Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« Has Everyone Finished Their Fitzmas Shopping? | Main | Urban Legend Update: Alligators In the Sewers? Confirmed »
November 03, 2005

Wet Hot Mixed-Blood Bitches In Heat!!!

The New York Post tells me today-- on the front page -- that the "puggle," a pug-beagle hybrid, is the new "hot dog" in Manhattan.

Okay, it's kind of cute:

puggleD40428Fmar8.jpg

There's also a buggle. (Boston Terrier-Beagle.)

And a dorkie. (Dachshund-Yorkie.)


And of course there are Labradoodles (labradors-poodles), which I've had the pleasure of petting, and which are cute too.

I think people are breeding these mutants just for an excuse to come up with painfully-cutesy names.

All these dogs are nice and all, but... if you want a mutt, why not just get yourself a good old fashioned American mutt? Maybe from the pound, maybe from a neighbor.

"I was increasingly disheartened with breeding German shepherds," said Manners. "These dogs, like other pure breeds of the show world had been bred for looks, and health was largely ignored. German shepherds, for example, are plagued with 89 inherited disorders."

Top winning dogs are often highly inbred—siblings are interbred, and fathers are mated with daughters. The result is a tiny gene pool that is saturated with bad traits.

And thus: mutts are best. But those with money to burn just can't have any mutt; they need a designer mutt.

I like dogs, but... $800 is an awful lot to spend on a mutt that comes with papers. Couldn't that money be spent on something more spiritually satisfying, like a down-payment on a widescreen HDTV?

Pic of Puggle boosted from PuppyParadise.com.

A Man's Hybrid: Cute as they are, the "hot hybrids" seem to be based on the assumption that the only thing wrong with poodles, Yorkies, and terriers is that they're not quite gay enough.

For the men, nothing beats a wolf-dog hybrid. Nice looking animals, and they can fuck any other dog they like up the ass. Not in a gay way. But like a hybrid Viking.


posted by Ace at 02:46 PM
Comments



Why on earth would you mix those to dogs? You would get a short, fat, smooshed up face dog that howls all day long!

Posted by: Radical Centrist on November 3, 2005 02:50 PM

I had a pair of West Highland White Terriers growing up, and my cousins had a German Shepherd. We wanted to get them together one day in order go create West German Shepherds.

Probably woulda worked, too, except the terriers were male, and couldn't have boned Duchess unless they stood on stilts.

Cheers,
Dave at Garfield Ridge

Posted by: Dave at Garfield Ridge on November 3, 2005 02:54 PM

And everyone knows what you get when you cross a bulldog with a shih-tzu...

Posted by: Sobek on November 3, 2005 02:55 PM

I'm a beagle mutt type of person straight out of the pound or abandoned. My neighbor's new puppy is a terrier-chihuahua. It actually looks like a mini labrador with tiny legs. I am going to dble check but I thought hers was a pound dog.

Posted by: on November 3, 2005 02:59 PM

A dorkie is a dachshund/yorkie mix (it says so at the bottom of the page, BTW). They are cute, though...even though you know they'll be "yip" dogs.

Posted by: Stacy on November 3, 2005 03:00 PM

That dog... well, I don't like him. He's trying to play that 'aw, I'ma cwooote little puppy' shit, lookin all droppy eyed.

Something bout him rings false though, something tells me that fukker's pulling a con job and thinks he's the slickest guy in the room.

I ain't fallin for it.

Posted by: on November 3, 2005 03:03 PM

Next up: cat blogging!

Posted by: on November 3, 2005 03:05 PM

stacy,

Thanks. I looked but didn't see its heritage.

Posted by: ace on November 3, 2005 03:06 PM

Heritage? Is that what you call it when a dachshund knocks up a yorkie?

Posted by: on November 3, 2005 03:14 PM

My brother conned my mother into agreeing to a puppy when we were kids: a poodle-chou mix, but not on purpose. Best dog I ever knew, bar none. Otherwise I'm in favor of mutts.

Posted by: Retread on November 3, 2005 03:21 PM

Cross a Mastiff with a Dachshund, you get a Stiffwiener.

Posted by: compos mentis on November 3, 2005 03:29 PM

That photo of the puppy is the antithesis of that of The Naked Testicle Spidyman. You post one, and all you hear are, “ah, so cute, come here little fella.” With the other, it's shrieks of horror and “Run!”

Posted by: on November 3, 2005 03:33 PM

We have a mixed mutt that my wife bought in front of Costco one Sunday afternoon. It almost caused a divorce but that's another story...Anyway, he's about 1 1/2 now, weighs all of 12 pounds, and also looks a lot like a mini Lab.

Whenever anyone asks his breed we quote my 5 year old son, who called him "the Chihuahua-Poodle Mixup"

Posted by: Jonathan on November 3, 2005 03:33 PM

I'm thinking a doberdor would be a kick ass dog.

Posted by: on November 3, 2005 03:45 PM

I'm not secure enough in my manhood to walk a "dorkie."

Especially since I live in Dupont Circle.

Posted by: Bill from INDC on November 3, 2005 03:50 PM

For the men, nothing beats a wolf-dog hybrid.

And when you accidentally step on your dog's paw and it goes all primal on you and rip's out your throat, then what do you do?

Posted by: on November 3, 2005 03:52 PM

I knew a gal that had a half wolf, half malamute. Eerily placid dog, snow white, huge (lots of fur), bright amber eyes. It got into a scuffle with two neighboring pit bulls and killed one of them before the scuffle was broken up.

Posted by: Bill from INDC on November 3, 2005 03:58 PM

For the ghey who wants everyone to know his preference I suggest the cockerspaniel and doberman hybrid.

Posted by: on November 3, 2005 03:59 PM

Actually, the reason for the Labradoodle is to breed out the Labrador "Box of Rocks" tendency, but Gawd, that really is the gayest name ever for a dog.

Sadly, My sister in law plans to fly from Minnesota out here to Oregon just to buy one from a breeder with a rep.

Posted by: Brian B on November 3, 2005 04:11 PM

You could find something better to spend your money on unless you are planning on breeding the dog you spent $800 on and selling its offspring for $800 each to other people who want dogs that come with papers. Then it might be a wise investment.

Posted by: on November 3, 2005 04:41 PM

Yeah, my husband wants a wolf-dog hybrid. He used to have some sort of shepherding dog that would corral kids, which seems more useful to me. What would a wolf-dog do for you, except make you seem really cool?

Posted by: meep on November 3, 2005 04:43 PM

My old roommate had a dog that looked like it was 75% coyote. That was a damned smart dog. The closer to the wild strain of dog you get, it seems, the smarter that dog gets. The huskies and such are incredibly intelligent. German Shepards, while they may be a sickly breed, they're smart as whips.

I like a properly bred dog myself. You have some inkling of what you're getting into according to breed. Mutts are fine if you're looking for a pet to keep in the backyard to play with occasionally, but if you're looking for a dog that you actully live with nearly 24/7, carefully choosing a breed and a breeder is a neccessity.

Posted by: rho on November 3, 2005 04:54 PM

Wolf-dog cross-breeds are, or can be, dangerous. Wolves are not dogs and are not bred to love humans. Crossbreeds can revert to feral behavior without warning.

Posted by: Steven Den Beste on November 3, 2005 04:58 PM

Two months till I pick up my AKC registered Golden Retriever pup. No he doesn't exude Conan the Destroyer side kick and yes he will undoubtedly be as dumb as a post and cost more than Honda Civic. But he will be as cute as a little teddy bear and a bona fide babe magnet.

Yea ok, I'm practically middle aged, divorced and posting here is a bright spot. I need an edge.

Posted by: JackStraw on November 3, 2005 05:04 PM

"carefully choosing a breed and a bareeder is a necessity".
Totally disagree. In my experience, mutts are just as trainable as purebreds. Maybe more trainable. Healthier too.
It's this type of attitude which leads to puppy mills and dog-snobbery.
As to the gayest breed name - It begins and ends with Cockapoo.

Posted by: rickinstl on November 3, 2005 05:14 PM

MEEP you are thinking of a Briard. My friend's mom used to have one. At a kids birthday party it got suddenly quiet and the kids were whimpering in the living room---the Briard had them all huddled in a circle in the corner. Very effectively!

Posted by: Kina on November 3, 2005 07:21 PM

Ace,
I can't believe you posted the "not quite gay enough" comment without a link to this post.

Posted by: Lorie Byrd on November 3, 2005 08:20 PM

The number of dogs we croak in shelters every year is astonishing. Because of this my personal opinion is we would all be better off if more people adopted and fewer people purchased purebred dogs.

If you want a good dog go to your local shelter and get one. You will have a pretty good chance of getting a purebred if that is what you want. Most states have a variety of purebreed rescue groups and this is a good source for purebred dogs.

Hybrid vigor / hetrosis works which is why (as a general rule) mutts will have fewer genetically related health problems then purebred dogs do.

I second Steven Den Beste's comments on dog wolf hybrids. They are not domesticated and could blow up in your face for any number of reasons.

Posted by: TJIT on November 3, 2005 11:53 PM

If I cross a Sheltie with a Spitz do I get a dog that's got the Shitz ?

Posted by: treefroggy on November 7, 2005 09:45 PM

I love animals and am owned by two cats. One of my cats is a rescue and one is the runt of a purebred litter who adopted me. Rescuing animals is the responsible way to go - unless you are getting a dog merely for status purposes. There are so many of these orphaned or unwanted dogs out there, perfectly wonderful animals whose only crime is being unwanted by some human jerk who got the animal on a whim and has since changed his/her mind. They are healthier and way less neurotic than the purebreds!

Posted by: Gayle Miller on November 11, 2005 02:58 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Classic Rock Mystery Click
This is super-obscure and I only barely remember it. Given that, I'll give you the hint that it's by the Red Rocker.
And I guess you think you've got it made
Oh, but then, you never were afraid
Of anything that you've left behind
Oh, but it's alright with me now
'Cause I'll get back up somehow
And with a little luck, yes, I'm bound to win

Now twenty people will tell me it's not obscure, it was huge in their hometown and played at their prom. That's how it usually goes. When I linked Donnie Iris's "Love is Like a Rock," everyone said they knew that one and that his other song (which I didn't know at all) Ah Leah! was huge in their area.
You know we "joke" about the GOPe just "conserving" leftist things?
David French just posted:

Populists ask what conservativism has ever conserved?
Well its about to conserve birthright citizenship!
Posted by: 18-1

I couldn't hate this queen of the cuck-chair more if it paid seven figures and came with a corner office.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk birthright citizenship, the 14th Amendment and SCOTUS, no boots in Iran, Artemis II and refocusing NASA, the NBA's hatred of everything non-woke, and more!
In more marketing for Project Hail Mary, scientists say they've found the biosigns indicating life growing on an alien planet. It's not proof, just signatures of chemicals that are produced by biological metabolism, and it could be nothing, but scientists think it's a strong sign that this planet is inhabited by something.
In a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a team of scientists announced the detection of dimethyl sulfide (along with a similar detection of dimethyl disulfide) in the atmosphere of an exoplanet called K2-18b. This is actually the second detection of dimethyl sulfide made on this planet, following a tentative detection in 2023.
Tons of chemicals are detected in the atmospheres of celestial objects every day. But dimethyl sulfide is different, because on Earth, it's only produced by living organisms.
"It is a shock to the system," Nikku Madhusudhan, first author on the paper, told the New York Times. "We spent an enormous amount of time just trying to get rid of the signal."

He means they tried to prove the signal was caused by things other than dimethyl sulfide but they could not.
Artemis moon shot a go, scheduled for 6:24 Eastern time tonight
Great marketing arranged by Amazon to promote Project Hail Mary. Okay not really but it does work out that way.
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Sefton and CBD talk about how would a peace treaty with Iran work, Democrats defending murderers and rapists, The GOP vs. Dem bench for 2028, composting bodies? And more!
Recent Comments
fd: ""The question is why Labour feels like home to the ..."

Blonde Morticia: " The question is why Labour feels like home to th ..."

Chairman LMAO: "/gd sock off! ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "When you get to the bottom of the page and find no ..."

NemoMeImpuneLacessit[/i][/b][/u][/s]: "The HMS Dragon incident suggests the British Navy ..."

Jake Tapper: "If the high speed rail boondoggle was ever nominal ..."

ChristyBlinkyTheGreat: "Read of her weeping jag in trial of Fat Weinstein. ..."

This is getting darker and darker: "In Hawaii? Oh this just gets better and better. S ..."

garrett: ">>What do real conservatives believe anyway? I'm n ..."

Aetius451AD work phone: "Nood. ..."

eleven: "Personally I think Bob Lazar is a Sasquatch. Ju ..."

wth: "She made poi out of her sister? ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives