Intermarkets' Privacy Policy
Support


Donate to Ace of Spades HQ!


Contact
Ace:
aceofspadeshq at gee mail.com
Buck:
buck.throckmorton at protonmail.com
CBD:
cbd at cutjibnewsletter.com
joe mannix:
mannix2024 at proton.me
MisHum:
petmorons at gee mail.com
J.J. Sefton:
sefton at cutjibnewsletter.com


Recent Entries
Absent Friends
Jay Guevara 2025
Jim Sunk New Dawn 2025
Jewells45 2025
Bandersnatch 2024
GnuBreed 2024
Captain Hate 2023
moon_over_vermont 2023
westminsterdogshow 2023
Ann Wilson(Empire1) 2022
Dave In Texas 2022
Jesse in D.C. 2022
OregonMuse 2022
redc1c4 2021
Tami 2021

Chavez the Hugo 2020
Ibguy 2020
Rickl 2019
Joffen 2014
AoSHQ Writers Group
A site for members of the Horde to post their stories seeking beta readers, editing help, brainstorming, and story ideas. Also to share links to potential publishing outlets, writing help sites, and videos posting tips to get published. Contact OrangeEnt for info:
maildrop62 at proton dot me
Cutting The Cord And Email Security
Moron Meet-Ups

TBD





















« The Reason For The Dems' Revolting? | Main | Okay, I Take Back What I Said, Valerie Plame Really Was SuperSpy 0036B »
November 03, 2005

California Voter? Here's A Guide To The Ballot Initiatives

It's kinda simple: vote yes for everything the bad guys hate and no to everything the bad guys want.

Recent polls, by the way, show that two or perhaps three of Arnold's intitiatives are winning, despite earlier being way behind. That's partly because unions and interest groups have been spending like the dickens throughout this process, whereas Arnold kept his powder dry and is only now unleashing his own ads, shortly before the November 8th voting day.

So, really, they all could pass. It just requires that marginal-voters -- people who sit on their asses and watch Wings marathons on most election days -- get down to their local polling place and pull a lever.


posted by Ace at 12:40 PM
Comments



Thanks for the link, Ace. Much is at stake for this special election on November 8.

By the way, we're also debuting the first-ever "Carnival of Arnold." Details here, including snappy logo.

Humorous submissions welcome -- which opens the doors to many of your witty readers. Check it out.

p.s. Is Wings still on? Dammit. Tivo it, people.

Posted by: California Conservative on November 3, 2005 01:21 PM

The media has also been doing the same thing to Arnold in CA as they have been done to Bush nationally. They keep claiming inherent weakness and "falling" poll numbers, but they'll probably be in for a surprise on election day. I live in San Francisco, and even a good amount of people that I talk to around here think that Arnold is on to something with these intiatives.

We'll see.

Posted by: TF6S on November 3, 2005 01:26 PM

I live in SF too, and the endless liberal closed-feedback-loop machine here feels pretty confident that Arnold's measures are going to be defeated. I saw a bunch of them driving around the city in a banner-festooned van this weekend, honking the horn and yelling. I don't think they appreciated the bird I flipped them.

Me, I voted already. Absentee rules -- it really makes it convenient to stick it to the bitchy public unions. Plus, I already voted against the SF handgun ban initiative, which will unfortunately probably pass anyway.

Posted by: Alex on November 3, 2005 01:44 PM

But, Alex, didn't you know that the LOUDER YOU SAY SOMETHING, the more TRUE it is? The loudspeakers are just speaking TRUTH TO POWER man.

Glad to see a fellow traveller in SF.

Cheers mate!

Posted by: TF6S on November 3, 2005 01:56 PM

Do not vote for 77. I say this as a conservative. The guy who wrote it (I've met him and talked about it) is pretty clueless and is one of those angry, blustery populists who Just. Wants. To. DO. SOMETHING! without thinking about the consequences.

Posted by: Russell Wardlow on November 3, 2005 02:26 PM

I really hope Prop 77 passes. California is so gerry-mandered, it's funny. Take a look at a map of congression districts, and look at district 23. I don't think Prop 77 is particularly well-written, but it's way better than the current arrangement.

Posted by: SJKevin on November 3, 2005 02:31 PM

Russell Wardlow:

I posted my comment before reading yours.

I understand what you're saying. I was tempted to reject it, too, until they come up with a better-written one. But we can pass this, get some actual fair elections, and then hopefully pass something better in the future. With a less gerrymandered state, future reform will be easier. California is in dire straits. Democrats are destroying our state.

Posted by: SJKevin on November 3, 2005 02:37 PM

All I can say is that the "flood the zone" adverts by the Unions/Democrats out to defeat 74-77 are WEAK.

Usually their scare-meisters do a good job at targeting the sub-100 IQ crowd but this time you'd actually have to have one of those helmets on and get picked up on a daily basis by a little yellow bus to belive their angle. In other words, the Union leadership and state workers are the only ones dull enough to buy their crap. I'm betting Arnold gets 3/4 passed. Lets hope so at least.

Posted by: Gromulin on November 3, 2005 02:43 PM

Ahem, some of us Wings fans are absentee voters, thank you very much.

Posted by: Da Goddess on November 3, 2005 03:15 PM

Speaking as a San Franciscan, it does my heart good to see non idiotarian folks from San Francisco posting here. It's entirely too easy to feel like you're a lone voice in the wilderness in this town...

I'm really curious to see how props 74 - 77 do. Something tells me they're going to do quite a bit better than the "falling poll numbers" crowd would have us believe. Whenever I see the union ads against these propositions, I can't help but think that these folks are whistling in the dark. If defeating props 74-77 is going to be as certain as they would have us believe, what gives with the hysteric media blitz? Here in S.F. just about every TV commercial you see these days is some teacher's union spot against the reform propositions. Last time I checked, anything that the Governor was for, people in S.F. were against. So why are the union folks spending so much money running ads that preach to the choir? Perhaps they're not convinced that their base supports them...

Good on you Alex for voting against prop H (the handgun ban). Sure it'll get passed here, and then propmtly overturned in court (just as it was in 1982). All the same, I take satifaction in knowing that by voting against prop H, I'm essentially flipping Chris Daly the bird. Nothing wrong with that.

Has anyone seen the "No on H" signs yet? Are they only posting them out here in the Sunset?

Posted by: G.D. Munem on November 3, 2005 03:30 PM

G.D. Munem: It's entirely too easy to feel like you're a lone voice in the wilderness in this town...

I hear ya. I live in the south bay. Most of my friends, bless their hearts, are radical leftists. I hate when I'm at a party or something and politics comes up.

Posted by: SJKevin on November 3, 2005 04:00 PM

GD, I've seen a few of them South of Market. Strangely, overall, I haven't seen that many signs around town. I know it is a "special" election, but usually our overly political city lives for this stuff.

Then again, maybe there was just such an abundance of it last year that anything seems small in comparison.

Posted by: TF6S on November 3, 2005 04:00 PM

I'm not sure if this is good guys or bad guys, but for Prop 73: It's Not About Aspirin

Posted by: Cal Lanier on November 3, 2005 04:40 PM

Don't believe any polls. Some say they are all leading. Other say they're all trailing. We won't know until the vote is done, so as Ace says, "get down to their [your] local polling place and pull a lever."

Posted by: on November 3, 2005 04:58 PM

It's simple.
Either look at the election pamphlet that explains measures and the 'for' and 'against' arguments (noting which measures the usual suspects are 'against'), or looking at what your local liberal rag (NY Times-owned, no doubt) endorses, and vote opposite.

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 3, 2005 05:02 PM

Oh, and by the way, I'm 5th generation San Franciscan. I'm in Sonoma County, but plenty of family still in SF, and they intend to keep their guns.
Hey, eat at Scoma's!!

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 3, 2005 05:05 PM

Uncle Jefe,

I got food poisoning at Scoma's! I've been back after that episode and it has been just fine though...

Posted by: TF6S on November 3, 2005 05:14 PM

That really surprises me, TF6S.
They do an unbelievable job of sanitation at that place, and you would not believe how high the quality is of the product they bring in (unless, of course, you eat there!). I mean fresh! Can't beat the portions either.
I worked there for some years (a decade ago; I still visit), so I'm telling you from the inside perspective!
But nothing's worse than shellfish poisoning, and I had that from oysters at a friend's restaurant.
Just die, it's better.

Posted by: Uncle Jefe on November 3, 2005 05:49 PM

I voted a week ago, but I'm still boggling over the fact that my choices and the list of San Jose Mercury News recommendations differed only by one proposition (note that my votes differed from those recommended on the California Conservative website by just one proposition also).

I can only conjecture that the regular Merc staff must have passed out from some drunken bacchanal and left some intellectually-gifted apprentice typesetter to compose their recommendations list.

I also suspect that there is a whole lot of smoke and mirrors going on about now with regard to polling. I'm keeping my fingers crossed. Of course, even if they narrowly lose, the statists/unionists will have outspent the proponents by about five-to-one, and there's nothing that keeps the issue from being raised again, and again, and again, and again until those bankrolling the resistance run out of cash.

Posted by: cthulhu on November 4, 2005 12:38 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?








Now Available!
The Deplorable Gourmet
A Horde-sourced Cookbook
[All profits go to charity]
Top Headlines
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Jim Lakely of Heartland Institute joins CBD for a discussion of their recent polling that shows a majority of 18-39s want socialism, the Epstein files, what will Mamdani do, and more!
Live voting in the House to end the shutdown.
I don't know if this is a preliminary procedural vote or what.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: Buck Throckmorton joins us for a wide-ranging discussion about the cultural and business shift away from the insanity of EVs and Climate Religion, his calm perspective on last week's election, Tucker is a toad, and more!
Our Favorite British Couple Exploring True America Experiences Flora-Bama And Sees A Side Of The Deep South Rarely Seen. [dri]
Tucker Carlson claims that it's weird that Ted Cruz is interested in the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, because he has "no track record of being interested in Christians," then blows off the massacre of Christians by Nigerian Muslims, saying it might or might not be a real concern
Tucker Carlson enjoys using the left-wing tactic of "Tactical Ignorance" to avoid taking positions on topics. Is Hamas really a terrorist organization? Tucker can't say. He hasn't looked into it enough, but "it seems like a political organization to me." Are Muslims slaughtering Christians in Nigeria? Again, Tucker just doesn't know. He hasn't examined the evidence yet. He knows every Palestinian Christian who said he was blocked from visiting holy sites in Bethlehem, but he just hasn't had the time to look into the mass slaughter of Christians in Nigeria that has been going on since (checks watch) 2009. He doesn't know, so he can't offer an opinion. Wouldn't be prudent, you know? Don't rush him! He'll sift through the evidence at some point in the future and render an opinion sometime around 2044.
Of course, if you need an opinion on Jewish Perfidy, he has all the facts at his fingertips and can give you a fully informed opinion pronto. Say, have you ever heard of the USS Liberty incident...?
You'd think that the main issue for Tucker Carlson, who pretends to be so deeply concerned about Palestinian Christians being bullied by Jews in Israel (supposedly), would be the massacre of 185,000 Christians in Nigeria itself. But no, his main problem is that Ted Cruz is talking about it, "who has no track record of being interested in Christians at all." And then he just shrugs as to whether this is even a real issue or not.
Whatever we do we must never "divide the right," huh?
Tucker is attacking Ted Cruz for bringing the issue up because he's acting as an apologist for Jihadism, and he can't cleanly admit that Jihadists are killing any Christians, anywhere. There is no daylight between him and CAIR at this point.
One might conclude that Tucker Carlson himself isn't interested in the plight of Christians -- except as they can be used as a cudgel to attack Jews.
Just gonna ask an Interesting Question myself -- why is it that Tucker Carlson's arguments all track with those shit out by Qatarian propaganda agents and the far left? That if Jews crush an ant underfoot it is worldwide news, but when Muslims slaughter Christians it elicits not even a vigorous shrug?
Garth Merenghi is interviewed by the only man who can fathom his ineffable brilliance -- Garth Merenghi
From the comments:
I once glimpsed Garth in the penumbra betwixt my wake and sleep. He was in my dream, standing afar, not looking my way, nor did he acknowledge me. But I felt seen. And that's when I knew I was a traveler on the right path. I'm glad he's still with us.

Now that's some Merenghian prose.
Garth Merenghi on the writer's craft

Greetings, Traveler. If you still have not experienced Garth Merenghi -- Author, Dream-weaver, Visionary, plus Actor -- the six episodes of his Darkplace are still available on YouTube and supposedly upscaled to HD. (Viewing it now, it doesn't appeared upscaled for shit.)
I think the second episode, "Hell Hath Fury," is the best by a good margin. Try to at least watch through to that one. It's Mereghi's incisive but nuanced take on sexism.
CJN podcast 1400 copy.jpg
Podcast: The elections! NYC, Virginia, New Jersey, Texas, California, and the future prospects of the Republican party...
Update on Scott Adams:
Scott Adams had approval for this cancer drug but they hadn't scheduled him to get it. He was taking a turn for the worse. Trump had told him to call if he needed anything, so he did. Talked to Don Jr (who is in Africa) , then RFK Jr, then Dr Oz. Someone talked to Kaiser and he was scheduled. Shouldn't have needed it but he did and he says it saved his life.
Posted by: Notsothoreau
Funny retro kid costumes, thanks to SMH
Good to see people honoring Lamont the Big Dummy
Four hours of retro Halloween commercials and specials
The first short is the original 1996 appearance of "Sam," the dangerous undead trick-or-treater from Trick r' Treat.
Recent Comments
Skip : "I am cursed ..."

Cow Demon: "No need for a 3AM McDonald's when the groceries an ..."

Visit US: "I do not know whether it's just me or if perhaps e ..."

Giles Overreach: "I lurk. I scrolled. “old femur bone” f ..."

Open the Link: "We absolutely love your blog and find almost all o ..."

JQ: "Good night, horde. *puts last of snacks on the ..."

publius, Rascally Mr. Miley (w6EFb): " Apollo 10 launched from 39B. It also launched th ..."

JQ: "https://youtu.be/TCRS4DRmf_w ..."

Common Tater: "The VAB has four (4) bays, there were plans for WA ..."

Oops! Oopsie!: " 313 I just got some medicine that says "take wit ..."

Berserker-Dragonheads Division : "My brother used corded Makita also, pre-2010, when ..."

JQ: "Late BF used the hell out of his 9.6v (?) cordless ..."

Bloggers in Arms
Some Humorous Asides
Archives