| Intermarkets' Privacy Policy Support
Donate to Ace of Spades HQ! Contact
Ace:aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com Buck: buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com CBD: cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com joe mannix: mannix2024 at proton.me MisHum: petmorons at gee mail.com J.J. Sefton: sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com Recent Entries
Saturday Night "Club ONT" November 22, 2025 [The 3 Ds]
Saturday Evening Movie Thread - 11/22/2025 Hobby Thread - November 22, 2025 [Buoyant Rex] Ace of Spades Pet Thread, November 22 Gardening, Home and Nature Thread, Nov. 22 Preparing for Thanksgiving - Gratitude The Classical Saturday Coffee Break & Prayer Revival Daily Tech News 22 November 2025 Happy ThanksMemeing! Action-Packed Weekend Cafe Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025 Jewells45 2025 Bandersnatch 2024 GnuBreed 2024 Captain Hate 2023 moon_over_vermont 2023 westminsterdogshow 2023 Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022 Dave In Texas 2022 Jesse in D.C. 2022 OregonMuse 2022 redc1c4 2021 Tami 2021 Chavez the Hugo 2020 Ibguy 2020 Rickl 2019 Joffen 2014 AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published.
Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups
TBD |
« [ C O R R E C T E D ] Michael Moore Owns Two Thousand Shares... of Halliburton? |
Main
| Mummy's Curse Claims Seventh Victim »
November 03, 2005
Paul Volcker Coverup in Food-for-Oil InvestigationThe International Community. FOX News discovered that Volcker, who spent 18 months investigating the oil for food scandal, was aware of the admissions by the Total executives, yet failed to issue an adverse finding against the company, as he did against many others accused of the same thing. This story appears to be a FOX News exclusive. Ace: FOX News Exclusive? Really? No other media outlets are assigning reporters to UN corruption & cover-up? What a shock. posted by LauraW. at 07:56 PM
CommentsExcuse me, but are you the poster with the big jugs? Posted by: on November 3, 2005 07:59 PM
Anon: a) You're thinking of bbeck. Laura W. is every bit as lovely, although a bit more demure. (Her kung-fu skills and savagely jealous husband prohibit further up-close perusal.) b) People who post anonymously are cowardly pukes. This goes double when speaking of the physical attributes of gentle ladies with whom you are not acquainted. c) The U. N. is a complete clown-rodeo. I pray for the day it gets moved to a garden-spot like Angola or Nigeria. Posted by: Monty on November 3, 2005 08:03 PM
So, you are saying you are personally acquainted with bbecks's jugs therefore it's okay for you to go on ad nauseam about them in 100 posts threads? Anyway you dumb puke, I was just trying to distinguish Ace from laura. Posted by: on November 3, 2005 08:15 PM
Anon: 1) Ace is easily distinguishable from everyone else here. Ace has a hairy back and runs like a girl. iii) What happened to John Bolton? I thought he went to the UN to crack heads and verbally abuse them. Posted by: Bart on November 3, 2005 08:25 PM
Ace has huge jugs and it is the only way to tell him and laura apart. Posted by: bartisanass on November 3, 2005 08:26 PM
Well done, ass. Posted by: Bart on November 3, 2005 08:28 PM
They're real, and they're spectacular. They're also covered in thickish man-hair. Best of both worlds, as they say. Posted by: ace on November 3, 2005 08:29 PM
Ace has huge jugs and it is the only way to tell him and laura apart. And you have no chance to score with either of them, so give it up before you lose all of your dignity. Posted by: Edward R. Murrow on November 3, 2005 08:29 PM
Man, what's with the anger floating round? Can't we put aside petty differences and let the juggs do their work - bring mankind together? It's ironic, really. Sometimes, I think we're looking past the innocent whole point of big juggs - how they're always there, comforting us in time of tumult. Have we forgotten? Have we lost the most decent part of ourselves, our unifier? Our big jugg lovin?
Posted by: Reo Symes on November 3, 2005 08:30 PM
Anyway you dumb puke, I was just trying to distinguish Ace from laura. Bart, does that count as an "I am rubber, you are glue" comeback? See, he used essentially the same insult I threw at him. Can I get a ruling? Anon: if the ruling comes back in my favor, that's a mandatory shot to the nuts. I wish it could be different, but it's one of the AoS bylaws. My hands are tied. Posted by: Monty on November 3, 2005 08:30 PM
Oh, you big dumb lovable lugs. Don't you know there's a war going on? Posted by: lauraw on November 3, 2005 08:34 PM
lauraw: Jeez! I stand up for your maidenly honor and I get only grief! Very well, milady. I will strive to project the love and brotherhood that AoS HQ is known for. Posted by: Monty on November 3, 2005 08:38 PM
Anon definitley lacks originality. Which leads to me believe he is either: Posted by: Bart on November 3, 2005 08:39 PM
Monty will always be Fonzie to me. Does anybody care about the story? Burned out on news? Maybe we're within 24 hours of needing a flame thread. Posted by: lauraw on November 3, 2005 08:43 PM
Reo Symes, Everybody needs a bosom for a pillow. General, As far as distinguishing Ace from the other posters, one might refer to the "Posted by . . . " at the bottom of each post. Or is that cheating? Posted by: Tim Higgins on November 3, 2005 08:43 PM
Can't we put aside petty differences and let the juggs do their work - bring mankind together? Juggs for peace? Anon: if the ruling comes back in my favor, that's a mandatory shot to the nuts. I wish it could be different, but it's one of the AoS bylaws. My hands are tied. And if it is in my favor, it's to The Naked Testicle Spidyman's nuts and you can't wear gloves. Posted by: on November 3, 2005 08:44 PM
Monty, Earlier someone said they couldn't tell Laura and I apart, and I said "I'm the one with the big jugs." The anonymous guy was playing on that joke. Although, yeah, without explaining the context, it's generally not considered polite to ask a woman if she has big jugs. Posted by: ace on November 3, 2005 08:46 PM
lauraw: "Don't you know there's a war going on?" Won't somebody please think of the children?!? Posted by: Xoxotl on November 3, 2005 08:48 PM
Monty will always be Fonzie to me. Aaaayyyyyyyyy! Does anybody care about the story?No? Eh? I dunno, Laura. This is definitely a "dog bites man" thing at this point. "Corruption" and "UN" are synonyms to me at this point. My disgust with and disdain for the UN have pegged at the extreme end of the meter; I simply cannot muster any more outrage. I vastly prefer calling the anonymous poster from earlier in the thread a dirty, shit-eating son of a syphilic whore. (Which should give you an answer to your last question.) Posted by: Monty on November 3, 2005 08:49 PM
Ace: Earlier someone said they couldn't tell Laura and I apart, and I said "I'm the one with the big jugs." I am duly chastised. Still, I maintain my belief that posting anonymously like that leaves you open to shots -- had bart, utron, or compos posted that, I'd have known right away what the score was. I may take shots at the dear Laura, but I will be damned, sir, if I'll stand for some anonymous rogue to do the same! I will re-iterate: if you post insults without a name or nick, you're a fetid sack of of cat-shit. Posted by: Monty on November 3, 2005 08:56 PM
Two things that really confuse me are: Posted by: Bart on November 3, 2005 08:58 PM
Although, yeah, without explaining the context, it's generally not considered polite to ask a woman if she has big jugs. I was very polite. Note, the "excuse me" I preface my question with. Anyway, I was no less polite than guys who make post after post about bbeck's breasts. After the first thousand or so , it's merely crass and boring. Posted by: monty is shit-eating son of a syphilic whore on November 3, 2005 08:58 PM
I may take shots at the dear Laura, but I will be damned, sir, if I'll stand for some anonymous rogue to do the same! I wasn't taking a shot at laura, you ninny. I was taking a shot at Ace's proud and hairy juggs. Posted by: on November 3, 2005 09:00 PM
anon: Oh, so it's like if I said: "Excuse me, fuckface, but your putrid stink is putting me off my food." Putting excuse me in front of that statement makes all the difference! Posted by: Monty on November 3, 2005 09:03 PM
it's generally not considered polite to ask a woman if she has big jugs. See? You really can learn important social skills on the internet. Posted by: lauraw on November 3, 2005 09:05 PM
Maybe we're within 24 hours of needing a flame thread. And I can feel it coming in the air tonight, Oh Lord Posted by: Phil Collins on November 3, 2005 09:05 PM
Can't we all just get along? And admire the magnificent vistas that the AoS boobage collection provides us? And put a freaking name in the name box out of a sense of chivalry, if not duty? Posted by: geoff on November 3, 2005 09:06 PM
Does anybody care about the story? I hope not. So far, so good. Posted by: Paul Volcker on November 3, 2005 09:06 PM
Yep, we get it now, anon. Or should I call you anonymousdildowhocan'tthinkofanameandthinksitisfunnytoaddstupidshittootherpeople'snames? Dood, if you're going to trade insults, at least have the wherewithal to not regurgitate the insult just thrown at you. See. Watch. You are a needle-dicked moron who still likes to play with Star Wars action figures. Now, you think of one. But remember: it should not contain Star Wars action figures or the phrase "needle-dick." Go ahead and try it, I know you can do it. Posted by: Bart on November 3, 2005 09:08 PM
it's generally not considered polite to ask a woman if she has big jugs. Sounds like someone's been reading from the same choirbook as my probation officer. Sell out. Posted by: on November 3, 2005 09:09 PM
You know what's funny? Going into anonymous commenter's comments and changing them to say other things, in an effort to encourage him to choose a stupid name. That's funny. Unfortunately, it is not permitted. Yet. Posted by: lauraw on November 3, 2005 09:10 PM
Dave in Texas: Okay, that was the first laugh-out-loud post I've read all day. Kudos! Posted by: Monty on November 3, 2005 09:11 PM
it's generally not considered polite to ask a woman if she has big jugs. See? You really can learn important social skills on the internet. I didn't ask Ace. He volunteered. Posted by: on November 3, 2005 09:12 PM
I will re-iterate: if you post insults without a name or nick, you're a fetid sack of of cat-shit. Well put sir. My sentiments exactly. In fact I'm willing to volunteer my considerable DHTML skilz to script a default of 'Shit Head' for an empty Name input box when the Post button is clicked. Just shoot me an Email Pixy. Posted by: BrewFan on November 3, 2005 09:15 PM
Oh, so it's like if I said: "Excuse me, fuckface, but your putrid stink is putting me off my food." Putting excuse me in front of that statement makes all the difference! I dunno. Let's try it: Excuse me, Monty -- but your putrid stink is putting me off my food, fuckface. Yes, it makes all the difference.
Posted by: on November 3, 2005 09:17 PM
I love how you guys think talking like 19th century fags is erudite politeness. Posted by: on November 3, 2005 09:20 PM
Speaking of bbeck, or as I like to call her, ddeck, has she put on that St. Pauli Girl outfit I asked for? Posted by: Bart on November 3, 2005 09:21 PM
*Sigh* I think I know what's going on. This dumbass troll is nothing more than a UNIX bash script. Let's say that I define $INSULT as "ridiculous pant-shitting retard" and cast it at the anonymous dickweed. The dickweed will then auto-respond with, "Well, you're a big fat $INSULT, so there!" We've been wasting perfectly good flames on a fucking computer program. And a badly-written one, at that. Posted by: Monty on November 3, 2005 09:22 PM
Laura said:
Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 3, 2005 09:26 PM
yeahp, Monty. Eliza in PHP. Posted by: BrewFan on November 3, 2005 09:26 PM
I love how you guys think talking like 19th century fags is erudite politeness. Once you get to high school you'll appreciate us more. I know because your mom likes it when I talk that way during sex. Posted by: BrewFan on November 3, 2005 09:28 PM
I love how you guys think talking like 19th century fags is erudite politeness. You intemperate whelp! How dare you insinuate that we are but gentle-men. Posted by: on November 3, 2005 09:29 PM
I think you might have something there with the jugs for peace. But I would perfer "Breasts for peace." That way all sizes can be involved...;-) Anyway, I'm thinking that if those insurgents had a bit more incentive to go peacefully home, they might do it. And I can't thnk of a better incentive than breasts. I mean just mention them and you guys go all woozy. We just have to figure out a way to get the Burkas off willingly...hmmm.... Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on November 3, 2005 09:36 PM
You intemperate whelp! How dare you insinuate that we are but gentle-men. Intemperate whelp? Is that interior design lingo? Posted by: scott on November 3, 2005 09:52 PM
I vastly prefer calling the anonymous poster from earlier in the thread a dirty, shit-eating son of a syphilic whore. (Which should give you an answer to your last question.) Yeahp. And though I despise Phil Collins as much as any human being can, I too feel it coming in the air tonight. Oh Lord. Hope tomorrow is a slow work day. Posted by: lauraw on November 3, 2005 10:11 PM
dirty, shit-eating son of a syphilic whore Monty: Rarely do you stumble when delivering a colorful insult, but here you have relaxed your normally high standards. The word is "syphilitic," not "syphilic." Posted by: AOSHQ Insult Quality Control Department on November 3, 2005 10:21 PM
Lauraw: I think we need a flamewar. Remember that conversation between Fat Clemenza and Mike Corleone in The Godfather? We need a flamewar every so often to clear the bad blood. It's been too long since the last one. But here's a twist: instead of flaming each other, let's see if we can bait some lefties into trolling here, and then we can insult them. I always feel vaguely dirty when I bust on you, my lovely lady. (It's a good kind of dirty, mind you, but still.) I say that Ace posts some ludicrously over-the-top right-wing stuff (Noam Chomsky and The Rev. Al Sharpton Are Out and Proud!), inveigle some arrogant left-tards onto site, and...fire for effect, baby! Posted by: Monty on November 3, 2005 10:24 PM
The word is "syphilitic," not "syphilic." The hell you say! Well, I am shocked! This requires an angry letter to the chair of the English department of my college! How could they have let me graduate with that kind of slop rolling around in my skull! I'm just glad we have Renaissance men such as yourself who can call me on such outrageous lapses. You are to be commended, sir! Posted by: Monty on November 3, 2005 10:27 PM
inveigle some arrogant left-tards onto site, and...fire for effect, baby! you sweet talker you Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 3, 2005 10:31 PM
I'm just glad we have Renaissance men such as yourself who can call me on such outrageous lapses. You are to be commended, sir! Weak sarcasm such as this is also considered well beneath the norms of AOSHQ. Here's a tip: Yank your head out of Laura's ass and take a deep breath before you try again. Hey Brewfan -- eat me. (It's just been too long.) Posted by: AOSHQ Insult Quality Control Department on November 3, 2005 10:34 PM
Hmmm...we may need a flypaper post for trolls. Perhaps one of Ace's 'US Economy Soaring but MSM Fails to Notice' posts would serve well in that regard. Then when they're hooked, WHAMMO. Add 'flamewar' to the title later. Posted by: lauraw on November 3, 2005 10:37 PM
Michael's just pissed because his head isn't up YOUR ass, Monty. Posted by: lauraw on November 3, 2005 10:38 PM
Weak sarcasm such as this is also considered well beneath the norms of AOSHQ. Why, you--but no! I'm saving my good stuff for the hoped-for flame thread. But be careful, my dear friend, or the next words you speak will be muffled by your own ass. Posted by: Monty on November 3, 2005 10:39 PM
Anybody here believe RWS doesn't shop nekkid at home? I know Michael believes it. Hell, I want to believe it. Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 3, 2005 10:40 PM
I must leave, alas, but let me leave you with a sincere wish that you all drown in a gumbo composed largely of your own effluents. Ta! Posted by: Monty on November 3, 2005 10:56 PM
Dave in Texas, I may very well shop naked, but...ya know... this COULD be me. Posted by: Rightwingsparkle on November 3, 2005 10:56 PM
somebody throw that spiderman pic at sparkle... she's gettin mean Posted by: Dave in Texas on November 3, 2005 11:07 PM
One thing I know for SURE. Slublog doesn NOT shop or surf the net naked. Don't even ask me how I know this. Posted by: rightwingsparkle on November 3, 2005 11:36 PM
It's amazing what a guy admits at 1 in the morning on AIM. So I'm modest. Nakedness makes me uncomfortable. If a flame war breaks out tomorrow, I'm toast. Posted by: Slublog on November 3, 2005 11:40 PM
I must leave, alas . . . Oh Monty. How you embarass yourself. See, a word like "alas" works well in one of your Victorian insults (at which you excel, I freely concede). But when used in context with otherwise modern discourse, it comes off as a pretentious affectation which causes one to wonder whether you are more than fifteen years old. Research here at the AOSHQ Insult Quality Control Department has established a direct correlation between oxygen deprivation and poor insult quality. From this I infer that you clearly did not take my advice, and your head remains firmly embedded in Laura's ass. Posted by: AOSHQ Insult Quality Control Department on November 3, 2005 11:48 PM
Didn't FOX also report that they were running shredders all during the investigation? Posted by: Aaron on November 4, 2005 12:17 AM
Then when they're hooked, WHAMMO. Add 'flamewar' to the title later. I like it. I really do :) Hey Michael, isn't it time to get the tires rotated on your house? Posted by: BrewFan on November 4, 2005 06:27 AM
causes one to wonder whether you are more than fifteen years old You and my ex-wife both, pal. Posted by: Monty on November 4, 2005 08:46 AM
FOX News Exclusive? Really? No other media outlets are assigning reporters to UN corruption & cover-up? No, they're all out looking for Lucy Ramirez. Posted by: Tongueboy on November 4, 2005 09:19 AM
Post a comment
| The Deplorable Gourmet A Horde-sourced Cookbook [All profits go to charity] Top Headlines
'A Monumental Betrayal': Indiana Republicans Fold Like a Cheap Suit, Defy Trump on Redistricting
GOPe business as usual in the Hoosier State. [CBD]
Live voting in the House to end the shutdown.
I don't know if this is a preliminary procedural vote or what.
I can't tell you the rules of three-dimensional chess but I can tell you the rules of hexagonal chess
Yes it's real This is too nerdy, even for this blog.
Our Favorite British Couple Exploring True America Experiences Flora-Bama And Sees A Side Of The Deep South Rarely Seen. [dri]
Oh no! Hamas' de facto press agent at the UN complains that she can't use her credit cards or rent a card now that she's been sanctioned as a terrorist operative
Why does this keep happening to members of the "political organization" (per Tucker Carlson) of Hamas?!?!
Tucker Carlson claims that it's weird that Ted Cruz is interested in the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, because he has "no track record of being interested in Christians," then blows off the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, saying it might or might not be a real concern
Tucker Carlson enjoys using the left-wing tactic of "Tactical Ignorance" to avoid taking positions on topics. Is Hamas really a terrorist organization? Tucker can't say. He hasn't looked into it enough, but "it seems like a political organization to me." Are Muslims slaughtering Christians in Nigeria? Again, Tucker just doesn't know. He hasn't examined the evidence yet. He knows every Palestinian Christian who said he was blocked from visiting holy sites in Bethlehem, but he just hasn't had the time to look into the mass slaughter of Christians in Nigeria that has been going on since (checks watch) 2009. He doesn't know, so he can't offer an opinion. Wouldn't be prudent, you know? Don't rush him! He'll sift through the evidence at some point in the future and render an opinion sometime around 2044. Of course, if you need an opinion on Jewish Perfidy, he has all the facts at his fingertips and can give you a fully informed opinion pronto. Say, have you ever heard of the USS Liberty incident...? You'd think that the main issue for Tucker Carlson, who pretends to be so deeply concerned about Palestinian Christians being bullied by Jews in Israel (supposedly), would be the massacre of 185,000 Christians in Nigeria itself. But no, his main problem is that Ted Cruz is talking about it, "who has no track record of being interested in Christians at all." And then he just shrugs as to whether this is even a real issue or not. Whatever we do we must never "divide the right," huh? Tucker is attacking Ted Cruz for bringing the issue up because he's acting as an apologist for Jihadism, and he can't cleanly admit that Jihadists are killing any Christians, anywhere. There is no daylight between him and CAIR at this point. One might conclude that Tucker Carlson himself isn't interested in the plight of Christians -- except as they can be used as a cudgel to attack Jews. Just gonna ask an Interesting Question myself -- why is it that Tucker Carlson's arguments all track with those shit out by Qatarian propaganda agents and the far left? That if Jews crush an ant underfoot it is worldwide news, but when Muslims slaughter Christians it elicits not even a vigorous shrug?
Garth Merenghi is interviewed by the only man who can fathom his ineffable brilliance -- Garth Merenghi
From the comments: I once glimpsed Garth in the penumbra betwixt my wake and sleep. He was in my dream, standing afar, not looking my way, nor did he acknowledge me. But I felt seen. And that's when I knew I was a traveler on the right path. I'm glad he's still with us. Now that's some Merenghian prose. Garth Merenghi on the writer's craft Greetings, Traveler. If you still have not experienced Garth Merenghi -- Author, Dream-weaver, Visionary, plus Actor -- the six episodes of his Darkplace are still available on YouTube and supposedly upscaled to HD. (Viewing it now, it doesn't appeared upscaled for shit.) I think the second episode, "Hell Hath Fury," is the best by a good margin. Try to at least watch through to that one. It's Mereghi's incisive but nuanced take on sexism.
Update on Scott Adams:
Scott Adams had approval for this cancer drug but they hadn't scheduled him to get it. He was taking a turn for the worse. Trump had told him to call if he needed anything, so he did. Talked to Don Jr (who is in Africa) , then RFK Jr, then Dr Oz. Someone talked to Kaiser and he was scheduled. Shouldn't have needed it but he did and he says it saved his life.
Funny retro kid costumes, thanks to SMH
Good to see people honoring Lamont the Big Dummy
Four hours of retro Halloween commercials and specials
The first short is the original 1996 appearance of "Sam," the dangerous undead trick-or-treater from Trick r' Treat. Recent Comments
seo onpage:
"This article is really a pleasant one it helps
n ..."
gp: "Movie star singing >>> movie star whistling ..." BeckoningChasm: "Watching "Nightmare at Noon" or "The Crazies, Done ..." Aetius451AD: "When it coms to 'singing', I'm not sure who is wor ..." Just Sayin: "I hate myself ..." RickZ: "[i]For a singing Clint, I'd rather watch Honkytonk ..." Anon Y. Mous: "For a singing Clint, I'd rather watch Honkytonk Ma ..." Aetius451AD: "165 Dirty Harry, though they weren't Westerns. Po ..." Just Some Guy: "Outta here for the evening. Thanks for the thre ..." Anon Y. Mous: "Dirty Harry, though they weren't Westerns. ..." Aetius451AD: "Ok, I can think of one character type Clint Eastwo ..." Darrell Harris: ""TJM talks about Yasujiro Ozu." I've never hear ..." Bloggers in Arms
RI Red's Blog! Behind The Black CutJibNewsletter The Pipeline Second City Cop Talk Of The Town with Steve Noxon Belmont Club Chicago Boyz Cold Fury Da Goddess Daily Pundit Dawn Eden Day by Day (Cartoon) EduWonk Enter Stage Right The Epoch Times Grim's Hall Victor Davis Hanson Hugh Hewitt IMAO Instapundit JihadWatch Kausfiles Lileks/The Bleat Memeorandum (Metablog) Outside the Beltway Patterico's Pontifications The People's Cube Powerline RedState Reliapundit Viking Pundit WizBang Some Humorous Asides
Kaboom!
Thanksgivingmanship: How to Deal With Your Spoiled Stupid Leftist Adultbrat Relatives Who Have Spent Three Months Reading Slate and Vox Learning How to Deal With You You're Fired! Donald Trump Grills the 2004 Democrat Candidates and Operatives on Their Election Loss Bizarrely I had a perfect Donald Trump voice going in 2004 and then literally never used it again, even when he was running for president. A Eulogy In Advance for Former Lincoln Project Associate and Noted Twitter Pestilence Tom Nichols Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: If You Touch My Sandwich One More Time, I Will Fvcking Kill You Special Guest Blogger Rich "Psycho" Giamboni: I Must Eat Jim Acosta Special Guest Blogger Tom Friedman: We Need to Talk About What My Egyptian Cab Driver Told Me About Globalization Shortly Before He Began to Murder Me Special Guest Blogger Bernard Henri-Levy: I rise in defense of my very good friend Dominique Strauss-Kahn Note: Later events actually proved Dominique Strauss-Kahn completely innocent. The piece is still funny though -- if you pretend, for five minutes, that he was guilty. The Ace of Spades HQ Sex-for-Money Skankathon A D&D Guide to the Democratic Candidates Michael Moore Goes on Lunchtime Manhattan Death-Spree Artificial Insouciance: Maureen Dowd's Word Processor Revolts Against Her Numbing Imbecility The Dowd-O-Matic! The Donkey ("The Raven" parody) Archives
|