM
I gotta start hangin' out at UCLA more often... Posted by: The Ugly American on December 4, 2005 05:47 PM
"When's the last time you saw two straight guys making out at a party to titilate the women? Or a straight guy "playfully" feeling up a guy's joint as a "joke"? " Happens all the time. In Berkeley. Your results may vary. Posted by: Knemon on December 4, 2005 06:03 PM
When's the last time you saw two straight guys making out at a party to titilate the women? Or a straight guy "playfully" feeling up a guy's joint as a "joke"? Most women aren't titilated by watching others. We prefer doing it. As to playfully feeling up each other, all I have to say is towel snapping. What's that about? And exactly what are your trying to hit with said towel? It's just "feeling up a guy's joint" subliated. Posted by: on December 4, 2005 06:06 PM
That shd read sublimated. Posted by: on December 4, 2005 06:08 PM
I don't know where you get these ideas. "Towel-snapping" is a joke. It almost never happens. If a guy tries to snap me with a towel in a locker room, yeah, I begin to suspect he's gay. The point of a locker room is to go from the showers to fully dressed in the most efficient manner possible, not engage in "playful" flirtation. But it doesn't happen much outside of gay porn movies. I played high school football for four years and never witnessed any "towel-snapping." Not saying it's never happened. It's just that you have these bizarre ideas of what's going on in male locker rooms. Posted by: ace on December 4, 2005 06:15 PM
You're like quicksand. I can't seem to disengage from this ludicrous discussion with you, but I intend to do so... Now. Posted by: ace on December 4, 2005 06:17 PM
Maybe, you just weren't pretty enough for anyone to snap their towel at. lol! Not saying it's never happened. It's just that you have these bizarre ideas of what's going on in male locker rooms. No more bizarre than the ideas men have of what's going on in female locker rooms. Posted by: on December 4, 2005 06:20 PM
You can't disengage because you know there is truth in what I am saying. I will admit that you are pretty enough for someone to snap their towel at. I was just fibbing when I suggested otherwise. If no one snapped a towel at you, that is their lost, not yours. What is the purpose of all this sex research? To change one's orientation? Or, as with gays, to validate that they are born that way and therefore any difference in rights is discrimination? Other than that, what purpose is served? Years ago I was in a large medical center waiting for an appt. They had a stack of med. journals and I started reading one. There was a story about a baby who had a circumcision gone wrong. Don't ask me how. So, they decide to cut what's left of his poor little penis off and castrate him to boot, and raise him as a girl. I was outraged. Is that what they think being female is all about? Not having a penis and testicles. I couldn't believe it and for a long time afterwards I didn't believe the story I read was true. Then a few years ago, I read in the paper about this kid being a teenager and how miserable he felt growing up as a girl. He finally rebelled and refused to dress like a girl and take the hormones. Anyway, a few years later, he committed suicide. I'm telling you all this because it is one of the reasons why I think all this sex research and all these sex researchers are a bunch of assholes. They put their junk science before common sense. Posted by: on December 4, 2005 06:25 PM
They put their junk science before common sense. No one study confirms nor denies anything. All you can determine is the degree to which your findings are not due to chance. The complex interplay between genetics and environment is a topic that always comes up in medicine and biology. Studying chemical reactions and human reactions to various things is always a large, thick, and valuable, um, "tool" if you're studying psychology or human behavior or neuroscience. In short, this is important because learning more about how the body and mind work is always important. Let's say some people are turned on at the sight of children....Pedophiliacs, ya know. Perhaps something found in the research of normal human sexuality can later lead to treatments to subvert pedophilia. This would be valuable, would it not? And, of course , I'm ALL about men learning about what turns chicks on. TOTALLY up for that. Posted by: Feisty on December 4, 2005 06:47 PM
hehe... Guys Gone Wild!! Posted by: Madfish Willie on December 4, 2005 06:55 PM
Perhaps something found in the research of normal human sexuality can later lead to treatments to subvert pedophilia. This would be valuable, would it not? Sure, but for the life of me I cannot imagine any successful treatment for pedophilia. All I have seen to come out of sex research are justifications for girl on girl pictorials and for little boys getting their dicks cut off. Bleh. Posted by: on December 4, 2005 06:56 PM
"I take this to mean that chicks are just horny 'take it where you find it' pleasure sluts. " You know maybe Mohammed was onto something with women's evil hair rays Posted by: Iblis on December 4, 2005 06:57 PM
Ace, they can do backbone transplants now. I only bring it up because your current one seems to not be working. Heh. Posted by: Bill from INDC on December 4, 2005 07:05 PM
Rule No. 1. When in a hole, stop digging. Personally I hope this is bullshit. Like the odds aren't bad enough, now I need competition from other women? Oh and high school and college ball and I saw lots of towel snapping. If you ever got snapped in the ass (yea that was the target) with a wet towel you would know that the only person who might find that sexually stimulating would be the Marquis de Sade. Posted by: JackStraw on December 4, 2005 07:07 PM
"I played high school football for four years " Football and D&D? You contain multitudes, Ace. Posted by: Knemon on December 4, 2005 07:17 PM
What does it matter what arouses women? All they have to do is lie there - while the man is hard at work, they can think about whatever they want to. Ducks runs hides. PS What is the question an Englishwoman most often asks her husband? - 'Darling, is it in yet?' Posted by: max on December 4, 2005 07:28 PM
I've seen loads of straight girls make out with each other at parties but have yet to see straight guys do the same. Anecdotal? Sure. But somehow that anecdote pops up an awful lot. In the same direction. We're quick to believe the MSM is biased because all of the "mistakes" operate in the same direction. Why is this any different? Posted by: Birkel on December 4, 2005 07:29 PM
I'm telling you, the girls are making out to arouse MEN. MEN are the main focus. Kissing the other girl is not exciting, what is exciting is the admiration of the MEN watching. Women will stop at nothing to get the attention of MEN. We love MEN. You MEN love MEN too. MEN are just GAY, they get off on watching other guy's naked bodies in porno movies, how GAY is that. Most men have looked at 100's of other men's naked dicks. That is so GAY. get over your GAY selves GAY guys! Posted by: Michelle on December 4, 2005 07:38 PM
I'm going to see Bareback Mountain, oops, I mean Brokeback Mountain. It's a true story. All cowboys are gay. Posted by: Michelle on December 4, 2005 07:42 PM
Yeah, and everybody has a friend whose mother works in the emergency room and was there the night Richard Gere came in. Posted by: on December 4, 2005 07:51 PM
So the fact that almost all these anecdotes operates in the same way is to be ignored? Thanks for that Michelle and blanky. So I guess the MSM really isn't biased to the Left. Posted by: Birkel on December 4, 2005 07:54 PM
Kidding aside, Michelle is right about this: I'm telling you, the girls are making out to arouse MEN. MEN are the main focus. Posted by: on December 4, 2005 08:01 PM
blanky, And as Ace said... Straight men don't kiss/fondle each other to excite the women. So there's something more to it. Posted by: Birkel on December 4, 2005 08:05 PM
57% of college age women say that would like to have sex with Angelina Jolie, and 90% of men would like to watch! Yea! Posted by: Grouper on December 4, 2005 08:13 PM
I don't think it's a matter of anything weird going on in women's brains, I think it's just that women are intrinsicly physically attractive, to everyone. _Gorillas_ are into human females. Remember when you were little and had no interest in having sex? You still REALLY wanted to see women naked, didn't you? Now the way so many women go around having sex with DUDES, that's perverse. Posted by: Dave Munger on December 4, 2005 08:17 PM
Most men have looked at 100's of other men's naked dicks. This statement is factually incorrect, as most men have only stared in awe at Dick Cheney's dick, also known as the Magnificent Obsession! Posted by: Grouper on December 4, 2005 08:18 PM
There is no towel-snapping in men's locker rooms? I feel so... disillusioned. I will admit all my ideas of what goes on in the male locker room comes from watching Porky's. Posted by: Andrea Harris on December 4, 2005 08:28 PM
One of the hottest dates I ever had was when my sister and I dated 2 roommates. One was from Spain and the other from Central America. They cooked us dinner and then put on some music. Then they started to dance kind of with each other. My sister and I got all squirmy. My sister said to me, American men don't do this. All they did was dance for us, but it showed a lack of inhibition that most American guys just don't have. But it only proves that they were GAY! Posted by: Michelle on December 4, 2005 08:29 PM
Michelle, was it like they were -- twins??? Posted by: on December 4, 2005 08:31 PM
Yes twins, that's the ticket. Me and the sista is practically twins too, both redheaded. So it was twins doing twins, you know, double your pleasure, double your fun. Posted by: Michelle on December 4, 2005 08:39 PM
Sounds like porn, to me Posted by: on December 4, 2005 08:43 PM
Well I'm glad to know blanky and Michelle have assured me that just because the evidence leans one direction I can ignore the logical conclusion. Now I'm off to click my heels three times while saying "There is no biased MSM!" Posted by: Birkel on December 4, 2005 08:48 PM
Some of it's cultural. I'm a young, completely straight woman, and have never been attracted to another woman, but the idea of making out with one just isn't as yucky to me as the idea of men making out. Concepts of femininity are much more flexible in our culture than concepts of masculinity. For the same reason, women can wear pants and like sports, but men wearing dresses and reading romance novels is taboo. P.S. Michelle, how funny! I would have been simultaniously mortified and deeply amused. Posted by: Sarah Brabazon-Biggar on December 4, 2005 10:27 PM
Really don't understand the whole chicks making out at parties thing, and have never witnessed it. But the very idea that all women are bisexual, just because of the results of this research, is preposterous to me. Girls tend to get physically close with their friends. We don't have this pathological fear about it, the way guys do, with their 'homo seat' between them in the movie theater. When I was a little girl I noticed that the little boys didn't hold hands when walking down the street, the way my sister and our friends often did. Completely straight girls who care about each other, are not afraid to hug and kiss each other. We are both straight adult married women. I find the female form pleasing, and can admire a beautiful woman. And porno with hot chicks is arousing. I think this is one of those weird areas where straight women don't really talk too much about it, mostly because men aren't going to be able to really understand, the same way that we don't understand men at times. Posted by: lauraw on December 4, 2005 10:36 PM
Girl-on-girl porn totally turns me on. Always has. However, on the two occassions when women have actually made advances, I utterly recoiled. It's just fantasy. The one thing I want most after watching two gals get it on, is a man. As for women 'doing it' in order to turn on men, I believe that. Some of the most insecure women I know have done exactly that. And, in the end, after the hootin and howlin had died down, even the men didn't care for them afterwards. Posted by: jmflynny on December 4, 2005 11:13 PM
I'm telling you, the girls are making out to arouse MEN. MEN are the main focus. Kissing the other girl is not exciting, what is exciting is the admiration of the MEN watching. Women will stop at nothing to get the attention of MEN. We love MEN. I have a name for women like these, I call them attention-whores because they'll do about anything to get attention. Sadly more and more girls are becoming attention-whores all the time. Posted by: brent on December 5, 2005 03:20 AM
Sadly???? Posted by: Madfish Willie on December 5, 2005 11:14 AM
Sadly more and more girls are becoming attention-whores all the time. Those naughty, naughty girls. Posted by: on December 5, 2005 11:49 AM
Interestingly, I'm not a college age femaile, but I'd like to have sex with Angelina Jolie. I believe that this proves the study is flawed. Posted by: physics geek on December 5, 2005 11:52 AM
Some of the most insecure women I know have done exactly that. Did they also leave addresses and pictures? Because I only date 8 to 10's and they got to come to the table with something. Otherwise, I've got fantasy football to play. Posted by: VRWC Agent on December 7, 2005 12:18 AM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Few people remember that Norm MacDonald began his career as a ventriloquist
MacDonald's old partner Adam Egot revealed that MacDonald repurposed a bit with one of his ventriloquist dolls -- that he was a "bad guy" who "didn't believe the Holocaust happened" -- for the Norm MacDonald show, in which he claimed Egot didn't believe in the Holocaust. Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?" I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove Chris
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near Somebody else holds your heart, yeah You turn to me with your icy tears And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source" Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held. Basil the Great
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.
Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing. Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult. Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending. (((Dan Hodges))) Nick Lowles
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98. Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years. Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45 Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%. I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens. REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs. Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
![]() That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time. I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Hamas is Humiliating Trump's 'Board of Peace'
[Hat Tip: TC] [CBD]
Ted Turner Dies At 87 [CBD]
Recent Comments
four seasons :
"
Ahh,
The lull before the tech thread.
..."
m: "cut and paste fail! 428 34 My Retired Life - 5 ..." m: "34 My Retired Life - 5 Things you should NEVER tel ..." four seasons : " SciVo, I have always been a night owl. I ..." FenelonSpoke: "Posted by: four seasons at May 12, 2026 Yes, in ..." SciVo[/i][/b][/u][/s]: "[i]Posted by: four seasons at May 12, 2026 03:57 A ..." four seasons : " Fen, They are so clever and don't resort to b ..." m: "34 A video I watched last year just came to mind w ..." FenelonSpoke: "Posted by: four seasons at May 12, 2026 03 Yes. ..." four seasons : " Good morning SciVo! ..." Reforger: "The UFO stuff that they were willing to reveal is ..." four seasons : " Good Morning Fenelon! Hubby reads me the Baby ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|