Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jon Ekdahl 2026
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021
Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups





















« The Reason For The Dems' Revolting? | Main | Okay, I Take Back What I Said, Valerie Plame Really Was SuperSpy 0036B »
November 03, 2005

California Voter? Here's A Guide To The Ballot Initiatives

It's kinda simple: vote yes for everything the bad guys hate and no to everything the bad guys want.

Recent polls, by the way, show that two or perhaps three of Arnold's intitiatives are winning, despite earlier being way behind. That's partly because unions and interest groups have been spending like the dickens throughout this process, whereas Arnold kept his powder dry and is only now unleashing his own ads, shortly before the November 8th voting day.

So, really, they all could pass. It just requires that marginal-voters -- people who sit on their asses and watch Wings marathons on most election days -- get down to their local polling place and pull a lever.


posted by Ace at 12:40 PM
Comments



Thanks for the link, Ace. Much is at stake for this special election on November 8.

By the way, we're also debuting the first-ever "Carnival of Arnold." Details here, including snappy logo.

Humorous submissions welcome -- which opens the doors to many of your witty readers. Check it out.

p.s. Is Wings still on? Dammit. Tivo it, people.

Posted by: California Conservative on November 3, 2005 01:21 PM

The media has also been doing the same thing to Arnold in CA as they have been done to Bush nationally. They keep claiming inherent weakness and "falling" poll numbers, but they'll probably be in for a surprise on election day. I live in San Francisco, and even a good amount of people that I talk to around here think that Arnold is on to something with these intiatives.

We'll see.

Posted by: TF6S on November 3, 2005 01:26 PM

I live in SF too, and the endless liberal closed-feedback-loop machine here feels pretty confident that Arnold's measures are going to be defeated. I saw a bunch of them driving around the city in a banner-festooned van this weekend, honking the horn and yelling. I don't think they appreciated the bird I flipped them.

Me, I voted already. Absentee rules -- it really makes it convenient to stick it to the bitchy public unions. Plus, I already voted against the SF handgun ban initiative, which will unfortunately probably pass anyway.

Posted by: Alex on November 3, 2005 01:44 PM

But, Alex, didn't you know that the LOUDER YOU SAY SOMETHING, the more TRUE it is? The loudspeakers are just speaking TRUTH TO POWER man.

Glad to see a fellow traveller in SF.

Cheers mate!

Posted by: TF6S on November 3, 2005 01:56 PM

Do not vote for 77. I say this as a conservative. The guy who wrote it (I've met him and talked about it) is pretty clueless and is one of those angry, blustery populists who Just. Wants. To. DO. SOMETHING! without thinking about the consequences.

Posted by: Russell Wardlow on November 3, 2005 02:26 PM

I really hope Prop 77 passes. California is so gerry-mandered, it's funny. Take a look at a map of congression districts, and look at district 23. I don't think Prop 77 is particularly well-written, but it's way better than the current arrangement.

Posted by: SJKevin on November 3, 2005 02:31 PM

Russell Wardlow:

I posted my comment before reading yours.

I understand what you're saying. I was tempted to reject it, too, until they come up with a better-written one. But we can pass this, get some actual fair elections, and then hopefully pass something better in the future. With a less gerrymandered state, future reform will be easier. California is in dire straits. Democrats are destroying our state.

Posted by: SJKevin on November 3, 2005 02:37 PM

All I can say is that the "flood the zone" adverts by the Unions/Democrats out to defeat 74-77 are WEAK.

Usually their scare-meisters do a good job at targeting the sub-100 IQ crowd but this time you'd actually have to have one of those helmets on and get picked up on a daily basis by a little yellow bus to belive their angle. In other words, the Union leadership and state workers are the only ones dull enough to buy their crap. I'm betting Arnold gets 3/4 passed. Lets hope so at least.

Posted by: Gromulin on November 3, 2005 02:43 PM

Ahem, some of us Wings fans are absentee voters, thank you very much.

Posted by: Da Goddess on November 3, 2005 03:15 PM

Speaking as a San Franciscan, it does my heart good to see non idiotarian folks from San Francisco posting here. It's entirely too easy to feel like you're a lone voice in the wilderness in this town...

I'm really curious to see how props 74 - 77 do. Something tells me they're going to do quite a bit better than the "falling poll numbers" crowd would have us believe. Whenever I see the union ads against these propositions, I can't help but think that these folks are whistling in the dark. If defeating props 74-77 is going to be as certain as they would have us believe, what gives with the hysteric media blitz? Here in S.F. just about every TV commercial you see these days is some teacher's union spot against the reform propositions. Last time I checked, anything that the Governor was for, people in S.F. were against. So why are the union folks spending so much money running ads that preach to the choir? Perhaps they're not convinced that their base supports them...

Good on you Alex for voting against prop H (the handgun ban). Sure it'll get passed here, and then propmtly overturned in court (just as it was in 1982). All the same, I take satifaction in knowing that by voting against prop H, I'm essentially flipping Chris Daly the bird. Nothing wrong with that.

Has anyone seen the "No on H" signs yet? Are they only posting them out here in the Sunset?

Posted by: G.D. Munem on November 3, 2005 03:30 PM

G.D. Munem: It's entirely too easy to feel like you're a lone voice in the wilderness in this town...

I hear ya. I live in the south bay. Most of my friends, bless their hearts, are radical leftists. I hate when I'm at a party or something and politics comes up.

Posted by: SJKevin on November 3, 2005 04:00 PM

GD, I've seen a few of them South of Market. Strangely, overall, I haven't seen that many signs around town. I know it is a "special" election, but usually our overly political city lives for this stuff.

Then again, maybe there was just such an abundance of it last year that anything seems small in comparison.

Posted by: TF6S on November 3, 2005 04:00 PM

I'm not sure if this is good guys or bad guys, but for Prop 73: It's Not About Aspirin

Posted by: Cal Lanier on November 3, 2005 04:40 PM

Don't believe any polls. Some say they are all leading. Other say they're all trailing. We won't know until the vote is done, so as Ace says, "get down to their [your] local polling place and pull a lever."

Posted by: on November 3, 2005 04:58 PM

It's simple.
Either look at the election pamphlet that explains measures and the 'for' and 'against' arguments (noting which measures the usual suspects are 'against'), or looking at what your local liberal rag (NY Times-owned, no doubt) endorses, and vote opposite.

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 3, 2005 05:02 PM

Oh, and by the way, I'm 5th generation San Franciscan. I'm in Sonoma County, but plenty of family still in SF, and they intend to keep their guns.
Hey, eat at Scoma's!!

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 3, 2005 05:05 PM

Uncle Jefe,

I got food poisoning at Scoma's! I've been back after that episode and it has been just fine though...

Posted by: TF6S on November 3, 2005 05:14 PM

That really surprises me, TF6S.
They do an unbelievable job of sanitation at that place, and you would not believe how high the quality is of the product they bring in (unless, of course, you eat there!). I mean fresh! Can't beat the portions either.
I worked there for some years (a decade ago; I still visit), so I'm telling you from the inside perspective!
But nothing's worse than shellfish poisoning, and I had that from oysters at a friend's restaurant.
Just die, it's better.

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 3, 2005 05:49 PM

I voted a week ago, but I'm still boggling over the fact that my choices and the list of San Jose Mercury News recommendations differed only by one proposition (note that my votes differed from those recommended on the California Conservative website by just one proposition also).

I can only conjecture that the regular Merc staff must have passed out from some drunken bacchanal and left some intellectually-gifted apprentice typesetter to compose their recommendations list.

I also suspect that there is a whole lot of smoke and mirrors going on about now with regard to polling. I'm keeping my fingers crossed. Of course, even if they narrowly lose, the statists/unionists will have outspent the proponents by about five-to-one, and there's nothing that keeps the issue from being raised again, and again, and again, and again until those bankrolling the resistance run out of cash.

Posted by: cthulhu on November 4, 2005 12:38 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
Oil prices plunge on bizarre realization that Eric Swalwell may actually be straight. A rapey molester, allegedly, but a straight one.
Classic Rock Mystery Click
This is super-obscure and I only barely remember it. Given that, I'll give you the hint that it's by the Red Rocker.
And I guess you think you've got it made
Oh, but then, you never were afraid
Of anything that you've left behind
Oh, but it's alright with me now
'Cause I'll get back up somehow
And with a little luck, yes, I'm bound to win

Now twenty people will tell me it's not obscure, it was huge in their hometown and played at their prom. That's how it usually goes. When I linked Donnie Iris's "Love is Like a Rock," everyone said they knew that one and that his other song (which I didn't know at all) Ah Leah! was huge in their area.
You know we "joke" about the GOPe just "conserving" leftist things?
David French just posted:

Populists ask what conservativism has ever conserved?
Well its about to conserve birthright citizenship!
Posted by: 18-1

I couldn't hate this queen of the cuck-chair more if it paid seven figures and came with a corner office.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: CBD and Sefton talk birthright citizenship, the 14th Amendment and SCOTUS, no boots in Iran, Artemis II and refocusing NASA, the NBA's hatred of everything non-woke, and more!
In more marketing for Project Hail Mary, scientists say they've found the biosigns indicating life growing on an alien planet. It's not proof, just signatures of chemicals that are produced by biological metabolism, and it could be nothing, but scientists think it's a strong sign that this planet is inhabited by something.
In a paper published in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a team of scientists announced the detection of dimethyl sulfide (along with a similar detection of dimethyl disulfide) in the atmosphere of an exoplanet called K2-18b. This is actually the second detection of dimethyl sulfide made on this planet, following a tentative detection in 2023.
Tons of chemicals are detected in the atmospheres of celestial objects every day. But dimethyl sulfide is different, because on Earth, it's only produced by living organisms.
"It is a shock to the system," Nikku Madhusudhan, first author on the paper, told the New York Times. "We spent an enormous amount of time just trying to get rid of the signal."

He means they tried to prove the signal was caused by things other than dimethyl sulfide but they could not.
Artemis moon shot a go, scheduled for 6:24 Eastern time tonight
Great marketing arranged by Amazon to promote Project Hail Mary. Okay not really but it does work out that way.
What? Skeleton of the most famous Musketeer, D'Artagnan, possibly discovered in Dutch church closet.
Dumas picked four names of real musketeers out of a history book, D'Artagnan, Athos, Aramis, and Porthos. So there was an actual D'Artagnan, though he made most of the story up. (Or, you know, all of it.)*
Charles de Batz de Castelmore, known as d'Artagnan, the famous musketeer of Kings Louis XIII and Louis XIV, spent his life in the service of the French crown.
The Gascon nobleman inspired Alexandre Dumas's hero in "The Three Musketeers" in the 19th century, a character now known worldwide thanks to the novel and numerous film adaptations.
D'Artagnan was killed during the siege of Maastricht in 1673, and there is a statue honoring the musketeer in the city. His final resting place has remained a mystery ever since.

A lot of Dumas's stories are based on bits of real history. The plot of the >Three Musketeers, about trying to recover lost diamonds from the queen's necklace, was cribbed from the then-almost-contemporaneous Affair of the Queen's Necklace. And the Man in the Iron Mask is based on real accounts of a prisoner forced to wear a mask (though I think it was a velvet mask).
* Oh, I should mention, Dumas says all this, about finding the names in an old book, in the prologue to his novel. But authors lie a lot. They frequently present fictions as based on historic fact. The twist is, he was actually telling the truth here. At least about these four musketeers having actually existed and served under Louis XIV.
Fun fact: You know the beginning of A Fistful of Dollars where the local gunslingers make fun of Clint Eastwood's donkey and Eastwood demands they apologize to the donkey? That's lifted from The Three Musketeers. Rochefort mocks D'Artagnan's old, brokedown farm horse and D'Artagnan is incensed.
A commenter asked which should be read first, The Hobbit of LOTR?
Easy, no question -- read The Hobbit first. It's actually the start of the story and comes first chronologically. It sets up some major characters and major pieces in play in LOTR.
Also, the Hobbit is Beginner-Friendly, which LOTR isn't. The Hobbit really is a delightful book, and a fast read. It's chatty, it's casual, it's exciting, and it's funny. In that dry cheeky British humor way. I love that the narrator is constantly making little asides and commentary, like he's just sitting next to you telling you this story as it occurs to him.
LOTR is a very long story. Fifteen hundred pages or so. The Hobbit is relatively short and very punchy and easy to read. If you don't like The Hobbit, you can skip out on LOTR. If you do like it, you'll be primed to read LOTR.
Oh, I should say: The Hobbit is written as if it's for children, but one of those smart children's stories that are also for adults. Don't worry, there's also real fighting and violence and horror in it, too.
LOTR is written for adults. (It's said that Tolkien wrote both for his children, but LOTR was written 17 years later, when his children were adults.) Some might not like The Hobbit due to its sometimes frivolous tone. Me, I love it. I find it constantly amusing. Both are really good but there is a starkly different tone to both. LOTR is epic, grand, and serious, about a world war, The Hobbit is light and breezy, and about a heist. Though a heist that culminates in a war for the spoils.
The Hobbit Challenge: Read two more chapters. I didn't have much time. Bilbo got the ring.
I noticed a continuity problem. Maybe. Now, as of the time of The Hobbit, it was unknown that this magic ring was in fact a Ring of Power, and it was doubly unknown that it was the Ring of Power, the Master Ring that controlled the others.
But the narrator -- who we will learn in LOTR was none of than Bilbo himself, who wrote the book as "There and Back Again" -- says this about Gollum's ring:
"But who knows how Gollum had come by that present [the Ring], ages ago in the old days when such rings were still at large in the world? Perhaps even the Master who ruled them could not have said."
In another passage, the ring is identified as a "ring of power."
I don't know, I always thought there was a distinction between mere magic rings and the Rings of Power created by Sauron. But this suggests that Bilbo knew this was a ring of power created by Sauron.
Now I don't remember when Bilbo wrote the Hobbit. In the movie, he shows Frodo the book in Rivendell, and I guess he wrote it after he left the Shire. I guess he might have added in the part about the ring being a ring of power created by "the Master" after Gandalf appraised him of his research into the ring.
I never noticed this before. I know Tolkien re-wrote this chapter while he was writing LOTR to make the ring important from the start. And also to make Gollum more sinister and evil, and also to remove the part where Gollum actually offers Bilbo the ring as a "present" -- Bilbo had already found it on his own, but Gollum was wiling to give it away, which obviously is not something the rewritten Gollum would ever do.
But I had no memory of the ring being suggested to be The Ring so early in the tale.
Finish the job, Mr. President!
Melanie Phillips lays out the case for the total destruction of the Iranian government and armed forces. [CBD]
Recent Comments
Thomas Bender: "@65 >>But it goes far explaining the leftist mi ..."

Anatoly Dyatlov: "Comrade, you cannot out-stupid California. It is p ..."

Yudhishthira's Dice: "I coulda told ya that. AI mode sucks dong. I just ..."

pookysgirl, taking deep breaths: "Couldn't get back to sleep because today is Embryo ..."

Hadrian the Seventh: " [i]All warfare isn't zero-sum. Genocidal warfare ..."

Richard Cranium: ""If they survive, they win." All warfare isn't ..."

Hadrian the Seventh: " [i]Convicted criminals are innocent victims you ..."

NR Pax: "[i]Maryland positions itself to out-stupid Califor ..."

vmom deport deport deport: "Happy birthday GMAC.& Richard Cranium! ..."

Hadrian the Seventh: " Happy birfday, Gmac. ..."

pawn: "Fen, I wish your son the best of luck with his ..."

Dark Litigator: ""Maryland positions itself to out-stupid Californi ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives