Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« So that's why they call it the "City of Lights!" | Main | Worst Night of Rioting Yet In France »
November 05, 2005

Danger Averted?

Friday before last, October 28th, Tai Wang Mak, and his wife, both resident aliens and Chinese citizens, sat nervously at LAX, waiting to board a flight to Hong Kong.

I’m sure Hong Kong is lovely this time of year, and a getaway would have been nice, but sadly, they never made it on board.

The reason? A problem with their carry-on baggage.

Apparently, it included several encrypted CDs which Tai Wang had received from his brother, Chi Mak - lead project engineer on our naval “Quiet Electric Drive” system (our real world version of the silent propulsion the Ruskies had in Red October.)

Yes, the disks contained information on the Q.E.D. project which they were intending to pass along to the Chinese military after Tai caught his connecting flight to Guangzhou.

Those are the details that are just emerging now as the arrest warrant's affidavits become public. You can read news accounts here, here and here. (though I wouldn't bother)

To get the full background on what was really happening, you’d have to turn to Bill Gertz, Washington Times reporter/favored intelligence community leakee.

He explains, today, that this wasn’t quite the “Pfew, disaster averted!” moment the other pieces might lead you to believe. In fact, Chi Mak and his brother weren’t just one-time spies we caught at the last moment. No, the engineer and his family had been running an incredibly damaging espionage ring since 1990.

How damaging? Here's a taste:

Key compromises uncovered so far include sensitive data on Aegis battle management systems that are the core of U.S. Navy destroyers and cruisers.

China covertly obtained the Aegis technology and earlier this year deployed its first Aegis warship, code-named Magic Shield, intelligence officials have said.

The Chinese also obtained sensitive data on U.S. submarines, including classified details related to the new Virginia-class attack submarines.

Officials said based on a preliminary assessment, China now will be able to track U.S. submarines, a compromise that potentially could be devastating if the United States enters a conflict with China in defending Taiwan.
...

China also is thought to have obtained information from the spy ring that will assist Chinese military development of electromagnetic pulse weapons -- weapons that simulate the electronic shock caused by a nuclear blast -- that disrupt electronics.

It also is thought to have obtained unmanned aerial vehicle technology from the spy ring.

To put this in context, why these leaks were so harmful, it’s useful to turn to Gertz again.

This longish July article makes clear China has intentions on Taiwan. This is absolutely nothing new (although it explains a little of their strategy in bringing it about), but the piece will help make concrete how these naval leaks will have dire, real world consequences. Military advantages we’d been counting on have been lost.


The July article on their espionage efforts:

China is stepping up its overt and covert efforts to gather intelligence and technology in the United States, and the activities have boosted Beijing's plans to rapidly produce advanced-weapons systems.

"I think you see it where something that would normally take 10 years to develop takes them two or three," said David Szady, chief of FBI counterintelligence operations.

He said the Chinese are prolific collectors of secrets and military-related information.

"What we're finding is that [the spying is] much more focused in certain areas than we ever thought, such as command and control and things of that sort," Mr. Szady said.

"In the military area, the rapid development of their 'blue-water' navy -- like the Aegis weapons systems -- in no small part is probably due to some of the research and development they were able to get from the United States," he said.

The danger of Chinese technology acquisition is that if the United States were called on to fight a war with China over the Republic of China (Taiwan), U.S. forces could find themselves battling a U.S.-equipped enemy.

The Chinese intelligence services use a variety of methods to spy, including traditional intelligence operations targeting U.S. government agencies and defense contractors.

Additionally, the Chinese use hundreds of thousands of Chinese visitors, students and other nonprofessional spies to gather valuable data, most of it considered "open source," or unclassified information.

"What keeps us up late at night is the asymmetrical, unofficial presence," Mr. Szady said. "The official presence, too. I don't want to minimize that at all in what they are doing."

China's spies use as many as 3,200 front companies -- many run by groups linked to the Chinese military -- that are set up to covertly obtain information, equipment and technology, U.S. officials say.”

I think the problem is huge, and it's something that I think we're just getting our arms around," Mr. Szady said of Chinese spying. "It's been there, and what we're doing is more or less discovering it or figuring it out at this point."

For more background on the Chinese use of front companies, the Heritage Foundation, with rather nice timing, put out this release yesterday.

And if you wanna learn about the Chinese use of computer hackers to crack into the DOD's and military contractors’ computer networks, try Time Magazine’s August 28th piece “Invasion of the Chinese Cyberspies” (behind their wall, but reproduced here) An entertaining (if that's the right word) read.


All in all, scary stuff. None of it’s comforting, but if nothing else, we’re waking up to the issue.

posted by Dr. Reo Symes at 04:25 PM
Comments



I had a friend from Hungary tell me about 6 months ago that China would be our next big problem. She had NO doubt.

This looks pretty bad.

Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on November 5, 2005 04:32 PM

I've spent some time working in Taiwan, have had an opportunity to listen to views on China and their future.

Opinions seems evenly split between those who favor separation, and those who favor leaving everything just the way it is.

It's troubling to see China's aggressive espionage, and it is as dangerous as you suggest.

The biggest problem China faces in pulling in the diamond of Taiwan is how to assert control without destroying the economic engine that makes it so valuable.

Probably why China has thrown lots of money (including Taiwanese investment) into building their industries. They'd love to replicate Taiwan's success. They can probably do it too.

Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 5, 2005 05:10 PM

It would be nice if we had a competent intelligence agency, wouldn't it?

I take some consolation in the knowlege that whereas intelligence is a tactical advantage, it's not generally the deciding factor. Long term, a broken system like China's cannot defeat a functional system like America's, no matter how good their spies are. The USSR had better intelligence than us, too.

I'm not trying to dismiss all this as trivial. In fact, it's terrifying. But we're not all doomed, either.

Posted by: SJKevin on November 5, 2005 05:37 PM

Total war with China would be unbelievably bad. We would all suffer immensely. It's hard to imagine what it would be like.

We obviously can't let China just mess up the entire world. So, there are some lines that they cannot cross without war breaking out. (War which they would lose, but at immense cost to us.) But the scary thing is that we don't really know where those lines are, and neither do they.

Are we willing to go to war for Taiwan? Are you? Am I? I don't really know. We've made the threat, and none of us really knows whether or not we actually mean it. Let's hope that China decides that we absolutely do mean it, because if they ever decide that we don't, it's either goodbye to Taiwan or goodbye to our peaceful American lifestyles, depending on whether or not China read us correctly.

Posted by: SJKevin on November 5, 2005 05:44 PM

I dunno, maybe I am not up to date on fascist military technology, but I am pretty sure that China doesn't have enough of the good stuff to do anything. It would be different if their army could swim further than 25 meters.

Again, based on my own limited guesswork, I don't see how China has a realistic expectation of invading Taiwan. Or if they get pissed at us, what they would do. What, invade North Korea or Russia? Maybe swim to Japan too?

Is Taiwan worth it? I am inclined to protect the few real democracies out there. Especially one that has a vibrant capitalist market.

Posted by: joeindc44 on November 5, 2005 06:02 PM

Yeah, it's that damn island that's fuckin everything up.

I'm not one of those that sees China's emergence as a threat. Frankly, it'd be a boon to have one billion plus people come online in the world economy, with all the research and technical advancements that many capitalist brains can give. We're all better off.

The problem, though, is that they're still a fascist state. That's not an empty slur. Do a cool headed examination and it's the most appropriate word. Behind the talk of nighclubs, and growing consumer culture, they're still a one-party state, tossing people in prison, executing people for their dangerous bad thoughts and speech.

People like that Barnett guy say, essentially, give 'em Taiwan. China's capitalaist growth will necessiatate freedom.

I agree with that last part. I'm not down with that cynical-sophisticate line where China is supposedly finding it's own way, that their population may well settle on go-go capiltalism under fascism in the long term. I doubt it. A taste of freedom changes what you're satisfied with elsewhere in your life.

But does that mean we turn our back on Taiwan? Say screw you, screw your freedom? Stability and the long term uber alles? I thought we were done with that Realpolitik shit. I hoped we were.

Still though? Nuclear war with China over Taiwan? There ain't no answers on this one.

Posted by: Reo Symes on November 5, 2005 06:04 PM

First off, it's Nationalist China, not Taiwan.
They're the ones who will return to power when the ChiCom system finally collapses. They are worth backing and protecting.
Secondly, we should treat the Red Chinese as the enemy that they are. A very public political and economic stand will assist the internal foes of the regime. Communism cannot long survive with the capitalism that's going on there.
Thirdly, everyone at the CIA needs to be sent to re-education camp to be reminded for whom they work.

Posted by: harrison on November 5, 2005 06:15 PM

Dr. Symes,

Yes, we are going to war, even nuclear if necessary, over Taiwan. It will be rough, but the PRC will cease to exist and in its place a new Warring States period will replace it.

If the US lets Taiwan get overrun, you'll get the same problems as the French are having in the Parisian suburbs and the New Orleans government got when they let looters loot. The Chinese Communist Party, no stranger to killing millions of people at a time, would feel unrestrained and run amok in East Asia. Our ally Japan would slide into neutralism and South Korea will swing to the PRC. These are bad things even if unsustainable by the PRC in the long run.

I won't even get into the inspiration it would provide to the Islamofascists...

Not to be paranoid or anything, but our enemies wherever they are, are waiting for the moment we show weakness. Letting a successful democracy fall to the Red Chinese, no matter how capitalistic they have become, would make our situation much more complicated and dangerous.

Therefore, an invasion of Taiwan is practically an automatic casus belli.

Posted by: EricTheRed21 on November 5, 2005 06:18 PM

Didn't we used to execute people for this sort of thing? Rosen-something?

I've been thinking a bit lately on how inappropriate the comparisons of Bush to Reagan have been. His presidency has seemed much closer to Truman's in most ways. And here comes another parallel event. It would be a poor comment on what decades of leftist influence have done to us if we fail to respond decisively to this kind of espionage once it has been detected.

Posted by: VRWC Agent on November 5, 2005 06:53 PM

It would be different if their army could swim further than 25 meters.

A major focus of the PRC order of battle for the past 10 years has been rectifying their long standing troop transport/amphibious problem. To a large degree they have been successful.

Today, they probably have enough transport capability to launch an invasion.

The USA desperately needs about 10 small titanium hulled diesel/electric subs in its inventory. Right now, we have zero and the nukes are too noisy.

Posted by: Purple Avenger on November 5, 2005 08:24 PM

Thank you, Bill Clinton. Burn in hell.

Posted by: someone on November 5, 2005 08:45 PM

OT -

A
club that has our name written all over it. Check out Wisconsin. Lol!

Posted by: BrewFan on November 5, 2005 09:09 PM

To those who thought Billy Bub was prudent in stifling the CIA into nothingness and cutting back all phases of the military (especially R & D), I concur completely with "someone". I hope he has not crippled our country beyond repair.

Then there's the next thought: Hillary in '08? I think not, since she probably goaded Billy Bub into his hits on intelligence and military because his thought stream was concentrated on cigars and blue dresses...

Posted by: Carlos on November 5, 2005 09:10 PM

Anyone know a good chinese-language learning course?
As a member of the US Military, I'm very sure I'm gonna need it before I retire.
I just hope they let us finish in the middle east first.
-And Europe is in for a rude wake-up call because when the Dragon Slipper Drops, Their bases will close as the whole US Military is relocated to SouthEast Asia.

Posted by: EbeneezerSquid on November 5, 2005 09:26 PM

Got just the place for you EbeneezerSquid! My Alma Mater; North Vietnam language class of '73-'74 :)

Posted by: BrewFan on November 5, 2005 09:31 PM

This is a very bad situation. China could probably take Taiwan now, in an amphibious/airborne invasion without too much trouble. Even without these espionage revelations, we would have had a very hard time stopping them. Now I am not sure that we can protect Taiwan at all, at least not without using nukes.

Posted by: BattleofthePyramids on November 5, 2005 11:18 PM

Let's have all of our electronics and computer parts manufactured in their sphere of influence. That way they can manufacture the hardware with something like a Y2K bug, say the middle earth 4Q USA bug. That'll fool em! Another worm of Clintonian proportions.

Posted by: Dennis on November 5, 2005 11:35 PM

how much the Clintons make on these deals?

Posted by: on November 6, 2005 04:25 AM

To EricTheRed21:

Hi I'm from SouthEast Asia and quite frankly I think you're just a paranoid asshole. The Chinese Communist Party, no stranger to killing millions of people Where the fuck you get that from? How about your ally Japan? Or is it more convenient to leave that out cuz they're your ally?

And have you ever been to Tawian? Do you really think they prefer to break away from China? I mean, have you ever been to the ground at all? I have, and the Taiwanese people -- peasants, villagers, taxi-drivers et al -- would rather keep the status quo than throw confetti at the American troops. Just because your media tend to portray a one-sided view doesn't mean the real thing. What do you really know about ASIA? Nothing.

And to EbeneezerSquid:

Oh, so after you lot are done conquering the Middle east, you're gonna park your warring asses in Asia?

Uncle Sam is in the middle of two wars, has his warships all over the planet, and here he is scared stiff of China's emergence; Rumsfeld can only harp on China's increasing military spending insead of checking his own balance sheet.

Let me tell you something: Asia -- maybe except maybe the Japanese -- is much more comfortable with China's rise than America's dominance of the region. We're just waiting for that day when we can do away with you lot.

I'm not even from China but like the rest of the world I think you guys are really pissing us off. Badly.

Posted by: kai on November 6, 2005 06:24 AM

Oh yeah and please stuff that 'liberation of lesser countries' back down your throats. (Or is that expanding your sphere of influence by wars and aggressive actions)

Democracy is not a populist whore, ya know?

Posted by: kai on November 6, 2005 06:35 AM

Kai says " I think you're just a paranoid asshole" and then finishes with "We're just waiting for that day when we can do away with you lot." Hmmmm, interesting...

Posted by: andy on November 6, 2005 06:52 AM

"We're just waiting for that day when we can do away with you lot."

It's funny how Americans don't feel this way about SE Asians who come to America in droves. What are you, Kai, racist against whites? Do you actually support the Chinese totalitarian state (like how they interrgate, er ,beat to death, Christians and imprison the fulong gong?

I have never been to SE Asia, but I did speak with a diplomat from Taiwan once who said that most Taiwanese would hate to be part of the PRC and how they find the American presence more preferrable.

Posted by: fasterplease on November 6, 2005 07:32 AM

Love how the tough talk manages to ignore that the US economy is kept going by the Chinese contribution to the $2 BILLION /DAY borrowed by the US.

Republican borrow-and-spend recklessness is tilting the balance of power -- toward China.

Thanks, George, thanks Grover, thanks to all the Bush team.

Like Reo, I don't think China has to be feared, but a little dose of reality on the part of the US in adapting to a multi-polar world would NOT be a bad thing.

Posted by: tubino on November 6, 2005 07:57 AM

The Chinese Communist Party, no stranger to killing millions of people Where the fuck you get that from?

Right here, dipshit. 40 million killed by Mao and his stooges, not counting 2.5 million in the Chinese civil war and another half million or more in Tibet.

The Chinese Communists have more blood on their hands than any other group in history. Though if you add Hitler and Stalin together, they come close.

Posted by: Pixy Misa on November 6, 2005 08:06 AM

Nice smack down Pixy. Kai might be forgiven for his ignorance if he grew up in a country that rewrote history as a matter of government policy. Tubino, on the other hand, is just an ignorant asshat who either chose not to learn any history or just chooses to ignore it so it doesn't interfer with his worldview. I suspect the latter.

Posted by: BrewFan on November 6, 2005 08:31 AM

Very Nice, Pixy. One other thing Mao had in common with Stalin was that he was so certain in the 'rightness' of his Marxist worldview that he didn't care about how many he killed or died under his power since it all would be for the better in the long run. So Stalin allowed 5-6 million Ukrainians to starve to death in the 1930s, and in the 1960s, Mao allowed 20 million Chinese to starve to death when he tried to collectivize the economy.

Granted, Mao's successors are not nearly as bad as Mao. But what makes China such a threat is that there is no political mechanism in place (that I know of) that will prevent another Mao from gaining power in China. In America, you have democracy, checks and balances, separation of powers, term limits, the Bill of Rights, etc. China has none of these.

Posted by: fasterplease on November 6, 2005 08:46 AM

Andy: It's interesting how you refer to only the first and last sentence of what I said, and then draw your conclusion. Do you read only the first and last paragraph of every book or news article or do you even read at all?

fasterplease: Oh that so? Do you have any SE Asian friends? But anyway if Americans don't feel that way about us, maybe it's becuz we're almost always gainfully employed, and that we also don't impose our ideologies on whoever, wherever we go?

Also, in case you didn't notice, I was speaking in terms of security and troops, not Americans per se or even whites. So don't be so quick to dish out your racist accusations -- your great 'equalizer' -- if you can't read properly.

Like I said, I'm not from China and I do not have any overt affection for her. . but hey didn't your gov't do exactly the same thing (interrgate, beat to death, muslims in some cases) in Gitmo?! What right have you to comment on China's totalitarianism? Because you really, er, dig human rights and your brand of democracy? So why don't you do what you preach, hang out some placards and start protesting somewhere for the Gitmo prisoners?

And so you did speak with a Taiwanese DIPLOMAT (note: not civilian) probably from the incumbent party who likely never have integrated themselves with their communities, and told you what he thought? Of course if I were to speak with Bush now, he'd probably tell me the war in Iraq was going great, wouldn't he?

Oh by the way, from what I see, you guys don't have to worry about any intelligence leaks in your country; you've got your Cheneys and Roves for that.

Posted by: kai on November 6, 2005 09:03 AM

Pixy: Thanks, bitch. I know that's really alot compared to how many POWs were starved and killed by American troops, and how many will be in the future. Keep it up! You'll be nearly there.

Kai might be forgiven for his ignorance if he grew up in a country that rewrote history as a matter of government policy.

Fuck off, brewfan. I'm not even from China. But that just exacerbates the anti-American sentiments brewing here in Asia, and the rest of the world, doesn't it. And I suspect it's due to ignorant rednecks like you.

Rewrote history?

You guys mean China's -- and Japan's? But of course we should just close an eye on Japan's war-time actrocities becuz they're America's wonderful and subservient ally and they keep coming up with those wonderful cars and gadgets.

China? They're only good at producing cheap stuff and labor and causing budget deficits in the US when you guys have 0% savings.

Posted by: kai on November 6, 2005 09:31 AM

Kai
"we also don't impose our ideologies on whoever, wherever we go." I'm sure there are a lot of Christians and Tibetans who wouldn't agree with that.

Anyway, as far as your lame Gitmo analogy goes, something happened on September 11, 2001. Not sure if you remember, but our country was attacked. We are at war. The vast majority of people detained at Gitmo were illegal aliens anyway. Which means we had the legal right to detain or deport them before 9-11. Many of them also are terrorists or people who planned to do harm to the US. Further, many of those folks are treated a heck of a lot better than people in Chinese prisons. Didn't you hear about the Chechnians prisoners who wrote home about how they DIDN'T want to leave Gitmo because they were treated better there than in the home countries? Or the innocent Afghani youth who was imprisoned there, released, and sent home bragging that the Americans taught him to read? Please send me similar heartwarming stories coming from any of the PRC dungeons.

Also, Christians are oppressed in China en masse and they never slammed airliners into buildings. These are innocent folks the PRC wants to squelch whereas many of the people in Gitmo are not so innocent.

No one is denying that the Japanese were bastards before and during WWII. It's just that now they are a parliamentary democracy and an free society to boot. I really respect the Japanese for what they've done in such a short time.

Finally, if America is so onerous, why is it that so many of your gainfully employed Chinese choose to come to America whereas very very few Americans choose to live in China? Answer: America is a better and more free country than China. Do your homework, pal.

You obviously can't run with the big doggies, so all you can do is sit on your porch and bark.

Posted by: fasterplease on November 6, 2005 09:58 AM

So, this worthless fucking BOLO is going to come here and tell us all how it is. O.K., kai, I'll bite:

When confronted with numbers that prove your utter stupidity, you retort with, "I'm sure that Americans have killed just as many P.O.W.'s. Really? PROVE IT. I want to see a fucking link to a statistic, ANY STATISTIC that shows where American troops STARVED P.O.W.'s. Any. And as for the statement about Gitmo, do you have any idea what the FUCK you are even talking about?

But I guess your little head cannot comprehend things like facts and logic, so I'll give you a free lesson:

America: Holds suspected terrorists for questioning in a place where they are given three hots and a cot, a copy of the Q'uaran, (which is even ceremoniously clensed before offered to the detainee), and a prayer message played over the loudspeaker 5 FUCKING TIMES A DAY so as not to anger the poor Islamist. After these poor terrorists have settled in, interrogators begin questioning, in which the detainee is subjected to horrifying things like Christina Aguellara's voice, wearing underwear on their head, and having to answer questions by a..(My god, the HORROR) A WOMAN!

PRC: Never even presumed anything but guilty, these poor bastards are lucky enough to experience Chinese interrogation

Yeah, kai. I see what you mean. We Amerikkkans are soo cruel. Why can't we be more like SE Asia?

Veritas

Posted by: Veritas on November 6, 2005 10:05 AM

Why can't we get a decent class of troll in here? I've been hoping for a step up, but Kai is several rungs down. If Tubino had any intellectual honesty, *he* would be hammering on Kai as well.

Posted by: geoff on November 6, 2005 10:15 AM

Geoff,
God gave tubby a choice between intellectual honesty and a direct telepathic link to Kos' talking points.

I think we know which one he chose.

Posted by: Veritas on November 6, 2005 10:26 AM

Republican borrow-and-spend recklessness is tilting the balance of power -- toward China.

Who is holding whose money? The power tilts in the opposite direction, stud.

Posted by: VRWC Agent on November 6, 2005 01:29 PM

Kai:

How about your ally Japan? Or is it more convenient to leave that out cuz they're your ally?

Back when Japan was killing large numbers of people, they were not our allies. We dropped some nuclear bombs on them to make them stop.

We freed SE Asia from Japanese imperialism.

I have, and the Taiwanese people -- peasants, villagers, taxi-drivers et al -- would rather keep the status quo than throw confetti at the American troops.

Guess what? The American people don't want war with China, either. We prefer the status quo, too. But if the status quo comes to an end, it won't be because of us; it'll be because China invades Taiwan. And in that case, it'll be a choice between throwing confetti at American liberators or Chinese conquerors. The Taiwanese have made their preference in that matter quite clear.

Let me tell you something: Asia -- maybe except maybe the Japanese -- is much more comfortable with China's rise than America's dominance of the region. We're just waiting for that day when we can do away with you lot.

This is just silly. It may be true in some circles of university students, there as it is here, but it is completely untrue about Asian societies at large. The democratic SE Asian nations enter defense and intelligence-sharing agreements with America, not China. As far as trade goes, America trades with China, too. So?

And skip the silly "you don't know anything about Asia!" nonsense. You don't speak for all Asians. I used to live in SE Asia, and I know from firsthand experience that you're spouting nonsense.

Posted by: SJKevin on November 6, 2005 01:29 PM

I love it when you guys bring the smack down.

Posted by: Brass on November 6, 2005 03:16 PM

"Do you have any SE Asian friends?"

Try family members. ASShat.

Posted by: Knemon on November 6, 2005 03:39 PM

Kai,

OK, since you addressed me directly I'll bite.

First of all, I endorse practically everything said regarding your specific criticisms. Thanks to all for their insightful comments.

Second, no, I haven't been to Taiwan, but I have a hard time believing that an invasion by the PRC would be welcomed. You see, friends and family would be killed in the ensuing combat, thus starting "a cycle of violence," that will most probably end in PRC failure. I do not underestimate the Taiwanese military's ability to defend their country especially since the Chinese have little practical experience with amphibious warfare and will be up against a first-class foe.

Third, I believe that the unification of China should be a political matter and not a military one, something that I would think the Taiwanese people would agree with. Whether a majority would support unification over the status quo or outright independence is not clear to me and not really my concern. But I do think they should be allowed to make their own choices; the PRC's actions to date suggest that if the Taiwanese decide a certain way, they would force them to change their minds. America shouldn't let the PRC be the last word in the self-determination of Taiwan. I would be shocked to think that any freedom-loving person would believe that the PRC should be allowed to have the last word on such a subject.

As for the relative balance between the PRC and the US, I don't really worry about it. The US has the most dynamic and powerful economy in the world. Even after 9/11, liberating two countries thousands of miles away, and going through the bursting of the tech bubble, the US still has the world's leading economy. The PRC is still learning the ropes with their somewhat more open markets, and, with the CCP in charge, it is guaranteed that corruption and accounting games on a horrendous scale are going on. For all of the talk of a multipolar world, I find it interesting that no one looks to China for help in the wake of a disaster, and instead looks to the Great Satan.

Posted by: EricTheRed21 on November 6, 2005 05:42 PM

I would be shocked to think that any freedom-loving person would believe that the PRC should be allowed to have the last word on such a subject.

freedom-loving? This Kai person is obviously redder than chairman Mao.

Posted by: Purple Avenger on November 6, 2005 06:18 PM

Gawd, not again! Every freaking minority ethnic group with dual citizenship and a math/science graduate degee, Jew, Indian, Paki, Chinese, Korean, and Japanese, is a threat to our national security.

How much longer are we going to spend US money giving these chumps PhDs and pay the even bigger price when they go south for their "homeland", their "people", and their "nation".

F*ck 'em all. None of them can be trusted.

Posted by: Big Bill on November 6, 2005 10:41 PM

I was going to come back and smack Kai around some more, but all you guys left for me was some grease stains and a nasty smell. Rats.

Posted by: Pixy Misa on November 7, 2005 08:06 AM

Kai, I lived in Hong Kong for a year. Half of it spent with a Taiwanese family. Trust me, they don't want the PRC taking over.

Posted by: Rip on November 7, 2005 10:26 AM

I get a real kick out of these people here blaming Clinton for this. Don't forget that these guys came here and started spying under Reagan.

Posted by: Jack on November 14, 2005 09:53 PM

Yeah...do you know what I get a kick out of?

Dogs in costumes, man.

They crack me up.

Posted by: Slublog on November 14, 2005 09:59 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Susie Wiles brings calm to Trump admin -- helping the president rack up wins When was the last time you saw her name in the media? Is it possible that the grownups are now in charge? [CBD]
Update on Jasmine Ratchet: The DEI Dum-Dumb is eyeing a Senate run, because why should Robert Francis "Beto" O'Rourke get paid millions every two years to get blown out in the Texas senatorial election? Shouldn't she get some of that sweet sweet Act Blue graft?
Crockett addressed the possibility in an Instagram post where she said she would make a decision "depending on how many people reach out," but that her main focus has been legislating in the House of Representatives.
The post came after a poll from the National Republican Senatorial Committee was published showing that she was leading the pack of candidates with 35 percent in a hypothetical primary and was leading former Senate candidate Colin Allred, who was at 20 percent, per the Latin Times.

The Republican Senatorial Committee claims that she's ahead? LOL, that might be a little troll-poll.
Forgotten 90s Mystery Click: When Grunge Ruled the Earth
Did you hear the distant cry
Calling me back to my sins?
Like the one you knew before
Calling me back once again
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Judicial Overreach gets even more ridiculous, Epstein coverup? Elon Musk's new party, Tucker Carlson is an idiot, Fauci is scum, is Trump punishing Putin, and more!
Vlogging the Revolutionary War
[Hat Tip: Vox Clamantis] [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: The shit sandwich of a spending bill that the Senate wants us to eat, NYC is screwed, the military rebounds, Iran may be stuck in its Mullah nightmare, and much more!
NeverTrump Nebraska Congressman Don Bacon throws in the towel, won't seek reelection in 2026
I wonder if he's the one who complained about the BBB imposing work requirements on able-bodied adults without children for Medicaid.
Ever Wonder How The Woke Left Can Be So Obviously Hypocritical And Automatically Reject All Opposing Facts? Below are four short 5 minute videos of author Melanie Phillips explaining why. The Disturbing Logic Of The Left.*** The Psychology Behind Why the WOKE Left Can't Win Arguments.*** The Bizarre Union of Woke and Jihad.*** Truth is a Right Wing Concept. [dri]
Wow, Katie Perry is having a rough couple of years: like her career, her engagement to Orlando Bloom is now over
The Trump Curse strikes again. She went from an apolitical ditz to a Hillary Clinton Crusader in 2016 and her career bottomed out like Hillary Clinton's blood sugar level after a weekend of vodka and self-pity. The Trump Curse even follows you into space, yo. Or at least into the lower upper atmosphere.
Forgotten 80s Mystery Click, I Can't Believe It's Not Night Ranger Edition
If you would just be sensible
You'd find me indispensable
I pray deep down to destiny
That it places you with me
Whoa, wanting you here in the sheets
Wandering around incomplete
Waiting so long

I'm pretty sure I've linked this before but it's a banger.
Recent Comments
JackStraw: "n't ..."

BifBewalski [/i][/u][/s][/b]: "Have a friend that just finished a ride from Damas ..."

sock_rat_eez[/i][/s][/b][/u]: "without commentary ... ; https://is.gd/Vu9D0t ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: "I'm gonna go watch Cobra right now. ..."

JackStraw: ">>This is what kills me! and causes me to brace fo ..."

The Meat Store: "[i]*looks for Bersekrer* Posted by: Pug Mahon,W ..."

Hacked gp's Feed Off The Bird: "Cobra and Invasion USA should be in the Pantheon. ..."

Pug Mahon,With a Towel: "Richard Farnsworth Posted by: Skip at July 11, 20 ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: "think it would be interesting to do a thread on th ..."

Hacked gp's Feed Off The Bird: "297 That one really surprised me. I didn't expect ..."

Blonde Morticia: " There's a lot of low hanging fruit out there. I ..."

Skip: "It's The Straight Story, guy rides his lawn tracto ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives