Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

Texas MoMe 2026: 10/16/2026-10/17/2026 Corsicana,TX
Contact Ben Had for info





















« Army: "We Want Artificial Gills!" | Main | Mass-Murder's Popularity Takes A Hit »
November 13, 2005

Zarqawi's Sister Arrested; Bomb Didn't Detonate

Let's hope Andrew Sullivan gets his way and no one so much as raises his voice to this psychotic whore.

Let's see... she intended to blow herself up (along with scores of innocents). Seems to me a little arm-twisting would be far less injury than she intended to inflict on herself.


posted by Ace at 04:42 PM
Comments



She's not psychotic, she subscribes to an exceptionally evil ideology. Big difference. Hardly any of the atrocity loving muslim terrorists are really insane. If it were a question of sanity, the threat would be far less.

Posted by: Village Idiot on November 13, 2005 04:49 PM

"Rishawi is the sister of a former senior aide to Abu Musab al Zarqawi - the leader of terror group al Qaeda in Iraq."

Loose shit.

Still, I wonder why her brother is a "former" aid to Zarqawi? Do you think he retired?

Posted by: Master of None on November 13, 2005 05:12 PM

But we can't twist their arms or Silly Sully will get his panties twisted in a wad.

Posted by: MH on November 13, 2005 05:38 PM

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought she was in the custody of the Jordanians. If so, she should be wishing she was captured by US forces.

Will Sully have harsh words for the way Arabs interrogate other Arabs?

Posted by: lauraw on November 13, 2005 06:13 PM

Gosh, Laura, I hope not. Because the logical result of Sully's shrill squeaking will be that we hand those kinds of suspects off to the arm-twisting regimes to be interrogated effectively. I'd hate to think that Andy was emoting without forethought.

Posted by: Sortelli on November 13, 2005 06:23 PM

Can anyone explain what in the world she was planning to do with 72 virgins???

Posted by: Dogstar on November 13, 2005 06:33 PM

The former aid has purchased a large piece of agrarian real estate sold to him by the US Military.

Posted by: Brass on November 13, 2005 06:41 PM

Dogstar,
What the story didn't mention that in addition to a strap on bomb, she had a strap on .......tool. Yeah, that's it. Those virgins were gonna be in for it.

Posted by: Sticky B on November 13, 2005 06:53 PM

I'm against arm twisting. I say break it. Both of them.

Posted by: on November 13, 2005 07:34 PM

Well, from the picture, I can finally understand the reason for burkhas and the whole hijab thing.

Yes, it's a cheap shot, but she's undeniably deserving, on multiple levels. Woof.

Posted by: Patton on November 13, 2005 08:08 PM

Patton, you are absolutely right.

They should just run pictures of Melissa the hot french newscaster

Posted by: Sean on November 13, 2005 08:16 PM

I was figuring her nasty ass look was mostly from that "Oh, shit, I really truly sincerely wish I was dead" expression on her face.

Too bad she's going to have to face up to what her companions did before joining them.

Posted by: Sortelli on November 13, 2005 09:17 PM

Where's tubino?

You'd think he'd be defending her by now.

After all, this HAS to reflect on Bush somehow, right?

Posted by: Edward R. Murrow on November 13, 2005 09:20 PM

The tub of fun would only appear on a thread like this to try and change the subject to his Fitzmas Wish List.

And when we failed to receive his wisdom he'd accuse us of dodging the issue.

Then he'd go slather himself up with butter and post pictures of himself on the internet wearing nothing but a diaper.

Posted by: Sortelli on November 13, 2005 10:03 PM

Considering fake menstrual blood probably wouldn't be nearly as effective against her--would Sully object to throwing a cup of warm yogurt on her and telling her it's baby batter?

Posted by: Christopher Cross on November 13, 2005 10:34 PM

Yeah, Christopher Cross, that would be so different than a regular Saturday night for her.

Perhaps if she were told it was from a joo...

Posted by: lauraw on November 13, 2005 10:48 PM

...baby batter

lol! AoSHQ and commenters is a font of knowledge!

BTW, Sailing is one of my favorites. Rock on!

Posted by: BrewFan on November 13, 2005 10:50 PM

Fake "baby batter" or no, it'd be gob-smackingly vile if the poor dear were draped with an Israeli flag.

Posted by: Sean M. on November 13, 2005 11:19 PM

Joy juice on a woman? I think he'd still be nauseated by the vileness of it all.

Posted by: VRWC Agent on November 13, 2005 11:47 PM

Well, lucky for us (and unlucky for her) she was captured by the Jordanians, not us. They can do whatever they like to her and no one will care. After all, it is only Americans putting panties on peoples heads and speaking to them in harsh tones our liberals lefties have trouble with. When Arabs do the torturing, no one cares in the slightest.

Right, Tubino?

Posted by: BattleofthePyramids on November 14, 2005 01:17 AM

We should threaten them with superior technology. Tell them we can use drugs, sensory deprevation, hynotism and brainwashing techniques to turn them into unbelievers who will go to hell.

Tell them we can use truth serum to find out their worst fears, and then use them against them.

And then, if they still don't believe us, do it to some and show them to the rest.

Posted by: Dogstar on November 14, 2005 01:57 AM

I just saw a story about this on the news. It seems an Al Qaeda website gave her away by praising her as one of the bombers. It seems the dumbasses didn't realize that she failed to 'splode.

D'oh!

Posted by: Sean M. on November 14, 2005 02:46 AM

How dare they show her on TV! As a captured insurgent, she should be accorded full Geneva rights, and certainly that includes not being allowed to be exploited for propaganda purposes.

I wonder if Sullivan and the ACLU will be working closely with the Jordanian human right orgs to protest this act!

Posted by: Aaron on November 14, 2005 03:58 AM

Al Qaeda website gave her away by praising her as one of the bombers. It seems the dumbasses didn't realize that she failed to 'splode

Maybe she wasn't supposed to explode...

...not all bombs are necessarily intended to detonate.

The coming weeks will indicate if there was value to AQ in having a "survivor".

If the non-detonation was NOT intentional, then that speaks to the quality of the bomb makers AQ has available. One would think that a high profile job like this, using high profile "personalities", would warrant using the best available talent.

Posted by: Purple Avenger on November 14, 2005 04:14 AM

Expanding on the above...

This may have been a probe to test the response of the Jordanian legal system and resolve.

It may have been a ploy to inject a "rallying point" for the splodydopes into the Jordanian prison system. Live bodies attract more lasting emotion than dead ones..."free Mumia!" and all that kind of stuff.

The Jordanians were mostly on board with the WOT anyway, so provoking them wouldn't ratchet up their cooperation much more than it already was. If AQ was willing to largely ignore jordan as a transit point, then they wouldn't care how much Jordan beefs up internal security.

Posted by: Purple Avenger on November 14, 2005 04:22 AM
...baby batter
lol! AoSHQ and commenters is a font of knowledge!

Considering the subject matter, couldn't you have chosen a better word than "font"? Bad imagery, man.

Posted by: sandy burger on November 14, 2005 04:41 AM

Having looked at her picture, I can understand why her husband wanted to kill himself. What puzzles me, though, is why he wanted to kill other people in the process.

If we were serious about winning the war on terror, we'd just widely distribute posters with 72 pictures of her. No caption necessary.

Posted by: on November 14, 2005 04:59 AM

She didn't look too "blown up" for having been in the middle of a bombing.

This seems curious to me. Why wasn't the vid clip taped from an ICU ward?

If the bomb was in fact good, this is one that got cold feet or is a psyops plant.

No bomb experts have said yet if the bomb was good or bad. This to I find curious.

Posted by: Purple Avenger on November 14, 2005 06:51 AM

I thought it was a little wierd that she was still wearing the whole thing during the TV interview. What if one of the wires was just a little loose? Adjust your weight, turn a little, make that connection and then...

BAMMMMMM!!!!!

Posted by: Dogstar on November 14, 2005 08:30 AM

As an American, I'm perfectly okay with torturing terrorists and terror suspects. I condone it. I expect it. And I want it. So by all means, torture in my name, please. In fact, I'm willing to volunteer to torture terror suspects.

I'll even drag a few around by a leash -- for kicks.

If torturing one hundred terrorists leads to saving one American soldier on a Baghdad road, or any American life anywhere in the world, it is worth it.


Does anyone else have a problem with torturing terror suspects?

Posted by: Bart on November 14, 2005 05:22 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
@KFILE 21m

Politico is reporting that multiple people have abruptly resigned from Eric Swalwell's gubernatorial campaign: "Members of senior leadership have departed the campaign, including Courtni Pugh, a strategic adviser who served as Swalwell's top liaison to organized labor groups."

So the campaign is collapsing due to the truth of the sexual harassment allegations.
That hissing sound you hear is the air going out of the Swalwell campaign. UPDATE: No it wasn't, it was just Swalwell one-cheek-sneaking out a fart on camera
Eric Swalwell more like Eric Farewell amirite
thanks to weft-cut loop.
This is the dumbest AI bullslop I've seen in a while: the CIA can use "quantum magnetometry" to track an individual man's heartbeat from twelve miles away
I wouldn't click on it, it's not interesting, it's just stupid clickslop. I just want to share my annoyance with you.
Oil prices plunge on bizarre realization that Eric Swalwell may actually be straight. A rapey molester, allegedly, but a straight one.
Classic Rock Mystery Click
This is super-obscure and I only barely remember it. Given that, I'll give you the hint that it's by the Red Rocker.
And I guess you think you've got it made
Oh, but then, you never were afraid
Of anything that you've left behind
Oh, but it's alright with me now
'Cause I'll get back up somehow
And with a little luck, yes, I'm bound to win

Now twenty people will tell me it's not obscure, it was huge in their hometown and played at their prom. That's how it usually goes. When I linked Donnie Iris's "Love is Like a Rock," everyone said they knew that one and that his other song (which I didn't know at all) Ah Leah! was huge in their area.
You know we "joke" about the GOPe just "conserving" leftist things?
David French just posted:

Populists ask what conservativism has ever conserved?
Well its about to conserve birthright citizenship!
Posted by: 18-1

I couldn't hate this queen of the cuck-chair more if it paid seven figures and came with a corner office.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk birthright citizenship, the 14th Amendment and SCOTUS, no boots in Iran, Artemis II and refocusing NASA, the NBA's hatred of everything non-woke, and more!
In more marketing for Project Hail Mary, scientists say they've found the biosigns indicating life growing on an alien planet. It's not proof, just signatures of chemicals that are produced by biological metabolism, and it could be nothing, but scientists think it's a strong sign that this planet is inhabited by something.
In a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a team of scientists announced the detection of dimethyl sulfide (along with a similar detection of dimethyl disulfide) in the atmosphere of an exoplanet called K2-18b. This is actually the second detection of dimethyl sulfide made on this planet, following a tentative detection in 2023.
Tons of chemicals are detected in the atmospheres of celestial objects every day. But dimethyl sulfide is different, because on Earth, it's only produced by living organisms.
"It is a shock to the system," Nikku Madhusudhan, first author on the paper, told the New York Times. "We spent an enormous amount of time just trying to get rid of the signal."

He means they tried to prove the signal was caused by things other than dimethyl sulfide but they could not.
Artemis moon shot a go, scheduled for 6:24 Eastern time tonight
Great marketing arranged by Amazon to promote Project Hail Mary. Okay not really but it does work out that way.
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
Recent Comments
[/i][/i][/i][/s][/s][/s][/b][/b][/b]Christopher R Taylor: "I don't care for horror movies in general so perha ..."

moviegique (buy my books): "I nominate "Prometheus" to be staked inside a clea ..."

Ronster: "Back at you Ben Had. ..."

PaleRider: "Oh right, I have to find envelops to mail my tax ..."

JQ: "Hi, Ben Had! Your origami ornaments sound perfect ..."

All Hail Eris, She-Wolf of the 'Ettes 'Ettes.: "5 Look, it's practically Walpurgisnacht, or "Sprin ..."

Mark1971: "I like 16:9 Ace Of Spades ..."

Pug Mahon, Trumpy can do magic: "Camels moving slowly, left to right...... dust... ..."

Smell the Glove: "Thx moviegique . Tom Atkins had one of the great ..."

Ben Had: "Waving to Ronster and JQ. ..."

moviegique (buy my books): "10 Okay, how did Joe Bob rate it on the Beasts/Bre ..."

Skip: "Just had a double take this wasn't a old thread ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives