| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Into The Valley Of The Shadow Of ONT Rode The 400
Barrel of Monkeys Cafe Democrats Melt Down Over Virginia Supreme Court Ruling, with Socialist Democrat Influencer Hasan Piker Demanding Violent Revolution and the "Smart" Commentators of the Left Unable to Read a Simple Court Decision Quick Hits/The Week In Woke Combo Thread DOJ Will Denaturalize 12 Cultural Enrichment Officers Who Lied About Their War Crimes and Support for Terrorism Reform Gains Over 1,300 Seats as Labour Loses Nearly 1,200 US Launches Airstrikes Against Iranian Targets, Stops 70+ Iranian Oil Tankers from Evading the Blockade lol THE MORNING RANT: School Board and Down Ballot Races Are the Most Important Races You Can Vote in this Cycle Mid-Morning Art Thread Absent Friends
Captain Whitebread 2026
Jon Ekdahl 2026 Jay Guevara 2025 Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX Contact Ben Had for info |
« Mobile Strip Club |
Main
| Another Lefty Busted Lying About Military Service »
November 28, 2005
I Guess Ted Rall Wasn't Getting Enough AttentionLovin' the troops, Rall-style. Hat tip to Karol and Naked Testicle Spiderman. posted by Ace at 08:25 PM
CommentsAs a Person of Girth, I can point out that Rall's Moore is missing a few chins. Posted by: Guy T. on November 28, 2005 08:32 PM
The cartoon you're interested in, Ace, is yesterday's. Let folks know they have to push "previous" to get there from your link. Posted by: gabriel malor on November 28, 2005 08:41 PM
Cartoon corrected. Thanks. Posted by: Dr. Reo Symes on November 28, 2005 08:51 PM
I want to comment on this but I have to go to the bathroom first and have a Rall movement. Posted by: BrewFan on November 28, 2005 08:54 PM
I refuse to even look at it, because I know if I do I'm going to have to hunt Rall down and murder him with my bare hands. Hmm, on second thought... Posted by: zetetic on November 28, 2005 08:55 PM
Ace, as you stated so well re Sarah Silverman, offensive humor has to have humor or it's just offensive. As ashamed as I am to admit it, I have involunarily giggled at some very un-PC and vulgar jokes that, despite their tastelessness, were actually funny. I think another key aspect is hurt: a joke that hurts (I don't mean annoys or even insults or "offends") is not funny. I get a tad irritated at blonde jokes, but that doesn't make them any less funny. Generalized group jokes are funny; specific jokes are dangerous. Posted by: goddessoftheclassroom on November 28, 2005 09:09 PM
C'mon, Ace. Everyone knows Rall is a tool and a hack. Why don't you point them towards the infinitely more talented Glenn McCoy? Posted by: Hal on November 28, 2005 09:11 PM
Go Ted! Good Boy! Be sure to let the folks at home know whose side you're on buddy. What a pathetic asshole. I'd almost swear he was one of Rove's moles. Posted by: lauraw on November 28, 2005 09:12 PM
Cartoon corrected. Thanks. Posted by Dr. Reo Symes at November 28, 2005 08:51 PM You're not Ace. Posted by: on November 28, 2005 09:13 PM
Ah yes, the old returning-war-vet-as-ready-to-explode-violent-sexual-psycho gambit. A staple of media Leftards since 1971 (see 'Deer Hunter,' 'Coming Home,' ad nauseum), it allows one to portray vets as unhinged lunatics while maintaining a fig leaf of "sympathy." Funny, it never seems that these amateur psychoanalysts have ever encountered one of the vets that they are more than eager to diagnose with every pathology. I was at a wedding last weekend between my niece and her boyfriend, both of whom returned 5 months ago from a lengthy tour of Iraq; both were members of an Iowa Natl Guard engineering batallion. I have it on good authority that their nuptial relations were amazing. The kind of sex you can only have after, say, liberating 25 million people. It might be a hard concept for Ted Rall to imagine while he's molesting his $19.95 lifelike vinyl girlfriend. All the more reason to have pity for the poor self-abusing scribbler. Posted by: iowahawk on November 28, 2005 09:26 PM
Man that guy is disgusting. I need a shower after visiting his site. I'll never do that again. I've dived nearly full CHT tanks to retrieve objects blocking the overboard valve, closed out CHT tanks without cleaning them first, and cleaned out the waste disposal tanks from the galley underway (which smelled even worse than the shit tanks -- I swear to God). There are some things even military folks won't do. Visiting Ted Rall's site should be listed as one of those most distasteful things. Subsunk Posted by: Subsunk on November 28, 2005 09:29 PM
Political cartoonists are a special breed of people. Rall is the most "special" of the breed. Ted uses the only way he knows how to express his politics -- cartoons. If it weren't for cartoons, Ted Rall would be just another guy with hatred towards the Right, like Tubino. But somewhere in history, the political cartoonist was regarded as a satirical genius, therefore, an artiste. No matter if the material is trash or profound, the artiste should have a platform in which to express himself (as long as he is left-leaning, of course). So we end up with Ted Rall: an angry little man filled with so much animosity he lives with nothing but the desire to attack his enemies. His talent for illustration is lousy, his captions are not even close to being clever or brilliant. Rall's words are that of angry teenager who is stuck in the parent hating phase of his life, like Tubino. Nevertheless Rall is published and, in some circles, acclaimed. I know everyone has different tastes, but the Ted Rall is an ugly cowardly human being who hides behind his cartoon to attack people, like Tubino. The same assholes who like Rall are probably the same ones who think Robin Williams and Dennis Leary are funny. *Robin Williams is not and never has been funny. His antics could be funny to an infant or toddler, but his act is nothing more than "funny" voices and goofy physical comedy, like sitting upside-down in a chair. Wow, what a comedic genius. Dennis Leary? He has never made me laugh. Not once. His street-wise samrt-ass act was a lot better the first time I heard it from the guys I grew up with in Massachusetts. Phony prick. And his acting sucks, too. Posted by: Bart on November 28, 2005 09:33 PM
You're not Ace : Corrected it for him. 'On Ace's behalf' implied. Sorry for confusion. Posted by: Dr. Reo Symes on November 28, 2005 09:36 PM
Wow, saw the Rall on Malkin. Tubino merely pisses me off, as he is a vessel of spit others have drooled. But I dunno if he is as bad as Bart says. Just like any other lefty friend who has read too much Moore. Just repeating stuff he memorized. What to make of Rall, is he too crazy to even take seriously, or should we be really pissed? I am sort of reminded of Jenny's hippy boyfriend in Gump, who beat her up because he was soooooooo upset about Vietnam. But I suppose that even if they don't need it, our moral protection, it should be outrageous that the people who we depend on to keep us safe even have to deal with domestic enemies like this. Then again, going back to the Vietnam model, damn dirty hippies spat on the returning troops. So, maybe we have to take this seriously to keep the belligerent idiots in line. fuckers... Why are they here, they can experience multicultural compassion in France. Posted by: joeindc44 on November 28, 2005 09:55 PM
Bart, the parent-hating thing is kind of a meme with you. But Rall strikes me as someone devoid of man's higher instincts; unburdened by compassion, he could mock the 9/11 widows and laugh at the shocked responses. Without a visceral understanding of service or duty, he cannot understand why people join the military. His scrawlings reflect what he really thinks its all about. And perhaps some jealousy; because a nasty little subhuman like him would probably enjoy such antics. Posted by: lauraw on November 28, 2005 10:02 PM
Tubino merely pisses me off, as he is a vessel of spit others have drooled. But I dunno if he is as bad as Bart says. I think I agree with Bart. I tried to engage tubino. I really did. But it's not the bad ideas that bother me. It's that if you make a point he can't refute, he doesn't even acknowlege it. He just stops posting to that thread and posts somewhere else. It's the fact that he drops a bunch of off-topic links which we're supposed to refute, and then if we go to the immense trouble to do so, ignores it and just does it again later. Posted by: SJKevin on November 28, 2005 10:03 PM
By the way, here's a touching Ted Rall essay about donating to charity to help the victims of Hurricane Katrina: Posted by: SJKevin on November 28, 2005 10:07 PM
Rall reminds me of Goya's Saturn (expressing the myth that the god Saturn, or Cronus, ate his children). Here is a man who is largely the product of America -- a tolerant, secular, free America -- who nevertheless turns on the very people who keep him and his bitter ilk safe from threat. When you see Rall's scribblings, just remember the painting of Saturn by Goya. This is what Rall really looks like, and is the personality his squalid little works of "art" express. Posted by: Monty on November 28, 2005 10:39 PM
The parent hating obsession I have lately is an attempt to find the common thread that holds the liberals, leftists, greenies, PETA idiots, and the communists together to hate Bush and the conservative Christians. These groups should be at odds with each other, yet they share a common goal -- defeat the Bush. I really want to know how a self proclaimed liberal can defend radical Islam for the purpose of hurting the Bush administration. I want to know how a liberal can side with a lefitst and dismiss the oppression in China and praise the government in Venezuela. Why do homosexual-doers and the leftists who hate organized religion not suppoort Bush's efforts to eradicate radical Islam?
The point is that the in vogue thing to do nowadays is be a victim. And there are plenty of "professionals" willing to find one's victimizer. (Like I asked before, what else could possible be the motivation for a man to be anally penetrated by another man and act all feminine? That isn't your run-of-the-mill lifestyle choice, it's werid shit, doods.) Posted by: Bart on November 28, 2005 10:45 PM
Oy vey.
Posted by: Bart on November 28, 2005 10:47 PM
It might be a hard concept for Ted Rall to imagine while he's molesting his $19.95 lifelike vinyl girlfriend. Vinyl boyfriend, yes. Vinyl girlfriend, no. Posted by: on November 28, 2005 10:58 PM
I'm reminded of the lovely poem by Mr. Goldstein from a while back. Syncronicity A fist in his pants, Posted by: Dale on November 28, 2005 11:04 PM
Obviously I'm going to have problems with Rall's politics, but in all honesty can someone look at that strip and say it's "good"? The drawing is crude--several people I knew in junior high could draw much, much better and would not have to label every character so the reader knows who it is. And the "ideas" are not clever. The comment about hiding behind the cartoon is true, despite Rall's pose as a brave maverick. If he just wrote his points in an essay--and he might as well, for all that the illustration adds to them--he'd be even more a laughingstock and intellectual buffoon than he already is. Posted by: Nicholas Kronos on November 28, 2005 11:11 PM
By the way, here's a touching Ted Rall essay about donating to charity to help the victims of Hurricane Katrina: Posted by SJKevin at November 28, 2005 10:07 PM What surprised me most about that article was this line in the next-to-last paragraph: "As we watched New Orleanians die of thirst, disease and anarchic violence in the face of Bush Administration disinterest and local government incompetence..." I was so shocked to see any blame pointed at the local government I almsot fell out of my chair. As for the original cartoon that started this discussion...disgusting as usual, but pretty average fare for Mr. Rall. Posted by: Grimaldi on November 28, 2005 11:14 PM
The same assholes who like Rall are probably the same ones who think Robin Williams and Dennis Leary are funny. Uh, I've actually found both of them pretty funny back in the day, but I still hate Ted Rall. But that's okay Bart, your mistaken characterization must be because you hate your parents. Posted by: Sortelli on November 28, 2005 11:34 PM
And the unfortunate aspect of all this is that his caustic hyperbole worked: He's getting all SORTS of traffic off this toon. Sort of like people slowing down to watch a bloody car wreck. Posted by: Partisan Pundit on November 28, 2005 11:36 PM
Good ol' Sortelli, my faithful contrarian. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and believe you enjoyed Williams' humor when you were younger than 13. Dennis Leary? Nah. I used to think Dice was funny. I still do.
Posted by: Bart on November 28, 2005 11:45 PM
The girl the soldier was "doing" in Rall's cartoon kinda looked like Mother Sheehan, what with the schnoz and all. Posted by: Iblis on November 28, 2005 11:58 PM
I for one am glad that Ted Rall speaks truth to power. There are few who will brave the slings and arrows of neocon fascist outrage. I'm reminded of the words of the brave patriot Kent Brockman..."Just miles from your doorstep, hundreds of men are given weapons and trained to kill. The government calls it the Army, but a more alarmist name would be... The Killbot Factory." Really, do we need to even pay attention to Ted Rall after his feeble attempt to rub Pat Tillman's name in the dirt? Posted by: Lapsed Leftist on November 29, 2005 12:10 AM
Bart, your whole parent-hating/liberal theory just doesn't make sense to me. For that matter, nor does your parent-hating/homosexuality theory. The ones who hate authority figures the most are libertarians. Liberals like authority figures, if the authorities are leftists. Look how they gush over Fidel Castro. Posted by: SJKevin on November 29, 2005 12:26 AM
I wonder if Ted thinks this is funny? Posted by: TedRall_Is_An_A-hole on November 29, 2005 12:39 AM
And perhaps some jealousy; because a nasty little subhuman like him would probably enjoy such antics.Ding! Right on the money. Posted by: someone on November 29, 2005 12:47 AM
Kevin, I am only trying to understand them better. They're not evil, they just have a different perspective, that's all. Heh. By the way, a libertarian is a liberal (not a leftist) who hates his taxes being wasted on other people. Posted by: Bart on November 29, 2005 12:52 AM
I can't even fake an intellectual reponse to Fuckin' Ted Rall. Posted by: jmon on November 29, 2005 12:57 AM
Ace, Did you see the petition for an Able Danger public hearing? Check it out here: http://www.petitiononline.com/cgi-bin/mailpage.cgi?weldon/petition.html J Posted by: J Koisch on November 29, 2005 01:27 AM
Aw man, Bart, I don't think of us as being polar opposites, I like you, man. I really do. Not in a gay-hate-my-dad way, but like a viking. A viking who is totally secure in the relationship he has with his father, even if that involved parent-child kissing and stuff. ;) P.S. My use of "asshole" has increased dramatically because of you, Sortelli. I use it for everything. That reminds me of this funny song called Asshole... it was great. Posted by: Sortelli on November 29, 2005 01:56 AM
That reminds me of this funny song called Asshole... it was great. Ah, but that was by Dennis Leary, recently relegated to the non-funny category by Bart. Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 02:20 AM
Heh. How's that fetish with girls with boyish figures going, geoff? Posted by: Bart on November 29, 2005 02:24 AM
How's that fetish with girls with boyish figures going, geoff? At least I didn't hate my parents. Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 02:26 AM
Obviously I'm going to have problems with Rall's politics, but in all honesty can someone look at that strip and say it's "good"? Lileks once called Rall "the guy who draws like he’s using a Sharpie stuck in his armpit". Posted by: Bill Birmingham on November 29, 2005 02:36 AM
I've always thought Ted Rall's cartoons looked like a bad imitation of Matt Groening's. Posted by: SJKevin on November 29, 2005 02:40 AM
geoff wrote: See, Bart? Another hole in your theory. Posted by: sandy burger on November 29, 2005 02:43 AM
Indeed. Posted by: Bart on November 29, 2005 02:57 AM
See, Bart? Another hole in your theory. So what does it mean if I hate Sandy? I think it means I'm a gawdamn sexual tyrannosaurus, but that's probably conservative. Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 02:57 AM
geoff: Bart, on the other hand, is a sexual bronto. (Not that there's anything wrong with that.) Posted by: sandy burger on November 29, 2005 03:09 AM
Obviously geoff is taking out his anger issues on Sandy, but are really meant for the authority figure -- me. Let it out, geoff. Posted by: Bart on November 29, 2005 03:16 AM
but are really meant for the authority figure -- me. Authority figure? You and Al Haig. But inasmuch as you're the authority on your Richard Simmons-approved psychosexual theory of deviancy, I'll just say this: Here's a picture of Tubino. (link excised by lauraw per geoff's wishes) Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 03:23 AM
Tubino's prettier than I had imagined. Too bad her husband looks like such a dork. Posted by: sandy burger on November 29, 2005 03:29 AM
It is a nice looking family, and that led me to naively give him another chance (until he called the military the 'fucking military' on another thread this very day, upon which I decided he was an irredeemable pr**k). Tubino sells vacuum tube-based audio equipment, hence the name. Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 03:33 AM
I don't think I can comment on this without running afoul of the laws regarding making threats over the internet. 5 million sperm and that one was the fastest? I'm not sure which his existance disproves more, Survival of the Fittest or Intelligent Design... Posted by: Cybrludite on November 29, 2005 04:53 AM
He spawned!? Posted by: on November 29, 2005 04:55 AM
You sure tubby isn't this guy. Quite a handsome fella. So dashing and virile. Posted by: Dale on November 29, 2005 07:06 AM
Rall is a spiteful, untalented crank and should be widely shunned, but of course he isn't. And I should be able to write him off as another one note hateful leftist, but of course I can't. Every time I hear that motherfucker's name I get this ball of tension in the back of my neck, and I send up one of my very rare prayers that he runs into either Pat Tillman's brother or me in an airport somewhere. Posted by: UGAdawg on November 29, 2005 07:27 AM
Bart wrote: lauraw responded: While it may be Bart's obsession, in this case he's on the money: (retarded filter prevents me from linking http://www.tedrall.com/inter02.htm, cut and paste it into address bar) MRR: I want to ask about your childhood. Where did you get to be bitter? A "poor childhood" in a "lily white suburb." How in the hell does that mesh? Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 29, 2005 08:39 AM
It's the fact that he drops a bunch of off-topic links which we're supposed to refute, and then if we go to the immense trouble to do so, ignores it and just does it again later. Errrrr...hello? That's pretty much the definition of an internet "troll." Seriously, I don't know why you guys waste time with that slimey little crapweasel. The first set of his links that I ever followed did not say what he claimed, so I've never made the attempt to engage him in debate. Why bother? Starve him or mock him, but please don't give him the courtesy of your time. He isn't worth it. Besides, he's Canadian. He can't even vote in the US. Posted by: The Warden on November 29, 2005 08:42 AM
Canada. Plucky little country. I hear they have their own currency and system of government. Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 29, 2005 09:02 AM
There was a female cartoonist who ripped Rall a new asshole with a 'toon about his daddy issues a few years back. I think it was not long after his "Terror Widows" garbage. I loved it so much because Rall is such a misogynist pig, and he couldn't respond in his normal moonbat fashion to her without exposing his true self. I'm trying to find that cartoon now. If anyone else gets to it before I do, please put up a link; I'd love to save it to my desktop to look at whenever Rall gets his panties in a bunch. Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 29, 2005 09:03 AM
Canada. Plucky little country. I hear they have their own currency and system of government. That is merely a rumor. Just because Drudge or Fox News says it doesn't make it so. Wait for Limbaugh and Rove to confirm it. Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 29, 2005 09:05 AM
You sure tubby isn't this guy. I've got the right guy. Besides, he's Canadian. I don't know what his nationality is, but he resides in Toledo, OH. Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 09:06 AM
I just don't get that rall clucker. I mean, his crap is not funny, clever, or particularly intelligent on any level. It is on about the same level as spray painting BUSH SUCKS on a wall somewhere. There are several liberal weenie cartoonists, that at least manage to be somewhat clever. Rall is not even good at bush-bashing. At least that fat sack of whale shit Moore, can manage to generate a chuckle once in a blue moon. Ralls childish and painfully cliche humor is just a waist of ink, it really is not worth even considering. Posted by: marty on November 29, 2005 09:10 AM
How did anyone get a hold of turbino family photos? Posted by: on November 29, 2005 09:11 AM
I don't know what his nationality is, but he resides in Toledo, OH. Really? How do you know this. I'm sure he mentioned he was Canadian somewhere. Did he really move to this fascist, oppressive, flaw-ridden country from his universal healthcare utopia? Posted by: The Warden on November 29, 2005 09:16 AM
Back in August of 2000, Rall led a tour called the Silk Road Tour. My friends with way too much money decided to take it. I told them they were nuts because one of the countries it went through was Afghanistan. Why wd anyone take their wife into Afghanistan? Anyway, the tour was a disaster, no one could stand Rall, and half of the group went off on their own. Posted by: on November 29, 2005 09:17 AM
the troll Fucking Reagan and Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 29, 2005 09:18 AM
Really? How do you know this. I got bored one night and commenced to googlin'. On several liberal web sites I found his comments where he referenced the Toledo Blade. The comments there were very consistent with what we see here. I then found liberal sites where he'd registered his real name and city along with the 'Tubino' pseudonym. It was corroborated with further searching, but I don't think I ought to publish any more than I have. It only took me 15 minutes on the web, though. Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 09:23 AM
It's more evil versions of people like geoff who forced me into hiding. Cyberstalkers with bad intentions (not the troll bashing kind, the call your family at night and make Nazi-like remarks kind) can mess up your life. Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 29, 2005 09:29 AM
It's more evil versions of people like geoff who forced me into hiding. Yeah, this was meant as a point of interest, and should certainly not prompt anybody to use this information beyond entertainment purposes. Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 09:37 AM
Eh. You're right, geoff. I found that page a while ago noodling around and dismissed it on account of that one was in the US, but now that I look further... Yeah, Sue, I've had problems, too. Somehow -- go figure! -- I occasionally manage to piss off someone on the internet a real lot. That taught me both to be careful of my own identity trail, and to perform at least a perfunctory Google search on any aliases that I find interesting. I live in fear of the day (surely coming soon) that search engines will be able to correlate identity based on style and turn of phrase. Then it's into the bunker for this little mustelid! Posted by: S. Weasel on November 29, 2005 09:38 AM
Because of this primitive interface that doesn't allow me to post pictures, I'm forced to use text only to communicate my ideas. Voice from TV: "We Republicans are sorry for calling Congressman John Murth a coward and Michael Moore clone." "Dissent is patriotic, Murtha is an ex-Marine, and he's nothing like Michael Moore." Man (middle-aged version of Shaggy from Scooby Doo?) clicks off his remote and says, "I said we should get out of Iraq two years ago." Pink-haired unidentified woman says, "But you weren't dumb enough to go to 'Nam." Trust me, it's lots funnier when I illustrate it. Bonus tip for all those youngsters out there wanting to become famous comics: a check mark with half circles on top looks just like a nose and two eyes. If you want other great tips like this, just write Uncle Ted, and be sure to include a photo. Posted by: Ted Rall on November 29, 2005 09:57 AM
Geoff, that is so cool. LOL I didn't figure him for a grey hair. Posted by: lauraw on November 29, 2005 09:57 AM
Guys, re the tubino stuff... ...in my opinion, it is very uncool to "out" people like that. Even spastic shitbirds like Bean-O. It's up to Ace, but I'm deeply uncomfortable with this sort of thing. If he wishes to be anonymous, please let him be so. Posted by: Monty on November 29, 2005 10:00 AM
Monty, I'm generally with you (seeing the wife and kids is a little spooky), but to Sue's point, I don't post pictures of my family on the web, much less in a gallery called "Dave in Texas". Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 29, 2005 10:12 AM
Monty, I understand your point. If the guy is intent upon pissing in my coffee and stupid enough to leave such an easy trail to follow, all I can think is what a naive tard he is. That being said, geoff, if you're vindictive enough to troll for info. on this guy, who knows what someone who Tubby's really pissed off might do. Probably better to keep it to yourself, though it was a nice little piece of detective work. Just my thoughts. They'll die of starvation in a minute or two. Posted by: compos mentis on November 29, 2005 10:18 AM
If the guy is intent upon pissing in my coffee and stupid enough to leave such an easy trail to follow, all I can think is what a naive tard he is. Didn't go any further than that in my own mind, but it would have been nice if the family weren't in the photo. Posted by: lauraw on November 29, 2005 10:21 AM
...in my opinion, it is very uncool to "out" people like that I was torn, myself. If someone wants to pull it, that's fine by me. But all you're doing is eliminating a link to very public information. Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 10:22 AM
It's pleasant to spend time with people who have consciences and a moral compass. bunch of nerds. Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 29, 2005 10:28 AM
It's pleasant to spend time with people who have consciences and a moral compass. I always remember that speech Thomas More made to his son-in-law Roper in Robert Bolt's A Man For All Seasons: ROPER: So now you'd give the devil the benefit of law? I don't do this for Bean-O; I do it for myself. Posted by: Monty on November 29, 2005 10:36 AM
Thanks for the heaping helping of guilt. Rat bastid. Posted by: lauraw on November 29, 2005 10:42 AM
Funny, I was reminded of Shakespeare's Queen Alexandria and Murray (a lesser known work), Act IV, Scene 2 Queen Alexandria: What ho, Murray! What could it have been that we have seen? Is it not in our bones? Is it not in our marrow? Are we not, one and anon? Murray: Whaaaat are you hollerin'? What are you hollerin'?
Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 29, 2005 10:45 AM
I don't do this for Bean-O; I do it for myself. I don't think he's attempting to preserve his anonymity - his life and his pseudonym are linked all over the web. Further: if I did a search and and found and linked to his nascent web page (which actually exists), would that be all right? How is that different from linking to an online, public domain photo gallery? Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 10:47 AM
...and people are making it sound like I did some serious sleuthing. Here's what I did to get the initial hits: 1) go to Google, type in "tubino," 2) go ah crap, all these hits are in italian, 3) type in "tubino us" in the vague hope of getting rid of Italian sites, and 4) marvel that it worked. That's all it took. Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 10:55 AM
people who have consciences I included you in that group geoff, based on past experience that you are a decent guy, the admittedly wide open trail of breadcrumbs tubino left laying around including a very irresponsible decision to expose his family, and your comment about having been torn with the decision, a comment I accept at face value. I don't consider it outing, my only response is really just a general unease about seeing his wife and kids. I put that on him, not you. Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 29, 2005 11:04 AM
Yeah, geoff. What Dave said. Vindictive was a word I hesitated to use, but I don't have Monty's vocabulary and I am too lazy to use a synonym finder. How about "interested" instead. Posted by: compos mentis on November 29, 2005 11:09 AM
geoff: Here's my point: to what end are you doing this? To what purpose? How does it help or hinder me to know the particulars of Bean-O's life? What I know of him is what he writes; and that is all I care to know. I use my real name here because I am among friends, and I believe in putting my own name to what I write. But if I choose not to go into more detail, that is my (deliberate!) choice. Now, there may be details of me floating around there in the Internet; but the Internet is like a vast tarpit that swallows everything and disgorges nothing. Just because finding those details is easy doesn't make it right. This kind of thing strikes me as a power-play: "Aha! I know your real name! I know where you live!" Given the nature of many whackos out there, that information alone is enough to alarm most people. I know (or at least believe) that's not your intention, geoff, but if not, then who perform the exercise at all? Free will and free exercise of will is a precious thing. If Bean-O does not choose to share details of his life with us, please respect that choice. I'd expect the same, and I think most posters here would as well. I speak as a friend. Posted by: Monty on November 29, 2005 11:10 AM
Yeah, it's the wife and kids aspect that make me uncomfortable. Nice looking family, though, which he hardly deserves in my opinion. Posted by: on November 29, 2005 11:11 AM
Here's my point: to what end are you doing this? I posted the link as an amusing/interesting tidbit during a late night interchange with Bart and Sue Dohnim. But my amusement pales beside your discomfort, so I'll officially ask: LauraW, is it possible to excise the comment thread from my link forward? Or at least vaporize the link? Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 11:23 AM
geoff: I don't want you to think that I'm angry or anything. I know you were just larking around, and no ill intent was intended. But remember that the Internet has a long memory, and someone else trolling for this information may not have such a benign intent as you. Group hug! Posted by: Monty on November 29, 2005 11:27 AM
I don't want you to think that I'm angry or anything. I'd just as soon meet the most stringent moral guidelines, which you are currently defining. I think it's legit to data mine and post the results on any topic or anybody, but if you don't, I'm perfectly willing to abide by your standards. Now if only someone can undo what I have wrought, we can lay this to rest. LauraW? Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 11:35 AM
If someone posted all over the internet using his true name or an identifiable moniker associated with multiple photos, I see no problem linking to their photo and their photo alone. Posted by: on November 29, 2005 11:35 AM
I think it's legit . . . While I believe that stance intellectually, I share the creepy feeling expressed by others, so I'd just as soon get past this. Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 11:40 AM
ah, come on Tubino isn't that bad...nic pics, too. Posted by: Aaron on November 29, 2005 11:41 AM
Got it, hope its OK with Ace. Posted by: lauraw on November 29, 2005 11:42 AM
Thanks, Laura Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 11:43 AM
Once was in Indonesia with a Northern Irish man and his Belgian friend who had been visiting with, ahem, trannies. Irish guy wishes to show naughty pictures involving Belgian with Tranny..."It's not like your small or anything..." Same with Tubino...he looks good, healthy, smart, it doesn't detract from his arguments in any way. Posted by: on November 29, 2005 11:45 AM
I'd just as soon meet the most stringent moral guidelines, which you are currently defining. Ah...would you be willing to repeat that under oath to my ex-wife's divorce lawyer? Posted by: Monty on November 29, 2005 11:46 AM
What's that smile all about? Did CNN report the deaths of a few more of our soldiers? Seriously, who gives a fuck about this guy? Just another lying leftist coward. Fuck him. Stop talking about him. Someone tell a dick joke or something. Posted by: The Warden on November 29, 2005 11:56 AM
So, how bout that Ted Rall, huh? What a dick. Posted by: adolfo velasquez on November 29, 2005 12:00 PM
Speaking of Bean-o, christ I could use some 'o that right now cuz I got the winds somethin' fierce. I would light a candle but my office is rather small and not especially well ventilated. Ah, what the hell, here goes noth Posted by: flagulating butthead on November 29, 2005 12:19 PM
but to Sue's point, I don't post pictures of my family on the web, much less in a gallery called "Dave in Texas". No, but you DO allow yourself to be pictured with your "crap tree" on what was a top 30 blog... (Yeah, I'm STILL jealous of you getting to guest blog on Michele's site and not me) Posted by: JFH on November 29, 2005 12:32 PM
I don't waste a lot of time worrying when stupid has consequences. You don't antagonize people AND publish family portraits under an unusual name. I did the same search geoff did with the same results a month ago when I lost my wager. So that's two, acting independently. Posted by: S. Weasel on November 29, 2005 12:55 PM
I'm special. Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 29, 2005 12:59 PM
Hey Dave, Nice Crap Tree post! Posted by: Lipstick on November 29, 2005 01:10 PM
Someone tell a dick joke or something. But please, not the one about Ace's mom giving Ace's dad the reach-around. Because contrary to the expression "it's funny because it's true", it's usually not funny if it's true. Posted by: sandy burger on November 29, 2005 01:16 PM
Say Lipstick, did Dad and Boyfriend ever agree on how many goats were necessary to close the deal? Posted by: Michael on November 29, 2005 01:22 PM
Thanks Lipstick. The Crap Tree goes back up this week. It's Christmas magic! Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 29, 2005 01:24 PM
Geez Lipstick, don't encourage him! BTW, Dave, I petitioned the "Non-blogger Commenters Commission" to have you stricken from the roles based on the post, but you got lucky... On a 5-4 decision they said that one guest post doesn't ruin your amateur status. Posted by: JFH on November 29, 2005 01:25 PM
On a 5-4 decision they said that one guest post doesn't ruin your amateur status. I think I would get a pass on this though, technically it's Frank J's post. Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 29, 2005 01:36 PM
I think the obvious question here is whether it is more alarming that Rall produces sick drawings or the degree to which society finds them interesting. This is essentially the work of a little boy who was encouraged rather than counselled when it was discovered that he liked to draw crayon pictures of himself disemboweling and cannibalizing other children - he is a "grown up" now, and has found people who will pay for his crayon renditions of his mental vomit, but otherwise it's the same little boy scribbling away with a twitching eye and snaggle toothed grin. Posted by: Scott on November 29, 2005 01:46 PM
Bastard! You got invited to the wedding too, I bet! Posted by: JFH on November 29, 2005 02:04 PM
Bastard! You got invited to the wedding too, I bet! funny you should mention that... but I don't think that necessarily makes me special. hell, if you took them out to dinner, I bet they'd invite you too. Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 29, 2005 02:12 PM
What with all the judgement? We're not the shitpiles from Kos or the DU. We're not to poke fun at someone's family because we disagree with their politics. We don't roll like that. I saw the web page. I looked at the photos. No big deal. IF it's really Tubino and his family, good for him. Cute kids. But I still think Tubino is a piece of shit and can go fuck himself. He hasn't impressed me as a stand-up guy. He's the worst kind of leftist and a fucked up liberal. Tubino is the type who Hates the conservatives and holds us in contempt. He's an arrogant snob. Tubino has shown he is Internet savvy. The man knows his way around the Web. I'm not totally convinced that anything is authentic about the web page. Tubino is a liar, remember? Tubino spends a lot of time on the Internet gathering information, remember? Random pics are easy to procure on the Net. Anybody can make a web page. Makes no difference to me if Tubino has three wives and eighteen children and living in Timbuktu. I'm judging Tubino by his own words, nothing else. P.S. See that, Lauraw? I was right about Ted Rall's abandonment issues. Heh!
Posted by: Bart on November 29, 2005 02:56 PM
Its not like you're trying to crush his credit rating or steal his identity. And nobody forced him to put his stuff out on the web. He wants you to see it. Now who is more disgusting: Rall, O-Chub, Moore, (insert name here) ? Posted by: Iblis on November 29, 2005 03:34 PM
TED RALL his cartoons are as putrid as BOONDOCKS and DUNESBURY just the usial leftist crap Posted by: spurwing plover on November 29, 2005 03:53 PM
Geoff did nothing wrong ... Maybe not wrong, but I've come to believe that it was rude, and for that I apologize. Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 04:08 PM
Maybe it's just me, but I'm not comfortable with the argument, "If he didn't want personal information publicized he should have guarded it better." He didn't volunteer the info around here. Geoff did the honorable thing by retracting it. Posted by: VRWC Agent on November 29, 2005 04:20 PM
Ugh. Submissive urination. Posted by: S. Weasel on November 29, 2005 04:26 PM
Ugh. Submissive urination. Geoff, Maybe you and Utron could cuddle now. (Just kidding, man. You did nothing wrong IMHO, but your apology for rudeness is a class move.) Posted by: Rocketeer67 on November 29, 2005 04:58 PM
Ugh. Submissive urination. If you like. I spent the morning and part of the afternoon trying to decide if I'd overstepped some ethical bounds. My position may continue to evolve, but right now it seems that publishing the link without permission was at the least rude, and was objectionable to some of the regulars here. I think I'll always choose to submit to the most rigorous ethical standards, so I'm sorry if I've disappointed, but I don't see this as an issue of commenters' rights. Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 05:31 PM
Who said Tubino didn't want people to see his webpage? It's on the World Wide Web for the whole fucking world to see (except the peeps at AoS)? Bullsheet. You guys are acting like we TP'd his house or something. Don't make me formulate a theory on why y'all feel guilty. I swear I'll do it, and it won't be pretty.
Posted by: Bart on November 29, 2005 05:34 PM
I don't consider it outing, my only response is really just a general unease about seeing his wife and kids. I put that on him, not you. emphasis mine mine mine? how do you do that when you're quoting yourself? Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 29, 2005 05:41 PM
ATTENTION AOSHQ COMMENTERS. THIS IS A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT FROM THE AOSHQ COMMENT QUALITY CONTROL DEPARTMENT We wish to inform you that the ethical ramifications of Geoff's post have now been thoroughly explored. This topic is now Officially Fucking Dead. Let's move on. As a further public service, the AOSHQ Comment Quality Control Department wishes to inform you that Brewfan, Slublog, Michael and Dave in Texas have been exchanging emails and have formed the Crap Tree Appreciation Society, which is dedicated to the annual Christmas veneration and admiration of the Crap Tree in the den at Dave in Texas' house. Dave is currently scheduled to decorate the Crap Tree on Thursday. If you wish to receive pictures of this year's Crap Tree for purposes of veneration and admiration, you may appeal to Dave in Texas for membership in the Crap Tree Appreciation Society and inclusion on his distribution list. The Crap Tree Appreciation Society is a prestigious AOSHQ affiliated organization, so please do not expect that just anyone will be admitted. It is not, however, as prestigious as another AOSHQ affiliate, the Banned By Bill Association, which requires that you must have actually made smoke come out of Bill Ardolino's ears in order to achieve membership (well, it's actually not that hard). But that's another subject. This has been a Public Service Announcement from the AOSHQ Comment Quality Control Department. Posted by: AOSHQ Comment Quality Control Department on November 29, 2005 07:18 PM
We wish to inform you that the ethical ramifications of Geoff's post have now been thoroughly explored. That's a relief. Now I can link to those pictures of the AoSHQ Comment Quality Control Department in its Batman suit. Posted by: geoff on November 29, 2005 07:26 PM
bbeck will automatically be granted membership upon request, of course. Posted by: AOSHQ Comment Quality Control Department on November 29, 2005 07:34 PM
I humbly request Crap Tree membership. Please consider my application, even though I have no bbeckian photos to post. (Cause no one could out-do those.) Posted by: Lipstick on November 29, 2005 07:58 PM
ANOTHER PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT That's a relief. Now I can link to those pictures of the AoSHQ Comment Quality Control Department in its Batman suit. See, Geoff, you reeeeally don't want to do that. Cuz, the Batman suit in question was basically just some black pantyhose from the waist down (along with some ankle-thingies that were supposed to make your shoes look like boots). And the generic one-size-fits-all Batman suit was actually way too small for Michael, who is 6'4" and weighs 205 lbs. So, well, the suit was really really tight on Michael. The overall effect approaches the Painted Spiderman Testicles, if you get my drift. Michael was not sober when he put that suit on. Dude, cut him some slack. You do not want to subject the AOSHQ Comment Community to that picture. This has been a public service announcement of the AOSHQ Comment Quality Control Department. Posted by: AOSHQ Comment Quality Control Department on November 29, 2005 07:59 PM
Keep it up with the Crap Tree crap and I'll re-hash the Tubino family argument. Posted by: Bart on November 29, 2005 08:12 PM
Bart, you are so full of anger! Were you ever jealous of the attention your mother paid to your father? Do you have Democratic tendencies and struggle with hiding them from society? I'm sensing there may be some issues here that need exploring... Posted by: BrewFan on November 29, 2005 08:20 PM
ANOTHER PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT Bart is ineligible for the Crap Tree Association, a prestigious AOSHQ Affiliate Organization™. The Crap Tree Association does not accept applications from individuals who are vindictive or petty, even towards dickwads like tubino. Such individuals are incapable of properly venerating and admiring the Crap Tree. This has been a public service announcement of the AOSHQ Comment Quality Control Department. Posted by: AOSHQ Comment Quality Control Department on November 29, 2005 08:24 PM
I'm not angry, nor petty, nor vindictive. So you can stick your Crap Tree up your asses. Posted by: Bart on November 29, 2005 08:30 PM
Hey, AoSHQCQCD! Has anybody ever told you that you are not, in fact, particularly funny? This leads me to believe that you are not, in fact, a member of the AoSHQ staff who are, in fact, pretty fucking funny, as a rule. Posted by: S. Weasel on November 29, 2005 08:32 PM
Ahhh...A flame war, in fact, may be in the making! Posted by: BrewFan on November 29, 2005 08:35 PM
Dave. What's a crap tree. I needs ta know. Posted by: lauraw on November 29, 2005 08:41 PM
Laura, Google "crap tree" and Dave in Texas. It's all there. Dang, now I want a crap tree--it will be decorated with wine corks and plane ticket stubs... Posted by: Lipstick on November 29, 2005 08:45 PM
The Crap Tree, circa 2004 Lipstick, you are on the distribution list. Along with the other 4 goobers. I can't believe Cindy Sheehan gets more attention than this. Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 29, 2005 09:08 PM
Thank you Dave! Posted by: Lipstick on November 29, 2005 09:46 PM
Ohhhhh, I like the Crap Tree! 22 years worth of memories, and your wife would rather look at something that anyone can see in a Macy's. That's kind of sad, in a way. I like nice, too, but tradition and memories are important. They make up so much of what we are, especially as families. Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 29, 2005 11:20 PM
Dave: So, that's the crap tree, eh? Fine bit of collected nostalgia at work. Side note - the kitchen shot looked so familiar I feel like I've been in "that" kitchen before. Trendmaker Home? Posted by: Patton on November 30, 2005 12:27 AM
Sue, she really likes the crap tree, for all the sentimental stuff, but it ain't goin in the nice room. Patton, beats me. It's the white one with the Camaro out front. Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 30, 2005 10:07 AM
Ah, now I see. The nice room. Is the furniture in it encased in clear vinyl? ;) Posted by: Sue Dohnim on November 30, 2005 10:19 AM
noooo. dust would not dare settle there. maybe ignorant dust, that doesn't know who it's fooling with. Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 30, 2005 10:34 AM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
Funniest thing I've read about the Virginia mess. Back when they were hustling the referendum through the assembly both Senators, Warner and Kaine, advised them to go slow and play by the rules. Louise Lucas said she respected them but didn't need advice from the "cuck chair" in the corner. The gerrymandering was overturned and Louise is heading for the big house. Edward G. Robinson voice "where's your cuck now?" I posted his post on twitter and it's gotten 25K views so far. Thanks, Smell the Glove Chris
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click That Sums Up the Democrat Communist Party Today
Something is wrong as I hold you near Somebody else holds your heart, yeah You turn to me with your icy tears And then it's raining, feels like it's raining
"It's f**king f**ked."
-- reportedly a genuine comment offered by a "senior Labour source" Correction: I wrote that Labour is losing 88% (now 87%) of the seats it is "defending." I think that's wrong. The right way to say it is the seats they are contesting -- that is, they don't necessarily already hold these seats, but they have put up a candidate to run for the seat. It's still very bad but not as bad as losing 87% of the seats they already held. Basil the Great
"The end of the two party system in the UK" as first the Fake Conservatives and now Labour chooses political suicide rather than simply STOPPING THE INVASION
Incidentally, the only reason this didn't already happen in the US is because of the Very Bad Orange Man (who is right on 85% of all policy calls and extremely, existentially right on 15% of them)
No political party that is NOT also a doomsday religious cult would EVER choose a cataclysmic loss -- and possible extinction as a party -- to support a toxically unpopular favoritism of NON-CITIZEN ILLEGAL MIGRANTS over actual citizen voters.
Only a cult does this.
Now they've lost 84%.
Annunziata Rees-Mogg Update: They've now lost 88% of the seats they're defending. As I mentioned earlier, I think I heard that London will not bail them out, as many of those Labour seats will probably flip to "Muslim Independent" or Green. Detroit's 5am vote will not save them.
Yup, Labour is losing 80% of its seats...
The British Patriot Wow, up to 1700-2100 seats. It's not incredible that this is happening. It's incredible that the Davos crowd is so absolutely determined to privilege Muslim "migrants" over the actual native population who elects them, no matter how loudly the natives scream that they want to be prioritized, that they will gladly self-extinguish as a party rather than simply representing the interests of their own voters. Astonishing. Remember, when they call other people "cultists" -- they are the ones so imprisoned in their social reinforcement and discipline bubbles that they will choose political death rather than dare upset the Karen Enforcement Officers of their cult. Update: Now they've lost 83% of the seats they were defending. (((Dan Hodges))) Nick Lowles
STARMERGEDDON: In early returns, Reform gains 135 seats, Labour loses 90, the Fake Conservatives lose 36 (and I didn't even know they could fall any further), the Lib Dems lose 4, and the Greens gain 6. Note that the only other party gaining seats is the Greens and they're only gaining a handful of seats.
Update: Reform now up 145, Labour down 98. Labour projected to lose Wales -- where they've ruled for 27 years. Fulton County Georgia just discovered 400 boxes of ballots for Labour Update: REF +156, LAB -107, CON -45 Brutal: In four out of five council seats where Labour is defending, they've lost. 80%. I'm sure it's not this simple, but Reform is straight taking Labour's and the "Conservatives'" seats. They've lost almost exactly what Reform gained. If understand this right (and warning, I probably don't), all of London's council seats are up for election, and Labour might lose hugely there, as their old voters abandon them for Reform, Muslim Indenpendents, and the Greens. REF +190, LAB -134, CON -56.
Updates on the Labour collapse in council elections -- which wags are calling #Starmergeddon -- from Beege Welborne. There are about 5000 seats up for grabs, Labour is expected to lose 1,800, Reform will probably gain 1,580, up from... zero. So this would be more than that.
People claim that while Labour has adopted the Sharia Agenda to appeal to the million Muslims it allowed to migrate to the country, those voters are ditching Labour to vote for the Muslim Independent Party or the Greens. Delicious. This shadenfreude is going straight to my thighs. Oh, and if Starmer loses about as badly as expected, Labour will toss him out of a window Braveheart style and replace him. He will announce he is resigning to spend more time with his Gay Ukrainian Male Prostitutes.
Media bias and senationalism are as old as, well, the media:
![]() That was written by Denny O'Neill and illustrated by, get this, Frank Miller. Editor to the Stars Jim Shooter was in charge at the time. I always thought the gag was original to the comic book, but in fact the "Threat or Menace" headline was a satirical joke about media bias and sensationalism for a long while. The Harvard Lampoon used it in a parody of Life magazine: "Flying Saucers: Threat or Menace?"
Hamas is Humiliating Trump's 'Board of Peace'
[Hat Tip: TC] [CBD]
Ted Turner Dies At 87 [CBD]
Recent Comments
Methos:
"Okay, they've just released some of the UFO files. ..."
Cicero (@cicero43): "Man, my IQ must be down like 80 points. I must hav ..." Pug Mahon, Rock 'n' Roll Martian: "This will be my first Mother's Day since my Mom pa ..." Have you ever thought about like, water?: "Did I keep losing 20 points for every boat? I m ..." Krebs 'v' Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) Imprison! Imprison! Imprison! : "[i] "I Fell for the Bullshit About the Wonders of ..." mindful webworker - but it does move!: "🛸Speaking of extraterrestrial secrets T ..." Gotta think sales and marketing: "How about a "I Fell for the Bullshit About the ..." JackStraw: ">>d. Buying a boat. Did I keep losing 20 points ..." Krebs 'v' Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) Imprison! Imprison! Imprison! : " Fuck Off, You Perverts Day fixed! ..." Berserker-Dragonheads Division: "Holy carp. Seattle media is promoting Other’ ..." Krebs 'v' Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars (TM) Imprison! Imprison! Imprison! : "[i] The crew took photos. Posted by: publius, Ra ..." four seasons: " Howz about Fuck Off Day you perverts. ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|